Medical Litigation Support Services

*** *** ** ** *** *** *** ** *** ** *** ***I am a physician and attorney, doing business as Medical Litigation Support ServicesAs part of my services, I review and analyze medical records to determine potential merit for a medical malpractice claimThis consumer initially
contacted me through the internet regarding a potential medical malpractice claim involving her daughter’s medical care and deathThe consumer’s complaint to the Revdex.com consists of several specific issues that I will address individuallyThe first contactmentioned he can provide services to me but first needs to haverecords reviewed extensively, to be evaluated in all areas of the entire file.My response: The only service that I agreed to provide was the evaluation of her daughter’s medical record,to evaluate its’ potential for a medical malpractice claimThere was no mention or guarantee of any additional or further service beyond the record reviewThe consumer’s statement that the review is supposed to be an evaluation of all areas of the entire file is completely unfoundedAlthough the entire record was reviewed, there is no requirement that a written summary of all aspects of the medical care be provided; only those aspects pertinent to making the determination whether or not the case warrants pursuit of an actual claim is appropriate in the report to the potential plaintifftook his sweet time with my medical files, 4/months.My response: The initial telephone consultation with the consumer was on January 02, The consumerprovided an extensive medical file, probably in excess of 3,pages, on January 08, Additional smaller batches of records were provided at intervals following receipt of the initial file.An agreement for review of the medical record was forwarded to the consumer; however, she did not return it until February 13, A preliminary notice, informing the consumer that there was no justification for a medical malpractice claim, was sent on May 03, 2015, approximately 2-1/months after receipt of the consumer’s signed agreementA final evaluation and analysis of the review findings was sent to the consumer on May 30, Considering the size of the medical record, and the complexity of the case, 2-1/months is considerably less than the average turn-around time to analyze such a fileThe consumer’s allegation of 4/months is factually erroneous...only to return back to me with a disclosure letter, instead of what I paid for...a medical practice evaluation of extended pages of report....he sent two pages and a lame-as email.My response: As stated above, the consumer paid for review of the medical record for a potential medicalmalpractice claimAfter completion of my review and analysis, I provided her a 2-page, detailed written report of my findings, enumerating the reasons why pursuit of a medical malpractice claim would not be justifiedMy report was considerably different from the common generic declination letter provided by most malpractice attorneys, in which the consumer is simply advised that the law office is not able to assist them at this time.There was never any agreement by me to provide the consumer with an extensive, multi-page recapitulation of the entire medical management of her daughterHer allegation that she did not receive what she paid for is completely ungroundedThis man is not honestHe is a fraud....beware of...his bogus services.My response: An Agreement and Acknowledgment for Review of Medical Records was signed by theconsumer on February 12, It clearly states the full and complete agreement between the consumer and me, including, but not limited to, the following:• There is no expressed or implied agreement that I will represent you in a medical malpractice claimI have not agreed to complete the review within a certain period of timeThere is no expressed or implied agreement that your circumstances will merit the filing of a lawsuit.• Agreement to pay the costs of medical records review does not assure or guarantee the outcome, or an opinion...The consumer signed the agreement, attesting: “I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and accept the terms of this agreement for the review of the medical records.”This consumer received more than what she contracted forI provided her a detailed analysis of the aspects of the case that were pertinent to determining potential merit to pursue a malpractice claim, even though the Agreement clearly states I did not have to express an opinion as to the merits of the case.This is a frivolous complaint by a disgruntled consumer who disagreed with, and was disappointed with, my opinion rendered to herThere is nothing dishonest or fraudulent in the relationship between the consumer and meThe consumer received no less than what she agreed to and contracted forShe is not entitled to any refund for services rendered by me

[redacted]
I am a physician and attorney, doing business as Medical Litigation Support ServicesAs part of my services, I review and analyze medical records to determine potential merit for a medical malpractice claimThis consumer initially contacted me through the internet regarding a potential medical malpractice claim involving her daughter's medical care and deathThe consumer's complaint to the Revdex.com consists of several specific issues that I will address individuallyThe first contactmentioned he can provide services to me but first needs to have
records reviewed extensively, to be evaluated in all areas of the entire fileMy response: The only service that I agreed to provide was the evaluation of her daughter's medical record,
to evaluate its' potential for a medical malpractice claimThere was no mention or guarantee of any additional or further service beyond the record reviewThe consumer's statement that the review is supposed to be an evaluation of all areas of the entire file is completely unfoundedAlthough the entire record was reviewed, there is no requirement that a written summary of all aspects of the medical care be provided; only those aspects pertinent to making the determination whether or not the case warrants pursuit of an actual claim is appropriate in the report to the potential plaintifftook his sweet time with my medical files, 4/monthsMy response: The initial telephone consultation with the consumer was on January 02, The consumer
provided an extensive medical file, probably in excess of 3,pages, on January 08, Additional smaller batches of records were provided at intervals following receipt of the initial fileAn agreement for review of the medical record was forwarded to the consumer; however, she did not return it until February 13, A preliminary notice, informing the consumer that there was no justification for a medical malpractice claim, was sent on May 03, 2015, approximately 2-1/months after receipt of the consumer's signed agreementA final evaluation and analysis of the review findings was sent to the consumer on May 30, Considering the size of the medical record, and the complexity of the case, 2-1/months is
considerably less than the average turn-around time to analyze such a fileThe consumer's allegation of 4/months is factually erroneous...only to return back to me with a disclosure letter, instead of what I paid for...a medical practice evaluation of extended pages of report....he sent two pages and a lame-as emailMy response: As stated above, the consumer paid for review of the medical record for a potential medical
malpractice claimAfter completion of my review and analysis, I provided her a 2-page, detailed written report of my findings, enumerating the reasons why pursuit of a medical malpractice claim would not be justifiedMy report was considerably different from the common generic declination letter provided by most malpractice attorneys, in which the consumer is simply advised that the law office is not able to assist them at this timeThere was never any agreement by me to provide the consumer with an extensive, multi-page recapitulation of the entire medical management of her daughterHer allegation that she did not receive what she paid for is completely ungroundedThis man is not honestHe is a fraud....beware of...his bogus servicesMy response: An Agreement and Acknowledgment for Review of Medical Records was signed by the
consumer on February 12, It clearly states the full and complete agreement between the consumer and me, including, but not limited to, the following:
• There is no expressed or implied agreement that I will represent you in a medical malpractice claimI have not agreed to complete the review within a certain period of timeThere is no expressed or implied agreement that your circumstances will merit the filing of a lawsuit• Agreement to pay the costs of medical records review does not assure or guarantee the outcome, or an opinionThe consumer signed the agreement, attesting: "I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and accept the terms of this agreement for the review of the medical records."
This consumer received more than what she contracted forI provided her a detailed analysis of the aspects of the case that were pertinent to determining potential merit to pursue a malpractice claim, even though the Agreement clearly states I did not have to express an opinion as to the merits of the caseThis is a frivolous complaint by a disgruntled consumer who disagreed with, and was disappointed with, my opinion rendered to herThere is nothing dishonest or fraudulent in the relationship between the consumer and meThe consumer received no less than what she agreed to and contracted forShe is not entitled to any refund for services rendered by me