Peak to Peak Industries, LLC

The response to the complaint will be short and to the point as not to waste undue timeMs***'s allegations are again changing, fictitious, and her figures have also changed in her storyPeak to Peak is ethical and conducted business with Ms*** professionallyThe price of the job is fair, and a final price.
We do not have time to respond to anymore stories, and will be pursuing proper litigation.
Ms*** has the option to immediately settle at the original invoiced amount, which again, is more than fair market price
If Ms*** chooses not to pay her bill, the other option will be set into motion
This word is final,

Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
It is not my story, but his that continues to changeI welcome other proceedings since this has obviously not helpedI am confident that my stance will hold in court or any other area.Sincerely,*** ***

Complaint: ***I am rejecting this response because:
There was no original contract other than a verbal agreement - my understanding was that the $1500-was for parts and labor since he said "I will charge you parts and labor and should be able to do the job for about $1500-2000." Even *if* I misunderstood and the estimate was for labor only, the total should have been about $3500, rather than the nearly $he tried to charge me
I have been nothing but prompt in responding to all communication I received, except for the threatening text that I did not respond to via text, but via letter within a few daysWhy the emails were not coming through it beyond me, but I checked all mailboxes - junk, spam, etc, and could not locate themWhen he called me about it only weeks after giving me the original bill (which was for materials but did not include anything itemized, and I requested that he send me an itemized list) and I informed him they were not coming through, he tried a few more times, which I kept quick responses to, checking repeatedly for them to come in my inboxI then told him he could bring me a printed copy if he didn't want to wait for the mail, which he did on the night of Saturday, Oct 31stOn Monday I reviewed the list and wrote a check for $intending to take it to him directly, but a snow storm made me decide to wait until TuesdayTuesday morning I received a threatening text from him, and I informed him I already had a check written, and that he could come get it from my work that day or I would mail it to him that afternoonHe chose to send some woman to my work who initially acted interested in my place of work, then informed my coworker no less than times that she was a lawyer, but never provided information to back this, and then finally admitted that she was there for the check.
When he sent me the bill for labor, I immediately responded asking him to send me the time sheets and after he became defensive and refused, I told him I would not pay him any further until I was able to see the time sheetsHe has continued to refuse to give them to meI have also received quotes from other contractors for the same job that were 2500-seems entirely unreasonable and I want to know why it is so much.
As for the "unwarranted floor demolition" - I was trying to save him from having to tear up the tiles after they were set because the pattern he laid, which was not the pattern I left for him to lay (see the pictures I sent in the initial complaint), looked horribleHe claims I should have contacted him prior for us to "discuss it" but that would have only left time for the tile to set, at which time he would have been required to tear up the tile, purchase new tile for me, and re-lay itI saved him a very costly and prolonged endeavor by taking the tiles up before they were set (yes, I used a flat-head screwdriver to get under the tiles and pop them up so none were damaged, I did not destroy the flooring with a screwdriver as Mr H*** has implied)
There was no written contract ever, so I don't know about all these things he's saying I agreed to, but verbally I agreed to $1500-for the project and I left him to lay the tile in the pattern I had laid and left for him - and had discussed that it *had* to be laid exactly how I left it(Which is why the second time I took an entire day out of my work and stayed with him, mortaring every piece and telling him which piece went where, which is part of what I back-charged him for, as it is legal for me to back-charge for the work I had to do on the things he did incorrectly)
Sincerely,*** ***

The original estimate was verbal and at around $2000.00 labor only, as Ms. [redacted] was originally going to buy all the materials. The tile floor was laid twice. After Ms. [redacted] ripped up the floor tile, we agreed on a contract which details Time/Materials and how work was going to proceed....

She agreed to the terms, and wrote a $900 dollar check to pay for the work up to the un-warranted tiled floor demolition. There were many other options for remediation of this issue, Ms. [redacted] did not consult with the contractor before ripping up the floor with a screw driver. The unwarranted demolition of the floor was an irrational decision made by Ms. [redacted] which is in violation of procedure, Alaska Statute listed in the attached response letter.
 
Ms. [redacted] has not been communicating well, it appears that she has been dodging, I have tried to contact her about 30 times in total to pay her material bill or to work on a payment plan. The extreme uncooperativeness presented by the client has created this situation.   
She claims that she was not getting my emails, but it is interesting that she gets them now right away, when a response letter was sent to her lawyer with her address CC.
The fact of the matter is, the materials were never included in the estimate, and Ms. [redacted] originally requested to buy the materials. Ms. [redacted] agreed that would I would furnish materials verbally and on Proposal 10009, and Invoice 10009.
The due materials price is non negotiable, Also the Labor, hours worked are non negotiable. Originally there was an agreement, Invoice 10009 where $1365 was due, here an agreement was discussed and a discount was given $900. This agreement has been broken, and the discount is now invalid where the original difference of $465 is now being billed. I have more records of the agreements. I will go after this amount as well if litigation is to continue on.
A $2210 labor bill is very close to the $2000 labor estimate.
All my original charges to be paid were: Remediation Invoice 10009 ($900.00), Material Invoice 10009a: $1509.97, Labor Invoice 10009b: $2210.00, The Original Grand Total was: $4619.97.
Ms. [redacted] has paid $2833.06 in total since the completion date and on receipt of Invoice 10009a (10/15/2015).
Ms. [redacted] has been very difficult to reach, communicate with, and continues to create un-due hassle.
From the original $4619.97-2833.06=$1786.91 is Due Immediately. If this amount is agreed to, and paid in full I will write of all the hassle and wasted time  perusing this matter.
This has gone on too long.
My next step is litigation, and protecting the interest involved with no discount.