Turnpike Appliance Service Of Suffolk

Steven CL [redacted] of SMI is lying once againOur funds totaling $22,have not been deposited in our account, neither has a check for that amount been received from Steven CL***/SMIIn addition, Steven CL***/SMI needs to check his books and realize that the total amount owed includes the following:- $10,Paid to Steven CL***/SMI for legal and consulting fees.- $6, Paid to Steven CL***/SMI for an upgrade to services requested.- $6, Paid to Steven CL***/SMI and remaining in our surrogate's Escrow account.We will continue to pursue this matter until our money is refunded in full

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2015/08/11) */ Contact Name and Title: Gnoth & Naragon Contact Phone: (XXX) XXX-XXXX Gnoth & Naragon was hired by Sassy Sandwiches to replace a water heaterThe job total was $of which there was a $down payment with a $dollar balance upon completionWhen the job was complete we were authorized by Sassy Sandwiches to charge the remaining balance in total amount of $We ran the credit card for the remaining balance and it was declinedWe again ran the card for $and it clearedThe following day the card was ran again for the remaining $The bill is now paid in full OFFER:

Occasionally, and unfortunately, a business deals with a customer that cannot be satisfied SMI offered to refund its full consulting fee ($10,000) to the customer, plus their remaining balance in their trust account The customer has refused SMI's offer The customer has relied on incorrect advice about a variety of things, and does not know what they are talking about when they suggest that the contract that they signed was illegal But, SMI remains committed to assisting the customer, even with their libelous accusations SMI has done all it can to try to resolve this matter, but regrettably this customer is demanding something to which they are not entitled

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 8, 2017/02/08) */ Contact Name and Title: [redacted] Owner Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX Contact Email: [redacted] @yahoo.com I have sent [redacted] his itemized bill and all should be taken care of

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 5, 2015/08/11) */ Contact Name and Title: scott [redacted] owner Contact Phone: XXX-XXX-XXXX The paper work was an over sight on our part and we greatly apologize for the situation I scott [redacted] have mailed the paper work out to them and they should have it all by nowSorry for the inconvenience OFFER:

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 8, 2016/10/27) */ I went out to ***'s house cause she said her blower motor wasn't coming on, when the furnace called for heatwhen I got there I found the problem and we changed the capacitor on the blower motorI started the unit roughly about times and the unit ran finethe furnace was roughly about yrs oldThe total call came out to [redacted] for the service call and [redacted] for the capacitora total of [redacted] never heard from her until I get this nasty review on my web sight that she was unhappyI talk to her on the phone and told her I would come back out and see what the problem wasshe responded and said I don't have any money and I just got into it with my dad and he wont help me anymore and she started to cryI said everything will be okshe continues to tell me that her dad called her a lazy good for nothing ***( I felt bad for her) So I told her everything will work out and not to cryI told her I would come back out for free and see what I could do for herNext thing I know im getting this bad review with you folks and she is saying I never came back out there,but when I did and no one was homeI don't want to sound insensitive of her situation, but after she sent a nasty complaint not only to my web sight but also to you folks; I find it very hard to want to help this person outwe do a lot of work for free for people in needand I have no problem helping someonebut I cant help them if they cant keep the appointments for the help we are offeringI feel she could of called me before making this complaint after she found out that her father didn't keep her appointment for hercommunication is the best way to get this solved Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 10, 2016/10/28) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) Why didn't [redacted] call me to say he was at my house and no one was there and I could have gotten someone there in minutes sorry my father's an [redacted] and didn't tell me he didn't stick around for [redacted] until almost a week later I dint know what else to do but pray my baby stays warm its the only thing I've got left

Steven CL [redacted] of SMI lied to the Supreme Court of Indiana (Case Number [redacted] ) when he claimed that he had informed all his clients that he was no longer an attorneyFor anyone reading this, please do your research on Steven CL***/SMI prior to considering engaging with him or his companyIf you need a lawyer for surrogacy, be sure to go with one who is a member of the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys (AAARTA)They all know about Steven CL***/SMI: For starters, you could also Google "Indiana Attorney in Surrogacy Adoption Controversy" for some information on how Steven CL [redacted] does businessWhatever you decide to do, be sure to follow the advice of the AAARTA.With regards to his consulting services for surrogacy, Steven CL [redacted] of SMI violated the law in drafting our contractThanks to the AAARTA, we learned that our contract as it was drafted by Steven CL [redacted] of SMI violates the code of the District of Columbia, which expressly states that "any person or entity who or which is involved in, or induces, arranges, or otherwise assists in the formation of a surrogate parenting contract for a fee, compensation, or other remuneration, or otherwise violates this section, shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $10,or imprisonment for not more than year or both.Here are just a few of the reasons why on August 2016, we asked Steven CL [redacted] to terminate the services we requested and refund our money, but he is yet to do so.If Steven CL [redacted] of SMI claims to have attempted a refund, he should show proof that a wire transfer was rejected by our bank, or that a check he mailed to our address has been returned to himIt's the 21st century, and everything is trackable, but maybe Steven CL [redacted] of SMI does not know thatIt is up to Steven CL [redacted] of SMI to demonstrate a sliver of professional and ethical behavior by refunding our money which totals $22,Of course, we will continue to pursue this matter until all of our funds are refundedThank you Revdex.com for assisting with mediation

Once again, client has no clue what she is talking about SMI offered to reimburse client its $10,consulting fee plus the remaining balance in client's escrow account SMI never said it had deposited money into client's account Client rejected SMI's offer, so SMI cannot do anything else Revdex.com offered arbitration, but SMI's contract requires it anyway, so SMI will anxiously await the opportunity to have someone neutral review client's ridiculous complaints

I am rejecting this response because: It is not an accurate representation of what occurred from December 27, - February 3, I am still willing to pay the $for the labor I was told I would be responsible for However, if this is not an acceptable solution, I welcome the opportunity to present my side of this dispute in court I will bring along my original invoices, all of my cell phone records, text messages, banking documentation (to prove the timing of the Stop Payment) as well as very detailed notes of each of day that I had to put forth personal effort to get the warrantied part installed on my furnace (a furnace that was installed by [redacted] in 2005)