Sign in

Olson Lawn Care LLC

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Olson Lawn Care LLC? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Olson Lawn Care LLC

Olson Lawn Care LLC Reviews (2)

Mr*** signed a contract to undertake landscape services with another company, one owned by my father ***It is a shame that he has provided half-truths and outright lies as he continues to slander my companyFor the sake of clarity I have provided a series of bullet points to set the
record straight…yet again: Mr*** signed a contract, paid a deposit to, and paid for services rendered to *** *** and *** and NOT my company *** Lawn Care*** Lawn Care stands alone and DOES NOT share facilities, phone numbers, websites, or personnel, nor does my company ever share contracts with any other companyMr*** claims about my company are outright liesA simple Google search will yield separate websites, phone numbers, and mission statementsThe companies file separate taxes, have separate federal EIN numbers, and have their own fleets of equipment, though on occasion equipment will be borrowed here and thereI also loan and borrow equipment to *** Landscape and Sprinkler, this does not equate to a parent/subsidiary relationshipThe reasoning behind Mr*** attempt to link the companies is simple and will be explained shortlyFor the sake of background, I (as a representative hired by *** *** and ***) was tasked to meet with Mr*** to discuss the last remaining tasks required to fulfill the landscape contract signed by *** Landscape and *** and himselfI explained my position to Mr*** the first day I met him*** at the time was out of town on vacationAfter lengthy discussion between Mr***, myself, and final approval by *** (owner of *** *** and ***) a punch list was createdMr*** now contents that this punch list, which is erroneously on *** Lawn Care letterhead, is some form of “contract,” “signed written agreement,” or “written agreement” between himself and my companyIn anticipation of someone asking why one company owner would enter into a “contract,” “signed written agreement,” or “written agreement” to undertake services outlined in a contract signed by another company, Mr*** is attempting to link the two companiesHe’s simply grasping at straws to implicate another company into a messy contractor disputeI, as the owner of *** Lawn Care, never signed any agreement or contracted any work with Mr***His “documentation” to the contrary is a simple punch listNeither I nor my company ever received payment or funds of any kind from Mr***Mr*** complaints are a matter between him and another company

Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:[redacted] Lawn Care continues to confuse the issue.  This is really a simple matter for which I already submitted numerous pieces of documentation to Revdex.com.  In fact Revdex.com previously determined based on my submissions, discussion with [redacted], and their research that the two companies have at best a thin veil separating the two companies. Here is what Revdex.com shared with me and what I previously shared with Revdex.com:1. Contrary to [redacted]'s statement, #2,  they did (maybe still do) in fact share the same facility located at [redacted] [redacted].  Revdex.com research verified this fact.  How many [redacted] Lawn Care, [redacted], statements do I need to refute before it is clear that their response in not factual?2. [redacted] Lawn Care and [redacted] Landscape and [redacted] share websites for which I previously submitted evidence to Revdex.com. I attached it again to insure you have a copy.  Take notice of the URL and the content.  The URL is [redacted] Landscape and [redacted], the content is [redacted] Lawn Care.  Again further evidence and contrary to [redacted]'s claims I am lying, that they share resources. I am unclear on which part I am unclear, but would be happy to discuss this with [redacted]. I don't bear him any malice, only want him to complete what he promised. Really simple.3. Attachment #3 is further evidence of the relationship between the two businesses where [redacted] refers to [redacted] Landscape and [redacted] as his parent company. I am just confused and again my only desire is for [redacted] to fulfill his commitment.  I really don't care if they are or are not separate companies, not the issue.I only raised these 3 points to help understand the confusion that is being created, and that while he questions my character and integrity it appears I have provided evidence to support my claims.  And once again, don't care about whether they are or are not separate companies, [redacted] just needs to fulfill his commitment. As I said repeatedly, don't care if they are or are not the same company.  In fact for the purposes of this response I agree they are not. However, based on their websites and other documentation I provided they tell a story of two companies that have created significant confusion regarding their corporate identities that is challenging for any customer to understand. To get to the crux of the matter, and the only thing that is import:My case against [redacted] Lawn Care is separate and apart from [redacted] Landscape and [redacted]. I assert he did not represent his father, his contract/agreement with me is standalone. He in fact told me that the issue with trees and plants were between me and [redacted] Landscape and [redacted], he/I never have said anything to the contrary. He in fact said he would bring the issue to his father, but [redacted] Landscape and [redacted] would have to respond, nothing to do with him and [redacted] Lawn Care.  His agreement as [redacted] Lawn Care is with me and was stand alone. See attached document on [redacted] Lawn Care stationary.4. Per his statement #3, his agreement to provide services was between [redacted] Lawn Care and [redacted].  He claims it is an error, but that does does not nullify the fact that [redacted] Lawn Care contracted to provide services and that agreement was provided by [redacted] Lawn Care, not [redacted] Landscape and [redacted].  What he did communicate to me is that issues with plants would have to be taken up with [redacted] Landscape and [redacted], he was just here to address the issues on the document prepared by [redacted] Lawn Care and me, attached. Perhaps the most important question we should be asking asking and [redacted] Lawn Care has yet to respond is why he committed [redacted] Lawn Care to provide services on the punch list we both agreed to but has not fulfilled his contractual obligation. He can "erroneously" state it is not a contract on the advice from his lawyer, but regardless he committed in writing to provide those services.  Why in fact has he not fulfilled his commitment to correct the items on the punch list?  He stated he would return to fix the sprinkler, as did Brian, as did the agreement.  The sprinkler does not in fact work.  The breeze was not done, and I find now that they dmagaed the fire pit stones when they moved the fire pit, they broke them in two places.There are clearly many issues that obfuscate the issues.  All [redacted] Lawn Care had/has to do is fix the sprinklers (drip zone that does not work and correct the coverage issue for Zone 4 where there were previously 5 heads and are now two functioning), fix the breeze on patio.  That is a total of three items from the entire check list that [redacted] Lawn Care committed to correct.Pretty simple...In the end [redacted] can either do what he promised, in writing or I will seek legal recourse and financial damages through the court against [redacted] Lawn Care.  Seems rather a simple choice, spend a day or less fixing what you promised or go to court and settle it there.  I honestly don't get it, beyond comprehension why he would not take the easier and honest path. If forced to go to court I will seek damages for the cost to have a third party come and fix the sprinkler system, estimates received are about $2500, patio should be about another $1000 to repair breeze, and probably another $500 to repair the fire pit where they broke stones moving it. The reason the sprinkler costs repairs are so high is because a third party can't locate the lines ([redacted] knows) and therefore they will have to dig up the backyard and start from scratch. If they have to dig up the entire drip zone, costs will potentially go up another $2000. For the remaining items on my list I will deal with [redacted] Landscape and [redacted]. Those damages estimates are material.So in short, [redacted] Lawn Care, a separate company, to which we both agree, provided an agreement in writing to provide services.  He has not provided the services for which he agreed to provide.  In fact the final payment was provided to [redacted] Landscape and [redacted] based on [redacted]'s commitment to complete the list of services they committed to.  If he had not given his word and I did not have it in writing I would never have provided the final payment of almost $14,000.If he returns to complete the work he agreed to provide I will drop the complaint and not file suit against [redacted] Lawn Care. The extent of the work is simple, not much supplies, mostly labor:1. Repair and harden patio breeze.  (probably 5 gallons of breeze, hardening liquid and 2-3 hours labor2. Repair drip zone - South and West are not distributing water (if they can find issue materials are a few drip zone caps and tubing and labor to repair main drip line)3. Correct sprinkler coverage   a. move and replace damaged heads on east to equal distance between the 5 sprinkler heads, repair leakage causing flooding the NE corner (replace two sprinkler heads, rest is labor.)   b. install 5 heads on West so that it matches the East equal distance apart.  Two heads are already in place on the East. (4 sprinkler heads, rest is labor) Regards,[redacted]  Referenced [redacted]s' response, below:Mr. [redacted] signed a contract to undertake landscape services with another company, one owned by my father [redacted]. It is a shame that he has provided half-truths and outright lies as he continues to slander my company. For the sake of clarity I have provided a series of bullet points to set the record straight…yet again:1. Mr. [redacted] signed a contract, paid a deposit to, and paid for services rendered to [redacted] and [redacted] and NOT my company [redacted] Lawn Care.2. [redacted] Lawn Care stands alone and DOES NOT share facilities, phone numbers, websites, or personnel, nor does my company ever share contracts with any other company. Mr. [redacted] claims about my company are outright lies. A simple Google search will yield separate websites, phone numbers, and mission statements. The companies file separate taxes, have separate federal EIN numbers, and have their own fleets of equipment, though on occasion equipment will be borrowed here and there. I also loan and borrow equipment to [redacted] Landscape and Sprinkler, this does not equate to a parent/subsidiary relationship.3. The reasoning behind Mr. [redacted] attempt to link the companies is simple and will be explained shortly. For the sake of background, I (as a representative hired by [redacted] and [redacted]) was tasked to meet with Mr. [redacted] to discuss the last remaining tasks required to fulfill the landscape contract signed by [redacted] Landscape and [redacted] and himself. I explained my position to Mr. [redacted] the first day I met him. [redacted] at the time was out of town on vacation. After lengthy discussion between Mr. [redacted], myself, and final approval by [redacted] (owner of [redacted] and [redacted]) a punch list was created. Mr. [redacted] now contents that this punch list, which is erroneously on [redacted] Lawn Care letterhead, is some form of “contract,” “signed written agreement,” or “written agreement” between himself and my company. In anticipation of someone asking why one company owner would enter into a “contract,” “signed written agreement,” or “written agreement” to undertake services outlined in a contract signed by another company, Mr. [redacted] is attempting to link the two companies. He’s simply grasping at straws to implicate another company into a messy contractor dispute.4. I, as the owner of [redacted] Lawn Care, never signed any agreement or contracted any work with Mr. [redacted]. His “documentation” to the contrary is a simple punch list. Neither I nor my company ever received payment or funds of any kind from Mr. [redacted]. Mr. [redacted] complaints are a matter between him and another company. 
Sincerely,
[redacted]

Check fields!

Write a review of Olson Lawn Care LLC

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Olson Lawn Care LLC Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Add contact information for Olson Lawn Care LLC

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated