R M Y N Construction

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2016/03/31) */
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE OPPRTUNITY TO EXPOSE AND CLARIFIED THE tRUTH ON THIS CASE. THE OWNERARNASSER,LINFORTTJNALY IS TOTALLY DELUSIONAL. BY SENT TO YOU HIS CLAIM AND BEEN SO FALSE IN HIS DEMANDS.
4
ANYHOW,PEOPLE CAN SAID WHATEVER THEY...

WANT,THE PROBLEM THEY WILL HAVE IS TO PROOF THE CLAIMS;OR PAY FOR THE MISTAKE THEY MAKE IN THIS PROCESS.
THE CONTRACT SIGNED WITH THE OWNER WAS MADE AND DATED NOV.01/2015 AND OF COURSE,BASE ON THE DATE WE ESTIMATED 90 DAYS APPROX. TO END THE JOB.
DUE TO A LOT A PROBLEMS BETWEEN [redacted] AND THE DRAFTING PERSON,TIIE ONE THAT MADE THE PLANS,DELAYS TEE PERMITS PROCESS AT CITY OF FRESNO. SO,WITHOUT A FORMAL PLANS APPROVED BY THE CITY,WE DESIDED TO SIGNED ON DEC. 05/2015:NOT BEFORE.
AT HAT DATE WE RECEIVED A CHECK POST DATED AS A PARTIAL DEPOSIT,FOR THE AMOUNT OF $ 4,900.00 WHICH HOLE PER OWNER REQUEST. A SECOND ONE WAS DATED DEC. 10/2015 WHICH WE ALSO HOLE FOR A WHILE.
AS SOON WE CASH THE CHECK AND WE PULL PERMITS AT FRESNO CITY,WE WAS READY TO START THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. THE DATE WAS AROUND THE DEC.18/2015 AND WE CALL THE FIRST INSPECTION BY DEC, 22 /2015.
AFTER THIS DATE,WE CLOSED ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DUE TO X-MAS FESTWITIES AND THE PERSONNEL TRAVELLING OUTSIDE FRESNO. ALL OF THISWAS DISCUSSED WITH TILE OWNERS;WHICH TAY UNDERSTOOD THE SITUATION.
SO,WE RETURN TO WORK THE FIRST WEEK OF JANUARY,AND KEEP WORKING ALL THE WEEKS,TI-IE FUNDS PROVIDED PERVIOUSLY WAS ALREADY USED,AND WE REQUEST MORE FUNDS TO N..ASSER,WHICH BE START DELAYING THE PROCESS OF PAYING US AS WE ASK.
5
THIS WAS THE FIRST VIOLATION OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT WITH RMYN CONS?. WHICH i-rE NEVER EVER .EVER FOLLOWS,ON THE CONTRARY HE PROVIDE THE COMPANY WITH TWO NONFUNDS CHECKS WHICH WERE RETURN TO US.
HE TOTALLY APOLOGIZE FOR BOTH INCEDENTS ,BUT IT DO HAPPENS,AND WE DO HAVE THE PROOF,SOMETHING I DEN1ED;BLTT OUR LAYERS KEEP THEN IN FILE FOR FUTURE REFERENCES.
GOING BACK TO THE AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION DAYS,WE ARE NOT ABOVE THE TIME REQUIRED,AS OF TODAY WE ARE IN A 101 DAYS; WHICH NOW I WILL EXPLAINED TO YOU.
THE REAL ISSUE HERE IS THAT OWNERS DOES NOT HAS ANY FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO BUILD THE PLACE,FURTFIERMORE THEY ARE TRYING TO JUSTIFY AND PINPOINT AREAS IN WHICH THEY WILL LIKE TO OBTAINED FUNDS TO OPERATED THE BUSINESS,THE CLAIM THE PUT OR REQUEST TO YOU IS TOTALLY FALSE AND A FRAUD THEY WANT TO GET AWAY WITH.
WE MEET THE PERSON WHO IS PROVIDING THE FUNDS TO Hits/LAND COULD BELI-VED THAT [redacted] IS BEHAVING SO POOR AND LOW CLASS WITH US. BY THE WAY HE MIGHT REQUEST ALL FUNDS PROVIDED TO HTMivi AND CLOSED THE RELATIONSHIP WITH [redacted].
WE AS A FORMAL AND PROFESSIONAL COMPANY,NEVER EVER NOT WORK AT THE SITE AT ANY GIVING TIME; IS IS ANOTHER FALSE I FRAUD FROM [redacted],
THE COST OF THE HOOD 1E SAYING WE DAMAGED,DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING AT ALL,AND BY TILE WAY I ORDERED AND COST 8,000.00 ;THE HOOD IS TOTALLY DONE AN OPERATIONAL AND IN PERFECT WORKING CONDITION.
TALKING ABOUT THE FIOOD,I PLACED THE ORDER TO CAPTIVE AIRE IN CA. AND [redacted] TOOK TWO WEEKS TO PAID FOR IT PLUS ANOTHER THREE WEEKS TO MA NUFACTURING AND SHIPPING TO THE SITE;BIG CONSTRUCTION DELAY,CAUSE BY [redacted].
HE / [redacted] TALK ABOUT 18 n EMS WE NEED TO CORRECT;LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS MATTER. [redacted] WITHOUT SAYING ANYTHING TO US AND IN ORDER TO MAKE HIS CASE AND REQUEST MONEY AS COMPENSATION; CALL CITY OF FRESNO TO HAVE A PRE-FINAL INSPECTION; THE 90% OF ALL THE ITEMS POINT OUT BY THE INSPECTOR BELONGS TO THE LANDLORD AND OWNERS ONLY, WHICH THEY NEED TO TAKE CARE.
WE TOOK CARE OF ALL IN THE LIST FOR [redacted] BUT IT WAS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY AT ALL; BUT WE DONE AND BE READY FOR FINAL ON FRIDAY.
1. OWNER SELECT PAINT COLORS, WE PAINT AND THEN HE DECIDED TO CHANGE AND REPAINT ALL THE SITE (TIME, LABOR, MONEY)
2. RESTROOMS / SAME SITUATION AS ABOVE
3. RESTROOMS / HE DECIDED TO ELIMINATED ALL EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING WITH NEW ONES.
4. WE INSTALLED FIVE (5) TV ON THE WALLS / NOT PART OF CONTRACT AND PROVIDED POWER / COMCAST.
5. MADE A NEW CUSTOMER COUNTER AREA,AFTER FINISHED,HE DECIDED TO MODIFIED TO ONE WITH GRANITE FRONT AND TOP IN REPLACE FOR THE TILES WE INSTALLED FIRST.
6. INSTALL A SOUND SYSTEM AT THE T-BAR AREA, NOT IN CONTRACT
7. INSTALLED SOME CHANDALIARS IN REPLACE OF LIGHT FIXTURES
8. PAINT AND SEAL THE FLOOR WHICH WE NEVER PROMISED OR IS IN CONTRACT BETWEEN BOTH PATIES;WE ARE DONE WITH THIS ALSO.
(READ CONTRACT PAGE 4 / ITEM #3
9. UPGRADE THE GAS LINE TO A BIGGER ONE FOR THE HOOD
10. INSTALL GRANITE AT COUNTER TOP / FRONT
12. TO DESTROYED THE PONY WALL BUILD BY PLAN SPECIFICATIONS,BUT HE DECIDED TO MOVE IT AND RE-BUILD A NEW ONE.
SO, YOU CAN SEE THE AMOUNT OF PROBLEMS CREATED DIRECTLY TO AND WITH THE OWNERS, WHICH NOT ONLY DELAY THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT ALSO WE NEED TO COLLECT IN TOP OF HE SIGNED CONTRACT.
NOW YOU SEE WHY HE IS TRYING TO COME OUT WITH EXCUSSES,AND FALSE CLAIMS SO HE CAN GET MONEY TO PAID OFF THE TOTAL AMOUNT HE OWN, WHICH WE ARE AROUND $8,900.00 GIVING OR TAKING.
IF MR.[redacted] DECIDED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ANY TYPE OF CLAIM WE WILL TAKE THE CHECKS TO COURT, AND OPEN A CIVIL CLAIM;FOLLOW BY A LEGAL / LAWYER SUE, AND CREATES A PROPERTY LIEN TO HIS SITE AND THE LANDLORD PROPERTY.
I BELIEVED WE HAS BEEN TOO PATIENT WITH MR. [redacted] AND SON;BUT IT WILL ENDS TODAY;WE ARE PRAYING TO GAVE THE SITE,THAT BY THE WAY,WE SHOULD NEVER BEEN INVOLVED TO MAKE $4,000.00 PROFIT. WE DID IT TO HELP HIM AS A FRIEND,SOMETIMES,PEOPLE DO NOT APPRECIATED AT ALL.
ENCLOSED YOU WILL FIND COPY OF THE CONTRACT ALRADY DISCUSSED,COPY OF THE DETAILED EXPENSES AND OF COURSE THIS MEMO.
IF AFTER THIS DETAILED AND SELF EXPLANNATORY LETTER WITH ALL FACTS, YOU THINK YOU NEED ANY FURTHER INFORMATION, DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT US. WE HAVE ALL BACK -UP DOCUMENTS NEEDED TO PROOF THE TRUTH AND AVOIDING LISTINING TO FALSE AND FRAUD CLAIMS.
THANK YOU ONCE MORE,
[redacted]
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2016/04/09) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
[redacted], much of your response is false and inaccurate. The contract was signed by me on the same day the plans were approved (12/5/15), that's when we agreed that all work shall be done in 40 days (by January). You can't argue this because you wrote the contract in your hand writing. All payment arrangements were approved by you at the time of payments. As we sit today I have paid you over $40,000 (out of 49,000) and you are having trouble finishing the project. (over 120 days from the start of work). You started work the same day I signed the contract (12/5/2015). You did not start the work on 12/18/2015 as you claim. Christmas is on December 25 not December 5, you can't sign a contract on the 5th and give yourself a month vacation and start in January. January is when you stated that you would complete the entire project per signed contract.
Your argument that I have no financial resources is a complete lie, due to the fact that you have already received over $40,000 out of the agreed $49,000. You are neither a formal nor a professional company, if you were a professional company you would honor your contract and complete the work by the agreed date. Furthermore, every time you call for an inspection you have to do 25 corrections. You say the hood is in perfect condition but as I type this my hood and restaurant are flooded because you and your crew are incompetent of doing anything right. How can you complain about funds when you have created a major hazard while the hood is leaking and all electrical is live (Please see picture), putting my employees and I in huge danger.
Regarding the repainting: you had to repaint because you had 3 different tones of color on one wall, completely unprofessional painting. The plans clearly show what and how to install the restroom equipment (toilet, soap dispenser, paper towel dispenser), but you still didn't install the equipment in the right manner and had to replace it to get it fixed. It took you 3 weeks to just do this and get this corrected which was totally your fault. We have only four TV's installed (not 5 as you claim) and we installed all four ourselves because your employee told us he doesn't know how to install any brackets.
Also, we changed to granite before you even started working on the counter.

Sound system was existing and it's in the kitchen not in the T-Bar area. This proves that your claim is false because you don't even know where the sound system is even located. You damaged the roof when you installed these light fixtures. Just because you say you did it doesn't mean you did it right. You are not done with this, you refused to wax the floor (as you promised) and refused to place epoxy coating. The seal you placed is a cheap sealant you bought from home depot, it doesn't belong on the floors of a restaurant. We received a quote from another contractor for $2,900 because you damaged it so much.
The gas line is in the plans, you installed it incorrectly and it has failed inspection twice so far. You placed an emergency light over 3 doors per plan.
So you can see that every argument made by the contractor is false. He is unable to build anything right, this claim is backed up with all the corrections the City is making him do. The contractor has yet to complete the project and we are already in April. The final inspection has yet to be scheduled because they haven't been able to complete the project and do the job right. If you have a project, do yourself a favor and DON'T hire this contractor. You can see in the contract he attached that the work is supposed to be complete in January. Also I have attached pictures of the damage he made, even though he says the hood is installed and is operational, it's currently flooded due to the rain. Also attached are city inspection corrections that they still need to make.
Mr. [redacted] you should be ashamed that you would call yourself a professional or even a decent contractor.
Best regards,
[redacted]