New Century Realtors Corporation

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear belowI would like to let you
know this is a very misleading and fraud business which should be eliminated
from the market I will submit all the documents to you to see that they
have motive to cheat the buyer for this transaction Seller and seller's
agent knew the fact that the house was cited by the City before the closing date:
March 21, (See attachment was signed by the Seller to notice that)
The seller and seller's agent had a motive to make a buyer to close early
such as closing within days, any day late will be extra charge for $/day
(see addendum in the contract) This is a motive of the seller wanted to
get away with the City
I am ordering another
case record which against the seller from the Anaheim City about this property
Since I get that, I will submit it to you Basically, this is a
case that still going between the seller and the City about the property
They fully get charged by the City and admitted If you need more
information please contact *** *** **, Anaheim City inspection
(Code Enforcement)
The seller and seller's
agent came to the property (The seller did not admit he is the seller when he
entered in the house, I asked who was he that time to verify his identity, he
said he was just a contractor however he is a seller) I will report this to a
police for him not to come into my house without my permission again I
DO NOT ACCEPT THE SELLER WALK INTO MY PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES.
Base on the TDS, the
buyer requested the seller to credit $2,for the illegal wiring in the
atticThere are nothing to do with all the citations that they got caught from
the City of Anaheim.
The seller did not
disclose that the carport need a permit from a City( It was clearly showed
that the house did not have a carport before) See the picture of the
Notice Violation.
The seller did not fully
disclose to the buyer about the citations that they were cited and get caught
by the City of Anaheim The seller and the seller's agent misled the
Buyer when the mark on the TDS that is just for the 2nd bedroom without permit
There are nothing to say about the Remodeling without the permit and
there is nothing else
Item C # Room
additions, structuralwere made without necessary permits They put
Yes, however, they misled the buyer's agent that is for 2nd bathroom without
permit to fully disclose the whole list from the City.
Item C # Any
notices or abatement or citations against the property They put Yes,
however, they did not fully disclose any ciation in the DTS and contract
The seller concealed the information.
Here is what the seller
got caught by the City and the seller and the seller's agent agrees (Attachment
voice recorded clip) The Seller to disclose his identity, that is
illegal when he entered into the property They both came to the house
and admitted all the fraud that cause the buyer and his buyer's family into
tremendous stressThey also promised to fix and comply all the mistakes.
The seller and the
seller's agent are concealed all the:
+ Laundry added without
permit
+Living room remodeling
without permit
+Carport added without
permit.
+ Running a new lighting
without permit
+ New kitchen remodeling
without permit.
There is a lawsuit
against the seller's agent and the seller for fraudulent and illegal sale in
North Justice Court, and there is also a file which is pending in a DRE
I would like you to keep them out of the market so they would not have a
chance to do an illegal transaction for another
Regards,
*** ***

I would like to let you know that everything was disclosed in this transaction. The offer was accepted on 2/10/13 and escrow was opened the day after. Escrow closed on 3/21/13. Escrow was open for forty days when in the contract was supposed be 30 and there was no rush in this transaction and the...

buyer was given a 10 day extension 8/12/13. The buyer had time to do all inspections.
In the listing MLS, under agent remarks, it was stated that buyer was to verify al permits. During the first 17 days of transaction, the buyer had a home inspection made that led to a request for repair. Per the request of repair, the seller issued a credit of $2,500 based on the inspection report and both parties agreed on 2/18/13.
 Also, in page 2 of the TDS, the following were disclosed:
Item C #4. Room additions, structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs were made without necessary permits. Yes
Item C #15. Any notices or abatement or citations against the property. Yes
Item C Explanations for any answers with yes:  Second Bathroom built without permits and received notice from city about obtaining remodel permits.
The TDS was signed by the seller on 2/12/13 and sent to the buyer’s agent on the same day. The buyer signed the TDS on 2/24/13.
Lastly, this transaction has complied with all Real Estate conditions by disclosing everything in the sale of this property.

Review: This agency was dishonest and fraud when they sell the house to a client. The house was completely unpermitted remodeling, and it was caught by the city. The seller's agent and its broker fully acknowledge the fact of the house and the City was requested the house need to obtained all the permits before selling. The agent did not care and still rapidly sold to a buyer without disclose anything in the DTS.Desired Settlement: The seller need to pay all the repairing cost for the house to obtain fully permitted areas.

Business

Response:

I would like to let you know that everything was disclosed in this transaction. The offer was accepted on 2/10/13 and escrow was opened the day after. Escrow closed on 3/21/13. Escrow was open for forty days when in the contract was supposed be 30 and there was no rush in this transaction and the buyer was given a 10 day extension 8/12/13. The buyer had time to do all inspections.

In the listing MLS, under agent remarks, it was stated that buyer was to verify al permits. During the first 17 days of transaction, the buyer had a home inspection made that led to a request for repair. Per the request of repair, the seller issued a credit of $2,500 based on the inspection report and both parties agreed on 2/18/13.

Also, in page 2 of the TDS, the following were disclosed:

Item C #4. Room additions, structural modifications, or other alterations or repairs were made without necessary permits. Yes

Item C #15. Any notices or abatement or citations against the property. Yes

Item C Explanations for any answers with yes: Second Bathroom built without permits and received notice from city about obtaining remodel permits.

The TDS was signed by the seller on 2/12/13 and sent to the buyer’s agent on the same day. The buyer signed the TDS on 2/24/13.

Lastly, this transaction has complied with all Real Estate conditions by disclosing everything in the sale of this property.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

I would like to let you

know this is a very misleading and fraud business which should be eliminated

from the market. I will submit all the documents to you to see that they

have motive to cheat the buyer for this transaction. Seller and seller's

agent knew the fact that the house was cited by the City before the closing date:

March 21, 2013 (See attachment was signed by the Seller to notice that).

The seller and seller's agent had a motive to make a buyer to close early

such as closing within 30 days, any day late will be extra charge for $100 /day

(see addendum in the contract). This is a motive of the seller wanted to

get away with the City.

I am ordering another

case record which against the seller from the Anaheim City about this property.

Since I get that, I will submit it to you. Basically, this is a

case that still going between the seller and the City about the property.

They fully get charged by the City and admitted. If you need more

information please contact [redacted], Anaheim City inspection.

(Code Enforcement)

The seller and seller's

agent came to the property (The seller did not admit he is the seller when he

entered in the house, I asked who was he that time to verify his identity, he

said he was just a contractor however he is a seller) I will report this to a

police for him not to come into my house without my permission again. I

DO NOT ACCEPT THE SELLER WALK INTO MY PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES.

Base on the TDS, the

buyer requested the seller to credit $2,500 for the illegal wiring in the

attic. There are nothing to do with all the citations that they got caught from

the City of Anaheim.

The seller did not

disclose that the carport need a permit from a City. ( It was clearly showed

that the house did not have a carport before). See the picture of the

Notice Violation.

The seller did not fully

disclose to the buyer about the citations that they were cited and get caught

by the City of Anaheim. The seller and the seller's agent misled the

Buyer when the mark on the TDS that is just for the 2nd bedroom without permit.

There are nothing to say about the Remodeling without the permit and

there is nothing else.

Item C #4. Room

additions, structural... were made without necessary permits. They put

Yes, however, they misled the buyer's agent that is for 2nd bathroom without

permit. False to fully disclose the whole list from the City.

Item C #15. Any

notices or abatement or citations against the property. They put Yes,

however, they did not fully disclose any ciation in the DTS and contract.

The seller concealed the information.

Here is what the seller

got caught by the City and the seller and the seller's agent agrees (Attachment

voice recorded clip). The Seller false to disclose his identity, that is

illegal when he entered into the property. They both came to the house

and admitted all the fraud that cause the buyer and his buyer's family into

tremendous stress. They also promised to fix and comply all the mistakes.

The seller and the

seller's agent are concealed all the:

+ Laundry added without

permit

+Living room remodeling

without permit

+Carport added without

permit.

+ Running a new lighting

without permit.

+ New kitchen remodeling

without permit.

There is a lawsuit

against the seller's agent and the seller for fraudulent and illegal sale in

North Justice Court, and there is also a file which is pending in a DRE.

I would like you to keep them out of the market so they would not have a

chance to do an illegal transaction for another.

Regards,