The Attorney Alternative

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2016/05/11) */ Contact Name and Title: [redacted] A [redacted] Contact Phone: (XXX)XXX-XXXX Contact Email: [redacted] @yahoo.com Please advise Mr [redacted] that the file had been sent prior to this complaint and that it is unreasonable to request a refund when all of the work has been done Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 7, 2016/05/11) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) The file has been sent where? No one has received itInquires to [redacted] asking if it has been sent or when it will be sent go unanswered Final Consumer Response / [redacted] (3000, 21, 2016/06/21) */ Since your last contact with us on 5-16-2016, which was only through this Revdex.com case, I have tried contacting you with the same question on 5-19-2016, 5-25-2016, 5-31-2016, 6-2-2016, and 6-9-through both text message and email to youNone of those five attempts to contact you have been acknowledged or replied toI have emailed and texted you again today to see if you will respond Final Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 25, 2016/07/13) */ In response to Mr***'s complaint: As far as I know the Revdex.com accepts complaints for legitimate issues, discontent IS NOT A LEGITIMATE ISSUE Allowing the complaintant to reopen this case is not only meritless but outside of the scope of what Revdex.com services are in place for Prior to the closing of the original complaint, my contractual obligations to the complainant had been met (up until that point) and that has not changedI had prepared Mr [redacted] amendment and sent it out to him In addition, to restate the information that I have provided in my original responsethe file was sent on the day I SAID IT WASIt was taken to Office Depot, I have no control over when they and/or the P.Ostamps their outgoing mail (I have the receipt) If I am understanding correctly, Mr [redacted] and Mr [redacted] wanted to know about his separate property and what is to be done about that However, THE JUDGE told Mr [redacted] that a request for order would be the proper avenue to seek his thingsThey (Mr [redacted] and Mr [redacted] have no reasonable cause to expect me to do that as it would be work that is beyond the scope of our contract and any work beyond the scope of that contract would require as a new contract between the parties or default to my hourly rate of $75.00hr(as per our contract) and I am not interested When I received notice of the original complaint, I severed all lanes of communication between Mr [redacted] and myself (as far as I am concerned the Revdex.com became the intermediary)I fully intend for it to remain that way until the statutory time of six months has passed to complete a divorce and I am not interested in doing ANYTHING more I would like to know the Revdex.com's policy of what types of things qualify the opening and reopening of complaintsPlease forward that information to the e-mail address at which I was originally contacted

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2016/05/11) */
Contact Name and Title: [redacted] A. [redacted]
Contact Phone: (XXX)XXX-XXXX
Contact Email: [redacted]@yahoo.com
Please advise Mr. [redacted] that the file had been sent prior to this complaint and that it is unreasonable to request a refund when...

all of the work has been done.
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 7, 2016/05/11) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
The file has been sent where? No one has received it. Inquires to [redacted] asking if it has been sent or when it will be sent go unanswered.
Final Consumer Response /* (3000, 21, 2016/06/21) */
Since your last contact with us on 5-16-2016, which was only through this Revdex.com case, I have tried contacting you with the same question on 5-19-2016, 5-25-2016, 5-31-2016, 6-2-2016, and 6-9-2016 through both text message and email to you. None of those five attempts to contact you have been acknowledged or replied to. I have emailed and texted you again today to see if you will respond.
Final Business Response /* (1000, 25, 2016/07/13) */
In response to Mr. [redacted]'s complaint:
As far as I know the Revdex.com accepts complaints for legitimate issues, discontent IS NOT A LEGITIMATE ISSUE.
Allowing the complaintant to reopen this case is not only meritless but outside of the scope of what Revdex.com services are in place for.
Prior to the closing of the original complaint, my contractual obligations to the complainant had been met (up until that point) and that has not changed. I had prepared Mr. [redacted] amendment and sent it out to him.
In addition, to restate the information that I have provided in my original response... the file was sent on the day I SAID IT WAS. It was taken to Office Depot, I have no control over when they and/or the P.O. stamps their outgoing mail (I have the receipt).
If I am understanding correctly, Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted] wanted to know about his separate property and what is to be done about that.
However, THE JUDGE told Mr. [redacted] that a request for order would be the proper avenue to seek his things. They (Mr. [redacted] and Mr. [redacted] have no reasonable cause to expect me to do that as it would be work that is beyond the scope of our contract and any work beyond the scope of that contract would require as a new contract between the parties or default to my hourly rate of $75.00hr. (as per our contract) and I am not interested.
When I received notice of the original complaint, I severed all lanes of communication between Mr. [redacted] and myself (as far as I am concerned the Revdex.com became the intermediary). I fully intend for it to remain that way until the statutory time of six months has passed to complete a divorce and I am not interested in doing ANYTHING more.
I would like to know the Revdex.com's policy of what types of things qualify the opening and reopening of complaints. Please forward that information to the e-mail address at which I was originally contacted.