Midas/SpeeDee

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2015/10/19) */
On our invoice XXXX X/31/we performed a check engine light request at no charge and the code pulled was powhich indicated the right rear wheel sensor had failed and require replacement This repair was performed with the approval of
*** in the amount of $During this repair our inspection also recommended front and rear brake pad replacement as the pads were below the minimum thickness and the vehicle mileage of 140,is a replacement intervalUnfortunately the rotors front and rear were also below the minimum thickness at on the front and which required replacement as they could not be machined*** received a call from us 0n 8/1/at 3:pm at which time she approved this service in the amount of $The vehicle was picked up on 8/7/and *** returned a few days later stating the check engine light was on againWe pulled the code again this time poright front wheel sensor and replace a sensor on this wheel at a cost to us of $but no charge to *** as a customer satisfaction adjustment
Upon further inspection of this vehicle it has been determined that additional codes were also present which were indicating an internal transmission failureWe further had this confirmed by a local transmission shop which confirmed our findingsThe code for the transmission issues were in no way related to the brake and wheel speed sensor repairs performed with the customers approvalI can understand that *** did not want to spend any additional money on the on this vehicle but repairs done by Midas were all required, documented and approved
*** ***
SpeeDee / Midas