Sign in

Premier Product Management, Inc.

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Premier Product Management, Inc.? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Premier Product Management, Inc.

Premier Product Management, Inc. Reviews (9)

I spoke with the customer and heard his account of what took place in his home during the time of deliveryThe driver and helper were both interviewed and a subsequent interview will be done by me, personally, to determine whether I sense any inconsistencies in both the driver and helper's account of what happened during this deliveryAlthough I'm unable to determine fault or whether the missing tablet was misplaced somewhere in the customer's home we have offered and sent a VISA gift card (in a mutually agreeable amount) to the customer to help resolve this incidentWe will note this incident in the delivery team's file and will take action at that time should a similar accusation be levied against them in the futureI'm truly sorry this customer had such a negative experience and sincerely hope the tablet turns up somewhere else in their home*** ***PresidentPremier Product Management, Inc

I am rejecting this response because: Larceny-Theft of customer committed by Premier Product Management Like many others here, I've had the misfortune of being forced to deal with "Premier" Product ManagementBeing that I ordered from and paid *** *** for my refrigerator, I thought much
like *** *** *** ** ***, they employed their own delivery staffInstead they chose to cut corners and use a "company" like thisThe Independent contractor/Driver *** was quite professional and pleasantNo complaints whatsoever with himIn fact, I feel he went above and beyond with waiting for me to arrive home and after install showing me that I had a leak in my ice maker water line faucetThe issue I had was with his helperThis kid waited until the friend who helped me remove my old fridge left, saw I was occupied with *** regarding the faucet and proceeded to disappear without saying a wordAs we wrapped up, I noticed he was standing by the truck near plastic wrap and the handful of debris doing nothing, as if to wait until we saw that he was simply cleaning upI thought it was suspicious, but didn't have time to as the situation further as I had to get to workI bid them a good day, *** responded in kind but the kid wouldn't even make eye contact and acknowledgeThe following evening, my wife texts explaining she's searched the house top to bottom and cannot find her tablet she left on the charging table right next to the front doorAfter attempting to locate it via tracking software with no result, we check our router for last activityTurns out the tablet disconnected from our network within a minute after the delivery truck leftI immediately called *** *** who surprisingly took NO RESPONSIBILITY for sending this horrible company out and allowing thieving people into my homeThey told me to contact ** insurance department, "Premier" Product Management, PPM insurance company and other hoops and of course no resolution, no ownershipI did unfortunately speak with PPM's ineffective "manager" *** ***He asked me to file a police report which I absolutely intended to do anywayHe gave me the names of the drivers and said he wouldn't keep anyone around that steals from customers and would turn them over to the police without an issueIn the interim, he would sit the delivery guys down and "get to the bottom of it"I filed the police report hours later and during which, ***'s receptionist relayed a message to me that he would prefer I just use his name instead of the name's he already provided me withStrange, but whateverThe next day, I had to contact him although he stated he would call me back with the info he uncovered after speaking with the staffTo nobody's surprise, he stated they knew nothing about the missing tabletThey did however attempt to implicate my friend of many years as a possible thiefAs I reiterated to ***, he left at least 5-minutes prior to his staff, but the tablet left my home network when his drivers didNice TryWe went on for about minutes as he tried to deflect and take no accountability, but understood that was unacceptableAnd albeit circumstantial, the signs point to the drivers assistant*** Promised a call back by the end of day with resolution, and of course failed to do soThe next morning I called PPM to ask why he never called as promised and to have him finally provide "resolution"I was told by the receptionist that he was in the warehouse and to please holdafter some time waiting, she returned to the call and stated very unassuredly - "apparently *** is no longer in the building?"At this point I google searched the company to find ownership information to make them aware of what was going on and to seek resolution immediatelyI found and contacted the president "*** ***", but only got his voicemailI explained the situation and asked for a call backAfter some time waiting and receiving no call back, I went ahead and filed a complaint with the Revdex.comWithin a half hour, *** *** calls me stating he was authorized to send me a $giftcard to replace the tablet, and didn't return my call as promised because he was waiting for the company's president to tell him what to doHe then went on to offer a mumbling apology and confirmed my address so he could purchase and send the gift card that day to close out this matterI accepted, as it took an extraordinary amount of time and effort to get either ** or PPM to do what should have been done immediately two weeks agoThe next morning I get a call from *** *** Explaining his president - which I still have not gotten a call from, tells him in order to send the giftcard which *** stated the day before would already be purchased and sent due to thieving employees, I would have to remove my complaintI stated that I would already be required the update the resolution with the Revdex.com, but I will not be blackmailed into hiding my experience and demanded the president contact me directlyOf course, I still have no response.ReplacementDesired Outcome:Proceed IMMEDIATELY with the sending of the gift card already promised by your company to cover the cost of the tablet and REMOVE your newly added condition of suppressing/removing my commented experience and complaint to the Revdex.com

I am rejecting this response because:This company has repeatedly lied and misrepresented its self
throughout this process. This is about one thing - the damage to my floor.I reported the damage to my floor the day of the delivery,
12/12/15, to [redacted]. It took over three weeks to get any sort of claim response.
After repeated attempts, via [redacted]
[redacted]  [redacted], I finally received
a response to set up a claim. When a response finally did come it was shrouded
in the form of an insurance company, Premier Product Management, which I was
supposed to file a claim with. Come to find out PPM is the delivery company and
my response was simply from a PPM manager.During what I was led to believe was an insurance company
inspection. Which come to find out was only PPM operations manager [redacted]’s
inspection. [redacted]’s said they have people that would come and repair the damage.
This reinforced my belief that I was dealing with the insurance company. He
also told me not to get an outside estimate because he would not be able to
cover those costs. Again, this reinforced my belief that I was dealing with an actual
insurance company. In the days following, 1/6/16, I received a phone call
message from [redacted] saying my claim was denied. He did not return any phone calls
after that point. If he was not representing himself as from the insurance company
how was he executing the claim or have the authority to deny the claim? During
that phone call I was told I would receive a denial letter I still have not received
one.At that point I contacted [redacted] at [redacted] again. She got
me in touch with the actual insurance company, [redacted] Insurance Company. An
actual insurance claim was filed at that time. During that insurance process
PPM continued to lie. First, [redacted] filed the Driver Statement Form, He was not
the driver. Second, in the Driver statement it eludes I was in the room with
the delivery drivers the entire time. That is not the truth. driver statement form attached.As to the damage itself, what I know is that there was no
damage prior to the delivery and there was damage after the delivery. As [redacted]
points out there are many ways that the damage may have happened. I agree
something made an impression in my floor. Since I was not in the room the
entire time with the delivery drivers I do not know what the made the
impression. They may have dropped their tools. They may have stepped on
something that pressed into the floor. They may have put the oven down awkwardly.
What is without doubt is the damage occurred where the delivery took place. Exactly
where the delivery men were going in and out of my house. Exactly where they
were standing and working while in my house. Maybe, as [redacted] acknowledges, since
I was not accepting of their desire that I lie about the damaged product being delivered
damaged. That I wouldn’t follow there instruction that I call the next day and
say I found the damage after the drivers left. Possibly, since the drivers
having already arrived a half hour outside the delivery window I was provided and
running behind. And again, was not accepting their desire that I lie on their
behalf about the damage that the product was delivered with. Possibly, the
drivers intentionally damaged my floor.[redacted] views this desire for me to lie about the damaged
product as an attempt to help me. I do not view it as an attempt to help me. I
view it as a tool the company uses to place blame on the customer and deny
responsibility. I view it as a way for the delivery company to trick customers
into accepting a damaged product. I view it as a way for the delivery drivers,
that were already late, to try to expedite there delivery. I view it as a way
for the company to say I caused the damage to the oven similar to the way they
are trying to say I caused the damage to my floor. I do view it as underhanded
and unethical and does speak to the honesty this company can be expected to
bring to the situation we now have before us – the damage to my floor.

During the initial installation the installer attempted to help the customer to keep the range in his home until a replacement could be ordered so he would not be without one for several days over the Christmas holidays. The customer's interpretation of this and view that this was somehow...

underhanded or unethical is inaccurate. In regard to [redacted] for Premier Product Mgmt.) implying he was an insurance adjuster or the installer...his name is on the denial letter sent from the company and he would not benefit from presenting himself from either of these positions. He has worked for me for more than ten years and I have never seen him misrepresent himself in this manner or any other.I've attached a photo of the damage to the consumer's floor. It is entirely inconsistent with any damage that would have been done resulting from placing a range down on the floor. It does, however, strongly resemble damage caused by dropping a can of canned food on the floor leaving a semi-circular impression. We see this type of pre-existing damage frequently when going to complete installations in customer homes and it is very common. If the damage were somewhere near where the range was installed and not in the middle of the room AND was consistent with that of pushing a range across or dropping on the floor leaving a scrape mark in the same shape as the feet on the range then we would not have denied this claim. However, neither of these conditions have been met during our site inspection so we must deny this customer's claim.We have submitted this claim back to [redacted] Insurance (independent third-party) and based on the photographs provided they have upheld our denial. This customer may bypass us and work directly with the individual at [redacted] Insurance if they disagree with our assessment of this claim.[redacted]Premier Product Management, Inc.

Review: I purchased an appliance through the [redacted] website. I was under the assumption that [redacted] would deliver my appliance, but without my knowledge they contracted the delivery to Premier Product Management. The delivery, resulted in cracked floor tile, as well as my wife's tablet being stolen from the younger installer of the two men.

I contacted the company and spoke with the manager [redacted] who advised I file a police report. In the interim, he would question his independent contractor and his assistant. As expected, the assistant denied removing the tablet and implicated my longtime friend who was present, and helped me take out the old appliance. As I mentioned to [redacted], my friend left approx 10 minutes prior to his delivery staff. I also explained that while I was occupied with the driver, his assistant waited until my friend left to disappear in the direction of the table in which the tablet was kept near the door.

I verified via router interface that the tablets last wifi activity was a disconnect from the network at 11:39 am, within less than a minute after their truck departed. As I walked the driver out my front door, I told them both to "have a good one" to which the driver bidded me the same, but his assistant refused to look my way and acknowledge.

After explaining this to [redacted], he promised to call back with resolution by end of day, 11/27/16. He failed to honor this, and when I contacted his business the following morning, his receptionist indicated he was in the warehouse and placed me on hold. When she returned to the phone she unassuredely stated "apparently he has left the building".

It's been over week, and this issue still has no resolution.Desired Settlement: to have my tile repaired and to have my wife's stolen tablet replaced.

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because: Larceny-Theft of customer committed by Premier Product Management Like many others here, I've had the misfortune of being forced to deal with "Premier" Product Management. Being that I ordered from and paid [redacted] for my refrigerator, I thought much like [redacted], they employed their own delivery staff. Instead they chose to cut corners and use a "company" like this. The Independent contractor/Driver [redacted] was quite professional and pleasant. No complaints whatsoever with him. In fact, I feel he went above and beyond with waiting for me to arrive home and after install showing me that I had a leak in my ice maker water line faucet. The issue I had was with his helper. This kid waited until the friend who helped me remove my old fridge left, saw I was occupied with [redacted] regarding the faucet and proceeded to disappear without saying a word. As we wrapped up, I noticed he was standing by the truck near plastic wrap and the handful of debris doing nothing, as if to wait until we saw that he was simply cleaning up. I thought it was suspicious, but didn't have time to as the situation further as I had to get to work. I bid them a good day, [redacted] responded in kind but the kid wouldn't even make eye contact and acknowledge. The following evening, my wife texts explaining she's searched the house top to bottom and cannot find her tablet she left on the charging table right next to the front door. After attempting to locate it via tracking software with no result, we check our router for last activity. Turns out the tablet disconnected from our network within a minute after the delivery truck left. I immediately called [redacted] who surprisingly took NO RESPONSIBILITY for sending this horrible company out and allowing thieving people into my home. They told me to contact ** insurance department, "Premier" Product Management, PPM insurance company and other hoops and of course no resolution, no ownership. I did unfortunately speak with PPM's ineffective "manager" [redacted]. He asked me to file a police report which I absolutely intended to do anyway. He gave me the names of the drivers and said he wouldn't keep anyone around that steals from customers and would turn them over to the police without an issue. In the interim, he would sit the delivery guys down and "get to the bottom of it". I filed the police report hours later and during which, [redacted]'s receptionist relayed a message to me that he would prefer I just use his name instead of the name's he already provided me with. Strange, but whatever. The next day, I had to contact him although he stated he would call me back with the info he uncovered after speaking with the staff. To nobody's surprise, he stated they knew nothing about the missing tablet. They did however attempt to implicate my friend of many years as a possible thief. As I reiterated to [redacted], he left at least 5-10 minutes prior to his staff, but the tablet left my home network when his drivers did. Nice Try. We went on for about 30 minutes as he tried to deflect and take no accountability, but understood that was unacceptable. And albeit circumstantial, the signs point to the drivers assistant. [redacted] Promised a call back by the end of day with resolution, and of course failed to do so. The next morning I called PPM to ask why he never called as promised and to have him finally provide "resolution". I was told by the receptionist that he was in the warehouse and to please hold. after some time waiting, she returned to the call and stated very unassuredly - "apparently [redacted] is no longer in the building?". At this point I google searched the company to find ownership information to make them aware of what was going on and to seek resolution immediately. I found and contacted the president "[redacted]", but only got his voicemail. I explained the situation and asked for a call back. After some time waiting and receiving no call back, I went ahead and filed a complaint with the Revdex.com. Within a half hour, [redacted] calls me stating he was authorized to send me a $250 giftcard to replace the tablet, and didn't return my call as promised because he was waiting for the company's president to tell him what to do. He then went on to offer a mumbling apology and confirmed my address so he could purchase and send the gift card that day to close out this matter. I accepted, as it took an extraordinary amount of time and effort to get either ** or PPM to do what should have been done immediately two weeks ago. The next morning I get a call from [redacted] Explaining his president - which I still have not gotten a call from, tells him in order to send the giftcard which [redacted] stated the day before would already be purchased and sent due to thieving employees, I would have to remove my complaint. I stated that I would already be required the update the resolution with the Revdex.com, but I will not be blackmailed into hiding my experience and demanded the president contact me directly. Of course, I still have no response.ReplacementDesired Outcome:Proceed IMMEDIATELY with the sending of the gift card already promised by your company to cover the cost of the tablet and REMOVE your newly added condition of suppressing/removing my commented experience and complaint to the Revdex.com.

Business

Response:

I spoke with the customer and heard his account of what took place in his home during the time of delivery. The driver and helper were both interviewed and a subsequent interview will be done by me, personally, to determine whether I sense any inconsistencies in both the driver and helper's account of what happened during this delivery. Although I'm unable to determine fault or whether the missing tablet was misplaced somewhere in the customer's home we have offered and sent a VISA gift card (in a mutually agreeable amount) to the customer to help resolve this incident. We will note this incident in the delivery team's file and will take action at that time should a similar accusation be levied against them in the future. I'm truly sorry this customer had such a negative experience and sincerely hope the tablet turns up somewhere else in their home. [redacted]PresidentPremier Product Management, Inc.

Review: My main complaint is that [redacted] represented himself as from an insurance company not from the delivery company I wanted to fill an insurance claim against. He then falsely represented himself in the insurance process as the driver. He also lied in the insurance review process

Here is my complaint in detail.

On Dec. 12th we expected a delivery between roughly 12-5pm. When no one called by 5pm I called to check on status of delivery. I received a return call and was told the delivery was on the way. Once delivery arrived the men were in a big hurry they said they were very behind and had more deliveries to make. They were very hurried and eager to get the job done as quickly as possible. First they brought in there tools and inspected area. They then went back out and brought in the oven. Once the oven was in they told me it was damaged. At that point they went in and out a couple times deciding what to do. They said I could keep the oven but that I couldn’t tell anyone that they knew the oven was damaged. That I was then to call [redacted] and say I found the damage after they left. I did not feel comfortable with this and told them I was refusing delivery of the oven. Again in a very hurried and by now very agitated, effort they removed the oven. They came in again and collected there tools and left.

The men came in and out multiple times with a variety of tools and items. The oven also came in and out multiple times. Something was dropped or pressed into the floor during the time that the delivery men were there. There was no damage to the floor prior to the delivery and there was damage in the exact area where they were walking through, bringing in tools and bringing the oven in and out, by the time they left. I did not find the damage until after the delivery men had left, same day. At that time I immediately went to [redacted] and reported it and started this process. That was Dec. 12th.

I have made an attempt to get a cost to repair. The problem is I do not have any more of the laminate flooring to replace the damaged pieces and I can’t not find anyone that still has that type of laminate for sale. I have included a picture of the damage and a wider view of the area where everything was going in and out on the day of delivery.

The flooring is a couple years old and has been kept in very good condition. We don’t even wear shoes in the house.

In reviewing the denial information I believe Premier Product Management Inc, through [redacted], misrepresented himself as working for the insurance company when he finally came to my house to inspect damage a month after damage occurred. Come to find out he works for only the delivery company.

The reason for denial was lack of evidence. But in the evidence that was provided are two clear lies.

1. [redacted] was not the driver that made the delivery.

2. I was not in the room the entire time of delivery as stated on driver statement form.

In addition, the form acknowledges there was no damage when they arrived but that the damage was, in his opinion, small.

It appears to me in looking at the driver document that the main reason it was denied was because, in his opinion, the damage was small. How is that evidence? How can someone that was not there when the damage occurred be the primary source of evidence for the events that caused the damage? At most, the only relevant thing that [redacted] offered was, his opinion, that the damage was small. At minimum this acknowledges damage. The opinion of someone over the size of the damage should have no relevance.

The document also says I was in the room. As if, I was there the entire time. At minimum misleading if not an outright lie.Desired Settlement: I would like my floor repaired or money to get my floor repaired.

Business

Response:

During the initial installation the installer attempted to help the customer to keep the range in his home until a replacement could be ordered so he would not be without one for several days over the Christmas holidays. The customer's interpretation of this and view that this was somehow underhanded or unethical is inaccurate. In regard to [redacted] ([redacted] for Premier Product Mgmt.) implying he was an insurance adjuster or the installer...his name is on the denial letter sent from the company and he would not benefit from presenting himself from either of these positions. He has worked for me for more than ten years and I have never seen him misrepresent himself in this manner or any other.I've attached a photo of the damage to the consumer's floor. It is entirely inconsistent with any damage that would have been done resulting from placing a range down on the floor. It does, however, strongly resemble damage caused by dropping a can of canned food on the floor leaving a semi-circular impression. We see this type of pre-existing damage frequently when going to complete installations in customer homes and it is very common. If the damage were somewhere near where the range was installed and not in the middle of the room AND was consistent with that of pushing a range across or dropping on the floor leaving a scrape mark in the same shape as the feet on the range then we would not have denied this claim. However, neither of these conditions have been met during our site inspection so we must deny this customer's claim.We have submitted this claim back to [redacted] Insurance (independent third-party) and based on the photographs provided they have upheld our denial. This customer may bypass us and work directly with the individual at [redacted] Insurance if they disagree with our assessment of this claim.[redacted]Premier Product Management, Inc.

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because:This company has repeatedly lied and misrepresented its self

throughout this process. This is about one thing - the damage to my floor.I reported the damage to my floor the day of the delivery,

12/12/15, to [redacted]. It took over three weeks to get any sort of claim response.

After repeated attempts, via [redacted]

[redacted], I finally received

a response to set up a claim. When a response finally did come it was shrouded

in the form of an insurance company, Premier Product Management, which I was

supposed to file a claim with. Come to find out PPM is the delivery company and

my response was simply from a PPM manager.During what I was led to believe was an insurance company

inspection. Which come to find out was only PPM operations manager [redacted]’s

inspection. [redacted]’s said they have people that would come and repair the damage.

This reinforced my belief that I was dealing with the insurance company. He

also told me not to get an outside estimate because he would not be able to

cover those costs. Again, this reinforced my belief that I was dealing with an actual

insurance company. In the days following, 1/6/16, I received a phone call

message from [redacted] saying my claim was denied. He did not return any phone calls

after that point. If he was not representing himself as from the insurance company

how was he executing the claim or have the authority to deny the claim? During

that phone call I was told I would receive a denial letter I still have not received

one.At that point I contacted [redacted] at [redacted] again. She got

me in touch with the actual insurance company, [redacted] Insurance Company. An

actual insurance claim was filed at that time. During that insurance process

PPM continued to lie. First, [redacted] filed the Driver Statement Form, He was not

the driver. Second, in the Driver statement it eludes I was in the room with

the delivery drivers the entire time. That is not the truth. driver statement form attached.As to the damage itself, what I know is that there was no

damage prior to the delivery and there was damage after the delivery. As [redacted]

points out there are many ways that the damage may have happened. I agree

something made an impression in my floor. Since I was not in the room the

entire time with the delivery drivers I do not know what the made the

impression. They may have dropped their tools. They may have stepped on

something that pressed into the floor. They may have put the oven down awkwardly.

What is without doubt is the damage occurred where the delivery took place. Exactly

where the delivery men were going in and out of my house. Exactly where they

were standing and working while in my house. Maybe, as [redacted] acknowledges, since

I was not accepting of their desire that I lie about the damaged product being delivered

damaged. That I wouldn’t follow there instruction that I call the next day and

say I found the damage after the drivers left. Possibly, since the drivers

having already arrived a half hour outside the delivery window I was provided and

running behind. And again, was not accepting their desire that I lie on their

behalf about the damage that the product was delivered with. Possibly, the

drivers intentionally damaged my floor.[redacted] views this desire for me to lie about the damaged

product as an attempt to help me. I do not view it as an attempt to help me. I

view it as a tool the company uses to place blame on the customer and deny

responsibility. I view it as a way for the delivery company to trick customers

into accepting a damaged product. I view it as a way for the delivery drivers,

that were already late, to try to expedite there delivery. I view it as a way

for the company to say I caused the damage to the oven similar to the way they

are trying to say I caused the damage to my floor. I do view it as underhanded

and unethical and does speak to the honesty this company can be expected to

bring to the situation we now have before us – the damage to my floor.

These people are the worst, most unprofessional installer/delivery people I have ever encountered. I STRONGLY SUSPECT THEY HIRE ILLEGALS OFF THE STREET. They left my kitchen a mess, broke the mis-installed microwave and walked out. I would never hire this company. When I called the Sacramento office (number above) they refused to give me a local number and referred me back to Home Depot. I would hide them as well. Forever.

Review: Worst customer service, company employees lied about delivery and refused to return to deliver my merchandise.

I placed a online order with Home Depot, I ordered a Samsung washer and dryer for 1400.00. Home Depot contracted Premier Product Management to deliver and install my merchandise. I received a call from them the day before 1/6/14 stating they would deliver between 1 and 5PM on 1/7/14. The company showed up on deliver date 1/7/14 at 12PM the delivery driver([redacted]) called me and informed me he was at my house. I explained I was an hour away at the a doctor appointment, and I explained I was told delivery would be after 1PM. [redacted] stated he would wait for me to arrive. I called at 12:50 and explained I was 20 minutes away due to traffic. [redacted] stated he would only wait till 1:05PM and leave, per their contact they are required to wait 15 minutes past. I arrived home at 1:08PM and they had left. My pest control company was at my house at 1 PM and informed me when they arrived no one was there. I called the driver [redacted] and he stated he couldn't wait and I would have to reschedule. I explained the situation and asked [redacted] to turn around and deliver my order, [redacted] stated "You don't seem like a nice guy and even if you were I wouldn't come back." I called the companies manager [redacted] and explained the situation he refused to have the driver return to deliver my merchandise. I asked to speak with his supervisor and he refused to provide that information then hung up on me. I called back and they now refused to even deliver my merchandise at another time, [redacted] informed me I would have to pick my merchandise up at Home Depot even tho I paid for delivery and haul away of old appliances. [redacted] told his dispatch he waited till 1:15PM for me to arrive which was a lie. I have phone records and a witness to support this.Desired Settlement: I just want my merchandise delivered and a formal apology from the drive [redacted] and Manager [redacted]. I would also like to speak with they owner of the company.

The worst ever! The delivery teams are nice enough guys and just doing what they are told - which, as far as I can tell, is do nothing if at all possible! They've now been to my house 3 times.

Refrigerator with ice maker installation - said they couldn't hook up the supply line because of the plumbing under the sink and call them back when I had a plumber out -I told them to just use the old supply line (this team was nice enough to do that)

Dishwasher delivery and installation part I - again with the plumbing issues under the sink - they couldn't touch it and said to get a plumber out. I did and the plumber had everything ready for when they came back. No apologies from the team they only offered to leave the dishwasher and come pick the old one up when I was ready.

Dishwasher delivery and installation part II - with all the plumbing in place they started to remove the old dishwasher. Low and behold they couldn't install the new one because the old one was "hardwired" and they couldn't touch it. Need to get an electrician or handyman out they said. This time I had them leave the dishwasher and moved on with another plumber having to come out to install the dishwasher. Again, no real apology and the left the old dishwasher partially disassembled and hanging out.

Check fields!

Write a review of Premier Product Management, Inc.

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Premier Product Management, Inc. Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: Warehouses - Merchandise

Address: 8430 Rovana Cir # A, Sacramento, California, United States, 95828-2536

Phone:

Show more...

Add contact information for Premier Product Management, Inc.

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated