San Diego Bay Marine

The customer [redacted] will be sued for the amount due The customer will also be responsible for any and all moneys, jobs or projected earnings as a result of his public posts to witch could potently hurt our company It is fact through several attorneys that this customer is in the wrong and does in fact owe the moneys to our companyIt is also fact that our law firm is also looking in to fraud charges in connection with the insurance company and the release he has signedI will cut copy and paste the settlement agreement between [redacted] and our insurance company to satisfy any doubt .You will see that the customer was plainly told in writing the way the insurance company wanted and instructed him to disperse the funds granted to himOf course he failed to pay our company there for we halted work from the first contractThis clearly states NOTHING from the first contract should be attributed to this contract and settlementWe have tried many ***es to resolve this and complete the original contract but the customer refused to pay the second one and wanted to change plans to upgrade at our expenseFurther more we are asking for a retraction to these allegations [redacted] [redacted] | [redacted] vSan Diego Bay Marine | Incident of January 29, [redacted] Dear ***, I am writing in regard to settlement of the damage claim in connection with the January 29, launching of “Margaritaville”Based on my calculation, a total of approximately $40, To [redacted] .com CC Me Mar Dear ***, I am writing in regard to settlement of the damage claim in connection with the January 29, launching of “Margaritaville” Based on my calculation, a total of approximately $40,has been invoiced on this project You have advised me that you have paid a total of $21, I have created the attached Excel Spreadsheet to help you review the calculations In Summary, San Diego Bay Marine, Inc.’s invoice was revised many ***es throughout the course of the initial repairs I have followed up with [redacted] and he confirms that this invoice was related to initial work that was done on the boat, and therefore not related to the incident damage I have deleted all of the duplicate charges from Driscoll which are reflected on San Diego Bay Marine, Inc.’s invoices Nothing from invoice should be attributed to the incident I have agreed to include a portion of Driscoll’s charges to the incident This includes a single haul/launch fee, washing the bottom, and lay days at $110/day (1-to 2-24), and antifouling I am rejecting charges for forklifting the motor and the $for “other materials to ***” [redacted] confirmed that the “other materials” were related to the initial work According to ***, invoice reflects the work he believes was required to repair issues related to the January 29, launching The review process was extremely challenging for the items claimed on this invoice Work was rushed and much of the claimed damage to the hull had been covered by press-board and the ribs had been “sistered” prior to arrival of our surveyor (Our surveyor attended one day after we were notified of the claim.) Nevertheless, out of an abundance of good faith, I have allocated every charge to the claim, except for the duplicate charge for lay days In Summary, I will agree to allocate $6,of the Driscoll Es***ate (35595) and $13,of San Diego Bay Marine, Inc.’s Es***ate (10023) to this claim, for a total of $19, Assuming you agree with this allocation, please sign/date and return the attached release to my attention In addition, you have three options for payment: Check payable solely to [redacted] You and [redacted] will be responsible to arrange transferring of funds to *** Check payable to both [redacted] and San Diego Bay Marine, Inc You can endorse the check and give it to *** Check payable solely to San Diego Bay Marine, Inc Please advise me as to which option (1, 2, or 3) you would prefer Sincerely, [redacted] | Claim Professional | Ocean Marine Travelers 4th Avenue | Suite Seattle, WA [redacted] [redacted]

This complaint is warranted they will be receiving a refund IV explained in detail what had happedThere were a number of things that came into playWe were attempting to work with (Second Chance Program) a state funded program to give felons’ a second chance at a job and well that didn’t work out to wellThe engine was fixed along with the Led's installedI had no idea There bike was stored on the boat and taken off the boat along with the Segway end tables etceverything got back on the boat except the bikei was only told about the bike days ago and since then it has been recovered it’s been in our storage all along and we will ship it to them as soon as I have a shipping addressI have pictures of the boat after shrink wrapping and it had NO duct tape on it and was tight when it left hereIf the shippers cut into it then duck taped it back up? No one knows but all I have to say is that it didn’t leave here that way [redacted] and his wife have been awesome customers and I feel bad for this inconvenience true underwater light didn’t get installed and true the trailer wasn’t finished I was told rather lied to by bad employees that is was complete those employees also stole from us all the parts for his boat and trailer our work truck parts moneys and about 5,in inventoryThey obviously do not work for us any longer and there is an ongoing investigation on the thefts ***’s bike will be returned, moneys for the underwater light and trailer will be refunded and something for their inconvenience

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below Regards, [redacted]

Mr [redacted] id just trying to keep insurance moneys that don't belong to himThe fact is he is being sueds at this ***e