Pressler & Pressler

Re: [redacted] SERVICES, INC vs COLLEEN V CROSS Supreme Court of the State of [redacted] County Of [redacted] Index No [redacted] P&P File Number [redacted] Revdex.com Case Number [redacted] Dear Sir/Madam: In the above matter, a judgment was entered by the Court on July 29, whereby the Court determined the balance was due and owing from the consumer to the creditor The judgment remains on the record as a valid judgment This judgment cannot be re-litigated or appealed to the Revdex.com However, in response to the consumer’s inquiry, the mere fact that the judgment was now assigned to a new owner does not cancel the arrangement The arrangement still stands as is Judgment was entered on July 29, in the amount of $16, On August 20, 2009, the consumer entered into an arrangement, copy of the agreement attached hereto To date, the consumer has made payments totaling $8, The accounting is as follows: Settlement Agreement Amount $16, Total Payments $ 8, Present Balance $ 7,The consumer is technically in default of the settlement agreement since she has not made a payment since October She now owes November, December, January, and February payments and is a total of $in arrears If that money is supplied to us, then she will be current with her arrangements, and we will continue to honor the arrangement as entered intoIf I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact usVery truly yours, PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP Gerard JF*

Dear Sir/Madam: We are unable to respond to the consumer's complaint as we would require more specific information regarding the account to which she is referring If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me Very truly yours, Pressler and Pressler, LLP [redacted] ** [redacted] ***

Re: [redacted] *** vs [redacted] Superior Court of New Jersey: Law Division Special Civil Part: HUDSON- Docket NoDC [redacted] P&P File Number [redacted] Revdex.com Case Number [redacted] Dear Sir/Madam: In the above matter, a judgment was entered by the Court on June 22, whereby the Court determined the balance was due and owing from the debtor, [redacted] , to the creditor, [redacted] *** The judgment remains on the record as a valid judgment A judgment is good for twenty (20) years and can then be renewed for another twenty (20) years This judgment cannot be re-litigated or appealed to the Revdex.com This judgment has been outstanding since June 22, If [redacted] has some proof of a settlement, we would be more than happy to review same However, throughout the last ten (10) years, he has never raised this issue with this office and has had many opportunities to do so We find no merit to his allegations and believe that he is just using the Revdex.com to delay the enforcement of the judgment Very truly yours, PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP Gerard JF*

[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response If you wish, you may update it before sending it.] Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me Regards, [redacted]

Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:This company Pressler and Pressler are scam artist and bullies harrassing me and accounts I do not have or ever opened
Regards,
*** ***

Re: Case #:
***
Consumer: *** ***
P&P File Numbers ***
*** *** *** *** ***
Dear Sirs:
In response to a Complaint
filed, please be advised that it is not our policy to re-litigate cases with
the Revdex.com. In each of
the files, Judgment was entered in full compliance with the Court Rule and *** *** is fully aware of that fact.
We have already sent her information regarding the Judgments entered as
follows:
Docket No Judgment Date
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
I reviewed our records and
at no time did we speak to any third-parties regarding this matter nor is there
any record that our office ever threatened that *** *** would be
imprisoned. We find no merit to her
allegations. The Judgments are a matter
of public record and may be reviewed accordingly. It is important to note that the consumer was
served with an Information Subpoena which has not been answered as of this
date. If completed and returned to our
office before March 20, 2017, we will accept same in lieu of court enforcement
proceduresIf you desire any further information please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Pressler and Pressler, LLP
Gerard JFelt, Esq

Re: CREDITOR: *** *** *** *** ***
DEBTOR: *** * ***
Account No
***
Case No***
P&P File Number ***
I am in receipt of the communication and complaint in the above matter. Please be advised that the payment was received and the file has been notated as “settled in full”. Our client has been notified of the settlement in full. The document to which the debtor is referring is a receipt which merely acknowledges the payment
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me
Very truly yours,
PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP
Gerard JF*

Revdex.com:I was sent a billThe attached document is exactly that and not a receipt or simple acknowledgement like you claimIf it were not a bill, there would be no "balance due" with a payment portionIf the debt is cleared, our final correspondence should be a piece of paper stating that exactly, not a bill! Nothing on here says anything about my account or my debt being "paid in full"I attempted calling before issuing the complaint with the Revdex.com but I refuse to sit on hold, waiting on a debt collector to clear something like this upA reputable law firm would seriously consider adjusting this practice of sending bills as receiptsIt only leads to confusion. I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID *** and although not exactly truthful (refer to attached document), I find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.Regards, *** ***

Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because: we have not yet heard back from the Superior Court of NJApparently, everyone is out for holiday through the first of next weekHowever, in the mail I am beginning to receive document copies in this matterI received one copy, dated 12/11/from P&P, advising *** to release the levy, and I have one signed by P&P's attorney, dated 12/17/The document is to the Superior Court of NJ, requesting "to satisfy of record the judgment". I was also notified by ** *** that my account there was debited on 12/14/15, days after I paid my debtI received confirmation from *** ** *** that my account there was debited on 12/9/15.As the documents begin to emerge and we hear back from the court, either P&P or the court will have to take responsibility because I incurred $from two banks in fees after I paid the delinquent amountShould it have taken from December 11th to December 31st, days, for the court clerk to receive notification and release the lien against my bank account? Please keep this complaint open until it is discovered who dropped the ball and how. Regards,
*** ***

Re: *** *** ***
vs *** ***
Superior Court
of New Jersey: Law Division
Special Civil
Part: BURLINGTON- Docket No***
P&P File
Number
***
Revdex.com Case
Number ***
We have reviewed the consumer’s complaint in the
above matter. When the consumer called
us on December 11, 2015, we had been notified by the Clerk of the Court through
their electronic filing system that the Writ was assigned to Court Officer
Jenkins on October 13, 2015. When the
consumer called us regarding the bank levy, we had not received any indication
from the Court Officer that he had levied.
This is not unusual since the consumer usually finds out before we
receive the formal documentation. When
the consumer called us, his papers did not indicate which Court Officer
levied. We immediately sent a memo on
December 11, via fax to hold the execution in abeyance. On that same date, we also faxed him a letter
indicating that he should release any levy as the matter had been paid in
full. It appears that the error was made
by the Court. Their notice indicated
that they sent the Writ to Court Officer Jenkins, but in reality, they sent it
to Court Officer ***. As soon as the
Court’s error was realized, we immediately sent a notice to Court Officer
***
If we can be of any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact usVery truly yours,
PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP
*** ** ***

Re:       [redacted] SERVICES, INC.  vs 
COLLEEN V CROSS
            Supreme
Court of the State of [redacted]
            County
Of...

[redacted]   Index No [redacted]
            P&P
File Number [redacted]
            Revdex.com Case Number [redacted]
Dear Sir/Madam:
In the above matter, a
judgment was entered by the Court on July 29, 2009 whereby the Court determined
the balance was due and owing from the consumer to the creditor.  The judgment remains on the record as a valid
judgment.  This judgment cannot be re-litigated
or appealed to the Revdex.com.
However, in response
to the consumer’s inquiry, the mere fact that the judgment was now assigned to
a new owner does not cancel the arrangement. 
The arrangement still stands as is. 
Judgment was entered on July 29, 2009 in the amount of $16,460.75.  On August 20, 2009, the consumer entered into
an arrangement, copy of the agreement attached hereto.  To date, the consumer has made payments totaling
$8,600.00.  The accounting is as follows:
                                    Settlement
Agreement Amount            $16,551.13
                                    Total
Payments                                      $  8,600.00
                                    Present
Balance                                     $  7,951.13
The consumer is
technically in default of the settlement agreement since she has not made a
payment since October 2016.  She now owes
November, December, January, and February payments and is a total of $400.00 in
arrears.  If that money is supplied to
us, then she will be current with her arrangements, and we will continue to
honor the arrangement as entered into.
If I can be of any
further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP
Gerard J. F[redacted]

Re: [redacted] 
vs  [redacted] [redacted]
      Superior Court
of New Jersey: Law Division
      Special Civil
Part: HUDSON- Docket No. DC[redacted]
      P&P File
Number...

[redacted]
      Revdex.com Case
Number [redacted]
 Dear Sir/Madam:
 In the above matter, a judgment was entered by the
Court on June 22, 2006 whereby the Court determined the balance was due and
owing from the debtor, [redacted], to the creditor, [redacted].  The judgment remains on the record as a valid
judgment.  A judgment is good for twenty
(20) years and can then be renewed for another twenty (20) years.  This judgment cannot be re-litigated or
appealed to the Revdex.com.
This judgment has been outstanding since June 22,
2006.  If [redacted] has some proof of a
settlement, we would be more than happy to review same.  However, throughout the last ten (10) years,
he has never raised this issue with this office and has had many opportunities
to do so.  We find no merit to his
allegations and believe that he is just using the Revdex.com to delay
the enforcement of the judgment.
 Very truly yours,
PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP
 Gerard J. F[redacted]

[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response.  If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards,
[redacted]

Dear Sir/Madam:
We are unable to respond to the consumer's complaint as we would require more specific information regarding the account to which she is referring.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Pressler and Pressler, LLP
[redacted]...

[redacted]

Re:      CREDITOR:   ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS VI, LLC
            DEBTOR:       [redacted]
            Revdex.com Complaint Number...

[redacted]
            P&P File Number [redacted]
 
The consumer’s statement dated January 31, 2015 that he previously sent a request for verification of the debt is false.  His request was first mailed on February 6, 2015 (see attached envelope) which was received February 9, 2015.
 
Pursuant to his request, all communications as to the collection of the debt have stopped.
 
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
 
Gerard J. F[redacted], Esq.
Pressler and Pressler, LLP

Review: Pressler & Pressler, LLP continues collection activity on an account they did not validate per my request (certified letter via US Mail and signed return receipt). Pressler & Pressler, LLP has not provided signed proof that I incurred this debt, an itemization of the debt (e.g. total principal, interest, fees, other charges), copy of the applicable contract giving rise to the debt, and a copy of the underlying account statement and other written validation and explanation of the debt. This is a clear violation of FDCPA. At this point I am entitled to statutory damages, as they continue to report this information and that is highly damaging to me. Proper validation consists of copies of some type of current creditor records, not records which only verify that the collector believes an account is valid. Under federal law, I could sue them and ask for $1,000.00 in damages. I have made every effort including reporting this matter to the Revdex.com and filed a complaint with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and New York State Attorney General's office. I am, however, respectfully requesting they stop collection efforts immediately, or I will have no choice but to exercise my rights in a courtroom before a jury.Desired Settlement: I would like Pressler & Pressler, LLP to cease collection immediately and send a copy of the cease collection letter to my mailing address.

Business

Response:

Re: CREDITOR: ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS VI, LLC

DEBTOR: [redacted]

Revdex.com Complaint Number [redacted]

P&P File Number [redacted]

Review: Pressler and Presseler have been contacting me non-stop with threatening calls. They are threatening to take me to court if I dont pay a debt that they claim to be mine. I have asked them on numerous occasions to provide me with proof that this debt belongs to me. They refuse to provide me with information. I asked them to send me information on said debt so that I may review it and set up a payment arrangement and that I would be willing to pay what I can. They only want me to pay what they ask for. Pressler and Pressler has been harassing my family and threatening them as well. They have threatened to me and my family and put us in jail if we do not pay them. I am asking that someone please contact these people have them leave us alone. They are causing extreme pain and suffering to my family and myself.Desired Settlement: I would like for Pressler and Pressler to provide me with full proof that this debt belongs to me. If this debt is mine I would like to work a payment plan that fits my budget and not what they want me to pay. I would like them to stop with threatening to take me to court or jail. I cannot afford a lawyer. I would like to have Pressler and Pressler treat me like a human being and not like some criminal. I would like them to stop with the harassing phone calls. I have yet to receive any letter in the mail from Pressler and Pressler, only threatening phone calls. If they have taken legal actions towards me, I would like these actions to be dropped because this is not fair. They have never sent me any notarized paperwork or any type of formal letters.

Business

Response:

Re: [redacted] CURRENT ASSIGNEE, [redacted], ORIGINAL CREDITOR] vs [redacted]

Superior Court of New Jersey: Law Division

Special Civil Part: ESSEX- [redacted]

Review: I am getting garnished by [redacted] and [redacted] keeps sending me threatening notices that they will garnish my paycheck for the same bill. This is unethical, and I want them to stop harassing me.Desired Settlement: Please fix issues on your end, and stop harassing me about a bill that is being handled by another company.

Business

Response:

Review: I HAVE TRIED FOR 3 YEARS TELLING THIS COMPANY THAT ACCOUNTS THEY HAVE BEEN SUING ME FOR ARE NOT MINE...I HAVE SENT IDENTITY THEIR REPORTS AND REQUESTED THEY STOP HARASSING ME. THIS COMPANY ARE SICK INDIVIDUALS WHO THREATEN AS PART OF THEIR COLLECTIONS. I DO NOT OWN ANY ACCOUNTS WITH THEMDesired Settlement: THEY NEED TO REPAIR FALSE ACCOUNTS REMOVED FROM MY CREDIT REPORT

Business

Response:

Dear Sir/Madam:

We are unable to respond to the consumer's complaint as we would require more specific information regarding the account to which she is referring.

If I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

Pressler and Pressler, LLP

Consumer

Response:

Review: [redacted]

I am rejecting this response because:This company Pressler and Pressler are scam artist and bullies harrassing me and accounts I do not have or ever opened

Regards,

Review: I paid Pressler & Pressler in full on December 11,2015. [redacted] (paralegal) told me he would submit the paperwork that day to release the lien they had placed against my bank account for $2,858.79. Instead of filing the correct paperwork to the bank and the court, they submitted paperwork for a court officer in 2013. When I asked to correct this paperwork, the paralegal Patrick laughed saying he would do what he can. I had to call the NJ Superior Court and have [redacted] call this company to get them to notice and accept that they made incompetent errors that they didn't seem to care about.Desired Settlement: Release the Lien.

Business

Response:

Re: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC

vs STEPHEN MOTHERWELL

Superior Court

of New Jersey: Law Division

Special Civil

Part: BURLINGTON- Docket No. [redacted]

P&P File

Number [redacted]

Revdex.com Case

Number [redacted]

We have reviewed the consumer’s complaint in the

above matter. When the consumer called

us on December 11, 2015, we had been notified by the Clerk of the Court through

their electronic filing system that the Writ was assigned to Court Officer

Jenkins on October 13, 2015. When the

consumer called us regarding the bank levy, we had not received any indication

from the Court Officer that he had levied.

This is not unusual since the consumer usually finds out before we

receive the formal documentation. When

the consumer called us, his papers did not indicate which Court Officer

levied. We immediately sent a memo on

December 11, 2015 via fax to hold the execution in abeyance. On that same date, we also faxed him a letter

indicating that he should release any levy as the matter had been paid in

full. It appears that the error was made

by the Court. Their notice indicated

that they sent the Writ to Court Officer Jenkins, but in reality, they sent it

to Court Officer [redacted]. As soon as the

Court’s error was realized, we immediately sent a notice to Court Officer

[redacted].

If we can be of any further assistance, please do not

hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours,

PRESSLER & PRESSLER,LLP

Consumer

Response:

Review: [redacted]

I am rejecting this response because: we have not yet heard back from the Superior Court of NJ. Apparently, everyone is out for holiday through the first of next week. However, in the mail I am beginning to receive document copies in this matter. I received one copy, dated 12/11/15 from P&P, advising Jenkins to release the levy, and I have one signed by P&P's attorney, dated 12/17/15. The document is to the Superior Court of NJ, requesting "to satisfy of record the judgment". I was also notified by TD bank that my account there was debited on 12/14/15, 3 days after I paid my debt. I received confirmation from Bank of America that my account there was debited on 12/9/15.As the documents begin to emerge and we hear back from the court, either P&P or the court will have to take responsibility because I incurred $350 from two banks in fees after I paid the delinquent amount. Should it have taken from December 11th to December 31st, 20 days, for the court clerk to receive notification and release the lien against my bank account? Please keep this complaint open until it is discovered who dropped the ball and how. Regards,