Rhoades Pool Plastering

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and have determined that the response would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below
The major point of my complaint, which has just been authenticated, which all parties involved have tried to cover over with extraneous falsification is that written consent was required on Sublease or it was null and void; I needed a valid contract to get my business loan and consent was unreasonably withheld and resulted in major monetary loss.Suzanne has made a lot of accusations that I have proof are lies which I will submit to your office I will mark exhibits and document what comment is disputed She was cautioned by my attorney previously for slanderous untrue comments I can now charge her for slander and have every intent to follow through with that charge When I interviewed with Suzanne O'*** for preapproval and written consent to sublease prior to signing any documents December 12, and / or working on build out and cleanup of space which began in January , (during polar vortex worst winter ever) I told her I had to get a business loan I had very little cash I explained my husband was 80% disabled and I could get a Patriot Loan: Suzanne O'*** has treated me like I am mentally rded ever since My husband has a military disability from flying Blackhawk helicopters for years and tours to Iraq I have amended my small court claim to focus on the invalid contract but that hearing is not until June 6th I have been in contact with the *** County Prosecutors office and they had me contact Revdex.com and re-open my Attorney General Complaint against Cedarview Management which is in process because of proof of discovery of new evidence Kind Regards,
***

North College Avenue, Suite 1A Bloomington, IN Phone: 812-339-Fax: 812-334-www.TenthAndCollege.com February 10, Revdex.com NDelaware Street #Indianapolis, IN 46204-Via Fax: RE: Case ID *** To Whom It May
Concern: Ms*** misrepresents or misstates facts, contractual relationships and actions of various parties in her complaintTo clarify the facts and the relationships - Cedarview Management was the Landlord for *** ***the original Tenant and LesseeMs*** informed Cedarview Management she had signed a contract or Purchase Agreement with *** ***., or its principals, to buy certainproperty related to the salon space that is managed by Cedarview Management Ms*** also executed a Sublease Agreement with *** ***to sublease the salon space formerly occupied by *** ***Cedarview Management's role in the process was as Landlord and to oversee and enforce the terms of the original Lease and Sublease Cedarview Management consented to the Sublease and Ms*** took possession of the space in December and attempted to start her businessMs*** had exclusive use of the space between her possession date and approximately March 14, whenthe space was found abandoned Cedarview Management did not force Ms*** to pay the rent due_ As a Sublessee, Ms*** was subject to the terms of the Lease, which required that rent be paid by ACH transferMs*** agreed to pay by auto deductions, provided her bank account infonnation, and completed the necessary bank authorization fonns to establish the ACH transfer for monthly rentMs*** made two payments via auto deduct February and March In March, Ms*** abandoned the leased space Jn violation of her Sublease agreementShe did not notify Cedarview Management nor the original Tenant of this actionMs*** was obligated to pay rent, as per the Sublease, through August Cedarview Management was not party to the contested Purchase Agreement, but only had a duty to enforce the terms of the Sublease unless it was found to be unenforceable in a court of law -which did not occur Cedarview personnel met with Ms*** to assist her in several respects with taking possession and undertaking a business operation in the premisesFor example, Ms*** scheduled a grand opening for her new business in the leased premisesCedarview cooperated and assisted and attempted to promote her grand openi11gMs*** failed to properly start up her businessOn the day of the grand opening, which Cedarview had helped promote, Ms*** did not have all electric service connected and a portion of the premises were darkIt was an inauspicious beginning to her business that she was not prepared for a grand opening that in fact did not take place as advertised Apparently, Ms*** had a falling out vvith the Seller of the businessShe began making allegations with regard to problems with the transaction, including fraud or misrepresentation by the SellerCedarview had nothing to do with that, and advised Ms*** she should go back to the SellerMs*** then began vocalizing her complaints with regard to the business transaction where she acquired the business from *** ***and she began making disparaging comments with regard to the leased premises and Cedarview Management CorporationAt Ms***'s request, Cedarview Management met with Ms*** and discussed her future as a tenantShe expressed a desire to enter in.to a long term lease agreement at that meetingHowever, during that meeting Ms*** began making disparaging and untruthful comments with regard to CedarviewMs*** was advised that if she were going to make comments of that nature and if she were that unhappy with the premises, that Cedarview was not interested in having her as a tenant under a long term lease The meeting ended without much further comment by Ms***Soon thereafter she abandoned the premisesShe stopped the ACH transfer authorization so she paid no further rent and walked away from the leaseAlthough it is correct that the formal acknowledgement of the sublease was never executed by Cedarview, that Cedarview had accepted the sublease with Ms, *** as the sublessee cannot be disputedShe was granted possession, keys and voluntarily set up the rent payments through the ACH transfer system Long after the fact, Ms*** began making complaints against anyone and everyone who had any contact "With her and her purchase of the businessShe has filed Complaints with the Attorney General's Office against a realtor involved on behalf of *** ***., *** *** in which she alleges the Attorney General "...noted against ..." Ms***, which is untrueShe has filed complaints with the Board of Realtors Ethic Board with regard to Ms, ***, which were found to have no meritShe has either threatened or filed lawsuits against the seller alleging various misconducts, including fraud, She has filed at least four different lawsuits involving Cedarview or other parties, all arising out of this transaction Her lawsuit complaint against Cedarview has been amended and changed in multiple waysThe most recent iteration of her lawsuit now asserts that Cedarview acted fraudulently by accepting rent payments by ACH transferHer claim demands return of the two months rent that she voluntarily paid during the time she had exclusive possession of the leased premisesCedarview, of course, disputes her entitlement to refund of the rent paid for the time that she was in possession Cedarview at no time rejected Ms*** as a tenantReservations of whether she should be a tenant or sublessee were expressed in view of her public disparaging statements with regard to Cedarview and the leased premisesNevertheless, she had been accepted under the sublease and that was never revokedHer claims are baselessHer claims misstate and misrepresent factsEvery complaint and claim she has filed that has been answered in any respect has been dismissed as unfoundedHer complaints to the Ethics Board and to the Attorney General's Office have been unfounded or dismissedCertain other lawsuits have already been dismissed by the CourtsHer amended claim as to Cedarview remains pending for trial on Febnwy 14, Because Ms*** has no factual or legal basis for her claim against Cedarview, it is folly expected that following the hearing, Ms***'s amended, remaining complaint against Cedarview will be dismissed by the CourtRespectfully Suzanne O’*** Vice President, Real Estate Cedarview Management Corporation