Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2017/03/10) */
This complaint is word-for-word her complaint to the Indiana Disciplinary Commission, which found it so without merit that no response was requested
I worked hard for Complainant in a difficult case, and achieved the initial goals she set I
communicated with her appropriately, but she seemed to think she was my only client
Because it was a difficult case she incurred more fees than she initially expected, but which she agreed to pay in her contract She is merely trying to stiff me for fees I earned and that she owes
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2017/03/13) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I do not accept this response because Attorney Drendall still refuses to accept responsibility for his poor service and lack of communicationMy complaint is valid and I have documented proofI did not act as if I was his only clientI was in fact very impatient until I Attorney Drendall's negligence effected the case in a negative fashionI do not ever avoid paying for services if they are properly executedI have a right as a consumer to express my dissatisfaction and to warn other consumers so they will not have to suffer through the same type of experience with Drendall Law OfficeThe fact remains that Attorney Drendall was not forthcoming that he was able to appropriate handle my case in an organized and professional mannerI am not the only client that has expressed frustration with his poor service and lack of communicationSeveral online reviews and prior disciplinary complaints validate my claimIn November *** Drendall was found to have violated attorney conduct rulesIn that case, Drendall had failed to notify a biological father that a child's grandparents were seeking custody of the child and was publicly reprimandedIn addition, *** *** filed a malpractice suit again *** for failing to file necessary paperwork for her lawsuit against St Joseph CountyHe failed file the paperwork within days and lost her chance to sue
***
These are two examples of Drendall's carelessness and lack of attention to detailThis is an obvious pattern of negligence and inability to adhere to the Indiana Rules of Court Rules of Professional Conduct
Final Business Response /* (4000, 10, 2017/03/17) */
Apparently this person will go to any lengths to smear a professional who has been providing high-quality service for years just to get out of paying her bill Her response has little to do with her case, in which I accomplished what she asked me to do It is easy to make complaintthe lawsuit she mentions was ordered dismissed as without merit, as is her complaint
I had not been in the habit of asking my satisfied clients to write favorable reviewsIn years there of course have been dissatisfied clients, but they are a minority I would not have been able to stay in practice for so long in the same city without referrals from those pleased with my work
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2017/03/10) */
This complaint is word-for-word her complaint to the Indiana Disciplinary Commission, which found it so without merit that no response was requested
I worked hard for Complainant in a difficult case, and achieved the initial goals she set I
communicated with her appropriately, but she seemed to think she was my only client
Because it was a difficult case she incurred more fees than she initially expected, but which she agreed to pay in her contract She is merely trying to stiff me for fees I earned and that she owes
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2017/03/13) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I do not accept this response because Attorney Drendall still refuses to accept responsibility for his poor service and lack of communicationMy complaint is valid and I have documented proofI did not act as if I was his only clientI was in fact very impatient until I Attorney Drendall's negligence effected the case in a negative fashionI do not ever avoid paying for services if they are properly executedI have a right as a consumer to express my dissatisfaction and to warn other consumers so they will not have to suffer through the same type of experience with Drendall Law OfficeThe fact remains that Attorney Drendall was not forthcoming that he was able to appropriate handle my case in an organized and professional mannerI am not the only client that has expressed frustration with his poor service and lack of communicationSeveral online reviews and prior disciplinary complaints validate my claimIn November *** Drendall was found to have violated attorney conduct rulesIn that case, Drendall had failed to notify a biological father that a child's grandparents were seeking custody of the child and was publicly reprimandedIn addition, *** *** filed a malpractice suit again *** for failing to file necessary paperwork for her lawsuit against St Joseph CountyHe failed file the paperwork within days and lost her chance to sue
***
These are two examples of Drendall's carelessness and lack of attention to detailThis is an obvious pattern of negligence and inability to adhere to the Indiana Rules of Court Rules of Professional Conduct
Final Business Response /* (4000, 10, 2017/03/17) */
Apparently this person will go to any lengths to smear a professional who has been providing high-quality service for years just to get out of paying her bill Her response has little to do with her case, in which I accomplished what she asked me to do It is easy to make complaintthe lawsuit she mentions was ordered dismissed as without merit, as is her complaint
I had not been in the habit of asking my satisfied clients to write favorable reviewsIn years there of course have been dissatisfied clients, but they are a minority I would not have been able to stay in practice for so long in the same city without referrals from those pleased with my work