The Honda Shop

Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: Levin Law Group says I "allegedly" emailed the surveyThat is a argument in that I have documentation of emailing the survey to the FirmThe question is, did the Firm 1) receive the emailed survey? 2) not receive the emailed survey? If they received the survey I emailed, they failed to forward it to the title company, causing the delay in setting up the closingIf they did not receive the survey I emailed, they failed to discover its absence in the transaction because they were not effectively communicating with the parties involved in the transactionHad Levin Law Group either sent the survey timely to the title company or discovered its absence timely, I would have been able to close on my home purchase well before August ** Had Levin Law Group been in effective contact with my Bank, they would know my Bank mandated an 8-day rate loperiod, meaning, once all the pieces of the transaction were in place (including the survey being in receipt by the title company), the Bank locthe mortgage rate and will not close until days has pastTo say I would have been able to close the day after the title company received the survey is simply incorrectSolidifying my argument that Levin Law Group was not effectively communicating with the parties involved in the transaction, they failed to identify this 8-day loperiod in their answer to my Revdex.com complaintWhat Levin Law Group has not addressed is the multitude of excuses the Firm sent me between July [redacted] and July [redacted] justifying the delay in my closing, none of which address the key issue: the title company was not in receipt of the surveyAs per Levin Law Group: 1) “Closing tomorrow is not possibleYour schedule is not the only one involved”; 2) “The lender is not clear to close”; 3) “The bank attorney said they cannot schedule and are not clear on their end”; 4) “We are still waiting on Nassau County to provide a Certificate of Occupancy.” My new attorney changed title companies because the original one refused to accept the existing survey done on the property; they wanted me to purchase a new surveyMy new attorney was able to find another title company that did accept the existing surveyHowever, due to my Bank’s rate loperiod, I was forced to wait days after all the pieces of the transaction were in placeAgain, had Levin Law Group sent the survey to the title company or discovered its absence timely, even with the 8-day rate loperiod, I would have closed timely and not incurred penalty payments Sincerely, [redacted] ***

The former client wants us to cover the cost of his choices in retaining a new attorney and his new attorney not being able to close for WEEKS We did NOT complete this transaction Our services were terminated There was a new survey order in process at the time the former client terminated our services That survey would be done within hours The surveyor was notified and the survey cancelled On our end, we would be clear to close the next day once we had the survey No correspondence was conducted with the bank after we were fired, so I have no knowledge of what went on businesses do not continue work after being fired Please note that this client was NEVER billed for our services Legally we are entitled to get compensated for the work performed We did not bill this client Title company that he ended up NOT using did not bill this client Yet he wants our office to pay for his choices in switching attorneysFormer client wants our office to go through every single email to determine why a particular email wasn't answered I think there may be some confusion on when our representation ended It ended when we were fired

Unfortunately due to ethics rules, I cannot disclose certain information about the client, but the client was not happy with our services and retained a different attorney That was his right to doHis primary complaint is that my office never forwarded a copy of the survey he allegedly sent to us to the title company and because of this his closing was delayedHOWEVER, his new attorney did not use the title company to whom the client claims we should have sent the survey So if a survey was sent, it would be IRRELEVANT as that was not the company used The NEW company still did not have the survey that his NEW attorney was supposed to send, which supposedly delayed his closingPlease note that he closed weeks after retaining a new lawyer We would have been able to close within a few days

Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: Levin Law Group says I "allegedly" emailed the survey. That is a false argument in that I have documentation of emailing the survey to the Firm. The question is, did the Firm 1) receive the emailed survey? 2) not receive the emailed survey? If they received the survey I emailed, they failed to forward it to the title company, causing the delay in setting up the closing. If they did not receive the survey I emailed, they failed to discover its absence in the transaction because they were not effectively communicating with the parties involved in the transaction. Had Levin Law Group either sent the survey timely to the title company or discovered its absence timely, I would have been able to close on my home purchase well before August **.
Had Levin Law Group been in effective contact with my Bank, they would know my Bank mandated an 8-day rate lock-in period, meaning, once all the pieces of the transaction were in place (including the survey being in receipt  by the title company), the Bank locks-in the mortgage rate and will not close until 8 days has past. To say I would have been able to close the day after the title company received the survey is simply incorrect. Solidifying my argument that Levin Law Group was not effectively communicating with the parties involved in the transaction, they failed to identify this 8-day lock-in period in their answer to my Revdex.com complaint. What Levin Law Group has not addressed is the multitude of excuses the Firm sent me between July [redacted] and July [redacted] justifying the delay in my closing, none of which address the key issue: the title company was not in receipt of the survey. As per Levin Law Group: 1) “Closing tomorrow is not possible. Your schedule is not the only one involved”; 2) “The lender is not clear to close”; 3) “The bank attorney said they cannot schedule and are not clear on their end”; 4) “We are still waiting on Nassau County to provide a Certificate of Occupancy.”
My new attorney changed title companies because the original one refused to accept the existing survey done on the property; they wanted me to purchase a new survey. My new attorney was able to find another title company that did accept the existing survey. However, due to my Bank’s rate lock-in period, I was forced to wait 8 days after all the pieces of the transaction were in place. Again, had Levin Law Group sent the survey to the title company or discovered its absence timely, even with the 8-day rate lock-in period, I would have closed timely and not incurred penalty payments.
Sincerely,[redacted]

Unfortunately due to ethics rules, I cannot disclose certain information about the client, but the client was not happy with our services and retained a different attorney.  That was his right to do. His primary complaint is that my office never forwarded a copy of the survey he allegedly...

sent to us to the title company and because of this his closing was delayed. HOWEVER, his new attorney did not use the title company to whom the client claims we should have sent the survey.  So if a survey was sent, it would be IRRELEVANT as that was not the company used.  The NEW company still did not have the survey that his NEW attorney was supposed to send, which supposedly delayed his closing. Please note that he closed 2 weeks after retaining a new lawyer.  We would have been able to close within a few days.

The former client wants us to cover the cost of his choices in retaining a new attorney and his new attorney not being able to close for WEEKS.  We did NOT complete this transaction.  Our services were terminated.  There was a new survey order in process at the time the former client terminated our services.  That survey would be done within 24 hours.  The surveyor was notified and the survey cancelled.  On our end, we would be clear to close the next day once we had the survey.  No correspondence was conducted with the bank after we were fired, so I have no knowledge of what went on.  Normal businesses do not continue work after being fired.  Please note that this client was NEVER billed for our services.  Legally we are entitled to get compensated for the work performed.  We did not bill this client.  Title company that he ended up NOT using did not bill this client.  Yet he wants our office to pay for his choices in switching attorneys. Former client wants our office to go through every single email to determine why a particular email wasn't answered.  I think there may be some confusion on when our representation ended.  It ended when we were fired.