SONOGAGE #IN PACHOMETRYRevdex.com May 26, Euclid Ave, 4th FloorCleveland, OH 44115RE: Complaint ID [redacted] To whom it may concern;This complaint is completely unfounded.By the time we received it the Doctor had purchased a new unit from us.I did not know that one of the goals of the Revdex.com was to assist customers in negotiating purchase price.Here are the facts:The doctor called us in early February stating” The unit will not turn onIt is dead”His unit was years old.We gave him a Return Authorization Number and told him that there would be anevaluation fee of $to evaluate his unit.The doctor waited months to send in his unit.On April 16, we sent him the cost of repairing his unit: $1920.25.This cost estimate included the evaluation fee of $350.00.We also sent him the cost of a new unit $2000.00This cost re?ected a $tradiscount and did not include the evaluation fee.The Doctor wanted a better price for a new unit.He had one of his colleagues call us for our [redacted] show price.This is the price we give to new customers who go to the [redacted] show.He wanted his tradiscount of $and the show price.He did not go to the [redacted] show.He admitted in discussions than he had tried a less expensive unit.He found that it was not easy to use and not accurate.He con?rmed that the Sonogage Pachometer was the easiest to use and the most accurateavailableIt is the gold standard Pachometer of the industry.Thus this complaint is his attempt to get a better price, nothing more.He was provided all the information and there were several e-mails and phone callsbetween us.I note that he paid more than the $in his complaint.Sincerely, [redacted] ***President
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below I think the vendor is getting confused by the Revdex.com process I filled out a Revdex.com complaint against this vendor several weeks ago I assumed that he had seen the complaint and that that was why he contacted me We spoke together and resolved the situation by my purchasing a new device at a discounted rate Apparently the vendor received this complaint AFTER everything had been taken care of between usTherefore, his comments that Revdex.com was used to "negotiate a better price" is simply wrong since the better price was agreed upon even before the complaint reached the vendorAlso, the vendor specifically reports that I was informed about the $fee to diagnose the instrument This is incorrect and is the entire crux of the problem If a $fee was divulged upfront I would never have accepted it and we would not be in this current situation If you impose a $fee to simply diagnose a problem you better make absolutely sure that the other party fully understands and accepts this fee AND you should put this stipulation in writing The fact that we are now having this conversation is evidence that this information was not divulged (whether on purpose or by omission) Lastly, the vendor gives the impression that somehow I acknowledged that his product is the #pachometer in the market; in fact, I have no idea how his pachometer is rated I purchased a new pachometer from him primarily because he gave me a traon the defective one and a special discounted rate Other than that I really have no idea how this instrument measures up to the many others that are available I would say that my prior experience with this equipment was satisfactory and ultimately the vendor seemed willing to meet me half way in this dispute Therefore, I hope that we are both satisfied and can lay the matter to rest Regards, [redacted]
SONOGAGE #IN PACHOMETRYRevdex.com May 26, Euclid Ave, 4th FloorCleveland, OH 44115RE: Complaint ID [redacted] To whom it may concern;This complaint is completely unfounded.By the time we received it the Doctor had purchased a new unit from us.I did not know that one of the goals of the Revdex.com was to assist customers in negotiating purchase price.Here are the facts:The doctor called us in early February stating” The unit will not turn onIt is dead”His unit was years old.We gave him a Return Authorization Number and told him that there would be anevaluation fee of $to evaluate his unit.The doctor waited months to send in his unit.On April 16, we sent him the cost of repairing his unit: $1920.25.This cost estimate included the evaluation fee of $350.00.We also sent him the cost of a new unit $2000.00This cost re?ected a $tradiscount and did not include the evaluation fee.The Doctor wanted a better price for a new unit.He had one of his colleagues call us for our [redacted] show price.This is the price we give to new customers who go to the [redacted] show.He wanted his tradiscount of $and the show price.He did not go to the [redacted] show.He admitted in discussions than he had tried a less expensive unit.He found that it was not easy to use and not accurate.He con?rmed that the Sonogage Pachometer was the easiest to use and the most accurateavailableIt is the gold standard Pachometer of the industry.Thus this complaint is his attempt to get a better price, nothing more.He was provided all the information and there were several e-mails and phone callsbetween us.I note that he paid more than the $in his complaint.Sincerely, [redacted] ***President
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below I think the vendor is getting confused by the Revdex.com process I filled out a Revdex.com complaint against this vendor several weeks ago I assumed that he had seen the complaint and that that was why he contacted me We spoke together and resolved the situation by my purchasing a new device at a discounted rate Apparently the vendor received this complaint AFTER everything had been taken care of between usTherefore, his comments that Revdex.com was used to "negotiate a better price" is simply wrong since the better price was agreed upon even before the complaint reached the vendorAlso, the vendor specifically reports that I was informed about the $fee to diagnose the instrument This is incorrect and is the entire crux of the problem If a $fee was divulged upfront I would never have accepted it and we would not be in this current situation If you impose a $fee to simply diagnose a problem you better make absolutely sure that the other party fully understands and accepts this fee AND you should put this stipulation in writing The fact that we are now having this conversation is evidence that this information was not divulged (whether on purpose or by omission) Lastly, the vendor gives the impression that somehow I acknowledged that his product is the #pachometer in the market; in fact, I have no idea how his pachometer is rated I purchased a new pachometer from him primarily because he gave me a traon the defective one and a special discounted rate Other than that I really have no idea how this instrument measures up to the many others that are available I would say that my prior experience with this equipment was satisfactory and ultimately the vendor seemed willing to meet me half way in this dispute Therefore, I hope that we are both satisfied and can lay the matter to rest Regards, [redacted]