Palmetto

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 8, 2015/12/23) */ Attached is correspondence from Attorney [redacted] , dated December 23, in response to the Complaint, along with Exhibits A and B Complaint Response Date bumped because: Holiday Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 11, 2015/12/30) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) Dear [redacted] First of all I did not assign this complaint to Palmetto, the Revdex.com did - likely because Palmetto and the [redacted] have the same phone number Secondly, all information listed in my complaint is factual and true Thirdly you have provided a lot of superfluous informationThe facts of the case are as follows: 1) The status letter was completed and paid for in advance 2) My wife was not provided the completed status letter, even though it had been purchased by the time she personally came to the HOA to pick it up 3) The status letter would not be provided by the HOA until a rush fee had been paid even though it was completed, ready to be picked up and ready to be usedIt was purposely being withheld by the HOA secretaryThe court will decide if this constitutes contract coercion Exhibit A is a copy of the status letter which is extremely confusing and intentionally difficult to interpretMy closing statement clearly lists each amount charged by the HOA for various fees totaling $1,These are excessive and inappropriate Exhibit B - the HOA assessment collection policy - does NOT list or define all the fees I was chargedThis violates CO state lawThank you for finally providing itEven though the fee schedule was requested prior to the closing, the HOA refused to provide itThere is no defined 'HOA Document Retrieval Fee', 'HOA Online Document Fee' or 'HOA Rush Fee' listed in the HOA assessment collection policy Have a nice New Year Sincerely, [redacted] Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 13, 2016/01/05) */ Attached is a Sur-Rebuttal letter from [redacted] , [redacted] dated January 5, Final Consumer Response / [redacted] (4200, 16, 2016/01/06) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) 1) The 'status letter' is not clear, nor does it make sense 2) Attached is a snapshot of my contract closing statement clearly showing all fees collected by the [redacted] Many of these fees are bogus 3) Yes, this case will be going to small claims court 4) No this case should not be closedIt should be listed on the Revdex.com website for all past and future home sellers who live (lived) in Parker, CO within the [redacted] realm

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 8, 2015/12/23) */
Attached is correspondence from Attorney [redacted], dated December 23, 2015 in response to the Complaint, along with Exhibits A and B.
Complaint Response Date bumped because: Holiday
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 11,...

2015/12/30) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Dear [redacted]
First of all I did not assign this complaint to Palmetto, the Revdex.com did - likely because Palmetto and the [redacted] have the same phone number.
Secondly, all information listed in my complaint is factual and true.
Thirdly you have provided a lot of superfluous information. The facts of the case are as follows:
1) The status letter was completed and paid for in advance.
2) My wife was not provided the completed status letter, even though it had been purchased by the time she personally came to the HOA to pick it up
3) The status letter would not be provided by the HOA until a rush fee had been paid even though it was completed, ready to be picked up and ready to be used. It was purposely being withheld by the HOA secretary. The court will decide if this constitutes contract coercion.
Exhibit A is a copy of the status letter which is extremely confusing and intentionally difficult to interpret. My closing statement clearly lists each amount charged by the HOA for various fees totaling $1,238.00. These are excessive and inappropriate.
Exhibit B - the HOA assessment collection policy - does NOT list or define all the fees I was charged. This violates CO state law. Thank you for finally providing it. Even though the fee schedule was requested prior to the closing, the HOA refused to provide it. There is no defined 'HOA Document Retrieval Fee', 'HOA Online Document Fee' or 'HOA Rush Fee' listed in the HOA assessment collection policy.
Have a nice New Year.
Sincerely,
[redacted]
Final Business Response /* (4000, 13, 2016/01/05) */
Attached is a Sur-Rebuttal letter from [redacted], [redacted] dated January 5, 2016.
Final Consumer Response /* (4200, 16, 2016/01/06) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
1) The 'status letter' is not clear, nor does it make sense.
2) Attached is a snapshot of my contract closing statement clearly showing all fees collected by the [redacted]. Many of these fees are bogus.
3) Yes, this case will be going to small claims court.
4) No this case should not be closed. It should be listed on the Revdex.com website for all past and future home sellers who live (lived) in Parker, CO within the [redacted] realm.