McCarty Customized Improvements

In follow up to ***'s phone call yesterday, below is a recap of all pertinent information and the corresponding timeline Timeline4/Travis assessed to bid4/Bid sent to customer (attached)4/Deposit check from customer cleared our bank4/First day work began and/or materials were purchased 5/Last day on site working: all work complete5/Travis final walk with ***, who confirmed all work was complete, but expressed interest in having additional work completedThe single most significant point of this debate is the division between work completed & additional work bidOn 5/it was confirmed by all parties that the work we were hired for was completedAt that point, the balance was immediately dueAny dispute whatsoever, involving additional work bid has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to the work completed prior to 5/22.5/per ***'s request, sent bid for additional work (attached)5/ [redacted] called Travis: the bid for additional work was agreed to be reduced to a flat $3,4005/ [redacted] & Travis spoke about the additional work and agreed it would be completed on 5/30*NOTE*No money, by way of a deposit for the additional work to date has been received Neither has any portion of the balance outstanding for work already completed$15,amount of original bid, on which the $8,deposit for approximately 1/was based$14,adjusted final invoice total, after eliminating the items requested to be eliminated by customer (attached)$6,balance+ 10% late fee(invoice attached)We have been left with no reasonable option except to file a mechanic's lien (attached).Thank you for your consideration

McCarty Customized Improvements (aka MCI) has been paid in full The documents provided by Travis McCarty, owner of MCI, in response to my complaint do not support his claim to monies owedMrMcCarty provided six (6) documents in response to our complaint Five (5) of these documents are versions of the first proposal we received from MCI on April 10, For four (4) of the attachments, Mr McCarty has simply converted this first proposal into a statement The first proposal was never agreed to and we received several emails from his office manager, Kim April and stating Travis was preparing a new proposal A second proposal (attached to complainant response) from Mr McCarty was received on April 21, I have numerous emails documenting my attempts to contact Travis McCarty and MCI between April and April 26, to discuss the two (2) proposals I was only given excuses and apologies for their lack of response to my questions On April 26, I emailed MCI a detailed and comprehensive list of what I was agreeing to be completed Mr McCarty attached a sixth (6) document to his response, which is a copy of the recorded mechanics lien The lien states I, [redacted] am the owner, part-owner, or leasee of the property in question This is a assertion, as I have no interest, ownership, or lease in this property The actual owner, [redacted] * [redacted] is not mentioned in Mr McCarty's filed lien His attached document (6th attachment) includes a copy of the property deed, which clearly demonstrates this point What was not provided by Mr Travis McCarty and/or MCI is equally important Not one (1) signed document No contract, no permission to commence work, no permits

McCarty Customized Improvements (aka MCI) has been paid in full.  The documents provided by Travis McCarty, owner of MCI, in response to my complaint do not support his claim to monies owed. Mr. McCarty provided six (6) documents in response to our complaint.  Five (5) of these documents are versions of the first proposal we received from MCI on April 10, 2017.  For four (4) of the attachments, Mr McCarty has simply converted this first proposal into a statement.  The first proposal was never agreed to and we received several emails from his office manager, Kim April 19 and 21 stating Travis was preparing a new proposal.  A second proposal (attached to complainant response) from Mr McCarty was received on April 21, 2017.  I have numerous emails documenting my attempts to contact Travis McCarty and MCI between April 21 and April 26, 2017 to discuss the two (2) proposals.  I was only given excuses and apologies for their lack of response to my questions.  On April 26, 2017 I emailed MCI a detailed and comprehensive list of what I was agreeing to be completed.  Mr McCarty attached a sixth (6) document to his response, which is a copy of the recorded mechanics lien.  The lien states I, [redacted] am the owner, part-owner, or leasee of the property in question.  This is a false assertion, as I have no interest, ownership, or lease in this property.  The actual owner, [redacted] is not mentioned in Mr McCarty's filed lien.  His attached document (6th attachment) includes a copy of the property deed, which clearly demonstrates this point.  What was not provided by Mr Travis McCarty and/or MCI is equally important.  Not one (1) signed document.  No contract, no permission to commence work, no permits.

In follow up to [redacted]'s phone call yesterday, below is a recap of all pertinent information and the corresponding timeline.  Timeline4/5 Travis assessed to bid4/10 Bid sent to customer (attached)4/18 Deposit check from customer cleared our bank4/18 First day work began and/or materials were...

purchased 5/20 Last day on site working: all work complete5/22 Travis final walk with [redacted], who confirmed all work was complete, but expressed interest in having additional work completedThe single most significant point of this debate is the division between work completed & additional work bid. On 5/22 it was confirmed by all parties that the work we were hired for was completed. At that point, the balance was immediately due. Any dispute whatsoever, involving additional work bid has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to the work completed prior to 5/22.5/23 per [redacted]'s request, sent bid for additional work (attached)5/23 [redacted] called Travis: the bid for additional work was agreed to be reduced to a flat $3,4005/26 [redacted] & Travis spoke about the additional work and agreed it would be completed on 5/30*NOTE*No money, by way of a deposit for the additional work to date has been received.  Neither has any portion of the balance outstanding for work already completed. $15,738.50 amount of original bid, on which the $8,000 deposit for approximately 1/2 was based$14,243.50 adjusted final invoice total, after eliminating the items requested to be eliminated by customer (attached)$6,243.50 balance+ 10% late fee(invoice attached)We have been left with no reasonable option except to file a mechanic's lien (attached).Thank you for your consideration.