My name is Robert F* The complaint issued was not involving Meritage at Mill Creek at all It was a private residence rented out by a private owner, so the complaint to Meritage at Mill Creek is not accurate I spoke with this individual and told him that I would work with the owners on the issue of pets but made no promises The application fee was paid directly to the screening company and I gained nothing from their application The reason they were not selected is another party that did not have pets applied It was the decision of the owners to go with the other party as they had advertised the property as "No Pets Allowed" and received an application from a party who was qualified and fit all of the criteria sought after for a tenant by the owners When a party applies there are no guarantees made to them that they will be approved If another application is received that is better qualified for the home it is the right of the owners to choose that application This is what occurred
The applications were submitted through Meritage at Mill CreekSee reference numbers attachedExplain to F* that if you are not certain about pets restrictions, do not lead people into applyingThis affirms F*'s negligence and incompetence
My name is Robert F[redacted]. The complaint issued was not involving Meritage at Mill Creek at all. It was a private residence rented out by a private owner, so the complaint to Meritage at Mill Creek is not accurate.
I spoke with this individual and told him that I would work with the...
owners on the issue of pets but made no promises. The application fee was paid directly to the screening company and I gained nothing from their application. The reason they were not selected is another party that did not have pets applied. It was the decision of the owners to go with the other party as they had advertised the property as "No Pets Allowed" and received an application from a party who was qualified and fit all of the criteria sought after for a tenant by the owners.
When a party applies there are no guarantees made to them that they will be approved. If another application is received that is better qualified for the home it is the right of the owners to choose that application. This is what occurred.
My name is Robert F
* The complaint issued was not involving Meritage at Mill Creek at all It was a private residence rented out by a private owner, so the complaint to Meritage at Mill Creek is not accurate I spoke with this individual and told him that I would work with the owners on the issue of pets but made no promises The application fee was paid directly to the screening company and I gained nothing from their application The reason they were not selected is another party that did not have pets applied It was the decision of the owners to go with the other party as they had advertised the property as "No Pets Allowed" and received an application from a party who was qualified and fit all of the criteria sought after for a tenant by the owners When a party applies there are no guarantees made to them that they will be approved If another application is received that is better qualified for the home it is the right of the owners to choose that application This is what occurred
The applications were submitted through Meritage at Mill CreekSee reference numbers attachedExplain to F
* that if you are not certain about pets restrictions, do not lead people into applyingThis affirms F
*'s negligence and incompetence
My name is Robert F[redacted]. The complaint issued was not involving Meritage at Mill Creek at all. It was a private residence rented out by a private owner, so the complaint to Meritage at Mill Creek is not accurate.
I spoke with this individual and told him that I would work with the...
owners on the issue of pets but made no promises. The application fee was paid directly to the screening company and I gained nothing from their application. The reason they were not selected is another party that did not have pets applied. It was the decision of the owners to go with the other party as they had advertised the property as "No Pets Allowed" and received an application from a party who was qualified and fit all of the criteria sought after for a tenant by the owners.
When a party applies there are no guarantees made to them that they will be approved. If another application is received that is better qualified for the home it is the right of the owners to choose that application. This is what occurred.