Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/11/06) */ Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on or about November 4, If she has any further questions she may contact me directly Best regards, [redacted] Associate Attorney Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 7, 2014/11/17) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) I have not recieved anything from Blatt, Hasenmiller, Liebsker & MooreIt has been business days since they claim to have sent out this documentationI still have not recieved it Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 9, 2014/11/19) */ Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on 11/4/This morning (11/18/14) I placed another copy of the release in the mailIt was sent to [redacted] SSt [redacted] Ave [redacted] XXXXXPlease feel free to contact me directly if this is not received
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2015/04/13) */ Contact Name and Title: [redacted] Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Contact Email: [redacted] @bhlmlaw.com April 13, Revdex.com Wabash Ave Chicago, IL Your File No: XXXXXXXX Our Reference No: XXXXXXX RE: [redacted] To Whom It May Concern: We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated April 10, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] ***On or about January 23, 2014, [redacted] , LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account On or about January 27, 2014, Blatt mailed a demand letter to [redacted] seeking a balance due of $2,Blatt did not receive a response to the demandBlatt filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance dueOn April 29, 2014, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $2, On or about May 27, 2014, [redacted] contacted ***'s office to resolve her outstanding debtAn agreement was made to resolve the account for $1, [redacted] provided checking account information for a $1,payment dated [redacted] 27, On or about May 29, 2014, [redacted] ***'s bank refused to honor the checkIn [redacted] ***'s complaint she states that this check was a balance transfer check from a credit cardOur office does not accept balance transfer checksNumerous attempts were made by Blatt to resolve the account with [redacted] ***However, Blatt never received funds to resolve the account On March 16, 2015, Blatt filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted] ***'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment [redacted] ***'s bank has responded that there are sufficient funds in her bank account to resolve the accountA hearing on the citation is scheduled for April 20, 2015, in the Fourth District Court for Cook CountyIf [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on that date or file a motion prior to the court dateIf [redacted] would like to resolve the account prior to the court date, she should contact our office If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me Very Truly Yours, [redacted] Associate Attorney Blatt Hasenmiller Leibsker & Moore LLC [redacted] Chicago, Illinois Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 7, 2015/04/20) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) I had court today they wanted 80% cash or money order check bank only I had $resolved it, but the lawyer said I need send the e-mail with the offer and wait days for respond from his managersThey didn't unfreeze my accounts Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 9, 2015/04/21) */ Law Offices ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC SLaSalle Street, [redacted] Suite [redacted] Chicago, Illinois XXXXX Phone 312/XXX-XXXX [redacted] Outside Chicago 800/XXX-XXXX Fax 312/XXX-XXXX April 21, Revdex.com Wabash Ave Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX Our Reference No: XXXXXXX RE: [redacted] To Whom It [redacted] Concern: We are in receipt of consumer's rebuttal dated April 20, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "***") represents [redacted] , LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] ***On or about January 23, 2014, [redacted] , LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account As previously stated in our original response, [redacted] and [redacted] agreed to resolve this account for $1,on [redacted] 27, That settlement offer expired on July 31, Numerous attempts were made by [redacted] to resolve the account with [redacted] prior to the settlement offer expiringHowever, [redacted] never received funds to resolve the account On March 16, 2015, [redacted] filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted] ***'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment [redacted] ***'s bank responded that, pursuant to the Citation, they have frozen $4,of the $29,held in accounts belonging to [redacted] ***On April 15, 2015, [redacted] ***'s bank further responded that there were two joint account holders or adverse claimants on the accounts belonging to [redacted] ***Pursuant to Illinois Statute ILCS 5/X-XXXX, our office is required to provide notice of the Citation to the joint account holders or adverse claimants On April 20, 2015, an attorney from our office and [redacted] appeared in court for hearing on the CitationOur office requested to continue the Citation in order to provide notice to the joint account holders or adverse claimants as required by Illinois StatuteThe attorney from our office informed [redacted] that our client has only authorized a settlement on this account for 80% of the current balanceThe previous offer to resolve the account for $1,expired on July 31, The attorney from our office further informed [redacted] that she could send him a settlement offer by e-mail , which he would submit to our client for review If [redacted] would like to resolve this matter prior to the next court date, she should contact our office with a settlement offerIf [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on the next court date or file a motion prior to the court date If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me Very Truly Yours, [redacted] Associate Attorney [redacted] Leibsker & [redacted] LLC [redacted] Chicago, Illinois XXXXX Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBTANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE Illinois Indiana Michigan Arizona Pennsylvania
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/03/13) */ March 13, Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois N Wabash Ave # Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX RE: [redacted] Our Reference #: XXXXXXX To whom it may concern: We are in receipt of your letter dated March 13, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] On or about January 16, LVNV placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account On or about January 20, 2014, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr [redacted] for the balance due of $1,On or about January 27, Blatt spoke with Mr [redacted] by phoneMr [redacted] offered to settle his account for a payment of $600.00, but Blatt declined his offerBlatt gave Mr [redacted] a counteroffer of $(85%) which he accepted Later that afternoon Mr [redacted] called Blatt and disputed the debtHe also asked to see documentation from the original creditorBlatt notified LVNV of the dispute and requested the documentation On March 5, 2014, LVNV recalled Mr [redacted] 's account from BlattBlatt closed the file and has no plans for further collection activity against Mr [redacted] at this time Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter Sincerely, [redacted] , Associate Attorney Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (2000, 7, 2014/03/18) */ (The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.) I did not accept any offer from BlattHowever I will accept this response from them
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/02/19) */ February 19, Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois N Wabash Ave # Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX RE: [redacted] Our Reference #: XXXXXXX To whom it may concern: We are in receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as ''***'') represents Capital One Bank in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] On or about April 4, Capital One placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account On or about April 6, 2011, [redacted] sent an initial demand letter to [redacted] for the balance due of $1, [redacted] received no return mail, and [redacted] did not respond to the letter [redacted] spoke with [redacted] by phone on May 18, The parties agreed to a temporary payment plan of $per month On November 28, [redacted] received a letter from [redacted] asking [redacted] to discontinue all further electronic automatic payments from her account [redacted] acted accordingly [redacted] attempted to reach [redacted] by phone in an effort to set up new payment arrangementsHowever, ***'s phone calls were not returnedHaving been unable to reach a resolution to [redacted] 's outstanding balance, [redacted] filed a law suit against herOn March 19, 2012, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her for $plus costs and attorney's fees On April 30, [redacted] resumed making her $monthly paymentsHowever, on March 28, [redacted] 's payment was returned as insufficient funds and no further payments have been made since that date [redacted] 's account currently has an outstanding balance of $1,She should contact our office if she has questions about her balance or would like to set up a new payment arrangement Best regards, ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC [redacted] , Associate Attorney [redacted] Chicago, IL XXXXX XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/09/24) */
A Satisfaction and Release of Judgment was mailed to *** *** on September 24, Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/09/23) */
On or about January 15, 2009, Citibank placed an account with our firm in the name of *** *** seeking a past due balance of $In an effort to collect the debt Blatt filed a law suit against *** ***
*** *** appeared in
court on November 24, and agreed to a judgment against her in the amount of $
On November 22, the parties reached a settlement of $*** is currently awaiting payment from *** ***Upon receipt of payment *** will close *** ***'s account and issue a Satisfaction and Release of Judgment
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you have in regards to this matter
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/09/25) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Just for clarification purposes on 9/22/not 11/22/we finally reached a settlementIT ONLY TOOK THEM WEEKS TO SETTLE! TERRIBLE BUSINESS! Thank you!
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2014/09/29) */
Please be advised that the parties have reached an agreement*** is now awaiting receipt of the settlement payment from *** ***
I have called this "law office" multiple times on a variety of business matters and each time I think the experience could not get worse, it doesThe hold times are extreme, if I were to average the amount of time I've spent on hold and being transferred to wrong department to wrong department, it would be about minutes
The lack of professional and customer service is atrociousI have spoken with many different representatives and each one is rude, disrespectful and condescending I understand that you are attempting to collect on a debt, and that is probably not something you enjoy doing, but the vile manner in which you treat your consumers is atrocious
Lack of professional, knowledge and overall integrity is how I view Blatt, Hassemiller, Leibsker & MooreIt's truly a shame that anyone has to contact your office for anything
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/04/13) */
Contact Name and Title: [redacted]
Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Contact Email: [redacted]@bhlmlaw.com
April 13, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No:...
XXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
To Whom It May Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated April 10, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 23, 2014,[redacted], LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
On or about January 27, 2014, Blatt mailed a demand letter to [redacted] seeking a balance due of $2,152.60. Blatt did not receive a response to the demand. Blatt filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance due. On April 29, 2014, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $2,152.60.
On or about May 27, 2014, [redacted] contacted [redacted]'s office to resolve her outstanding debt. An agreement was made to resolve the account for $1,600.00. [redacted] provided checking account information for a $1,600.00 payment dated [redacted] 27, 2014. On or about May 29, 2014, [redacted]'s bank refused to honor the check. In [redacted]'s complaint she states that this check was a balance transfer check from a credit card. Our office does not accept balance transfer checks. Numerous attempts were made by Blatt to resolve the account with [redacted]. However, Blatt never received funds to resolve the account.
On March 16, 2015, Blatt filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted]'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment. [redacted]'s bank has responded that there are sufficient funds in her bank account to resolve the account. A hearing on the citation is scheduled for April 20, 2015, in the Fourth District Court for Cook County. If [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on that date or file a motion prior to the court date. If [redacted] would like to resolve the account prior to the court date, she should contact our office.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
Blatt Hasenmiller Leibsker & Moore LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2015/04/20) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I had court today they wanted 80% cash or money order check bank only I had $1600 resolved it, but the lawyer said I need send the e-mail with the offer and wait 3 days for respond from his managers. They didn't unfreeze my accounts.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2015/04/21) */
Law Offices
[redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
10 S. LaSalle Street, * Suite 2200 * Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone 312/XXX-XXXX * Outside Chicago 800/XXX-XXXX
Fax 312/XXX-XXXX
April 21, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No: XXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
To Whom It [redacted] Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's rebuttal dated April 20, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
[redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "[redacted]") represents[redacted], LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 23, 2014,[redacted], LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
As previously stated in our original response, [redacted] and [redacted] agreed to resolve this account for $1,600.00 on [redacted] 27, 2014. That settlement offer expired on July 31, 2014. Numerous attempts were made by [redacted] to resolve the account with [redacted] prior to the settlement offer expiring. However, [redacted] never received funds to resolve the account.
On March 16, 2015, [redacted] filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted]'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment. [redacted]'s bank responded that, pursuant to the Citation, they have frozen $4,962.58 of the $29,077.32 held in accounts belonging to [redacted]. On April 15, 2015, [redacted]'s bank further responded that there were two joint account holders or adverse claimants on the accounts belonging to [redacted]. Pursuant to Illinois Statute 735 ILCS 5/X-XXXX, our office is required to provide notice of the Citation to the joint account holders or adverse claimants.
On April 20, 2015, an attorney from our office and [redacted] appeared in court for hearing on the Citation. Our office requested to continue the Citation in order to provide notice to the joint account holders or adverse claimants as required by Illinois Statute. The attorney from our office informed [redacted] that our client has only authorized a settlement on this account for 80% of the current balance. The previous offer to resolve the account for $1,600.00 expired on July 31, 2014. The attorney from our office further informed [redacted] that she could send him a settlement offer by e-mail , which he would submit to our client for review.
If [redacted] would like to resolve this matter prior to the next court date, she should contact our office with a settlement offer. If [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on the next court date or file a motion prior to the court date.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
[redacted] Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE
Illinois Indiana Michigan Arizona Pennsylvania
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 8, 2014/10/10) */
We are in receipt of your letter dated September 29, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents Capital One Bank in the collection of...
delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about March 2, 2010, an account was placed with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card.
On March 4, 2010, Blatt sent a demand letter to Ms. [redacted] seeking a balance due of $1,225.09. Blatt received no response to the demand letter. Blatt attempted to contact Ms. [redacted] by phone but Blatt's phone calls went unanswered and voice messages were not returned. In an effort to collect the outstanding balance, Blatt filed a lawsuit against Ms. [redacted].
On November 9, 2010, Ms. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $1225.09.
On or about April 11, 2014. Blatt spoke on the phone with Ms. [redacted] and discussed a resolution to her outstanding debt. The parties discussed a few different payment options but did not finalize an agreement. The conversation ended with Ms. [redacted] stating that she would make monthly payments of $400 towards the balance.
On or about May 16, 2014 Ms. [redacted] made a payment of $1500 which was applied to her account. Ms. [redacted] might have been under the impression that this payment would satisfy her debt. However, the parties had not reached a final arrangement and there remained a balance due after Ms. [redacted]'s $1500 payment. A bank citation was filed against Ms. [redacted] in an effort to collect the remaining balance.
On or about September 10, 2014 the parties spoke by phone. Ms. [redacted] explained her confusion and Blatt agreed to dismiss the bank citation. On September 30, 2014, Blatt dismissed the citation. Ms. [redacted]'s account is now considered settled and no further collection activity will take place on this matter.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/03/05) */
Contact Name and Title: [redacted]
Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Contact Email: [redacted]@bhlmlaw.com
March 5, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No: XXXXXXX
RE:...
[redacted]
To Whom It May Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated March 4, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
[redacted], [redacted], [redacted] & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "[redacted]") represents Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about September 11, 2013, Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
On or about September 16, 2013, [redacted] mailed a demand letter to [redacted] W. [redacted] seeking a balance due of $16,504.61. [redacted] did not receive a response to the demand. [redacted] filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance due. On January 9, 2014, Mr. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against him in the amount of $16,504.61 plus costs.
In his complaint, Mr. [redacted] requests a statement of his account including payments, principal, and interest. On March 3, 2015, our office provided Mr. [redacted] with a detailed accounting including the principal balance, court costs, interest accrued to date, and a payment ledger.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
[redacted] & [redacted] LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/03/13) */
March 13, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are...
in receipt of your letter dated March 13, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 16, 2014 LVNV placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about January 20, 2014, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr. [redacted] for the balance due of $1,776.61. On or about January 27, 2014 Blatt spoke with Mr. [redacted] by phone. Mr. [redacted] offered to settle his account for a payment of $600.00, but Blatt declined his offer. Blatt gave Mr. [redacted] a counteroffer of $1510.11 (85%) which he accepted.
Later that afternoon Mr. [redacted] called Blatt and disputed the debt. He also asked to see documentation from the original creditor. Blatt notified LVNV of the dispute and requested the documentation.
On March 5, 2014, LVNV recalled Mr. [redacted]'s account from Blatt. Blatt closed the file and has no plans for further collection activity against Mr. [redacted] at this time.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 7, 2014/03/18) */
(The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.)
I did not accept any offer from Blatt. However I will accept this response from them.
The service is ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS!! I completely understand that they (those who answer the phones) are required to give information based on scripted information and that's fine. However you DO NOT have to rude to those calling to get an informed explanation of what's going on. I don't care how many times you call you will get a VERY different answer. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO consistency in the information given. They lack integrity. IF you think this is the way to handle busy, unfortunately something went VERY WRONG....
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/11/06) */
Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on or about November 4, 2014. If she has any further questions she may contact me directly.
Best regards,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker...
& Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/11/17) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I have not recieved anything from Blatt, Hasenmiller, Liebsker & Moore. It has been 10 business days since they claim to have sent out this documentation. I still have not recieved it.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2014/11/19) */
Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on 11/4/14. This morning (11/18/14) I placed another copy of the release in the mail. It was sent to [redacted] S. St. [redacted] Ave [redacted] XXXXX. Please feel free to contact me directly if this is not received.
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/02/19) */
February 19, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are in...
receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as ''[redacted]'') represents Capital One Bank in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about April 4, 2011 Capital One placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about April 6, 2011, [redacted] sent an initial demand letter to [redacted] for the balance due of $1,336.04. [redacted] received no return mail, and [redacted] did not respond to the letter. [redacted] spoke with [redacted] by phone on May 18, 2011. The parties agreed to a temporary payment plan of $50 per month.
On November 28, 2011 [redacted] received a letter from [redacted] asking [redacted] to discontinue all further electronic automatic payments from her account. [redacted] acted accordingly.
[redacted] attempted to reach [redacted] by phone in an effort to set up new payment arrangements. However, [redacted]'s phone calls were not returned. Having been unable to reach a resolution to [redacted]'s outstanding balance, [redacted] filed a law suit against her. On March 19, 2012, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her for $1136.04 plus costs and attorney's fees.
On April 30, 2012 [redacted] resumed making her $50 monthly payments. However, on March 28, 2013 [redacted]'s payment was returned as insufficient funds and no further payments have been made since that date.
[redacted]'s account currently has an outstanding balance of $1,342.92. She should contact our office if she has questions about her balance or would like to set up a new payment arrangement.
Best regards,
[redacted], [redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
[redacted], Associate Attorney
[redacted]
Chicago, IL XXXXX
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/04/16) */
April 16, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are in receipt of...
your letter dated April 9, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents Midland Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about June 18, 2012 Midland placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about June 21, 2012, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr. [redacted] for the balance due of $2,520.42. Blatt received no response to the demand letter. Blatt attempted to contact Mr. [redacted] by phone to discuss his outstanding balance, but Blatt's phone calls went unanswered. Having been unable to contact Mr. [redacted], Blatt filed a lawsuit against him in an effort to collect the past due debt.
On January 11, 2013 Mr. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against him in the amount of $2520.42.
Mr. [redacted] provided Blatt with a copy of his credit report which he believed showed that his account had been paid. Blatt submitted the documents to Midland for their review. Midland advised Blatt that the credit report was insufficient proof of a prior payment. Midland explained that the credit report shows a "zero balance" because the account was charged off and not because the account was paid in full. Midland also stated that if Mr. [redacted] is able to provide a settlement letter or a canceled check they would look at it for review.
Mr. [redacted]'s account currently has an outstanding balance of $3,161.12. He should contact our office if he would like to discuss his settlement options. Alternatively, if Mr. [redacted] would like to submit additional documents showing a prior payment Blatt will provide them to Midland for their review.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/04/17) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
This information is incorrect. I appeared in court on 10/1/2012 to address this case. At this time I requested a continuance to provide the attorneys office with documentation. The judge approved this request. A new court date was scheduled for 1/11/2013. Prior to this on January 2, 2013 I faxed over the evidence this item was paid to this attorneys office. I then spoke to a representative at this office who told me that I DID NOT NEED TO APPEAR at the 1/11/13 court hearing and that a motion to dismiss/release was going to be filed. I'm sure the attorneys office has a record of this as they record all calls for quality assurance. I assumed the case was closed as it was listed "count legally closed" on the court website. I then started to receive correspondence regarding a wage garnishment from this law firm. Again, I faxed over and spoke to several people at the firm regarding this. Each time I was told the infomation was to be reviewed with no response. I again had the account reinvestigated which shows it was paid in full. After speaking to another representative at this firm I was instructed to send this information via email directly to the lawfirm ([redacted]@bhlmlaw.com) on March 28, Apr, 1 and April 3rd with absolutely no response.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 13, 2014/04/24) */
The documents provided by Mr. [redacted] have been submitted to Midland for their review. Midland has concluded that Mr. [redacted]'s account was charged off, and the account was not paid in full. If Mr. [redacted] has additional documentation that he would like Midland to review he should submit that to [redacted]'s office.
Final Consumer Response /* (4200, 11, 2014/04/23) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Both parties have incorrect information. In addition to the documetation I have provided I was also employed with the original creditor [redacted] Bank)last year. Through the employment verification process, they also verified this account was paid. Also, if you will look at the documentation I have provided the account numbers are not even correct. I have tried on several occasions to work with this lawfirm with no success. I have spoken to several representatives and emailed the lawfirm directly with no respose. Why would I attempt to arrange for payments on a debt that I do not owe?
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/11/06) */ Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on or about November 4, If she has any further questions she may contact me directly Best regards, [redacted] Associate Attorney Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 7, 2014/11/17) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) I have not recieved anything from Blatt, Hasenmiller, Liebsker & MooreIt has been business days since they claim to have sent out this documentationI still have not recieved it Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 9, 2014/11/19) */ Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on 11/4/This morning (11/18/14) I placed another copy of the release in the mailIt was sent to [redacted] SSt [redacted] Ave [redacted] XXXXXPlease feel free to contact me directly if this is not received
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2015/04/13) */ Contact Name and Title: [redacted] Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Contact Email: [redacted] @bhlmlaw.com April 13, Revdex.com Wabash Ave Chicago, IL Your File No: XXXXXXXX Our Reference No: XXXXXXX RE: [redacted] To Whom It May Concern: We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated April 10, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] ***On or about January 23, 2014, [redacted] , LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account On or about January 27, 2014, Blatt mailed a demand letter to [redacted] seeking a balance due of $2,Blatt did not receive a response to the demandBlatt filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance dueOn April 29, 2014, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $2, On or about May 27, 2014, [redacted] contacted ***'s office to resolve her outstanding debtAn agreement was made to resolve the account for $1, [redacted] provided checking account information for a $1,payment dated [redacted] 27, On or about May 29, 2014, [redacted] ***'s bank refused to honor the checkIn [redacted] ***'s complaint she states that this check was a balance transfer check from a credit cardOur office does not accept balance transfer checksNumerous attempts were made by Blatt to resolve the account with [redacted] ***However, Blatt never received funds to resolve the account On March 16, 2015, Blatt filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted] ***'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment [redacted] ***'s bank has responded that there are sufficient funds in her bank account to resolve the accountA hearing on the citation is scheduled for April 20, 2015, in the Fourth District Court for Cook CountyIf [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on that date or file a motion prior to the court dateIf [redacted] would like to resolve the account prior to the court date, she should contact our office If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me Very Truly Yours, [redacted] Associate Attorney Blatt Hasenmiller Leibsker & Moore LLC [redacted] Chicago, Illinois Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 7, 2015/04/20) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) I had court today they wanted 80% cash or money order check bank only I had $resolved it, but the lawyer said I need send the e-mail with the offer and wait days for respond from his managersThey didn't unfreeze my accounts Final Business Response / [redacted] (4000, 9, 2015/04/21) */ Law Offices ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC SLaSalle Street, [redacted] Suite [redacted] Chicago, Illinois XXXXX Phone 312/XXX-XXXX [redacted] Outside Chicago 800/XXX-XXXX Fax 312/XXX-XXXX April 21, Revdex.com Wabash Ave Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX Our Reference No: XXXXXXX RE: [redacted] To Whom It [redacted] Concern: We are in receipt of consumer's rebuttal dated April 20, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "***") represents [redacted] , LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] ***On or about January 23, 2014, [redacted] , LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account As previously stated in our original response, [redacted] and [redacted] agreed to resolve this account for $1,on [redacted] 27, That settlement offer expired on July 31, Numerous attempts were made by [redacted] to resolve the account with [redacted] prior to the settlement offer expiringHowever, [redacted] never received funds to resolve the account On March 16, 2015, [redacted] filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted] ***'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment [redacted] ***'s bank responded that, pursuant to the Citation, they have frozen $4,of the $29,held in accounts belonging to [redacted] ***On April 15, 2015, [redacted] ***'s bank further responded that there were two joint account holders or adverse claimants on the accounts belonging to [redacted] ***Pursuant to Illinois Statute ILCS 5/X-XXXX, our office is required to provide notice of the Citation to the joint account holders or adverse claimants On April 20, 2015, an attorney from our office and [redacted] appeared in court for hearing on the CitationOur office requested to continue the Citation in order to provide notice to the joint account holders or adverse claimants as required by Illinois StatuteThe attorney from our office informed [redacted] that our client has only authorized a settlement on this account for 80% of the current balanceThe previous offer to resolve the account for $1,expired on July 31, The attorney from our office further informed [redacted] that she could send him a settlement offer by e-mail , which he would submit to our client for review If [redacted] would like to resolve this matter prior to the next court date, she should contact our office with a settlement offerIf [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on the next court date or file a motion prior to the court date If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me Very Truly Yours, [redacted] Associate Attorney [redacted] Leibsker & [redacted] LLC [redacted] Chicago, Illinois XXXXX Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBTANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE Illinois Indiana Michigan Arizona Pennsylvania
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/03/13) */ March 13, Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois N Wabash Ave # Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX RE: [redacted] Our Reference #: XXXXXXX To whom it may concern: We are in receipt of your letter dated March 13, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] On or about January 16, LVNV placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account On or about January 20, 2014, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr [redacted] for the balance due of $1,On or about January 27, Blatt spoke with Mr [redacted] by phoneMr [redacted] offered to settle his account for a payment of $600.00, but Blatt declined his offerBlatt gave Mr [redacted] a counteroffer of $(85%) which he accepted Later that afternoon Mr [redacted] called Blatt and disputed the debtHe also asked to see documentation from the original creditorBlatt notified LVNV of the dispute and requested the documentation On March 5, 2014, LVNV recalled Mr [redacted] 's account from BlattBlatt closed the file and has no plans for further collection activity against Mr [redacted] at this time Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter Sincerely, [redacted] , Associate Attorney Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (2000, 7, 2014/03/18) */ (The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.) I did not accept any offer from BlattHowever I will accept this response from them
Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2014/02/19) */ February 19, Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois N Wabash Ave # Chicago, IL XXXXX Your File No: XXXXXXXX RE: [redacted] Our Reference #: XXXXXXX To whom it may concern: We are in receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as ''***'') represents Capital One Bank in the collection of delinquent credit accountsThis firm does not represent [redacted] On or about April 4, Capital One placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account On or about April 6, 2011, [redacted] sent an initial demand letter to [redacted] for the balance due of $1, [redacted] received no return mail, and [redacted] did not respond to the letter [redacted] spoke with [redacted] by phone on May 18, The parties agreed to a temporary payment plan of $per month On November 28, [redacted] received a letter from [redacted] asking [redacted] to discontinue all further electronic automatic payments from her account [redacted] acted accordingly [redacted] attempted to reach [redacted] by phone in an effort to set up new payment arrangementsHowever, ***'s phone calls were not returnedHaving been unable to reach a resolution to [redacted] 's outstanding balance, [redacted] filed a law suit against herOn March 19, 2012, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her for $plus costs and attorney's fees On April 30, [redacted] resumed making her $monthly paymentsHowever, on March 28, [redacted] 's payment was returned as insufficient funds and no further payments have been made since that date [redacted] 's account currently has an outstanding balance of $1,She should contact our office if she has questions about her balance or would like to set up a new payment arrangement Best regards, ***, [redacted] , Leibsker & [redacted] LLC [redacted] , Associate Attorney [redacted] Chicago, IL XXXXX XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/09/24) */
A Satisfaction and Release of Judgment was mailed to *** *** on September 24, Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/09/23) */
On or about January 15, 2009, Citibank placed an account with our firm in the name of *** *** seeking a past due balance of $In an effort to collect the debt Blatt filed a law suit against *** ***
*** *** appeared in
court on November 24, and agreed to a judgment against her in the amount of $
On November 22, the parties reached a settlement of $*** is currently awaiting payment from *** ***Upon receipt of payment *** will close *** ***'s account and issue a Satisfaction and Release of Judgment
Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions you have in regards to this matter
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/09/25) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Just for clarification purposes on 9/22/not 11/22/we finally reached a settlementIT ONLY TOOK THEM WEEKS TO SETTLE! TERRIBLE BUSINESS! Thank you!
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2014/09/29) */
Please be advised that the parties have reached an agreement*** is now awaiting receipt of the settlement payment from *** ***
I have called this "law office" multiple times on a variety of business matters and each time I think the experience could not get worse, it doesThe hold times are extreme, if I were to average the amount of time I've spent on hold and being transferred to wrong department to wrong department, it would be about minutes
The lack of professional and customer service is atrociousI have spoken with many different representatives and each one is rude, disrespectful and condescending I understand that you are attempting to collect on a debt, and that is probably not something you enjoy doing, but the vile manner in which you treat your consumers is atrocious
Lack of professional, knowledge and overall integrity is how I view Blatt, Hassemiller, Leibsker & MooreIt's truly a shame that anyone has to contact your office for anything
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/04/13) */
Contact Name and Title: [redacted]
Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Contact Email: [redacted]@bhlmlaw.com
April 13, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No:...
XXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
To Whom It May Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated April 10, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 23, 2014,[redacted], LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
On or about January 27, 2014, Blatt mailed a demand letter to [redacted] seeking a balance due of $2,152.60. Blatt did not receive a response to the demand. Blatt filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance due. On April 29, 2014, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $2,152.60.
On or about May 27, 2014, [redacted] contacted [redacted]'s office to resolve her outstanding debt. An agreement was made to resolve the account for $1,600.00. [redacted] provided checking account information for a $1,600.00 payment dated [redacted] 27, 2014. On or about May 29, 2014, [redacted]'s bank refused to honor the check. In [redacted]'s complaint she states that this check was a balance transfer check from a credit card. Our office does not accept balance transfer checks. Numerous attempts were made by Blatt to resolve the account with [redacted]. However, Blatt never received funds to resolve the account.
On March 16, 2015, Blatt filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted]'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment. [redacted]'s bank has responded that there are sufficient funds in her bank account to resolve the account. A hearing on the citation is scheduled for April 20, 2015, in the Fourth District Court for Cook County. If [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on that date or file a motion prior to the court date. If [redacted] would like to resolve the account prior to the court date, she should contact our office.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
Blatt Hasenmiller Leibsker & Moore LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2015/04/20) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I had court today they wanted 80% cash or money order check bank only I had $1600 resolved it, but the lawyer said I need send the e-mail with the offer and wait 3 days for respond from his managers. They didn't unfreeze my accounts.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2015/04/21) */
Law Offices
[redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
10 S. LaSalle Street, * Suite 2200 * Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone 312/XXX-XXXX * Outside Chicago 800/XXX-XXXX
Fax 312/XXX-XXXX
April 21, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No: XXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
To Whom It [redacted] Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's rebuttal dated April 20, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
[redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "[redacted]") represents[redacted], LLC, in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 23, 2014,[redacted], LLC, placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
As previously stated in our original response, [redacted] and [redacted] agreed to resolve this account for $1,600.00 on [redacted] 27, 2014. That settlement offer expired on July 31, 2014. Numerous attempts were made by [redacted] to resolve the account with [redacted] prior to the settlement offer expiring. However, [redacted] never received funds to resolve the account.
On March 16, 2015, [redacted] filed a Third Party Citation To Discover Assets on [redacted]'s bank to collect on the outstanding judgment. [redacted]'s bank responded that, pursuant to the Citation, they have frozen $4,962.58 of the $29,077.32 held in accounts belonging to [redacted]. On April 15, 2015, [redacted]'s bank further responded that there were two joint account holders or adverse claimants on the accounts belonging to [redacted]. Pursuant to Illinois Statute 735 ILCS 5/X-XXXX, our office is required to provide notice of the Citation to the joint account holders or adverse claimants.
On April 20, 2015, an attorney from our office and [redacted] appeared in court for hearing on the Citation. Our office requested to continue the Citation in order to provide notice to the joint account holders or adverse claimants as required by Illinois Statute. The attorney from our office informed [redacted] that our client has only authorized a settlement on this account for 80% of the current balance. The previous offer to resolve the account for $1,600.00 expired on July 31, 2014. The attorney from our office further informed [redacted] that she could send him a settlement offer by e-mail , which he would submit to our client for review.
If [redacted] would like to resolve this matter prior to the next court date, she should contact our office with a settlement offer. If [redacted] would like to contest the citation or assert one of her exemptions, she should appear in court on the next court date or file a motion prior to the court date.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
[redacted] Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A DEBT COLLECTOR AND THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE
Illinois Indiana Michigan Arizona Pennsylvania
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 8, 2014/10/10) */
We are in receipt of your letter dated September 29, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents Capital One Bank in the collection of...
delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about March 2, 2010, an account was placed with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card.
On March 4, 2010, Blatt sent a demand letter to Ms. [redacted] seeking a balance due of $1,225.09. Blatt received no response to the demand letter. Blatt attempted to contact Ms. [redacted] by phone but Blatt's phone calls went unanswered and voice messages were not returned. In an effort to collect the outstanding balance, Blatt filed a lawsuit against Ms. [redacted].
On November 9, 2010, Ms. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her in the amount of $1225.09.
On or about April 11, 2014. Blatt spoke on the phone with Ms. [redacted] and discussed a resolution to her outstanding debt. The parties discussed a few different payment options but did not finalize an agreement. The conversation ended with Ms. [redacted] stating that she would make monthly payments of $400 towards the balance.
On or about May 16, 2014 Ms. [redacted] made a payment of $1500 which was applied to her account. Ms. [redacted] might have been under the impression that this payment would satisfy her debt. However, the parties had not reached a final arrangement and there remained a balance due after Ms. [redacted]'s $1500 payment. A bank citation was filed against Ms. [redacted] in an effort to collect the remaining balance.
On or about September 10, 2014 the parties spoke by phone. Ms. [redacted] explained her confusion and Blatt agreed to dismiss the bank citation. On September 30, 2014, Blatt dismissed the citation. Ms. [redacted]'s account is now considered settled and no further collection activity will take place on this matter.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/03/05) */
Contact Name and Title: [redacted]
Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Contact Email: [redacted]@bhlmlaw.com
March 5, 2015
Revdex.com
330 Wabash Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
Our Reference No: XXXXXXX
RE:...
[redacted]
To Whom It May Concern:
We are in receipt of consumer's complaint dated March 4, 2015, and now submit this letter as our response.
[redacted], [redacted], [redacted] & [redacted] LLC (hereinafter referred to as "[redacted]") represents Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about September 11, 2013, Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit account.
On or about September 16, 2013, [redacted] mailed a demand letter to [redacted] W. [redacted] seeking a balance due of $16,504.61. [redacted] did not receive a response to the demand. [redacted] filed a lawsuit against [redacted] in an effort to collect the balance due. On January 9, 2014, Mr. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against him in the amount of $16,504.61 plus costs.
In his complaint, Mr. [redacted] requests a statement of his account including payments, principal, and interest. On March 3, 2015, our office provided Mr. [redacted] with a detailed accounting including the principal balance, court costs, interest accrued to date, and a payment ledger.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very Truly Yours,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
[redacted] & [redacted] LLC
[redacted]
Chicago, Illinois XXXXX
Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Fax: XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/03/13) */
March 13, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are...
in receipt of your letter dated March 13, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents [redacted] Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about January 16, 2014 LVNV placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about January 20, 2014, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr. [redacted] for the balance due of $1,776.61. On or about January 27, 2014 Blatt spoke with Mr. [redacted] by phone. Mr. [redacted] offered to settle his account for a payment of $600.00, but Blatt declined his offer. Blatt gave Mr. [redacted] a counteroffer of $1510.11 (85%) which he accepted.
Later that afternoon Mr. [redacted] called Blatt and disputed the debt. He also asked to see documentation from the original creditor. Blatt notified LVNV of the dispute and requested the documentation.
On March 5, 2014, LVNV recalled Mr. [redacted]'s account from Blatt. Blatt closed the file and has no plans for further collection activity against Mr. [redacted] at this time.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 7, 2014/03/18) */
(The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.)
I did not accept any offer from Blatt. However I will accept this response from them.
The service is ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS!! I completely understand that they (those who answer the phones) are required to give information based on scripted information and that's fine. However you DO NOT have to rude to those calling to get an informed explanation of what's going on. I don't care how many times you call you will get a VERY different answer. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO consistency in the information given. They lack integrity. IF you think this is the way to handle busy, unfortunately something went VERY WRONG....
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/11/06) */
Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on or about November 4, 2014. If she has any further questions she may contact me directly.
Best regards,
[redacted]
Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker...
& Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/11/17) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I have not recieved anything from Blatt, Hasenmiller, Liebsker & Moore. It has been 10 business days since they claim to have sent out this documentation. I still have not recieved it.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 9, 2014/11/19) */
Please be advised that a Release of Lien was mailed to [redacted] on 11/4/14. This morning (11/18/14) I placed another copy of the release in the mail. It was sent to [redacted] S. St. [redacted] Ave [redacted] XXXXX. Please feel free to contact me directly if this is not received.
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/02/19) */
February 19, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL XXXXX
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are in...
receipt of your letter dated February 19, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as ''[redacted]'') represents Capital One Bank in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about April 4, 2011 Capital One placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about April 6, 2011, [redacted] sent an initial demand letter to [redacted] for the balance due of $1,336.04. [redacted] received no return mail, and [redacted] did not respond to the letter. [redacted] spoke with [redacted] by phone on May 18, 2011. The parties agreed to a temporary payment plan of $50 per month.
On November 28, 2011 [redacted] received a letter from [redacted] asking [redacted] to discontinue all further electronic automatic payments from her account. [redacted] acted accordingly.
[redacted] attempted to reach [redacted] by phone in an effort to set up new payment arrangements. However, [redacted]'s phone calls were not returned. Having been unable to reach a resolution to [redacted]'s outstanding balance, [redacted] filed a law suit against her. On March 19, 2012, [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against her for $1136.04 plus costs and attorney's fees.
On April 30, 2012 [redacted] resumed making her $50 monthly payments. However, on March 28, 2013 [redacted]'s payment was returned as insufficient funds and no further payments have been made since that date.
[redacted]'s account currently has an outstanding balance of $1,342.92. She should contact our office if she has questions about her balance or would like to set up a new payment arrangement.
Best regards,
[redacted], [redacted], Leibsker & [redacted] LLC
[redacted], Associate Attorney
[redacted]
Chicago, IL XXXXX
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2014/04/16) */
April 16, 2014
Revdex.com Chicago & Northern Illinois
330 N Wabash Ave #3120
Chicago, IL 60611
Your File No: XXXXXXXX
RE: [redacted]
Our Reference #: XXXXXXX
To whom it may concern:
We are in receipt of...
your letter dated April 9, 2014, and now submit this letter as our response.
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC (Hereinafter referred to as "Blatt") represents Midland Funding in the collection of delinquent credit accounts. This firm does not represent [redacted]. On or about June 18, 2012 Midland placed an account with our firm in the name of [redacted] for collection of a past due balance on a credit card account.
On or about June 21, 2012, Blatt sent an initial demand letter to Mr. [redacted] for the balance due of $2,520.42. Blatt received no response to the demand letter. Blatt attempted to contact Mr. [redacted] by phone to discuss his outstanding balance, but Blatt's phone calls went unanswered. Having been unable to contact Mr. [redacted], Blatt filed a lawsuit against him in an effort to collect the past due debt.
On January 11, 2013 Mr. [redacted] failed to appear in court and a default judgment was entered against him in the amount of $2520.42.
Mr. [redacted] provided Blatt with a copy of his credit report which he believed showed that his account had been paid. Blatt submitted the documents to Midland for their review. Midland advised Blatt that the credit report was insufficient proof of a prior payment. Midland explained that the credit report shows a "zero balance" because the account was charged off and not because the account was paid in full. Midland also stated that if Mr. [redacted] is able to provide a settlement letter or a canceled check they would look at it for review.
Mr. [redacted]'s account currently has an outstanding balance of $3,161.12. He should contact our office if he would like to discuss his settlement options. Alternatively, if Mr. [redacted] would like to submit additional documents showing a prior payment Blatt will provide them to Midland for their review.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions you might have in regards to this matter.
Sincerely,
[redacted], Associate Attorney
Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLC
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2014/04/17) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
This information is incorrect. I appeared in court on 10/1/2012 to address this case. At this time I requested a continuance to provide the attorneys office with documentation. The judge approved this request. A new court date was scheduled for 1/11/2013. Prior to this on January 2, 2013 I faxed over the evidence this item was paid to this attorneys office. I then spoke to a representative at this office who told me that I DID NOT NEED TO APPEAR at the 1/11/13 court hearing and that a motion to dismiss/release was going to be filed. I'm sure the attorneys office has a record of this as they record all calls for quality assurance. I assumed the case was closed as it was listed "count legally closed" on the court website. I then started to receive correspondence regarding a wage garnishment from this law firm. Again, I faxed over and spoke to several people at the firm regarding this. Each time I was told the infomation was to be reviewed with no response. I again had the account reinvestigated which shows it was paid in full. After speaking to another representative at this firm I was instructed to send this information via email directly to the lawfirm ([redacted]@bhlmlaw.com) on March 28, Apr, 1 and April 3rd with absolutely no response.
Final Business Response /* (4000, 13, 2014/04/24) */
The documents provided by Mr. [redacted] have been submitted to Midland for their review. Midland has concluded that Mr. [redacted]'s account was charged off, and the account was not paid in full. If Mr. [redacted] has additional documentation that he would like Midland to review he should submit that to [redacted]'s office.
Final Consumer Response /* (4200, 11, 2014/04/23) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Both parties have incorrect information. In addition to the documetation I have provided I was also employed with the original creditor [redacted] Bank)last year. Through the employment verification process, they also verified this account was paid. Also, if you will look at the documentation I have provided the account numbers are not even correct. I have tried on several occasions to work with this lawfirm with no success. I have spoken to several representatives and emailed the lawfirm directly with no respose. Why would I attempt to arrange for payments on a debt that I do not owe?