I'll point out something hereIf you're listening to a copywriter who has the luxoury to review other copywriter's work for "Free", there are two "red flags": 1) he's out of workAnd when a supposed "good" copywriter can quite literally create a salesforce from pen and paper, that's very telling, and concerning2) Whoever copywriter she's mentioning is clearly biased towards a paycheckSo bringing on outside advice is hardly qualifying as "unusable copy"Especially considering I'm happily using my work with her as a show pieceI would happily submit this in to the Revdex.com, however I'm assuming this is expanding beyond their scope of authority.Let me know if I'm wrong.The real blame here IS on my self because I should have screened my clients better before taking on a project that was not suited for a direct response and high volume sales environmentThe sales letter that I've written is designed intentionally to grab the attention of the "busy" consumer in their daily life, stop her for what she's doing, and encourage her to pull out her credit card and orderThis isn't something you can do with flowery languageAs far as our conversation goes that was well understoodHer only other complaint was the fact that the copy I've sent in was "too sciencey"Which she has supposed video and audio tapes (unbeknownest to me she was recording everything) as do I have proof of our conversation on Facebook that these were her only concernsI wish I was simply selling "jumpers" and could politely refund and move onHowever, this is the result of several hours of work and tightly crafted sales languageAs convenient as it would be to simply refund and move on, it's not possibleAgain, I am very passionate about my work and I do not take her attempt to bring her threats and accusations into the public lightly at all.Thank you for time, I do wish her the best of luck
I asked them to cut and remove six medium size trees around my homeThey were responsive, on time, and cleaned up very nicely, more than I expected from the tree removing firms The price was very competitive compared with the quality work they performed
I will definitely hire them again in the near future
Hello review board of the Revdex.com, this is an entirely new process for me and I see that I am under a 30 minute timer. I am not entirely sure how to respond to this complaint for reasons you can imagine, considering claims of a "fake Facebook" account, especially when we spoke directly on...
Facebook's Video/Audio Chat.Regardless, this is not the raving letter of a satisfied customer. Which is unfortunate, because I had hoped for a great relationship. I work as a copywriter in the health market. Imagine a salesman's pitch put into a word doc. That's what I create. I received a 2,000 character limit upon my initial reply, and I don't know what good a reply would even be if I managed to trim it down to meet your requirements. I simply am attaching a .PDF document with my reply (clocks in at just 667 words). However, I will say that the work I provided to her was a fantastic turn-key front-end system that "Would" (and still can, and likely is) have made her entire investment back. More, I would have continued to optimize and refine the work I had supplied her had she continued a healthy, working relationship together. And I'll also say that the quality of the work was of the level to attract an additional client out of the process. I have a list of satisfied clients who would happily vouch for the quality of my work. Thank you for your time, it is unfortunate she ascended to this level with hardly getting in touch with me first. I hope you agree that this is a "baseless" complaint and I had done everything in my ability to create a satisfied client.
I'll point out something here. If you're listening to a copywriter who has the luxoury to review other copywriter's work for "Free", there are two "red flags": 1) he's out of work. And when a supposed "good" copywriter can quite literally create a salesforce from pen and paper, that's very telling, and concerning. 2) Whoever copywriter she's mentioning is clearly biased towards a paycheck. So bringing on outside advice is hardly qualifying as "unusable copy". Especially considering I'm happily using my work with her as a show piece. I would happily submit this in to the Revdex.com, however I'm assuming this is expanding beyond their scope of authority.Let me know if I'm wrong.The real blame here IS on my self because I should have screened my clients better before taking on a project that was not suited for a direct response and high volume sales environment. The sales letter that I've written is designed intentionally to grab the attention of the "busy" consumer in their daily life, stop her for what she's doing, and encourage her to pull out her credit card and order. This isn't something you can do with flowery language. As far as our conversation goes that was well understood. Her only other complaint was the fact that the copy I've sent in was "too sciencey". Which she has supposed video and audio tapes (unbeknownest to me she was recording everything) as do I have proof of our conversation on Facebook that these were her only concerns. I wish I was simply selling "jumpers" and could politely refund and move on. However, this is the result of several hours of work and tightly crafted sales language. As convenient as it would be to simply refund and move on, it's not possible. Again, I am very passionate about my work and I do not take her attempt to bring her threats and accusations into the public lightly at all.Thank you for time, I do wish her the best of luck.
I reject Sales Copy Systems claims in this letter. Jacob is blatant lying. I recorded our telephone conversations and at no point did I ever say I was happy with the work. It is not of a high standard and I never gave my "thumbs up". I have never said that his "sales page was fantastic". The work submitted to me, was not of a good standard. Jacob claims it is "polished” I beg you to read his work, which I have since had other copywriters look over to see if it can be salvaged. But it cannot The role of a copywriter (Jacob) is to write advertising content/words that a company (myself) can share with their audience on a website in order to persuade them to purchase a product/service. The role of the copywriter is to research how the company already writes, their tone, their style, and then be able to mimic this and write content that still sounds like the company has written it. This is the service I purchased, and this is not the service that I received. The content does not sound like me, in some parts he has also plagiarized. Jacob claims that I haven't tested this with my audience - however, if I shared this content with them, I would lose business. I cannot put my name against this work. I would receive a refund if the jumper I ordered came and wasn't good quality and was falling to pieces. So this should be the same rules for receiving copy writing content. Jacob claims I didn't express my concerns and just sent a letter out of the blue to him. This is not correct, I told him many times I was not happy, I have proof of this. I can send voice recordings, Facebook messenger screenshots and emails. I have attached my original complaint for you to see. Jacob claims that because he has sent the work to me, that if I get a refund, I will still use his content. I would like to declare and promise that there is absolutely no way I will use his work. Therefore, I wish to receive my money back. I paid for a service I did not receive.
I'll point out something hereIf you're listening to a copywriter who has the luxoury to review other copywriter's work for "Free", there are two "red flags": 1) he's out of workAnd when a supposed "good" copywriter can quite literally create a salesforce from pen and paper, that's very telling, and concerning2) Whoever copywriter she's mentioning is clearly biased towards a paycheckSo bringing on outside advice is hardly qualifying as "unusable copy"Especially considering I'm happily using my work with her as a show pieceI would happily submit this in to the Revdex.com, however I'm assuming this is expanding beyond their scope of authority.Let me know if I'm wrong.The real blame here IS on my self because I should have screened my clients better before taking on a project that was not suited for a direct response and high volume sales environmentThe sales letter that I've written is designed intentionally to grab the attention of the "busy" consumer in their daily life, stop her for what she's doing, and encourage her to pull out her credit card and orderThis isn't something you can do with flowery languageAs far as our conversation goes that was well understoodHer only other complaint was the fact that the copy I've sent in was "too sciencey"Which she has supposed video and audio tapes (unbeknownest to me she was recording everything) as do I have proof of our conversation on Facebook that these were her only concernsI wish I was simply selling "jumpers" and could politely refund and move onHowever, this is the result of several hours of work and tightly crafted sales languageAs convenient as it would be to simply refund and move on, it's not possibleAgain, I am very passionate about my work and I do not take her attempt to bring her threats and accusations into the public lightly at all.Thank you for time, I do wish her the best of luck
I asked them to cut and remove six medium size trees around my homeThey were responsive, on time, and cleaned up very nicely, more than I expected from the tree removing firms The price was very competitive compared with the quality work they performed
I will definitely hire them again in the near future
Hello review board of the Revdex.com, this is an entirely new process for me and I see that I am under a 30 minute timer. I am not entirely sure how to respond to this complaint for reasons you can imagine, considering claims of a "fake Facebook" account, especially when we spoke directly on...
Facebook's Video/Audio Chat.Regardless, this is not the raving letter of a satisfied customer. Which is unfortunate, because I had hoped for a great relationship. I work as a copywriter in the health market. Imagine a salesman's pitch put into a word doc. That's what I create. I received a 2,000 character limit upon my initial reply, and I don't know what good a reply would even be if I managed to trim it down to meet your requirements. I simply am attaching a .PDF document with my reply (clocks in at just 667 words). However, I will say that the work I provided to her was a fantastic turn-key front-end system that "Would" (and still can, and likely is) have made her entire investment back. More, I would have continued to optimize and refine the work I had supplied her had she continued a healthy, working relationship together. And I'll also say that the quality of the work was of the level to attract an additional client out of the process. I have a list of satisfied clients who would happily vouch for the quality of my work. Thank you for your time, it is unfortunate she ascended to this level with hardly getting in touch with me first. I hope you agree that this is a "baseless" complaint and I had done everything in my ability to create a satisfied client.
I'll point out something here. If you're listening to a copywriter who has the luxoury to review other copywriter's work for "Free", there are two "red flags": 1) he's out of work. And when a supposed "good" copywriter can quite literally create a salesforce from pen and paper, that's very telling, and concerning. 2) Whoever copywriter she's mentioning is clearly biased towards a paycheck. So bringing on outside advice is hardly qualifying as "unusable copy". Especially considering I'm happily using my work with her as a show piece. I would happily submit this in to the Revdex.com, however I'm assuming this is expanding beyond their scope of authority.Let me know if I'm wrong.The real blame here IS on my self because I should have screened my clients better before taking on a project that was not suited for a direct response and high volume sales environment. The sales letter that I've written is designed intentionally to grab the attention of the "busy" consumer in their daily life, stop her for what she's doing, and encourage her to pull out her credit card and order. This isn't something you can do with flowery language. As far as our conversation goes that was well understood. Her only other complaint was the fact that the copy I've sent in was "too sciencey". Which she has supposed video and audio tapes (unbeknownest to me she was recording everything) as do I have proof of our conversation on Facebook that these were her only concerns. I wish I was simply selling "jumpers" and could politely refund and move on. However, this is the result of several hours of work and tightly crafted sales language. As convenient as it would be to simply refund and move on, it's not possible. Again, I am very passionate about my work and I do not take her attempt to bring her threats and accusations into the public lightly at all.Thank you for time, I do wish her the best of luck.
I reject Sales Copy Systems claims in this letter. Jacob is blatant lying. I recorded our telephone conversations and at no point did I ever say I was happy with the work. It is not of a high standard and I never gave my "thumbs up". I have never said that his "sales page was fantastic". The work submitted to me, was not of a good standard. Jacob claims it is "polished” I beg you to read his work, which I have since had other copywriters look over to see if it can be salvaged. But it cannot The role of a copywriter (Jacob) is to write advertising content/words that a company (myself) can share with their audience on a website in order to persuade them to purchase a product/service. The role of the copywriter is to research how the company already writes, their tone, their style, and then be able to mimic this and write content that still sounds like the company has written it. This is the service I purchased, and this is not the service that I received. The content does not sound like me, in some parts he has also plagiarized. Jacob claims that I haven't tested this with my audience - however, if I shared this content with them, I would lose business. I cannot put my name against this work. I would receive a refund if the jumper I ordered came and wasn't good quality and was falling to pieces. So this should be the same rules for receiving copy writing content. Jacob claims I didn't express my concerns and just sent a letter out of the blue to him. This is not correct, I told him many times I was not happy, I have proof of this. I can send voice recordings, Facebook messenger screenshots and emails. I have attached my original complaint for you to see. Jacob claims that because he has sent the work to me, that if I get a refund, I will still use his content. I would like to declare and promise that there is absolutely no way I will use his work. Therefore, I wish to receive my money back. I paid for a service I did not receive.