Sign in

TK Plus Property Holding LLC

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about TK Plus Property Holding LLC? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews TK Plus Property Holding LLC

TK Plus Property Holding LLC Reviews (3)

October 6, 2015Revdex.com of San Diego Attn: [redacted] Viewridge Avenue #San Diego, CA 92123RE: [redacted] ID# [redacted] Dear [redacted] ,We are in receipt of your letter dated September 28, We appreciate the opportunity to present our side and our position regarding this issue.We acquired the property January 7, 2014.The Tenants had leased the property prior to our acquiring it for the lease terms commencing on October 9, ending October 31, The tenants knew about the sale of the property as they signed the Estoppel Certificate on December 31, This document provides detail information about what Tenants knows about the property and if they are aware of any issues with the property, also informs them about the transferIn this event the tenants did not complain about anything.W????S ??????'s ?S?????L: A tenant estoppel certificate is used to verify the current status of the tenant and landlord’s rights and obligations under an existing leaseThe estoppel certificate identifies the tenant and landlord; the leased property location; the lease commencement date, termination date and option period, if any; the status of rent, prepaid rents and security deposits; status of any defaults by the landlord, or any issues with property among other information.An estoppel certificate is typically used when the owner of a commercial property wants to sell or refinance the property, and the buyer or lender requires confirmation of the status of all leases in the property, to ensure that the tenant(s) do not have any claims or issues against the landlord.ADDITIONALLYIt appears that the tenants were emailing the previous owner about some related issues before we acquired the building, however the tenants did not convey this in the estoppel and they did not complain about any issues until months after we had acquired the buildingWe have proof via emails.The tenants complained once on March 1, about some plumbing issues which we assisted themOn March 28, they brought a mold report to our office, at which time we asked if they wish to leavesvacate the property, we would allow them an early termination of the lease (months early).They did not pay the April rent as they vacated the property and we returned their security deposit of $on April 16, 2014.They hired an attorney and demanded $10,which we refused to pay.They sued the previous owner that leased the premises to the them and it appears that the Tenants won their case and recovered the expenses they are asking in this complaint.There aren't any damagesWe allowed them to break the lease and leave Seven (7) months early, returned their security deposit and they recovered their alleged expenses, if any, via law suit against previous owner/landlord.Please contact our office if you have any further questions.Sincerely, [redacted] ***, Manager

October 6,
" background-">Revdex.com of San Diego Attn: [redacted] Viewridge Avenue #San Diego, CA RE: [redacted] ID# [redacted] Dear [redacted],
We are in receipt of your letter dated September 28, We appreciate the opportunity to present our side and our position regarding this issueWe acquired the property January 7, The Tenants had leased the property prior to our acquiring it for the lease terms commencing on October 9, ending October 31, The tenants knew about the sale of the property as they signed the Estoppel Certificate on December 31, This document provides detail information about what Tenants knows about the property and if they are aware of any issues with the property, also informs them about the transferIn this event the tenants did not complain about anythingW????S ??????'s ?S?????L: A tenant estoppel certificate is used to verify the current status of the tenant and landlord's rights and obligations under an existing leaseThe estoppel certificate identifies the tenant and landlord; the leased property location; the lease commencement date, termination date and option period, if any; the status of rent, prepaid rents and security deposits; status of any defaults by the landlord, or any issues with property among other informationAn estoppel certificate is typically used when the owner of a commercial property wants to sell or refinance the property, and the buyer or lender requires confirmation of the status of all leases in the property, to ensure that the tenant(s) do not have any claims or issues against the landlordADDITIONALLYIt appears that the tenants were emailing the previous owner about some related issues before we acquired the building, however the tenants did not convey this in the estoppel and they did not complain about any issues until months after we had acquired the buildingWe have proof via emailsThe tenants complained once on March 1, about some plumbing issues which we assisted themOn March 28, they brought a mold report to our office, at which time we asked if they wish to leavesvacate the property, we would allow them an early termination of the lease (months early)They did not pay the April rent as they vacated the property and we returned their security deposit of $on April 16, They hired an attorney and demanded $10,which we refused to payThey sued the previous owner that leased the premises to the them and it appears that the Tenants won their case and recovered the expenses they are asking in this complaintThere aren't any damagesWe allowed them to break the lease and leave Seven (7) months early, returned their security deposit and they recovered their alleged expenses, if any, via law suit against previous owner/landlordPlease contact our office if you have any further questionsSincerely,
[redacted], Manager

October 6, 2015Revdex.com of San Diego Attn: [redacted] 4747 Viewridge Avenue #200 San Diego, CA 92123RE: [redacted] ID# [redacted] Dear [redacted],We are in receipt of your letter dated September 28, 2015. We appreciate the opportunity to present our side and our position regarding this issue.We...

acquired the property January 7, 2014.The Tenants had leased the property prior to our acquiring it for the lease terms commencing on October 9, 2013 ending October 31, 2014. The tenants knew about the sale of the property as they signed the Estoppel Certificate on December 31, 2013. This document provides detail information about what Tenants knows about the property and if they are aware of any issues with the property, also informs them about the transfer. In this event the tenants did not complain about anything.W????S ??????'s ?S?????L: A tenant estoppel certificate is used to verify the current status of the tenant and landlord’s rights and obligations under an existing lease. The estoppel certificate identifies the tenant and landlord; the leased property location; the lease commencement date, termination date and option period, if any; the status of rent, prepaid rents and security deposits; status of any defaults by the landlord, or any issues with property among other information.An estoppel certificate is typically used when the owner of a commercial property wants to sell or refinance the property, and the buyer or lender requires confirmation of the status of all leases in the property, to ensure that the tenant(s) do not have any claims or issues against the landlord.ADDITIONALLY. It appears that the tenants were emailing the previous owner about some related issues before we acquired the building, however the tenants did not convey this in the estoppel and they did not complain about any issues until 2 months after we had acquired the building. We have proof via emails.The tenants complained once on March 1, 2014 about some plumbing issues which we assisted them. On March 28, 2014 they brought a mold report to our office, at which time we asked if they wish to leavesvacate the property, we would allow them an early termination of the lease (7 months early).They did not pay the April rent as they vacated the property and we returned their security deposit of $1500.00 on April 16, 2014.They hired an attorney and demanded $10,000.00 which we refused to pay.They sued the previous owner that leased the premises to the them and it appears that the Tenants won their case and recovered the expenses they are asking in this complaint.There aren't any damages. We allowed them to break the lease and leave Seven (7) months early, returned their security deposit and they recovered their alleged expenses, if any, via law suit against previous owner/landlord.Please contact our office if you have any further questions.Sincerely,[redacted], Manager

Check fields!

Write a review of TK Plus Property Holding LLC

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

TK Plus Property Holding LLC Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 7660 Fay Ave #H405, La Jolla, California, United States, 92037


Add contact information for TK Plus Property Holding LLC

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated