Master Feed Mill of Hillsboro

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.? For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below First the weather was not the reason for the delay - MrK [redacted] said he was having trouble getting ties out of IndianaHe was the one that said the weather was not going to be a factor - I wanted to get more estimates & wait until spring to start the job.? We did sign the contract for $& gave him a check for $? He? got the first payment & was ready to start the job asap.? ? About two weeks passed? before his crew came & I asked them about the tie problem & they all (3) said that he buys his ties from [redacted] for $or $apiece.? why MrK [redacted] was saying Indiana I do not? know ? ? ? ? ? ? MrK [redacted] ? was dealing with the [redacted] Twp& his? engineering? firmHe called us about three weeks after he received the first payment & said he was very sorry but the Twpsaid that the tie? wall would have to be built in two sections plus the engineers stamp was $With the extra ties & the cost of the engineer he would sadly need $more to cover the labor, tie & engineers feeOur [redacted] Twpbuilding inspector? had zero knowledge of the wall being built as MrK [redacted] is sayingI've spoken to him personally & he would be more than happy to talk to you about MrK [redacted] The fact is MrK [redacted] told us that all was taken care of at the Twpoffice -- He did not even have the building permit until 4/29/The reason he got it then was because I called over to his office to complain about his work & was? told he did not have a permit to do anything at all -? let alone dig.? I? told his workers? & then he did get the permit.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Next MrK [redacted] states that the original contract was for $12,360.00.? ? I'm sure he has the original contract? for $as I do.? The contract he his misrepresenting as the original? is the one that he signed in front? of a notary? with the extra $increase due to the $engineers fee labor & more ties.? ? Again he should have the contract for the increase that he signed stating all the work that he? was to? doThis was signed by him? & notarized.? (1)? My storm drains were dug out & are not working!? (2) His workers cut down the tree,? they all said MrK [redacted] was back on there pay so they have? me a price to cut the tree down & I agreed.? (3) Again? this fence? was his idea the [redacted] building inspector has NO knowledge of a fence!(4) The contract with the increase has all that is to be done -- I will gladly fax it to youBy the way signed & initialed by him-- WILL HAUL ALL DIRT FROM DRIVEWAY TO? REAR OF PROPERTY(5) I SEE KNOW REASON TO GO ONMRk [redacted] ? ? HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR SOME TIME - HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE HIS DOING - BUT NOT THIS TIME - SOMEONE MUST BUT A STOP TO HIS BUSINESS PRACTICES!!!? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Regards, [redacted] ***

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below First the weather was not the reason for the delay - MrK [redacted] said he was having trouble getting ties out of IndianaHe was the one that said the weather was not going to be a factor - I wanted to get more estimates & wait until spring to start the jobWe did sign the contract for $& gave him a check for $ He got the first payment & was ready to start the job asap About two weeks passed before his crew came & I asked them about the tie problem & they all (3) said that he buys his ties from [redacted] for $or $apiecewhy MrK [redacted] was saying Indiana I do not know MrK [redacted] was dealing with the [redacted] Twp& his engineering firmHe called us about three weeks after he received the first payment & said he was very sorry but the Twpsaid that the tie wall would have to be built in two sections plus the engineers stamp was $With the extra ties & the cost of the engineer he would sadly need $more to cover the labor, tie & engineers feeOur [redacted] Twpbuilding inspector had zero knowledge of the wall being built as MrK [redacted] is sayingI've spoken to him personally & he would be more than happy to talk to you about MrK [redacted] The fact is MrK [redacted] told us that all was taken care of at the Twpoffice -- He did not even have the building permit until 4/29/The reason he got it then was because I called over to his office to complain about his work & was told he did not have a permit to do anything at all - let alone digI told his workers & then he did get the permit Next MrK [redacted] states that the original contract was for $12, I'm sure he has the original contract for $as I doThe contract he his misrepresenting as the original is the one that he signed in front of a notary with the extra $increase due to the $engineers fee labor & more ties Again he should have the contract for the increase that he signed stating all the work that he was to doThis was signed by him & notarized (1) My storm drains were dug out & are not working! (2) His workers cut down the tree, they all said MrK [redacted] was back on there pay so they have me a price to cut the tree down & I agreed (3) Again this fence was his idea the [redacted] building inspector has NO knowledge of a fence!(4) The contract with the increase has all that is to be done -- I will gladly fax it to youBy the way signed & initialed by him-- WILL HAUL ALL DIRT FROM DRIVEWAY TO REAR OF PROPERTY(5) I SEE KNOW REASON TO GO ONMRk [redacted] HAS BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR SOME TIME - HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE HIS DOING - BUT NOT THIS TIME - SOMEONE MUST BUT A STOP TO HIS BUSINESS PRACTICES!!! Regards, [redacted] ***

June 16, 2016Revdex.com [redacted] ***RE: [redacted] ***ID# [redacted] Dear Ms [redacted] :This letter is in response to your letter dated June 9, regarding above mentioned consumer complaint that was filed against us by Mr***.The weather in February was a factor in the length of time for the job, Keith K [redacted] Construction was only contracted to build one wall for Mr***After dealing with [redacted] Township and our engineering firm, they requested that a second tier be placed below the top of the wall for added upper wall strengthThis was decided because they did not want one wall to be too high and unstable.Naturally, to add a second wall that was twice the size of the upper wall, additional costs were going to be incurredThe additional wall is three times the size of the upper wallMr [redacted] wanted this done for the original wall priceActual job price should have been $23,Original contract price was $12,and so far we have only been paid $11,He advised he had no more money to give us, but yet they had a very large tree removed.We will go back out for the cost of $4,200.With regards to the driveway, the three concrete pads were split in half due to the faulty wallWe jacked up the pads in order to repair themWe also attached a split wall fence on the top wallAll of Mr***'s storm drains are connectedHis old ones were bad.In conclusion, there was no mention of two walls in the original contractThe job changedNothing about a fence on top and no mention of machinery time to fill in his two ponds with dirt up in the backSo you see, the contract changedThere were many extrasWhen trying to reason with Mr***, his ' voice overpowered you because he was still trying to squeeze us for the original pricePeople say go ahead and do it for the extras, sometimes they pay and sometimes they don'tIt is not always the contractors fault.Keith K [redacted] Construction has been in business since We are reputable, insured and PA licensedWe also pay our crew, I have no idea where Mr [redacted] came up with ThatOur crew will not work for free and neither will we.Sincerely,Keith K [redacted] , Project Manager