Mr [redacted] called our leasing agent about viewing the home on Sunday November He stated he needed to find a home to move into by Tuesday Our leasing agent informed him, on such short notice he should go on our website and apply online to get a quick approval We ran his credit report and an eviction did show up on his credit report Not only that on his application he answered yes to being evicted or ever left owing money from a rental property The owner of this particular property will not rent to someone with an eviction or judgment on their credit report We therefore cancelled the appointment with him and informed him that he would have to prove the credit report was incorrect before we could show the property In addition Mr [redacted] stated that he never lived at the property that his eviction states, he stated that he was just a co-signer for this property, yet it shows thru or credit report verification that this is his place of residence Mr [redacted] also falsified additional information on his application which is immediate grounds for denial In regards to his final comment of a possible prejudice issue, I find this one difficult to understand as not one single employee of PMI Midwest has met nor seen a picture of Mr [redacted] We are willing to provide proof to our decision as well [redacted] President-PMI Midwest
Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Attached you will find the itemized statement sent to me by the business.The business is correct that my deposit was $450, however, I was charged more than $The total deductions from my deposit equaled $I was charged $(blinds), $(burner pans), $(light bulb), $(toilet roll holder), $(cleaning).Regards, [redacted]
We showed [redacted] over properties **, also had engaged the services of a realtor in helping him find a home Once this occurs we no longer work with the applicant but deal with the applicant's realtor We informed him of that and yet he continued to demand we show him properties We shared this information to his realtor and his realtor apologized.we have already refunded his application fee
Mr [redacted] called our leasing agent about viewing the home on Sunday November He stated he needed to find a home to move into by Tuesday Our leasing agent informed him, on such short notice he should go on our website and apply online to get a quick approval We ran his credit report and an eviction did show up on his credit report Not only that on his application he answered yes to being evicted or ever left owing money from a rental property The owner of this particular property will not rent to someone with an eviction or judgment on their credit report We therefore cancelled the appointment with him and informed him that he would have to prove the credit report was incorrect before we could show the property In addition Mr [redacted] stated that he never lived at the property that his eviction states, he stated that he was just a co-signer for this property, yet it shows thru or credit report verification that this is his place of residence Mr [redacted] also falsified additional information on his application which is immediate grounds for denial In regards to his final comment of a possible prejudice issue, I find this one difficult to understand as not one single employee of PMI Midwest has met nor seen a picture of Mr [redacted] We are willing to provide proof to our decision as well [redacted] President-PMI Midwest
Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Attached you will find the itemized statement sent to me by the business.The business is correct that my deposit was $450, however, I was charged more than $The total deductions from my deposit equaled $I was charged $(blinds), $(burner pans), $(light bulb), $(toilet roll holder), $(cleaning).Regards, [redacted]
We showed [redacted] over properties **, also had engaged the services of a realtor in helping him find a home Once this occurs we no longer work with the applicant but deal with the applicant's realtor We informed him of that and yet he continued to demand we show him properties We shared this information to his realtor and his realtor apologized.we have already refunded his application fee