Sign in

Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A

Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A Reviews (2)

Our law firm was retained by [redacted] on September 27, 2017, with regard to Mr [redacted] ’s [redacted] Credit Card account.? Our client advised us that Mr [redacted] had requested that no telephone calls be placed to him.? Our firm sent a letter to Mr [redacted] , addressed to his [redacted] address in Berlin, Wisconsin, on September 28, 2017, and the letter was not returned to us by the post office as undelivered.? Having received no response to our letter, we commenced a lawsuit against Mr [redacted] in June 2018.? In response to a telephone call we received from Mr [redacted] after he received notice of the suit, we sent to Mr [redacted] on June 20, 2018, a copy of our September 27, letter, the [redacted] Credit Card Agreement, and the billing statements on the account from October through September 2017.? Mr [redacted] subsequently paid off the account, and our firm has filed a dismissal of the suit with the court

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2015/12/23) */ Our firm was referred this American Express account for collection in August 2010, and the consumer was personally served with the Summons and Complaint on September 20, After having received no response to the Summons and Complaint, judgment was entered on November 9, The principal amount of the judgment was $8,The consumer phoned our office after the judgment was entered and claimed that some of the charges were fraudulent, but admitted to charging about $5,worth of goods on the accountShe offered to make payments to settle the account, and we verbally agreed upon a settlement of $3,to be paid within daysNo payments were ever made by the consumer, and our client recalled the account from our firm on November 9, Our file has been closed in this matter since November 9, Our firm does not report to the credit bureaus, and has never reported this judgment to the credit bureausAccordingly, our firm was not involved in any decision by the credit bureau to remove the reporting of this judgment or to renew the reporting of this judgment on MsWright's credit bureauA credit bureau's removal of the reporting of a judgment may not mean that the court has vacated the judgment We have forwarded this Complaint to our client who may be able to assist the consumer further

Check fields!

Write a review of Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for Meyer Njus Tanick, P.A

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated