The Weymouth Company Inc.

Review: The management team that was hired for Morrison Creek/Franklin Villa has been mis-using Home owners Association dues wrongfully. Its causing health issues in the community do to the mold in the garage areas the association management doesn't care to address or fix the problem in the low income community. I as a home owner have attempted to get this thing done but its been a long struggle between the HOA and the other parties involved like code enforcement that's swept the issues under the carpet there are so many code violations in the community that know one is willing to do anything there needs to be something done because peoples life are at risk and know one is willing to help. Just maybe the company that purchased a portion of the area are all in conspiracy in the near future to take over the rest of the development dirt cheap and continue to move in minorities and let them die slowly.Desired Settlement: Would like for code enforcement to re-open the case and come into the community and start looking at the violations that need to be addressed so that the property management can start working on these issues and for are Property management team The Weymouth Company to update there Business License and have there staff update there license also because there dealing with large sums of money, and fix these garages that have mold in them because Ive had them inspected and they are in bad condition

Business

Response:

Garages in the Morrison Creek HOA are under the control of the homeowner; not the Association. As to the situation at [redacted] the damage in the garage is both old and is the result of leaking water from inside the #2, 3 or 4 units. The Associations insurance adjustor described the damage as years old and the result of negligence. The damage is so old, it is impossible to determine which unit is the offending unit. The owner has had the unit for over a decade I believe. The governing documents of the HOA do not require the Association to repair leaks inside of owners’ units, nor to repair damage to any area of the garage resulting from the leaks inside of units.

Review: The Weymouth Company owns [redacted] and [redacted]. In April 2015 [redacted] and [redacted] switched from [redacted] to [redacted]. [redacted] is a very aggressive predatory type towing company that immediately began towing Resident and Guest vehicles late at night between midnight and 3am. Neither [redacted] nor [redacted] gave any notice to residents about this change. The first notice I received stapled to my fence was on May 27 2015. My vehicle was towed by [redacted] April 4 2015 because I had parked in an area that was reserved for [redacted] guests. This parking area is right next to my building and I had occasionally parked there not knowing that it was reserved for [redacted] only. My neighbors also never knew that this parking area was off limits to [redacted] residents or guests. [redacted] only recently on June 22 2015 put a sign to inform [redacted] residents and guests that this parking area is [redacted] guests only. And the rules booklet does not identify this [redacted] only area as off limits for [redacted].Why were residents not notified before April. If someone mistakenly parks in the wrong area why are they not given a warning notice with a reasonable time limit to comply. Why does [redacted] and [redacted] allow a known predatory towing company to continue to harass residents and their guests creating a hostile and un secure environment in an otherwise quiet and peaceful communityThis lack of proper notification has resulted in thousands of dollars of unnecessary and wrongful towing fees for [redacted] residents and guests. Getting our vehicles returned cost $350 minimum.The Weymouth Company should compensate residents and guests who were wrongfully towed before adequate notices were given.Desired Settlement: A refund of the $450 it cost to have my car returned.

Business

Response:

I would like to recommend each tenant discuss parking assignment and Association boundaries with the owner of their unit.

There are multiple tow companies contracted to perform private property tow between the 3 HOAs and [redacted].

The towing of vehicles occurs throughout the day as well as in the evening.

The Rules and Regulations in [redacted] are given to each potential tenant when they submit their screening application.

Each owner agrees to private property towing by virtue of the Governing Documents they bought into at the time of purchase.

The private property signage posted in the Association exceeds what is required by law.

The majority of residents have never been towed because they agree to follow the Rules and Regulations. As a 24 year resident of [redacted] HOA and 9 year manager, I too, follow the private property towing requirements.

Thank you,

Consumer

Response:

I am rejecting this response because:The response from [redacted] did not answer the issues in the complaint. Why were [redacted] residents not notified in advance of the change from [redacted] to [redacted] before April 1st 2015 when the change took place?Why were [redacted] residents not notified in writing that the parking area next to two [redacted] buildings was off limits to [redacted] residents or guests?Why are warning notices not given when someone mistakenly parks in the wrong area as required in the California Vehicle Code and [redacted] Parking's Website?From [redacted] Parking Services page:Compliance Services:CC&R InspectionThis is a Free Service that we provide to our Managers, (With Signed Agreement).Our Inspection Team will come on to your Property as determined by Management, to inspect all vehicles to conform that they are in Compliance with the Current CC&Rs of the Property. We will Tag all vehicles that are in violation with either a 24, 48, 72, or 96 hours warning. VEHICLES will not be towed without Management Authorization.Why does Weymouth Company Owner [redacted] choose to allow a predatory towing company to harass [redacted] residents and guestsand disrupt the peace quiet and security of a nice neighborhood by hiring [redacted] to manage parking.Why are residents thrown out of [redacted] offices and targeted with additional towing s when they complain about the wrongful towing problem?[redacted]'s choice to allow predatory towing of residents and guests without proper and reasonable notice has caused great financial hardship to a mostly low income neighborhood.

Business

Response:

I do not own the corporations none as [redacted] and [redacted].