Sign in

Scripps Psychological Associates

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Scripps Psychological Associates? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Scripps Psychological Associates

Scripps Psychological Associates Reviews (6)

My responses to Mr***'s latest complaints are as follows: Mr [redacted] has the right to file a complaint with the Board of PsychologyI do not have a contract with the courtThe court appointed me to conduct a child custody evaluation pursuant to California Evidence Code Section This code section designates a court appointed expert as being the court's expertI have not engaged in any criminal activityThere was no contract with Mr [redacted] stating that the evaluation would cost $7,This fee issue was answered by me last timeMy request is that the Revdex.com ask Mr [redacted] for a copy of this alleged $7,contractThe report results were not "leaked" to Mr***'s ex-wife as doing so would be unethicalI request that the Revdex.com contact Ms [redacted] to refute his untrue allegationI have already responded to Mr***'s untrue allegation regarding [redacted] ***I have never had a previous relationship with herI request that the Revdex.com contact Ms [redacted] to refute this untrue allegationMr [redacted] has emailed my office to essentially blame me for him killing some of his chickens and blaming me for his dog becoming lost at a lake in NevadaI bring this to your attention because Mr [redacted] has continued to state other obviously untrue allegations to the Revdex.com without any proof whatsoever [redacted] * [redacted] , Ph.D

I am rejecting this response because: Dr [redacted] has been approved as a "service contractor" by the state for evaluationsHe is appointed by the court if both parties and the judge agree He was my lawyer, Dr [redacted] s’s third choice at the time, but if memory serves correct, was the only one available at the time Dr [redacted] has confirmed in writing that the only contract that exists is what his office provided and I signed Dr [redacted] implies or seems to think that since he is court appointed he has some sort of court protection and assumes he has no obligations to full fill his own contract with the persons paying the bill Dr [redacted] has failed to provide test data, witness transcripts, child drawings, his notes and methodology despite several requests Both parties counsel dates Mr [redacted] has made reference an old email of mine concerning my sons pets True to form Mr [redacted] has omitted much of the information so has to make a impression or innuendo I would be happy to provide the entire email to the Revdex.com so they know the whole story But suffice it to say Mr [redacted] does not seem to comprehend the ramification of his own reports Dr [redacted] report has been life altering for both of us My son and I are living miles away from our previous home My son’s horse was sold, his pet chickens could not cross state lines have agreed and requested that he turn over my test data and he has not obliged Dr [redacted] has not delivered the complete product in its entirety which I consider to be a breach of his own contract I paid for the service and ALL the information that has been assembled to write the report Per his contract Dr [redacted] owns the original information but I am entitled to a copy of the complete file This is basic contract law that Dr [redacted] needs to familiarize himself with I have supplied a copy of Scripps Psychological contract that I signed to the State Board of Psychology Dr [redacted] quoted me verbally $for both parties and I was required to pay half the amount up front as a down payment before the study began I am compelled to state that this is also illegal in the state of California as a service contractor can only charge 10% upfront as down payment on a service contract per California Contract Law, and it also goes against accounting laws You can't account for something you have not done Dr [redacted] seems to be out of touch with current state laws, rules and regulations For Dr [redacted] to state that $was not the quoted amount is nothing short of fraud I am happy to provide a copy of my initial check for half the amount as “proof” of what Dr [redacted] quoted There are now four different versions of Nancy Bloom and [redacted] s relationship per my x wife written statements and Dr [redacted] written statements 1) They worked at the same business for years2) They worked in the same building in the 80's and were friends 3) They worked in the same building but never met 4) They don't know each other at all I have no idea which version is true or untrue All I can say is that the day I heard version one my x wife was gloating and she packed up her furniture and my son’s belongings and loaded them into a large shipping container and had them shipped to Florida It was very large container according to my son [redacted] is not old enough to lie about such details Somebody obviously tipped her as to the outcome of the report This flies against regulation The Revdex.com can contact the container company and subpoena a copy of the container rental to confirm the and were slaughtered, and our year old dog wandered off while stopping for a rest in Nevada He has not been heard of since Our year electrical testing and engineering business is struggling without me Our office in Fresno was closed when the supervisor quit because of my departure The list goes on regarding the financial and emotional hardships that we have had to endure because of Dr [redacted] flawed and biased report [redacted] and I were not given the opportunity to present our case to the court judge because of the Dr [redacted] distorted and biased report [redacted] and I were effectively railroaded to Florida without the judge ever hearing a discussion or argument Mr [redacted] 's comment about my sons pets in themselves show a complete lack of compassion for a year old child Truthfully I am more than a bit shocked that he would make lite of such thing I realize he grew up in the concrete world of San Francisco and has disdain for anyone who owns a horse or likes cowboys, but his comment is far beyond odd and awkward, to borrow his own phrase and/or projection Perhaps if Dr [redacted] knew the importance of his work and took it more seriously, he would not make over errors and omissions in a page report Dr [redacted] recommended to the court that [redacted] spend less time with his father than a convicted criminal is granted with his family while in prison I have no criminal record, don’t smoke or drink and have no vices I have an engineering degree and was in senior management for General Electric and W [redacted] I built my own successful electrical testing and engineering company and employ a dozen engineers I passed a battery of psychological tests at ** and W [redacted] Dr [redacted] , Dr [redacted] and [redacted] ***, MFT all have given their written support on my behalf Every witness and person in my corner believes that there is foul play involved or incompetence on Dr [redacted] part We all make mistakes but nobody in my field makes over seventy (70) in a page report To summarize Mr [redacted] is in breach of contract His comments and my response will be sent to the State Board of Psychology who is considering assigning an investigator from Southern California to review the case Based on comments made by Dr [redacted] and retired Superior Court Judge [redacted] and my own attorney Dr [redacted] , I do not think I am the only father to be subjected to a lack of "bias control" Based on Mr [redacted] ’s reputation in the industry, there is mother favoritism or perhaps a core father issue in play I am not a psychologist that is what review boards are for I am considering filing a complaint with the Sacramento Grand Jury

Mr*** contends that he has a contract dispute with me although this is not trueThe Placer County Superior Court ordered a child custody evaluation involving Mr*** and his ex-wife and son and appointed me to conduct the evaluationThus, my "client" in this case was the courtI did have
Mr*** read and sign a "Child Custody Evaluation Agreement" which outlined the procedures and costs involvedMr*** does not like the custody recommendation made to the court (primary custody to the mother) and this is the reason I believe he has filed this complaint with the Revdex.comThe fees for the evaluation were consistent with the fee schedule he signed prior to the beginning of the evaluationThe cost did not double "at the last moment" as he claims, since I bill at a standard hourly rate which always remains the sameMr*** was well aware of the hourly rate as he signed my fee scheduleMr.*** readily paid his portion of the bill and is only complaining now due to him not liking the outcomeSome of my specific comments to his complaint are as follows: The evaluation did not take a year to completeThe evaluation began on 1/13/and was completed on 7/24/I was not paid in cashFull payment in the form of a cashier's check is due prior to the report being sent to the court which is the norm with child custody evaluationsMr*** also signed an agreement acknowledging this was the procedureI have never had any type of relationship with *** ***Mr*** signed a written authorization allowing me to interview her as part of the evaluationI have never recorded any telephone interviews with collateral witnessesTo do so without their knowledge would be illegalIn summary, there is no contract disputeMr*** is a disgruntled litigant in a child custody matter and this is the reason for his complaint to the Revdex.comMr*** signed a fee agreement in my office prior to the evaluation commencing and there will be no refund unless instructed to do so by the Superior Court Judge who ordered the evaluation

My responses to Mr. [redacted]'s latest complaints are as follows: 1. Mr. [redacted] has the right to file a complaint with the Board of Psychology. 2. I do not have a contract with the court. The court appointed me to conduct a child custody evaluation pursuant to California Evidence Code Section 730. This code section designates a court appointed expert as being the court's expert. 3. I have not engaged in any criminal activity. 4. There was no contract with Mr. [redacted] stating that the evaluation would cost $7,500.00. This fee issue was answered by me last time. My request is that the Revdex.com ask Mr. [redacted] for a copy of this alleged $7,500.00 contract. 5. The report results were not "leaked" to Mr. [redacted]'s ex-wife as doing so would be unethical. I request that the Revdex.com contact Ms. [redacted] to refute his untrue allegation. 6. I have already responded to Mr. [redacted]'s untrue allegation regarding [redacted]. I have never had a previous relationship with her. I request that the Revdex.com contact Ms. [redacted] to refute this untrue allegation. 7. Mr. [redacted] has emailed my office to essentially blame me for him killing some of his chickens and blaming me for his dog becoming lost at a lake in Nevada. I bring this to your attention because Mr. [redacted] has continued to state other obviously untrue allegations to the Revdex.com without any proof whatsoever. [redacted]. [redacted], Ph.D.

I am rejecting this response because:
Dr. [redacted] has been approved as a "service
contractor" by the state for 730 evaluations. He is appointed by the court
if both parties and the judge agree.   He was my lawyer, Dr. [redacted]s’s third choice
at the time, but if memory serves correct, was the only one available at the
time.   Dr. [redacted] has confirmed in
writing that the only contract that exists is what his office provided and I
signed.  
Dr. [redacted] implies or seems to think that since he is court
appointed he has some sort of court protection and assumes he has no
obligations to full fill his own contract with the persons paying the bill.     Dr. [redacted] has failed to provide test
data, witness transcripts, child drawings, his notes and methodology despite
several requests.   Both parties counsel
dates.   
 
Mr [redacted] has made reference an old email of mine concerning
my sons pets.   True to form Mr. [redacted]
has omitted much of the information so has to make a false impression or
innuendo.  I would be happy to provide
the entire email to the Revdex.com so they know the whole story.    But suffice it to say Mr. [redacted] does not
seem to comprehend the ramification of his own reports.  Dr. [redacted] report has been life altering for
both of us.    My son and I are living
3000 miles away from our previous home.  
My son’s horse was sold, his pet chickens could not cross state lines
have agreed and requested that he turn over my test data and he has not
obliged.     Dr.  [redacted] has not delivered the complete product
in its entirety which I consider to be a breach of his own contract.    I paid for the service and ALL the
information that has been assembled to write the report.   Per his contract Dr. [redacted] owns the
original information but I am entitled to a copy of the complete file.  This is basic contract law that Dr [redacted]
needs to familiarize himself with.      I
have supplied a copy of Scripps Psychological contract that I signed to the
State Board of Psychology.     
 
Dr. [redacted] quoted me verbally $7500 for both parties and I
was required to pay half the amount up front as a down payment before the study
began.    I am compelled to state that
this is also illegal in the state of California as a service contractor can
only charge 10% upfront as down payment on a service contract per California
Contract Law, and it also goes against accounting laws.  You can't account for something you have not
done.     Dr. [redacted] seems to be out of
touch with current state laws, rules and regulations.     For Dr. [redacted] to state that $7500 was not
the quoted amount is nothing short of fraud.   
I am happy to provide a copy of my initial check for half the amount as “proof”
of what Dr. [redacted] quoted.   
 
There are now four different versions of Nancy Bloom and
[redacted]s relationship per my x wife written statements and Dr. [redacted]
written statements.   1) They worked at
the same business for 5 years. 2) They worked in the same building in the 80's
and were friends.   3)  They worked in the same building but never
met.   4) 
They don't know each other at all.   
I have no idea which version is true or untrue.      All I can say is that the day I heard
version one my x wife was gloating and she packed up her furniture and my son’s
belongings and loaded them into a large shipping container and had them shipped
to Florida.         It was very large container according to my
son.    [redacted] is not old enough to lie
about such details.    Somebody obviously
tipped her as to the outcome of the report.   
This flies against regulation 5.0220.   
   The Revdex.com can contact the
container company and subpoena a copy of the container rental to confirm the
and were slaughtered, and our 10 year old dog wandered off while stopping for a
rest in Nevada.   He has not been heard
of since.    Our 30 year electrical testing and engineering
business is struggling without me.   Our
office in Fresno was closed when the supervisor quit because of my
departure.     The list goes on regarding the financial and
emotional hardships that we have had to endure because of Dr. [redacted] flawed and
biased report.    [redacted] and I were not
given the opportunity to present our case to the court judge because of the Dr.
[redacted] distorted and biased report.     [redacted]
and I were effectively railroaded to Florida without the judge ever hearing a
discussion or argument.   
Mr. [redacted]'s comment about my sons pets in themselves show a
complete lack of compassion for a 7 year old child.          Truthfully I am more than a bit shocked
that he would make lite of such thing.  
I realize he grew up in the concrete world of San Francisco and has
disdain for anyone who owns a horse or likes cowboys, but his comment is far
beyond odd and awkward, to borrow his own phrase and/or projection.     Perhaps if Dr. [redacted] knew the importance of
his work and took it more seriously, he would not make over 70 errors and
omissions in a 44 page report.   
Dr. [redacted] recommended to the court that [redacted] spend less
time with his father than a convicted criminal is granted with his family while
in prison.     I have no criminal record,
don’t smoke or drink and have no vices.     
I have an engineering degree and was in senior management for General
Electric and W[redacted].   I built my
own successful electrical testing and engineering company and employ a dozen
engineers.    I passed a battery of
psychological tests at ** and W[redacted].  
Dr. [redacted], Dr. [redacted] and [redacted], MFT all have
given their written support on my behalf.  
Every witness and person in my corner believes that there is
foul play involved or incompetence on Dr. [redacted] part.      We
all make mistakes but nobody in my field makes over seventy (70) in a 44 page
report.  
To summarize Mr. [redacted] is in breach of contract.    His comments and my response will be sent
to the State Board of Psychology who is considering assigning an investigator
from Southern California to review the case.    
Based on comments made by Dr. [redacted] and retired Superior Court
Judge [redacted] and my own attorney Dr. [redacted], I do not think I am the only
father to be subjected to a lack of "bias control".    Based on Mr. [redacted]’s reputation in the
industry, there is mother favoritism or perhaps a core father issue in play.       I
am not a psychologist that is what review boards are for.      I am considering filing a complaint with
the Sacramento Grand Jury.

Review: Dr. [redacted] failed to control bias while performing a 730 child custody evaluation. The evaluation took almost a year to complete and he doubled his price at the last moment. He refused to deliver the report until he was paid in cash. According to our review his report has over 70 errors and omissions including mistatements or omission regarding a 6 years old hand sketches. Dr. [redacted] failed to disclose a five (5) year relationship he had previously with Ms [redacted] who was our marriage counselor prior to the evaluation. Full disclosure is required as part of a 730 evaluation. Dr. [redacted] recorded telephone conversations which is against California law when done without consent.Dr. [redacted] agreed to provide test results and transcripts of his recording(s), then reneged on his commitment. He has also failed to turn over copies of the child's drawings.Desired Settlement: Per my letter to Dr. [redacted], I am requesting the following:1) A full refund of $7500.2) A written apology addressing the 70 errors and omissions listed in his report.3) A copy of my test results.4) A copy of transcripts for all of my witnesses with his hand written notes.5) All of my sons hand sketches.

Business

Response:

Mr. [redacted] contends that he has a contract dispute with me although this is not true. The Placer County Superior Court ordered a child custody evaluation involving Mr. [redacted] and his ex-wife and son and appointed me to conduct the evaluation. Thus, my "client" in this case was the court. I did have Mr. [redacted] read and sign a "Child Custody Evaluation Agreement" which outlined the procedures and costs involved. Mr. [redacted] does not like the custody recommendation made to the court (primary custody to the mother) and this is the reason I believe he has filed this complaint with the Revdex.com. The fees for the evaluation were consistent with the fee schedule he signed prior to the beginning of the evaluation. The cost did not double "at the last moment" as he claims, since I bill at a standard hourly rate which always remains the same. Mr. [redacted] was well aware of the hourly rate as he signed my fee schedule. Mr.[redacted] readily paid his portion of the bill and is only complaining now due to him not liking the outcome. Some of my specific comments to his complaint are as follows: 1. The evaluation did not take a year to complete. The evaluation began on 1/13/14 and was completed on 7/24/14. 2. I was not paid in cash. Full payment in the form of a cashier's check is due prior to the report being sent to the court which is the norm with child custody evaluations. Mr. [redacted] also signed an agreement acknowledging this was the procedure. 3. I have never had any type of relationship with [redacted]. Mr. [redacted] signed a written authorization allowing me to interview her as part of the evaluation. 4. I have never recorded any telephone interviews with collateral witnesses. To do so without their knowledge would be illegal. In summary, there is no contract dispute. Mr. [redacted] is a disgruntled litigant in a child custody matter and this is the reason for his complaint to the Revdex.com. Mr. [redacted] signed a fee agreement in my office prior to the evaluation commencing and there will be no refund unless instructed to do so by the Superior Court Judge who ordered the evaluation.

Business

Response:

My responses to Mr. [redacted]'s latest complaints are as follows: 1. Mr. [redacted] has the right to file a complaint with the Board of Psychology. 2. I do not have a contract with the court. The court appointed me to conduct a child custody evaluation pursuant to California Evidence Code Section 730. This code section designates a court appointed expert as being the court's expert. 3. I have not engaged in any criminal activity. 4. There was no contract with Mr. [redacted] stating that the evaluation would cost $7,500.00. This fee issue was answered by me last time. My request is that the Revdex.com ask Mr. [redacted] for a copy of this alleged $7,500.00 contract. 5. The report results were not "leaked" to Mr. [redacted]'s ex-wife as doing so would be unethical. I request that the Revdex.com contact Ms. [redacted] to refute his untrue allegation. 6. I have already responded to Mr. [redacted]'s untrue allegation regarding [redacted]. I have never had a previous relationship with her. I request that the Revdex.com contact Ms. [redacted] to refute this untrue allegation. 7. Mr. [redacted] has emailed my office to essentially blame me for him killing some of his chickens and blaming me for his dog becoming lost at a lake in Nevada. I bring this to your attention because Mr. [redacted] has continued to state other obviously untrue allegations to the Revdex.com without any proof whatsoever. [redacted], Ph.D.

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because:

Dr. [redacted] has been approved as a "service

contractor" by the state for 730 evaluations. He is appointed by the court

if both parties and the judge agree. He was my lawyer, Dr. [redacted]s’s third choice

at the time, but if memory serves correct, was the only one available at the

time. Dr. [redacted] has confirmed in

writing that the only contract that exists is what his office provided and I

signed.

Dr. [redacted] implies or seems to think that since he is court

appointed he has some sort of court protection and assumes he has no

obligations to full fill his own contract with the persons paying the bill. Dr. [redacted] has failed to provide test

data, witness transcripts, child drawings, his notes and methodology despite

several requests. Both parties counsel

dates.

Mr [redacted] has made reference an old email of mine concerning

my sons pets. True to form Mr. [redacted]

has omitted much of the information so has to make a false impression or

innuendo. I would be happy to provide

the entire email to the Revdex.com so they know the whole story. But suffice it to say Mr. [redacted] does not

seem to comprehend the ramification of his own reports. Dr. [redacted] report has been life altering for

both of us. My son and I are living

3000 miles away from our previous home.

My son’s horse was sold, his pet chickens could not cross state lines

have agreed and requested that he turn over my test data and he has not

obliged. Dr. [redacted] has not delivered the complete product

in its entirety which I consider to be a breach of his own contract. I paid for the service and ALL the

information that has been assembled to write the report. Per his contract Dr. [redacted] owns the

original information but I am entitled to a copy of the complete file. This is basic contract law that Dr [redacted]

needs to familiarize himself with. I

have supplied a copy of Scripps Psychological contract that I signed to the

State Board of Psychology.

Dr. [redacted] quoted me verbally $7500 for both parties and I

was required to pay half the amount up front as a down payment before the study

began. I am compelled to state that

this is also illegal in the state of California as a service contractor can

only charge 10% upfront as down payment on a service contract per California

Contract Law, and it also goes against accounting laws. You can't account for something you have not

done. Dr. [redacted] seems to be out of

touch with current state laws, rules and regulations. For Dr. [redacted] to state that $7500 was not

the quoted amount is nothing short of fraud.

I am happy to provide a copy of my initial check for half the amount as “proof”

of what Dr. [redacted] quoted.

There are now four different versions of Nancy Bloom and

[redacted]s relationship per my x wife written statements and Dr. [redacted]

written statements. 1) They worked at

the same business for 5 years. 2) They worked in the same building in the 80's

and were friends. 3) They worked in the same building but never

met. 4)

They don't know each other at all.

I have no idea which version is true or untrue. All I can say is that the day I heard

version one my x wife was gloating and she packed up her furniture and my son’s

belongings and loaded them into a large shipping container and had them shipped

to Florida. It was very large container according to my

son. [redacted] is not old enough to lie

about such details. Somebody obviously

tipped her as to the outcome of the report.

This flies against regulation 5.0220.

The Revdex.com can contact the

container company and subpoena a copy of the container rental to confirm the

and were slaughtered, and our 10 year old dog wandered off while stopping for a

rest in Nevada. He has not been heard

of since. Our 30 year electrical testing and engineering

business is struggling without me. Our

office in Fresno was closed when the supervisor quit because of my

departure. The list goes on regarding the financial and

emotional hardships that we have had to endure because of Dr. [redacted] flawed and

biased report. [redacted] and I were not

given the opportunity to present our case to the court judge because of the Dr.

[redacted] distorted and biased report. [redacted]

and I were effectively railroaded to Florida without the judge ever hearing a

discussion or argument.

Mr. [redacted]'s comment about my sons pets in themselves show a

complete lack of compassion for a 7 year old child. Truthfully I am more than a bit shocked

that he would make lite of such thing.

I realize he grew up in the concrete world of San Francisco and has

disdain for anyone who owns a horse or likes cowboys, but his comment is far

beyond odd and awkward, to borrow his own phrase and/or projection. Perhaps if Dr. [redacted] knew the importance of

his work and took it more seriously, he would not make over 70 errors and

omissions in a 44 page report.

Dr. [redacted] recommended to the court that [redacted] spend less

time with his father than a convicted criminal is granted with his family while

in prison. I have no criminal record,

don’t smoke or drink and have no vices.

I have an engineering degree and was in senior management for General

Electric and W[redacted]. I built my

own successful electrical testing and engineering company and employ a dozen

engineers. I passed a battery of

psychological tests at ** and W[redacted].

Dr. [redacted], Dr. [redacted] and [redacted], MFT all have

given their written support on my behalf.

Every witness and person in my corner believes that there is

foul play involved or incompetence on Dr. [redacted] part. We

all make mistakes but nobody in my field makes over seventy (70) in a 44 page

report.

To summarize Mr. [redacted] is in breach of contract. His comments and my response will be sent

to the State Board of Psychology who is considering assigning an investigator

from Southern California to review the case.

Based on comments made by Dr. [redacted] and retired Superior Court

Judge [redacted] and my own attorney Dr. [redacted], I do not think I am the only

father to be subjected to a lack of "bias control". Based on Mr. [redacted]’s reputation in the

industry, there is mother favoritism or perhaps a core father issue in play. I

am not a psychologist that is what review boards are for. I am considering filing a complaint with

the Sacramento Grand Jury.

Check fields!

Write a review of Scripps Psychological Associates

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Scripps Psychological Associates Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: Associations

Address: 1012 19th St, Sacramento, California, United States, 95811-4102

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

www.scrippspsychological.com

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with Scripps Psychological Associates, but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for Scripps Psychological Associates

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated