Reliable Clinical Experts Ltd

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: [redacted] intentionally misrepresents the engagement between me and [redacted] The engagement required that an expert witness selected by [redacted] would review all raw test data protocols, all computer scoring printouts (including re-scored instruments), and interview notes from my psychological evaluations conducted during This entire package of information was delivered to [redacted] in June 2014, who intern was supposed to pass it on to the expert witness for review The purpose of this review was to determine the validity of a psychological diagnosis based on the data present and write a report on the findings At no time was there to be any additional assessment or interview conducted on me by the appointed expert witness The expert witness proposed by [redacted] of [redacted] was [redacted] , contact numbers T: ###-###-####, and M: ###-###-#### I contacted [redacted] on the following dates and times, as can be verified by my detailed phone records: [redacted] June 2014, 9:45am, ###-###-#### [redacted] June 2014, 9:48am, ###-###-#### [redacted] July 2014, 9:31am, ###-###-#### [redacted] July 2014, 2:50pm, ###-###-####I finally reached [redacted] on [redacted] July During my conversation with [redacted] , he told me that he had not received any package of information, and he explicitly told me that he did not want to have any further direct contact with me, in order to prevent our contact from influencing his review.I called [redacted] on [redacted] July 2014, 3:29pm, at ###-###-####, and left a message requesting that he forward the information package to [redacted] I received no reply whatsoever.I called [redacted] again on [redacted] October 2014, 8:39am, at ###-###-####, and again left a message requesting a status update on the report, since nothing had been produced Again, I received no reply whatsoever.I see how [redacted] works: take an advanced fee, then create a situation where he can attempt to pass blame onto the client for non-performance and keep the fee In this case, it is [redacted] and his expert witness who did not perform No review was made, no report was produced, and I was set up by [redacted] to fit his argument of non-performance I hereby deny and refute [redacted] ***'s response In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted]

Dear [redacted] , This is our response to the above inquiry [redacted] was requesting a fulll refund because he claims his file was not reviewed in a timely fashion [redacted] was supposed to contact our expert for an appointment to facilitate the review He never did so Therefore, the review was never completedThis was [redacted] 's fault We did our part He is not entitled to a refundAlso, please email information to us on how to be rated by the Revdex.comThank you, [redacted] ***, MD ###-###-####

Dear *** ***, I have reviewed the updated complaint in this matter The complainant never met any of his responsibilities in this matter If there had been a problem in the expert receiving his records, he should have registered this with his attorney His attorney was our actual client and never communicated any such problem to us Thank you, ** ***, MD

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[redacted] intentionally misrepresents the engagement between me and [redacted].  The engagement required that an expert witness selected by [redacted] would review all raw test data protocols, all computer scoring printouts (including re-scored instruments), and interview notes from my psychological evaluations conducted during 2012.  This entire package of information was delivered to [redacted] in June 2014, who intern was supposed to pass it on to the expert witness for review.  The purpose of this review was to determine the validity of a psychological diagnosis based on the data present and write a report on the findings.  At no time was there to be any additional assessment or interview conducted on me by the appointed expert witness.  The expert witness proposed by [redacted] of [redacted] was [redacted], contact numbers T: ###-###-####, and M: ###-###-####.  I contacted [redacted] on the following dates and times, as can be verified by my detailed phone records:** June 2014, 9:45am, ###-###-####** June 2014, 9:48am, ###-###-####* July 2014, 9:31am, ###-###-####* July 2014, 2:50pm, ###-###-####I finally reached [redacted] on * July 2014.  During my conversation with [redacted], he told me that he had not received any package of information, and he explicitly told me that he did not want to have any further direct contact with me, in order to prevent our contact from influencing his review.I called [redacted] on * July 2014, 3:29pm, at ###-###-####, and left a message requesting that he forward the information package to [redacted].  I received no reply whatsoever.I called [redacted] again on * October 2014, 8:39am, at ###-###-####, and again left a message requesting a status update on the report, since nothing had been produced.  Again, I received no reply whatsoever.I see how [redacted] works:  take an advanced fee, then create a situation where he can attempt to pass blame onto the client for non-performance and keep the fee.  In this case, it is [redacted] and his expert witness who did not perform.  No review was made, no report was produced, and I was set up by [redacted] to fit his argument of non-performance.  I hereby deny and refute [redacted]'s response.
 
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

Dear [redacted], This is our response to the above inquiry. [redacted] was requesting a fulll refund because he claims his file was not reviewed in a timely fashion. [redacted] was supposed to contact...

our expert for an appointment to facilitate the review.  He never did so.  Therefore, the review was never completed. This was [redacted]'s fault.   We did our part.  He is not entitled to a refund. Also, please email information to us on how to be rated by the Revdex.com. Thank you, [redacted], MD ###-###-####

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:
[redacted] was advised of the situation with the proposed expert and took no action.  [redacted] failed to perform the service for which he and his organization were hired.  [redacted] is responsible to return the entire engagement fee of $1800.
 
 
 
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

Review: I was asked by Reliable Clinical Experts to provide consultive work. We agreed on my fee. I reviewed the materials he sent me and spoke on the phone several times to discuss the case. I spent an hour working for him on 1/**/15 and another hour on 2/*/15. I submitted my charges on 2/*/15 by email. He acknowledged receiving it and told me he would pay it. A few weeks later I asked him for the payment as he had called about another case and he told me he would pay at the end of the month. He asked me to further review the initial case. I resubmitted my charges on 3/**/15. I was told the payment was forth coming. I spent three more hours on 3/**/15 and 3/**/15 reviewing the case further and providing further consultation. No payment ever arrived. I resubmitted my charges on 4/*/15 and 4/**/15. I called and texted several times but no further communication.Desired Settlement: I would like to be paid for my services which is a total of $1,250.

Business

Response:

[redacted] complained to you that he was not paid for his work. This is true. He was not paid because he misrepresented himself to us. He wanted to work as an expert witness. An expert witness needs to be able to testify in court as to his opinions or his opinions are useless to us. During the course of his work with us, he sent us an email that his wife did not want him to testify in cases. He said he was therefore not goilng to testify. Because of this he was not paid. Thank you, M. S[redacted] Reliable Clinical Experts, Ltd.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[Your Answer Here]

The reason I'm not being paid after spending several hours reviewing the patient's charts is because I didn't agree with Dr. Milton S[redacted] and therefore I did not agree to be a witness in court. My wife's opinion had nothing to do with it. Who would have spent several hours reviewing records to get paid only in the event that the opinion would suit the person needing the consultation. I don't believe any consultant would agree to those terms. I have contacted The [redacted] who hired Dr Milton S[redacted] and they informed me that they no longer do business with Dr S[redacted] and indicated it was because of issues like this. He is dishonest in his dealing with those he consults. They told me they pay Dr S[redacted] to get doctors to review the records and give an opinion about the merits of the case and be witness in court if the case has merits. [redacted] indicated to me that it is their policy to pay consultants for work done regardless of which way the opinion goes. To say that the consultant only gets paid if he agrees to be a witness would set up an unethical bias, but Dr Milton S[redacted] appears to operate just fine under these circumstances. All I know is that I agreed to review medical records for a fee. I did the work and gave my honest opinion. I was told repeatedly I would get paid, but no payment ever arrived. [redacted]

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,

Business

Response:

My response remains the same. The doctor refused to meet his responsibility as an expert witness.I will send you his email in which he stated that because of his wife he would not testify as an expert.However, I believe I need his consent to do so. The doctor also advertises with SEAK and other such organizations. With his consent, I will share this email with these organizations and get there opinion as well. Thank you,Dr. S[redacted]

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[Your Answer Here]

I agree to be a witness if Dr Milton S[redacted] will pay the money he owes me for my work done. Also, per usual routine, he will agree to pay me for my expenses and travel to NY and for the trial work. However, he needs to know that my opinion stands and it is that there is no reason to sue the doctor he wants to sue. In other words, I would be testifying for, not against, the doctor he wants to sue. This isn't about being an expert. It's about me being paid for work I did in reviewing the material he sent me. And also me not agreeing with what he wanted me to say in court. As far as my wife, yes it is true she didn't want me to go to NY to testify but I would have if in my honest opinion there was a case. But there was not. This is all very transparent. I didn't agree with Dr Milton S[redacted] and he is refusing to pay me for my services because of it.I would have been a witness, but I wouldn't say what he wanted me to say. He didn't want me as a witness, as I would have supported the doctor he so badly wants to sue.

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,

Review: Paid [redacted] run by [redacted] $1800 for an expert witness report for my malpractice case. No expert witness report was ever produced and no other services were rendered. Made several attempts to contact [redacted] requesting a refund. [redacted] does not return repeated phone messages, nor does he reply to repeated correspondence submitted through [redacted] contact form.Desired Settlement: Would like a refund of the entire $1800 fee.

Business

Response:

Dear [redacted], This is our response to the above inquiry. [redacted] was requesting a fulll refund because he claims his file was not reviewed in a timely fashion. [redacted] was supposed to contact our expert for an appointment to facilitate the review. He never did so. Therefore, the review was never completed. This was [redacted]'s fault. We did our part. He is not entitled to a refund. Also, please email information to us on how to be rated by the Revdex.com. Thank you, [redacted], MD ###-###-####

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[redacted] intentionally misrepresents the engagement between me and [redacted]. The engagement required that an expert witness selected by [redacted] would review all raw test data protocols, all computer scoring printouts (including re-scored instruments), and interview notes from my psychological evaluations conducted during 2012. This entire package of information was delivered to [redacted] in June 2014, who intern was supposed to pass it on to the expert witness for review. The purpose of this review was to determine the validity of a psychological diagnosis based on the data present and write a report on the findings. At no time was there to be any additional assessment or interview conducted on me by the appointed expert witness. The expert witness proposed by [redacted] of [redacted] was [redacted], contact numbers T: ###-###-####, and M: ###-###-####. I contacted [redacted] on the following dates and times, as can be verified by my detailed phone records:** June 2014, 9:45am, ###-###-####** June 2014, 9:48am, ###-###-####* July 2014, 9:31am, ###-###-####* July 2014, 2:50pm, ###-###-####I finally reached [redacted] on * July 2014. During my conversation with [redacted], he told me that he had not received any package of information, and he explicitly told me that he did not want to have any further direct contact with me, in order to prevent our contact from influencing his review.I called [redacted] on * July 2014, 3:29pm, at ###-###-####, and left a message requesting that he forward the information package to [redacted]. I received no reply whatsoever.I called [redacted] again on * October 2014, 8:39am, at ###-###-####, and again left a message requesting a status update on the report, since nothing had been produced. Again, I received no reply whatsoever.I see how [redacted] works: take an advanced fee, then create a situation where he can attempt to pass blame onto the client for non-performance and keep the fee. In this case, it is [redacted] and his expert witness who did not perform. No review was made, no report was produced, and I was set up by [redacted] to fit his argument of non-performance. I hereby deny and refute [redacted]'s response.

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,

Business

Response:

Dear [redacted], I have reviewed the updated complaint in this matter. The complainant never met any of his responsibilities in this matter. If there had been a problem in the expert receiving his records, he should have registered this with his attorney. His attorney was our actual client and never communicated any such problem to us. Thank you, [redacted], MD

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:

[redacted] was advised of the situation with the proposed expert and took no action. [redacted] failed to perform the service for which he and his organization were hired. [redacted] is responsible to return the entire engagement fee of $1800.

In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.

Sincerely,