First and foremost, during our initial meeting, I explained to [redacted] how very much I love and adore my husband. I told him we have a good life to- gether, and are together most of the time. I did not know if there was anyone about which to be concerned, and even if there was, I would not necessarily do something about it. I also emphasized how important it was to me that he be discreet and not call me; I would call him!!! He did not say that it would be a problem. I don't talk "in circles". He does! Just read his counterclaim. I am not a liar. I am not paranoid, so don't be "sorry for me". I am not a "crazy lady". I simply wanted an answer, either way, regarding my husband. Isn't that why I hired him? Isn't that the premise of his agency? I could have told my husband that I did not trust him, and I would be following him, or having him "investigated". I could have done a myriad of things. I didn't,though. I hired [redacted]. I didn't say I "never hired or knew of them to my husband". I never said "my lying husband", or "that he is having affairs with several women in the neighborhood". Also, he did not discuss my husband's dishonesty and unfaithfulness. In fact, in his countercomplaint he says I was wrong thinking my husband might be cheating. He is the one who intimated these things and more. I am incensed about his lying to make himself "look better". As for my working, I mentioned the possibility of surveillance to him a week or so before receiving my "comprehensive report", as I was curious to find out what he had discovered or done, and how much my bill would be. I did not want to commit before knowing those things. I gave him a temporary timetable of days, times, and a place or two I told him I would think about it, knowing that I would receive the "comprehensive report" soon, and could decide afterward if I wanted to "rehire" him. In the meantime, he did not communicate in any way --- to confirm dates, times, places, etc. or to even ask about "going ahead" with surveillance when I would be working. He did not call me in-between the time I paid him for my "faux" report and the time he billed me for the "supposed surveillance" bill. The initial information was "stale" by the time I started working, but it is a moot point since I signed the Conclusion Agreement, stating that it was the end of our contract on March 19, 2016. After viewing the "report", and the billing, I was absolutely livid!!! It was like expecting an extensive, serious, important, formal report and instead receiving comic strips! And bilking for it, charging $3110.00 for something I could do myself for under $10. One example is charging $60.00 for something I could get online for ninety-nine cents! It was not even information pertinent to my case! He was so sloppy and poorly organized in his work that he did work that was NOT AUTHORIZED!!! I am sorry for his "mental state", but it is not my problem. He confuses and intertwines issues and information. He bullies, belittles, and tries to intimidate. He does this to make himself "the authority".He is no authority, and I shall do everything in my power to get him and his agency SHUT DOWN! I do not want others to be subjected to his thievery and immoral behavior. I didn't lie to him. He did not have trouble getting paid by me. I do not owe him anything; he owes me!!!
I am disputing the amount that I already paid $3,110 and the amount billed $3,051.60 for a total of $6161.60. I am seeking to be refunded the $3,110 and to not pay the difference of $3,051.60 charge.
The client talks in circles. One minute she is telling us that she "Never hired Us" and never knew of...
us to her husband. The whole problem here is that she is not telling the truth to anyone. She told me on more than one occasion that she does not trust her lieing husband, and that he is having affairs with several women in the neighborhood and she thinks she knows this, but she is wrong. This is not the first time I have trouble with Mrs. [redacted]. Facts are - Mrs.[redacted] does not want her husband to know that she doesnt trust him, or that she had him investigated. Most of the information I wanted to talk to her about, she avoided talking to me or calling me back, because of her fear of her husband. I have discussed many situations involving her husbands dishonesty and unfaitfhfulnes. This last situation when she gave me instructions to watch him, is true, "how would I know when, where and the times to be on him? she told me she had to work in a jewelry store in [redacted]. "she -would be working in the store all week long" she now claims this was all not true."Lady I do not spend my time investigation or do a week lond surveillance for nothing." I have all the details of this period, times she wanted us un the case, and the fact that she told me she would be in the Jewelry store in [redacted] I even go some video of her car parked at the store on the 1st day I commenced the surveillance. She is often lied to me. I had trouble getting paid by her other times, not because she didn't have the money, "but because she felt so certain her husband WAS Cheating, and still does"! -"she is Paranoid". Now I told her again, he did nothing that I found, "she still feels he is Cheating"! I have found that clients like her, will never beleive there suspicions are wrong, and many times absolutely will refuse to pay the investigation fee. Spending the time to answer any of the Revdex.com stuff is more tiime I've spent that is a waste. This client is so convinced she is right with all her suspicions about her husband, that nothing anyone else tells her that she is wrong, is only more wasted time - "It is not going to change her mind one bit" this women needs to see [redacted]. I have a better chance to be paid by a routine "Dead beat" than a person who is PARANOID. While I'm sorry for her mental state, I have this happen often. My next move, will be filing litigation in a week or two. So ten she can tell the judge. I'm Done, for now~! Thank you
First and foremost, during our initial meeting, I explained to [redacted] how very much I love and adore my husband. I told him we have a good life to- gether, and are together most of the time. I did not know if there was anyone about which to be concerned, and even if there was, I would not necessarily do something about it. I also emphasized how important it was to me that he be discreet and not call me; I would call him!!! He did not say that it would be a problem. I don't talk "in circles". He does! Just read his counterclaim. I am not a liar. I am not paranoid, so don't be "sorry for me". I am not a "crazy lady". I simply wanted an answer, either way, regarding my husband. Isn't that why I hired him? Isn't that the premise of his agency? I could have told my husband that I did not trust him, and I would be following him, or having him "investigated". I could have done a myriad of things. I didn't,though. I hired [redacted]. I didn't say I "never hired or knew of them to my husband". I never said "my lying husband", or "that he is having affairs with several women in the neighborhood". Also, he did not discuss my husband's dishonesty and unfaithfulness. In fact, in his countercomplaint he says I was wrong thinking my husband might be cheating. He is the one who intimated these things and more. I am incensed about his lying to make himself "look better". As for my working, I mentioned the possibility of surveillance to him a week or so before receiving my "comprehensive report", as I was curious to find out what he had discovered or done, and how much my bill would be. I did not want to commit before knowing those things. I gave him a temporary timetable of days, times, and a place or two I told him I would think about it, knowing that I would receive the "comprehensive report" soon, and could decide afterward if I wanted to "rehire" him. In the meantime, he did not communicate in any way --- to confirm dates, times, places, etc. or to even ask about "going ahead" with surveillance when I would be working. He did not call me in-between the time I paid him for my "faux" report and the time he billed me for the "supposed surveillance" bill. The initial information was "stale" by the time I started working, but it is a moot point since I signed the Conclusion Agreement, stating that it was the end of our contract on March 19, 2016. After viewing the "report", and the billing, I was absolutely livid!!! It was like expecting an extensive, serious, important, formal report and instead receiving comic strips! And bilking for it, charging $3110.00 for something I could do myself for under $10. One example is charging $60.00 for something I could get online for ninety-nine cents! It was not even information pertinent to my case! He was so sloppy and poorly organized in his work that he did work that was NOT AUTHORIZED!!! I am sorry for his "mental state", but it is not my problem. He confuses and intertwines issues and information. He bullies, belittles, and tries to intimidate. He does this to make himself "the authority".He is no authority, and I shall do everything in my power to get him and his agency SHUT DOWN! I do not want others to be subjected to his thievery and immoral behavior. I didn't lie to him. He did not have trouble getting paid by me. I do not owe him anything; he owes me!!!
I am disputing the amount that I already paid $3,110 and the amount billed $3,051.60 for a total of $6161.60. I am seeking to be refunded the $3,110 and to not pay the difference of $3,051.60 charge.
The client talks in circles. One minute she is telling us that she "Never hired Us" and never knew of...
us to her husband. The whole problem here is that she is not telling the truth to anyone. She told me on more than one occasion that she does not trust her lieing husband, and that he is having affairs with several women in the neighborhood and she thinks she knows this, but she is wrong. This is not the first time I have trouble with Mrs. [redacted]. Facts are - Mrs.[redacted] does not want her husband to know that she doesnt trust him, or that she had him investigated. Most of the information I wanted to talk to her about, she avoided talking to me or calling me back, because of her fear of her husband. I have discussed many situations involving her husbands dishonesty and unfaitfhfulnes. This last situation when she gave me instructions to watch him, is true, "how would I know when, where and the times to be on him? she told me she had to work in a jewelry store in [redacted]. "she -would be working in the store all week long" she now claims this was all not true."Lady I do not spend my time investigation or do a week lond surveillance for nothing." I have all the details of this period, times she wanted us un the case, and the fact that she told me she would be in the Jewelry store in [redacted] I even go some video of her car parked at the store on the 1st day I commenced the surveillance. She is often lied to me. I had trouble getting paid by her other times, not because she didn't have the money, "but because she felt so certain her husband WAS Cheating, and still does"! -"she is Paranoid". Now I told her again, he did nothing that I found, "she still feels he is Cheating"! I have found that clients like her, will never beleive there suspicions are wrong, and many times absolutely will refuse to pay the investigation fee. Spending the time to answer any of the Revdex.com stuff is more tiime I've spent that is a waste. This client is so convinced she is right with all her suspicions about her husband, that nothing anyone else tells her that she is wrong, is only more wasted time - "It is not going to change her mind one bit" this women needs to see [redacted]. I have a better chance to be paid by a routine "Dead beat" than a person who is PARANOID. While I'm sorry for her mental state, I have this happen often. My next move, will be filing litigation in a week or two. So ten she can tell the judge. I'm Done, for now~! Thank you