Sign in

Skytop Rovers

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Skytop Rovers? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Skytop Rovers

Skytop Rovers Reviews (6)

------ Forwarded message ----------From: Revdex.com of Metro Washington DCDate: Mon, Nov 30, at 11:AMSubject: Fwd: You have a new message from the Revdex.com of Metro Washington DC & Eastern Pennsylvania in regards to your complaint # [redacted] .To: [redacted] < [redacted] @myRevdex.com.org>---------- Forwarded message ----------From: [redacted] < [redacted] @ [redacted] .com>Date: Wed, Nov 25, at 1:PMSubject: RE: You have a new message from the Revdex.com of Metro Washington DC & Eastern Pennsylvania in regards to your complaint # [redacted] .To: "[email protected]" , " [redacted] @ [redacted] .com" < [redacted] @ [redacted] .com>Dear Sir/Madam:Please rescind my complaintWe got hold off each other and everything is in good orderThanks for the assistance.Sincerely, [redacted]

To Whom it May ConcernSkytop Rover Cois a *** Registered importer, and is responsible for the importation of nonconforming "Grey Market" vehicles not originally manufactured for sale in the US.Mr [redacted] Contacted Skytop and demanded that we write him a petition for his [redacted] vehicle which was originally purchased new in CanadaUsing "demand" in this case is an important fact, because from the outset we were notable to really reason with Mr***, he simply demanded we write it, without wanting to listen to any of the nuances regarding how the petition process worksalso need to state that Mr [redacted] had ample opportunity to review our standard contract prior to signing it, I am not sure if he has reviewed it, but the responsibilities of the importer are very clear.I do have to say that Mr***'s characterization of what transpired between my company, himself and US [redacted] is wildly inaccurateSpecifically, Mr [redacted] was fully aware that a key engineer at *** was working on responding to specific questions had regarding a Component on his vehicle, the Tire Pressure Monitoring System, or TPMS, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 138, while at the same time demanding a refund and threatening to sue Skytop To quote the late [redacted] , "this does not make sense".In an email dated August 29, 2017, Mr [redacted] emailed me and told me that Skytop had not submitted a "competent petition", (even though we had written the petition within a few days, and [redacted] accepted itLater, [redacted] required some clarificationWe directed a number of questions to the [redacted] engineer responsible for addressing TPMS issues.) Mr [redacted] then, in said email, stated "the foregoing actions of yours have compelled me to initiate legal action against you and your company to recover the $paid you." emailed him back immediately and told him that while was sorry he felt that way and that he was free to avai himself of the courts (I did not, as he asserts "challenge him to go to the court"), the path to a final decision on a petition to [redacted] is a lengthy one, and requires not only review from [redacted] but also submission to The Federal Register for a day comment period I stated that we had indeed completed the petition as per our contract, and that any expenses incurred by the the customer are not the responsibility of Skytop, namely storage charges for a vehicle in CanadaThe contract also states that any fees for writing a petition are non-refundableWe submitted the petition and were in the process of addressing the details with it when Mr [redacted] effectively cancelled the contract, which he was within his rights to doHowever, it also obviated Skytop from any further Work on his behalf.He then called [redacted] in September of this year, a month after he stated he was going go sue Skytop, whereupon the chief of the [redacted] held an impromptu conference callMr*** took it upon himself to shout at the engineers and [redacted] Chief on the phone and myself, all of whom could barely get a word in to respondOnce he had stopped shouting, the engineers and the Chief of *** reiterated what had said, that submitting a petition for import eligibility is a lengthy process and that his expectations of a quick result were unreasonable.Skytop tried to work with Mr***, but his unreasonable expectations, coupled with his puzzling anger and threatening behavior made it an impossible situation to deal withUltimately, since Mr [redacted] unilaterally cancelled the contract he had with Skytop, he is not in a position to expect anything further from my companyI would like to note however, that we are still working very diligently on the petition for his vehicle, for the greater good of all motorists in a similar positionWe expect to have available a Tire Pressure Monitoring System that can be retrofitted to not only his vehicle but any other vehicle that may require it to meet US [redacted] safety standard I have told him that he can follow along as the petition is shepherded through the process, and contact another Registered Importer to do the final work on his vehicle when final approval is realized.Lastly, I would caution Mr [redacted] that the language he has used to characterize my company, without any evidence to back it up, may open Mr [redacted] up to legal issues unrelated to his [redacted] .Thank You,Gabor A

I am rejecting this response because: Contrary to all the dishonest statements made by Gabor A [redacted] of Skytop Rover, I have email trail of the communication that I had with Gabor A [redacted] and the *** [redacted] after repeated requests to do so by both [redacted] and myself Now, he does not want to return the $2,"deposit" either I have emails to show his preference of facing me in the court for collecting the $2,Therefore, it has become necessary that the general public, the ***/ [redacted] and the government is made aware of what this "registered importer" is doing to the general public by misrepresenting and collecting $2,for drafting a so called "petition" full of inadequacies and deficiencies By his own admission Gabor A [redacted] knows that the TPMS issue on the [redacted] is a sure and ongoing problem that would be a hurdle to importation of such vehicles into the US; a problem for which he has not found a solution yetThe bottom line is, he does not want to return the $2,500.00, which he knows he has not earned, for him to keep.For all the foregoing reasons, please publish my complaint on the Revdex.com's website at the earliest, without any further delay Regards, [redacted] ***

------ Forwarded message ----------From: Revdex.com of Metro Washington DCDate: Mon, Nov 30, at 11:AMSubject: Fwd: You have a new message from the Revdex.com of Metro Washington DC & Eastern Pennsylvania in regards to your complaint #***.To: *** ***
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: *** *** Date: Wed, Nov 25, at 1:PMSubject: RE: You have a new message from the Revdex.com of Metro Washington DC & Eastern Pennsylvania in regards to your complaint #***.To: "[email protected]" , "***@***.com" Dear Sir/Madam:Please rescind my complaintWe got hold off each other and everything is in good orderThanks for the assistance.Sincerely, *** ***

I am rejecting this response because:
Contrary to all the dishonest statements made by Gabor A[redacted] of Skytop Rover, I have email trail of the communication that I had with Gabor A[redacted] and the [redacted]/[redacted]; that will unambiguously show that Skytop Rover and Gabor A[redacted] filed a deficient petition in the first place and thereafter repeatedly failed to file amendments to the petition; that was repeatedly asked by [redacted], from him.  After all these reminders, at the teleconferencing with [redacted], Gabor A[redacted] and myself, Gabor A[redacted] was given a set date for filing the amended petition.  Since Gabor A[redacted] did not comply with the deadline, the [redacted] eventually took the decision to dismiss the deficient petition he filed for me.  It is also to be noted that Gabor A[redacted] had no reason to participate in the teleconferencing if he truly believed that I had cancelled the agreement that I entered with him; as he now claims.I have proof of the published decision of [redacted] where they have dismissed my petition, citing the reason for dismissal as "dismissed as incomplete".  This proves the extent of dishonesty in the statements made by Gabor A[redacted] when he states that he is still working on my petition. Gabor A[redacted] states that I "demanded" that he file a petition on my behalf for importing my car.  He thinks anybody reading this are stupid enough to believe his itic statements that a customer can "demand" something from a business entity and the business entity will accede to those demands made by such a client over the email or phone; as though the business entity was under some compulsion to some stranger client or this stranger client had some control over that business entity so as to demand anything from that entity or individual.  The reality is Gabor A[redacted] and Skytop Rover collected $2,500.00 from me knowing fully well as a registered importer, that [redacted] will not allow importation of [redacted] without TPMS installed by the manufacturer.  Gabor A[redacted] thereby indulged in misrepresentation and fraudulently collected $2,500.00 as a "deposit".  He then failed to provide amendments sought by the [redacted]/[redacted] after repeated requests to do so by both [redacted] and myself.  Now, he does not want to return the $2,500.00 "deposit" either.  I have emails to show his preference of facing me in the court for collecting the $2,500.00. Therefore,  it has become necessary that the general public,  the [redacted]/[redacted] and the government is made aware of what this "registered importer" is doing to the general public by misrepresenting and collecting $2,500.00 for drafting a so called "petition" full of inadequacies and deficiencies.   By his own admission Gabor A[redacted] knows that the TPMS issue on the [redacted] is a sure and ongoing problem that would be a hurdle to importation of such vehicles into the US; a problem for which he has not found a solution yet. The bottom line is,  he does not want to return the $2,500.00, which he knows he has not earned, for him to keep.For all the foregoing reasons,  please publish my complaint on the Revdex.com's website at the earliest, without any further delay.
Regards,
[redacted]

To Whom it May ConcernSkytop Rover Co. is a [redacted] Registered importer, and is responsible for the importation of nonconforming "Grey Market" vehicles not originally manufactured for sale in the US.Mr. [redacted] Contacted Skytop and demanded that we write him a petition for his [redacted] vehicle...

which was originally purchased new in Canada. Using "demand" in this case is an important fact, because from the outset we were notable to really reason with Mr. [redacted], he simply demanded we write it, without wanting to listen to any of the nuances regarding how the petition process works. also need to state that Mr. [redacted] had ample opportunity to review our standard contract prior to signing it, I am not sure if he has reviewed it, but the responsibilities of the importer are very clear.I do have to say that Mr. [redacted]'s characterization of what transpired between my company, himself and US [redacted] is wildly inaccurate. Specifically, Mr. [redacted] was fully aware that a key engineer at [redacted] was working on responding to specific questions had regarding a Component on his vehicle, the Tire Pressure Monitoring System, or TPMS, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 138, while at the same time demanding a refund and threatening to sue Skytop.  To quote the late [redacted], "this does not make sense".In an email dated August 29, 2017, Mr. [redacted] emailed me and told me that Skytop had not submitted a "competent petition", (even though we had written the petition within a few days, and [redacted] accepted it. Later, [redacted] required some clarification. We directed a number of questions to the [redacted] engineer responsible for addressing TPMS issues.) Mr. [redacted] then, in said email, stated "the foregoing actions of yours have compelled me to initiate legal action against you and your company to recover the $2500 paid you." emailed him back immediately and told him that while 1 was sorry he felt that way and that he was free to avai himself of the courts (I did not, as he asserts "challenge him to go to the court"), the path to a final decision on a petition to [redacted] is a lengthy one, and requires not only review from [redacted] but also submission to The Federal Register for a 30 day comment period.  I stated that we had indeed completed the petition as per our contract, and that any expenses incurred by the the customer are not the responsibility of Skytop, namely storage charges for a vehicle in Canada. The contract also states that any fees for writing a petition are non-refundable. We submitted the petition and were in the process of addressing the details with it when Mr. [redacted] effectively cancelled the contract, which he was within his rights to do. However, it also obviated Skytop from any further Work on his behalf.He then called [redacted] in September of this year, a month after he stated he was going go sue Skytop, whereupon the chief of the [redacted] held an impromptu conference call. Mr. [redacted] took it upon himself to shout at the engineers and [redacted] Chief on the phone and myself, all of whom could barely get a word in to respond. Once he had stopped shouting, the engineers and the Chief of [redacted] reiterated what had said, that submitting a petition for import eligibility is a lengthy process and that his expectations of a quick result were unreasonable.Skytop tried to work with Mr. [redacted], but his unreasonable expectations, coupled with his puzzling anger and threatening behavior made it an impossible situation to deal with. Ultimately, since Mr. [redacted] unilaterally cancelled the contract he had with Skytop, he is not in a position to expect anything further from my company. I would like to note however, that we are still working very diligently on the petition for his vehicle, for the greater good of all motorists in a similar position. We expect to have available a Tire Pressure Monitoring System that can be retrofitted to not only his vehicle but any other vehicle that may require it to meet US [redacted] safety standard 138.  I have told him that he can follow along as the petition is shepherded through the process, and contact another Registered Importer to do the final work on his vehicle when final approval is realized.Lastly, I would caution Mr. [redacted] that the language he has used to characterize my company, without any evidence to back it up, may open Mr. [redacted] up to legal issues unrelated to his [redacted].Thank You,Gabor A.

Check fields!

Write a review of Skytop Rovers

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Skytop Rovers Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 1045 Sarah Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19125

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

www.skytoprover.com

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with Skytop Rovers, but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for Skytop Rovers

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated