Pittsburgh Career Institute

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] None of what was in the statement is trueI have a witness to every conversation I had with them about the matterI am very disappointed with their reply Regards, [redacted] ***

RE: ID [redacted] Dear MsPalmer-Edwards: This letter is in response to the above mentioned ID number with a complaint made by Ms [redacted] *** As you are aware, Ms [redacted] is a current student in our Dialysis Technology program Ms***’s complaints are unfounded and without merit Pittsburgh Career Institute (PCI) has diligently worked with Ms [redacted] during her education at PCI The program director was out for two months for personal reasons; however, education occurred and was completed without disruption to the student as evidenced by her transcripts Pittsburgh Career Institute has worked with Ms [redacted] extensively to provide her with many options, but she found fault with them allThe aforementioned efforts have included the Director of Education and the Campus PresidentFactual Ms [redacted] started in our program in January In July 2015, for her preparation for her first clinical rotation, Ms [redacted] was slated to do her clinical rotation at [redacted] in [redacted] All of her paperwork was completed and she was to start on the first day of the new module which would have been July 20, Below is a summary of events that led up to the current state of affairsEvent 1: July – Met with Ms [redacted] and she expressed disapproval of the curriculum and programResolution: Advised student that the program is BONENT approved and the curriculum is in place to allow them to sit for the BONENT exam upon completion Pittsburgh Career Institute has little control over Programmatic requirements set by a third party Significance: Additionally, the program content and sequence it outlined in the Catalog which the student acknowledges receipt during the admissions processEvent 2: July – Student placed for clinical as per operations in the program July 29, – Student left site in middle of clinical rotation and refused to returnStudent stated that felt that the staff was being rude toward her Student was informed that she refused the site and another site would have to be procuredResolution: August 10, – PCI secured additional site at [redacted] Significance: Pittsburgh Career Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as published in the catalog Event 3: Due to the fact that Ms [redacted] refused to attend her first and the school had to procure a second site, Ms [redacted] was behind on her hours.Resolution: Special accommodations were made for her to complete her assignments and course work but still attend clinical rotations in order to allow her adequate time to fulfill the clinical time requirement Pittsburgh Career Institute assured the student that this would be at no extra cost to her and that it would not delay her graduation dateAugust 15, President Patti Y [redacted] spoke to student to stay informed on her progress Student reported that she was learning and was very happy at her site Significance: The Campus President, Patti Y***, granted an exception to attend clinical rotations and keep up with her course workEvent 4: August 17, student met with Thomas G [redacted] to obtain the schedule for her next courses Student claimed that she was told the program contained clinical rotation Ms [redacted] stated that the school was unorganized Student was very unprofessional and used profanity toward MrG [redacted] and the school Resolution: Thomas G [redacted] explained that there are two clinical rotations and an extern rotationSignificance: Curriculum is described in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during the admissions processEvent 5: August 21, student spoke with Program Chair and was concerned about completing her clinical hours on time.Resolution: Program Chair explained that she will have a week extension for each of her rotations in order to allow her adequate time to finish her timeSignificance: Clinical and externship policies on the two week time extension is described in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during the admissions process: moreover, the extension was needed due to the students’ own refusal of the secured siteEvent 6: September 15, – Student met with Program Chair to turn in time sheets Samantha C [redacted] , Program Chair, asked Ms [redacted] how she felt about her site and the student responded that she liked the clinic but did not like the staffResolution: Student was asked if she would like a new siteStudent stated that she did not knowSignificance: Student was asked if she would need another site at this timeStudent did not answer in the affirmativeEvent 7: October 1, 2015- Student spoke with Program Chair and asked if she has found her a new siteProgram Chair stated that Ms [redacted] did not tell her she wanted a new siteResolution: October 2, – Program Chair called to inform student that she had secured a new site at FMC Penn HillsSignificance: Pittsburgh Career Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as published in the catalog Event: October 5, – Student called program chair and refused [redacted] because it was too far for her to travel Resolution: The Program Chair explained that this was the site that would accept her at the last minute and she would keep looking over the weekend to ensure that the student had a site; however, this was not a task that can be completed in a short timeframe Significance: Pittsburgh Career Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as published in the catalog There was another exception made to policy for Ms [redacted] on the securing of yet another site Pittsburgh Career Institute has a mile radius policy contained in the catalog as it pertains to the placement of studentsEvent: October 7, – student called to complain that she did not have a siteResolution: October 7, – Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for the studentStudent again refused this site stating that she had heard things about the clinic and in addition could not go to sites on Mondays or FridaysSignificance: Pittsburgh Career Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as published in the catalog There was another exception made to policy for Ms [redacted] on the securing of yet another siteFinal Resolution: October 15, – Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for student to complete her externshipConclusion: In review of the foregoing events, it is unconscionable to conclude that Pittsburgh Career Institute somehow deviated from any standard of duty when it pertains to the student and the ensuing complaintWhile we remain ever vigilant to ensure that the student experience is one that is beneficial to all partied involved, we are bound by our accrediting and approving agencies to operate within the confines of regulations I feel that our organization has performed above and beyond our required scope with the amount of exceptions (sites and completion) that we have granted to this studentShould you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at any timeSincerely,Patti Y***Campus President

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below [To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] None of what was in the statement is trueI have a witness to every conversation I had with them about the matterI am very disappointed with their reply Regards, [redacted] ***

The negative students run this school! Very good Instructors leave or are fired due to the negative students making a complaint. These negative students disrupt classes and most do not even graduate.

PCI is NOT a positive place to learn

Do not waste your money- go to the Community College you will receive a better education.

RE:  ID [redacted]Dear Ms. Palmer-Edwards: This letter is in response to the above mentioned ID number with a complaint
made by Ms. [redacted].  As you are
aware, Ms. [redacted] is a current student in our Dialysis Technology program.  Ms. [redacted]’s complaints are unfounded and
without...

merit.  Pittsburgh Career
Institute (PCI) has diligently worked with Ms. [redacted] during her education at
PCI.  The program director was
out for two months for personal reasons; however, education occurred and was
completed without disruption to the student as evidenced by her transcripts.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has worked with
Ms. [redacted] extensively to provide her with many options, but she found fault
with them all. The aforementioned efforts have included the Director of
Education and the Campus President. Factual Background: Ms. [redacted] started in our
program in January 2015.  In July 2015,
for her preparation for her first clinical rotation, Ms. [redacted] was slated to do
her clinical rotation at [redacted] in [redacted].  All of her paperwork was completed and she was to start on the first day
of the new module which would have been July 20, 2015. Below is a summary of
events that led up to the current state of affairs. Event 1: July 2015 – Met with Ms.
[redacted] and she expressed disapproval of the curriculum and program. Resolution: Advised student that the
program is BONENT approved and the curriculum is in place to allow them to sit
for the BONENT exam upon completion.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has little control over Programmatic
requirements set by a third party.  Significance: Additionally, the
program content and sequence it outlined in the Catalog which the student
acknowledges receipt during the admissions process. Event 2: July 2015 – Student
placed for clinical as per normal operations in the program.  July 29, 2015 – Student left site in middle
of clinical rotation and refused to return. Student stated that felt that the
staff was being rude toward her.  Student
was informed that she refused the site and another site would have to be
procured. Resolution: August 10, 2015 – PCI
secured additional site at [redacted]Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  Event 3: Due to the fact that Ms.
[redacted] refused to attend her first and the school had to procure a second site,
Ms.  [redacted] was behind on her hours.Resolution: Special accommodations
were made for her to complete her assignments and course work but still attend
clinical rotations in order to allow her adequate time to fulfill the clinical
time requirement.  Pittsburgh Career
Institute assured the student that this would be at no extra cost to her and
that it would not delay her graduation date. August 15, 2015
President Patti Y[redacted] spoke to student to stay informed on her progress.
Student reported that she was learning and was very happy at her site.  Significance: The Campus President,
Patti Y[redacted], granted an exception to attend clinical rotations and keep up
with her course work. Event 4: August 17, 2015 student
met with Thomas G[redacted] to obtain the schedule for her next courses.  Student claimed that she was told the program
contained 1 clinical rotation.  Ms. [redacted]
stated that the school was unorganized.  Student was very unprofessional and used
profanity toward Mr. G[redacted] and the school.  Resolution: Thomas G[redacted] explained
that there are two clinical rotations and an extern rotation. Significance: Curriculum is described
in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during the admissions
process. Event 5: August 21, 2015 student
spoke with Program Chair and was concerned about completing her clinical hours
on time.Resolution: Program Chair explained
that she will have a 2 week extension for each of her rotations in order to
allow her adequate time to finish her time. Significance: Clinical and externship
policies on the two week time extension   is described in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during
the admissions process:  moreover, the
extension was needed due to the students’ own refusal of the secured site. Event 6: September 15, 2015 –
Student met with Program Chair to turn in time sheets.  Samantha C[redacted], Program Chair, asked Ms.
[redacted] how she felt about her site and the student responded that she liked the
clinic but did not like the staff. Resolution:  Student was asked if she would like a new
site. Student stated that she did not know. Significance: Student was asked if she
would need another site at this time. Student did not answer in the
affirmative. Event 7: October 1, 2015- Student
spoke with Program Chair and asked if she has found her a new site. Program
Chair stated that Ms. [redacted] did not tell her she wanted a new site. Resolution: October 2, 2015 –
Program Chair called to inform student that she had secured a new site at FMC
Penn Hills. Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  Event: October 5, 2015 –
Student called program chair and refused [redacted] because it was too far
for her to travel.  Resolution: The Program Chair
explained that this was the site that would accept her at the last minute and
she would keep looking over the weekend to ensure that the student had a site;
however, this was not a task that can be completed in a short timeframe.  Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  There was
another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another
site.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has a
60 mile radius policy contained in the catalog as it pertains to the placement
of students. Event: October 7, 2015 –
student called to complain that she did not have a site. Resolution: October 7, 2015 –
Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for the student. Student
again refused this site stating that she had heard things about the clinic and
in addition could not go to sites on Mondays or Fridays. Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  There was
another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another
site. Final Resolution: October 15, 2015 –
Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for student to complete her
externship. Conclusion: In review of the
foregoing events, it is unconscionable to conclude that Pittsburgh Career
Institute somehow deviated from any standard of duty when it pertains to the
student and the ensuing complaint. While we remain ever vigilant to ensure that
the student experience is one that is beneficial to all partied involved, we
are bound by our accrediting and approving agencies to operate within the
confines of regulations.  I feel that our
organization has performed above and beyond our required scope with the amount
of exceptions (sites and completion) that we have granted to this student. Should you require
additional information, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely,Patti Y[redacted]Campus President

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] None of what was in the statement is true. I have a witness to every conversation I had with them about the matter. I am very disappointed with their reply.
Regards,
[redacted]

RE:  ID [redacted]Dear Ms. Palmer-Edwards: This letter is in response to the above mentioned ID number with a complaint
made by Ms. [redacted].  As you are
aware, Ms. [redacted] is a current student in our Dialysis Technology program.  Ms. [redacted]’s complaints are...

unfounded and
without merit.  Pittsburgh Career
Institute (PCI) has diligently worked with Ms. [redacted] during her education at
PCI.  The program director was
out for two months for personal reasons; however, education occurred and was
completed without disruption to the student as evidenced by her transcripts.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has worked with
Ms. [redacted] extensively to provide her with many options, but she found fault
with them all. The aforementioned efforts have included the Director of
Education and the Campus President. Factual Background: Ms. [redacted] started in our
program in January 2015.  In July 2015,
for her preparation for her first clinical rotation, Ms. [redacted] was slated to do
her clinical rotation at [redacted] in [redacted].  All of her paperwork was completed and she was to start on the first day
of the new module which would have been July 20, 2015. Below is a summary of
events that led up to the current state of affairs. Event 1: July 2015 – Met with Ms.
[redacted] and she expressed disapproval of the curriculum and program. Resolution: Advised student that the
program is BONENT approved and the curriculum is in place to allow them to sit
for the BONENT exam upon completion.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has little control over Programmatic
requirements set by a third party.  Significance: Additionally, the
program content and sequence it outlined in the Catalog which the student
acknowledges receipt during the admissions process. Event 2: July 2015 – Student
placed for clinical as per normal operations in the program.  July 29, 2015 – Student left site in middle
of clinical rotation and refused to return. Student stated that felt that the
staff was being rude toward her.  Student
was informed that she refused the site and another site would have to be
procured. Resolution: August 10, 2015 – PCI
secured additional site at [redacted]Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  Event 3: Due to the fact that Ms.
[redacted] refused to attend her first and the school had to procure a second site,
Ms.  [redacted] was behind on her hours.Resolution: Special accommodations
were made for her to complete her assignments and course work but still attend
clinical rotations in order to allow her adequate time to fulfill the clinical
time requirement.  Pittsburgh Career
Institute assured the student that this would be at no extra cost to her and
that it would not delay her graduation date. August 15, 2015
President Patti Y[redacted] spoke to student to stay informed on her progress.
Student reported that she was learning and was very happy at her site.  Significance: The Campus President,
Patti Y[redacted], granted an exception to attend clinical rotations and keep up
with her course work. Event 4: August 17, 2015 student
met with Thomas G[redacted] to obtain the schedule for her next courses.  Student claimed that she was told the program
contained 1 clinical rotation.  Ms. [redacted]
stated that the school was unorganized.  Student was very unprofessional and used
profanity toward Mr. G[redacted] and the school.  Resolution: Thomas G[redacted] explained
that there are two clinical rotations and an extern rotation. Significance: Curriculum is described
in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during the admissions
process. Event 5: August 21, 2015 student
spoke with Program Chair and was concerned about completing her clinical hours
on time.Resolution: Program Chair explained
that she will have a 2 week extension for each of her rotations in order to
allow her adequate time to finish her time. Significance: Clinical and externship
policies on the two week time extension   is described in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during
the admissions process:  moreover, the
extension was needed due to the students’ own refusal of the secured site. Event 6: September 15, 2015 –
Student met with Program Chair to turn in time sheets.  Samantha C[redacted], Program Chair, asked Ms.
[redacted] how she felt about her site and the student responded that she liked the
clinic but did not like the staff. Resolution:  Student was asked if she would like a new
site. Student stated that she did not know. Significance: Student was asked if she
would need another site at this time. Student did not answer in the
affirmative. Event 7: October 1, 2015- Student
spoke with Program Chair and asked if she has found her a new site. Program
Chair stated that Ms. [redacted] did not tell her she wanted a new site. Resolution: October 2, 2015 –
Program Chair called to inform student that she had secured a new site at FMC
Penn Hills. Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  Event: October 5, 2015 –
Student called program chair and refused [redacted] because it was too far
for her to travel.  Resolution: The Program Chair
explained that this was the site that would accept her at the last minute and
she would keep looking over the weekend to ensure that the student had a site;
however, this was not a task that can be completed in a short timeframe.  Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  There was
another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another
site.  Pittsburgh Career Institute has a
60 mile radius policy contained in the catalog as it pertains to the placement
of students. Event: October 7, 2015 –
student called to complain that she did not have a site. Resolution: October 7, 2015 –
Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for the student. Student
again refused this site stating that she had heard things about the clinic and
in addition could not go to sites on Mondays or Fridays. Significance: Pittsburgh Career
Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as
published in the catalog.  There was
another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another
site. Final Resolution: October 15, 2015 –
Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for student to complete her
externship. Conclusion: In review of the
foregoing events, it is unconscionable to conclude that Pittsburgh Career
Institute somehow deviated from any standard of duty when it pertains to the
student and the ensuing complaint. While we remain ever vigilant to ensure that
the student experience is one that is beneficial to all partied involved, we
are bound by our accrediting and approving agencies to operate within the
confines of regulations.  I feel that our
organization has performed above and beyond our required scope with the amount
of exceptions (sites and completion) that we have granted to this student. Should you require
additional information, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely,Patti Y[redacted]Campus President

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, we would like to know your view on the matter.] None of what was in the statement is true. I have a witness to every conversation I had with them about the matter. I am very disappointed with their reply.
Regards,
[redacted]

Review: Enrolled in the school's dialysis technician program. I was told the price of the program was due to the expensive machines that were used in the course. The machines were broken the entire time I was there. The instructor was gone for two months with no explanation for her absence. It has been almost a month since I have finished my clinical at a dialysis clinic. According to the school I have to complete externship of 120 hours to complete the course. The instructor of the course informed me that she had some places lined. She informed me that they weren't excepting students. It is now almost the end of October with no end in sight for me finishing this program. To my knowledge the instructor is not trying to find a site for me to complete my externship. I This school does not have any relationship with any dialysis clinics to promise a student clinical or extern sites.

Business

Response:

RE: ID [redacted]Dear Ms. Palmer-Edwards: This letter is in response to the above mentioned ID number with a complaint

made by Ms. [redacted]. As you are

aware, Ms. [redacted] is a current student in our Dialysis Technology program. Ms. [redacted]’s complaints are unfounded and

without merit. Pittsburgh Career

Institute (PCI) has diligently worked with Ms. [redacted] during her education at

PCI. The program director was

out for two months for personal reasons; however, education occurred and was

completed without disruption to the student as evidenced by her transcripts. Pittsburgh Career Institute has worked with

Ms. [redacted] extensively to provide her with many options, but she found fault

with them all. The aforementioned efforts have included the Director of

Education and the Campus President. Factual Background: Ms. [redacted] started in our

program in January 2015. In July 2015,

for her preparation for her first clinical rotation, Ms. [redacted] was slated to do

her clinical rotation at [redacted] in [redacted]. All of her paperwork was completed and she was to start on the first day

of the new module which would have been July 20, 2015. Below is a summary of

events that led up to the current state of affairs. Event 1: July 2015 – Met with Ms.

[redacted] and she expressed disapproval of the curriculum and program. Resolution: Advised student that the

program is BONENT approved and the curriculum is in place to allow them to sit

for the BONENT exam upon completion. Pittsburgh Career Institute has little control over Programmatic

requirements set by a third party. Significance: Additionally, the

program content and sequence it outlined in the Catalog which the student

acknowledges receipt during the admissions process. Event 2: July 2015 – Student

placed for clinical as per normal operations in the program. July 29, 2015 – Student left site in middle

of clinical rotation and refused to return. Student stated that felt that the

staff was being rude toward her. Student

was informed that she refused the site and another site would have to be

procured. Resolution: August 10, 2015 – PCI

secured additional site at [redacted]Significance: Pittsburgh Career

Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as

published in the catalog. Event 3: Due to the fact that Ms.

[redacted] refused to attend her first and the school had to procure a second site,

Ms. [redacted] was behind on her hours.Resolution: Special accommodations

were made for her to complete her assignments and course work but still attend

clinical rotations in order to allow her adequate time to fulfill the clinical

time requirement. Pittsburgh Career

Institute assured the student that this would be at no extra cost to her and

that it would not delay her graduation date. August 15, 2015

President Patti Y[redacted] spoke to student to stay informed on her progress.

Student reported that she was learning and was very happy at her site. Significance: The Campus President,

Patti Y[redacted], granted an exception to attend clinical rotations and keep up

with her course work. Event 4: August 17, 2015 student

met with Thomas G[redacted] to obtain the schedule for her next courses. Student claimed that she was told the program

contained 1 clinical rotation. Ms. [redacted]

stated that the school was unorganized. Student was very unprofessional and used

profanity toward Mr. G[redacted] and the school. Resolution: Thomas G[redacted] explained

that there are two clinical rotations and an extern rotation. Significance: Curriculum is described

in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during the admissions

process. Event 5: August 21, 2015 student

spoke with Program Chair and was concerned about completing her clinical hours

on time.Resolution: Program Chair explained

that she will have a 2 week extension for each of her rotations in order to

allow her adequate time to finish her time. Significance: Clinical and externship

policies on the two week time extension is described in the catalog that she received and acknowledged during

the admissions process: moreover, the

extension was needed due to the students’ own refusal of the secured site. Event 6: September 15, 2015 –

Student met with Program Chair to turn in time sheets. Samantha C[redacted], Program Chair, asked Ms.

[redacted] how she felt about her site and the student responded that she liked the

clinic but did not like the staff. Resolution: Student was asked if she would like a new

site. Student stated that she did not know. Significance: Student was asked if she

would need another site at this time. Student did not answer in the

affirmative. Event 7: October 1, 2015- Student

spoke with Program Chair and asked if she has found her a new site. Program

Chair stated that Ms. [redacted] did not tell her she wanted a new site. Resolution: October 2, 2015 –

Program Chair called to inform student that she had secured a new site at FMC

Penn Hills. Significance: Pittsburgh Career

Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as

published in the catalog. Event: October 5, 2015 –

Student called program chair and refused [redacted] because it was too far

for her to travel. Resolution: The Program Chair

explained that this was the site that would accept her at the last minute and

she would keep looking over the weekend to ensure that the student had a site;

however, this was not a task that can be completed in a short timeframe. Significance: Pittsburgh Career

Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as

published in the catalog. There was

another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another

site. Pittsburgh Career Institute has a

60 mile radius policy contained in the catalog as it pertains to the placement

of students. Event: October 7, 2015 –

student called to complain that she did not have a site. Resolution: October 7, 2015 –

Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for the student. Student

again refused this site stating that she had heard things about the clinic and

in addition could not go to sites on Mondays or Fridays. Significance: Pittsburgh Career

Institute has a policy on securing students two clinical/externship sites as

published in the catalog. There was

another exception made to policy for Ms. [redacted] on the securing of yet another

site. Final Resolution: October 15, 2015 –

Pittsburgh Career Institute secured [redacted] for student to complete her

externship. Conclusion: In review of the

foregoing events, it is unconscionable to conclude that Pittsburgh Career

Institute somehow deviated from any standard of duty when it pertains to the

student and the ensuing complaint. While we remain ever vigilant to ensure that

the student experience is one that is beneficial to all partied involved, we

are bound by our accrediting and approving agencies to operate within the

confines of regulations. I feel that our

organization has performed above and beyond our required scope with the amount

of exceptions (sites and completion) that we have granted to this student. Should you require

additional information, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely,Patti Y[redacted]Campus President

Consumer

Response: