Sipes, Michael K. Law Offices of

I am rejecting this response because: [redacted] signed away all rights and claims to the propertyI would like the law office to pursue him and get the lien paid off

The judgment lien recorded in Sacramento County was recorded as to property owned by *** *** *** *** was not listed on the Abstract of Judgment

He is a fraud ! He has countless fake companies and illegally use's peoples phone numbers and address's to hide his fraud, call the fbi the police and turn him into the da do not talk with him also turn him into the state bar of calif,, he might also have alias's throughout the us... Beware of all and take action now !

This case of [redacted] was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Court on December 3, 2007.   On September 29, 2008, judgment was entered against Jennifer [redacted].   The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes was not the attorney for the [redacted] Capital at that time.   The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes substituted in as attorney for [redacted] Capital on January 29, 2009.  The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes did not report the judgment to credit reporting agency.   In fact, The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes does not credit report at all.   On March 9, 2015, [redacted] & [redacted] substituted in as attorney of record for the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes.  The address and contact information is as follows:   Name: [redacted] & [redacted] PC Address: [redacted]
[redacted]

In January, 2009, the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes substituted in as the attorney for the judgment creditor in case number [redacted].   Judgment was entered in that case prior to that date and different law firm handled the case up until January, 2009.   The judgment was not reported...

on [redacted]'s credit report by the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes.    The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes is no longer the attorney of record for the judgment creditor in this case.

In October, 2013, a client placed an account with the consumer's name with this office for collection.   Since October 31, 2013 the law office has done no business with the consumer and no longer represents the client.   Any inquiry on the consumer's credit at the time was authorized by...

law and the attempt(s) to contact the consumer to arrange payment of this debt were legal.   This office made no attempt to practice law in [redacted].   In terms of removal of any inquiry on the consumer's credit, this office is informed that inquiries drop off a credit report after two years which would be in less than 30 days from now.

If [redacted] is not on title to the property, then the recorded Abstract of Judgment did not create a lien on the property.   If he is on title the the property, then the lien attached to his interest in the property.

I am rejecting this response because:[redacted] signed away all rights and claims to the property. I would like the law office to pursue him and get the lien paid off.

I am rejecting this response because: At this time in March another file was in fact placed with their name on it to the courts in reguards to this case. Show me proof of who is now in charge when I see your information still being used in the courts and your filing without proper address. As usual.

Review: I entered into a payment plan with this law firm on behalk of cach,llc cach,llc did not receive payments from the law firm on my behalf. I have canceled checks to show I paid this debt to the law firm in full.Desired settlement: I want the collection removed from my credit report asap and the debt to show as satisfied

business

response:

the customer agreed to settle an account balance owed to cach, llc by paying $2,779.29. The customer's check was returned as nsf on november 6, 2013. My office no longer handles this account. The customer should contact[redacted] law office at

Review: Law Office of Michael Sipes has been attaching a lien to my bank accounts and wages for more than 10 years. California statute of limitations ignored.

A representative from this law office threatened to "take everything you have and will ever have in the future" and "stop your Social Security Disability" in 2010. These statements were made regarding a credit card debt [redacted] Credit Services) which Michael Sipes has been submitting liens since 1995. The California statute of limitations on credit card debt is three (3) years! For two decades this law firm has been using a single debt to make my life [redacted]! The Law Offices of Michael Satan continues to threaten my disability income and my livelihood.Desired Settlement: I would like this law office to refund my bank account charges for the past decade and be exposed for illegal debt collection.

Business

Response:

Business' Initial Response

The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes represents a judgment creditor attempting to collect a debt. The judgment was entered on May 9, 2007. The judgment has not been collected for over ten years. We are committed to working with Ms. [redacted] if she would like to resolve the amount owed on the judgment. We have never enforced the judgment against exempt funds such as disability payments as stated by Ms. [redacted]. The statements in her complaint are simply false.

Review: These people stole my money from my bank account,$143.55, put a lean on checking account and blocked it causing account to be over drawn of $146 extra

on july 26th had a lean put on my account,they took out $143.55 for a levy from 2002 that was not mine, and I have never received any type of court oders or bills from the so called company I have filed a police report for fraud and called hewett packard to file a claim of fraud but they were unable to help me, futher more it was not on my credit report,I had to get a copy of lein from my bank,alaw office will not return my calls or help in this case and are very rude when talking to them,making me feel stupid for not knowing of this problem 12 years ago.I NEED HELPDesired Settlement: I would like the money they stole $143.55 plus $250.00 for overdraft fees and bank fees incured because of these people

Business

Response:

Business' Initial Response

The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes disputes the claim of Ms. [redacted] but we have been informed that Ms. [redacted] has worked out a settlement directly with the judgment creditor and my office is no longer involved in this matter.

Consumer's Final Response

(The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.)

I have contacted the creditors and am still waiting for their decision...

Review: Poor collection practice, customer service and follow up with clients.

On around September 23 I received a law suit from the Law office of Michael Sipes stating that I have failed to pay a debt. I received the notice on Saturday afternoon and called their office on Monday afternoon. I spoke to a lady who was very rude and did not let me explain the reason for my call. She demanded for payment on the debt. First I asked her if an attempt was made to contact me and she said yes a letter was sent out by their clent who hired them. I asked her again if "her company" tried to contact me and she said "no" because the prior company had already tired. So I asked her, why didnt they try to call me? she said they did, I asked her what number did they call me at? She gave me a number that I did not recognized and I told her that thats not my number. She became aggresive and said I need to pay the debt as they have done all they could to contact me...so I asked her if there was an attempt to contact me before the law suit and she did not want to answer. I finally asked her to let me speak to her supervisor. I was connected with [redacted] who could not answer my questions either. She demanded I pay the debt which I couldnt because of financial difficulties. [redacted] asked when can I make the payment? I told her I would have to call her back because I had already spent 1 on the phone with the other lady and I would call her on my next lunch break, which I did. I told her I was willing to pay the debt but would like to hear the payment options so she told me to contact them the next day to work something out. I called the following day Tuesday at noon and [redacted] refused to talk to me and transfered me to Pablo who was rude as well and demanded payment. I asked him about the payment options and decided to pay the full amount once I received a letter from their company stating details on the amount owed. Pablo assured me he would and I told him I would need 10 days to get the money and he agreed that my balance would be wiped clean once I made payment and a letter would be forward to me,credit bureau and court stating that the debt was settled. I contact Pablo on 10/8/13 at 12pm and paid by check. I asked Pablo to please email me a receipt that shows I have paid, he said that wont be possible until a 30 days. He said the they would automatically sent the receipt and I can call to get it emailed too. 30 days passed and I did not receive a receipt nor an email. I called their number and left numerous voice mails and did not hear back from them. I then received a letter from [redacted] Law group that the account was sold to them by Michael Sipes law office. I contacted [redacted] Law office and they immediately tried to help me out but were unable because no file was ever forwarded to them. It has now been over 2 months since I made payment and no one can give me an answer as to my account. I made my payment in full to avoid any further harrasment from this company but they just seemed to disappear leaving with my money, a bad report on my credit and no attempt to even contact me. Very upsetting that I did my part and settled my account only to find out they could not follow through on their promise to get me a receipt, clean the negative scores on the credit report and file the paper work with the court.Desired Settlement: Settlement receipt stating that the debt was paid off, clearing the collection/debt from my credit history and closing the lawsuit with the court. Also, copies of the paper work sent to the court for my records and monetary refund for the amount of time I have spent trying to get this resolved. This has cause many difficulties as the law suit has affect me through work and in job opportunities.

Business

Response:

Initial Business Response

Mr. [redacted] has paid the account at issue in full. My client has closed the account. My client's trade line was reported as paid in full on Mr. [redacted]'s credit report on October 15, 2013. This file was transitioned from my office to law firm following the payment made by Mr. [redacted] in October, 2013. I apologize for the lack of communication following that transition. The new law firm has requested that the case be dismissed and the entire matter is resolved. Today, I will also mail a letter/receipt to Mr. [redacted] as he requested.

Review: To whom it may concern, This time last year I contacted your agency and was told that you guys didnt have anything on my credit reporting, While running my credit report again, I see that it is in fact still on my credit. So I searched the case and noticed that you guys supposedly served me to an address that in fact I havent lived at in 4 years. Isnt this against the law to make false reporting? Just like when I was served at an address back 6 years ago that I didnt even live at over 10 years. I have given your company my new address many times along with a letter, and I have filed with the courts, this is illegal and I know that I do not owe this much money for a credit card. This is ridiculous, and I would like some type of proper treatment, you guys also know that I have been on workers compensation for over 3 years now from [redacted] my employer in which you supposedly served. All of this is getting out of hand and I will be acting out to the judge calling your company out for lying along with fraud.Please be advised this is wrong! I would like this removed from my Credit reporting A.S.A.P.This office continues to serve paperwork at old addresses in which I haven't lived at in years, and turning it into the court for dates, etc I found this out by running my credit. This is horrible, and their practices are illegal. Stating that I now owe over 4500 dollars? Your out of your mind.This law office is corrupted, and needs to be researched for all their illegal practices going after innocent people to earn a buck.I would like this to be settled. As soon as possible I want this off my credit.Desired Settlement: I would like them to stop lying to the courts stating I was in fact when I wasn't I've called this office and no one knows anything but it's on my credit report as a judgement...FUNNY!

Business

Response:

In January, 2009, the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes substituted in as the attorney for the judgment creditor in case number [redacted]. Judgment was entered in that case prior to that date and different law firm handled the case up until January, 2009. The judgment was not reported on [redacted]'s credit report by the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes. The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes is no longer the attorney of record for the judgment creditor in this case.

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because: At this time in March another file was in fact placed with their name on it to the courts in reguards to this case. Show me proof of who is now in charge when I see your information still being used in the courts and your filing without proper address. As usual.

Business

Response:

This case of [redacted] was filed in San Bernardino County Superior Court on December 3, 2007. On September 29, 2008, judgment was entered against Jennifer [redacted]. The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes was not the attorney for the [redacted] Capital at that time. The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes substituted in as attorney for [redacted] Capital on January 29, 2009. The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes did not report the judgment to credit reporting agency. In fact, The Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes does not credit report at all. On March 9, 2015, [redacted] & [redacted] substituted in as attorney of record for the Law Offices of Michael K. Sipes. The address and contact information is as follows: Name: [redacted] & [redacted] PC Address: [redacted]

Review: My ex-husband failed to pay his credit card and through the collections process, a lien for the amount, with interest was placed on my house. When Mr. [redacted] came after me for the debt because my wages were unattached, I agreed to pay $150.00 a month to avoid his office attaching my wages (as he threatened to do). I ended up filing a bankruptcy to avoid having to pay a debt that belonged to my ex- husband. I informed the attorney that my ex- husband, Mark [redacted], had signed away his claim to the former family home. I also provided the office with Mr. [redacted]'s current address several times. The lien on the house is currently preventing me from accepting offers on my house, which is for sale. I need it removed and I need them to actually go after my ex- husband for HIS debt.Desired Settlement: Please remove the lien from my home and contact the debtor at his current address.

Business

Response:

The judgment lien recorded in Sacramento County was recorded as to property owned by [redacted]. [redacted] was not listed on the Abstract of Judgment.

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because:[redacted] signed away all rights and claims to the property. I would like the law office to pursue him and get the lien paid off.

Business

Response:

If [redacted] is not on title to the property, then the recorded Abstract of Judgment did not create a lien on the property. If he is on title the the property, then the lien attached to his interest in the property.

Review: This law firm sent a letter stating that I owed more than what I actually owed or what was charged off by the company I owed. This law firm also is not allowed to even practice law in [redacted], which is where I live and where the debt is. They also did a hard inquiry on my credit.Desired Settlement: I would like the original charge off amount to be corrected, and for them to be taken off my credit report completely. I want the hard inquiry they made taken off as well as any debt they reported I owed them because legally they can't practice law in [redacted] and should never been able to do a hard inquiry and even look at what I owed.

Business

Response:

In October, 2013, a client placed an account with the consumer's name with this office for collection. Since October 31, 2013 the law office has done no business with the consumer and no longer represents the client. Any inquiry on the consumer's credit at the time was authorized by law and the attempt(s) to contact the consumer to arrange payment of this debt were legal. This office made no attempt to practice law in [redacted]. In terms of removal of any inquiry on the consumer's credit, this office is informed that inquiries drop off a credit report after two years which would be in less than 30 days from now.

Review: don't want to be bothered I got call from this number XXX-XXX-XXXX I hung up on the girl I redialed the number it is from a law office

I got a call from law office of michael k sipes I answered after the lady asked for my last 4 digits of my ss# I hung up on her, then I called back and it is on recording that it is a law office of michael k sipes, I want them to know I am filing a complaint against them and for them to know I am in a debt consolidation program!Desired Settlement: I want a refund for distress and the [redacted] they put me through and for them to know right now I am not working so I cannot make a payment and that I am in a debt consolidation program! and I do have a lawyer

Business

Response:

Initial Business Response

My office will no longer communicate with Mr. [redacted] as he has requested. We believe this will resolve his complaint.

Final Consumer Response

(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)

I want a settlement case as well I want them to pay me a fee