Tyler's Renovations Reviews (%countItem)
Tyler's Renovations Rating
Address: 12441 Chamberlain Dr., Horizon City, Texas, United States, 79928-3707
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Web: |
www.elpasorenovations.net
|
E-mails: |
Sign in to see
|
Add contact information for Tyler's Renovations
Add new contacts
My compliant is as follows: ***'s Renovations is a Deceptive Business and *** is involved in a Deceptive Business Practice because ***'s Renovations is owned by *** a company that has ceased to exist per the TX Comptroller website. As a result, Mr. falsely represents ***'s Renovations. To date, I have paid Mr. almost $97k for renovations on our home. Construction on our home began in December 2019 and currently remains unfinished. Mr. claims my mother and I breached a contract. Mr. has defrauded me of my life savings and my mother of some of her retirement pay. He has continually harassed me and my family seeking money and continues to insist we still owe him money. In addition, Mr. has repeatedly and continually harassed my father. I ask that *** and ***'s Renovations be investigated so that he *** never continue to defraud people by falsely misrepresenting a construction company that no longer exists. I ask that he be investigated so he stop robbing people of money and destroying other people's homes they have worked hard for. I ask that he be investigated because I do not want others to be defrauded and robbed like me and my family. I have all emails, texts, photos, video, invoices, checks, etc.
Product_Or_Service: Home Renovations
Other (requires explanation) Refund of all services not completed and/or refund of everything that was overcharged. Stop misrepresentation of business. No further contact from him and/or anyone from the business.
Mrs. did enter into a legal contact, 2019. The contract is a a valid agreement between the company and Mrs.. All documents show that Mrs. did willing enter into the contract and did so understanding that She would have to comply with all aspects of the contract. Contract is not only signed and dated but each paragraph was gone over and the homeowner did initial Her understanding. A letter supplied by Mrs. can show that She and Her Daughter were willing to sign a contract that they did not have the monies inwhich to pay for all the work contrcated; that in itself can constitue fraud on their part. As well, paperwork will show that Mrs. did willingly sign for extra work to bring the dwelling up to city code, said signature was with their full understanding that this work was outside the scope of the original contract, Inspection by city of El paso inpsectors will show that the house is now compliante with all state, federal and city guidlines. As well, Mrs. and Her daughter did slandered *** in such as to cliam harrassement, when in fact no communication with the father and Mr. did take place at any time. Text and emails will show that Mr. went out of His way to make sure noone from the company was working at the same time as the Father was in the house. All communication between Mr. and the Daughter were done via text and will show that not once did Mr. ever have communication within anyone else but Mrs. fernandenze and Her daughter. It should be noted at the time of the contrcat signing, Mrs. did not inform the company that She co-owned the home with Her Husband which is in direct violation of the contract. Mrs. Fernadez did state a claim of harrassment for money when in fact that has not taken place; as per contract an invoice is submitted for work, invoice is then payable. Submitting an invoice is not harrassment, that is standard business paractice and is clearly stated in the contract agreed to by Mrs.. As per contract past due notices for change orders and other invoices will be sent out on a monthly basis. Furthermore, work was stopped because Mrs. once again could not pay for work that She agreed to. clearly stated in the contract, if the Homeowner does state, or suggest that they cannot or will not pay all monies become due and paybale before work continues. Mrs. did sate that they could not pay their invoices and any other work that was still required. This is a violation of the contract initself.
Paperwork can show, that all extra work must be paid for when completed, if the person does not pay all work stops until the debt is settled. Paper work will also show that the company did offer solutions to address the shortfall which Mrs. did not take advantage of. Mrs. was informed of her breach of contract in writing as per contract. Mrs. signed a contract, She also signed change orders to allow for extra work at extra cost; She did so willingly.
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
***'s response is filled with nothing but lies, which coincidentally is the only word he can properly spell. To further read his comments ad nauseam filled with extremely bad grammar and spelling only further add to the fact that he doesn't know anything about anything. He never addresses the fact that he's not supposed to be doing and conducting business in Texas but still continues to do so.
To anyone who's been unfortunate enough to have met *** and do business with him, like me and my family, we know now that bad times don't last but bad guys do. To anyone thinking of doing business with *** in El Paso, Hawaii, *** or wherever he *** be, you're better off doing business with a serial killer than trusting and doing business with ***.
Stay away from this contractor. Bad news.
TYLER AND FRANK S WERE PAID $40,000 TO RENOVATE LEAKING UPSTAIRS FRONT BALCONY, REBUILD 3 PILLARS ON FRONT PORCH AND 2 PILLARS ON UPSTAIRS BALCONY, REPAIR WATER DAMAGE IN LOWER LEVEL OF ONE BATHROOM, KITCHEN, AND REMOVE POPCORN AND RENOVATE LIVING ROOM, AND PAINT OUTSIDE OF HOUSE INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF SOFFET WHEN NEEDED, AND REPLACEMENT OF WOOD WHEN NEEDED. NONE OF THE JOBS WERE COMPLETED, THEY DESTROYED OR STOLE OVER $2500 OF CRYSTAL, GLASS, AND MY TRANE HVAC UNIT. I HAVE HIRED ANOTHER GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CORRECT ALL THE DAMAGE AND ADDITIONAL WATER LEAKS RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK. UPON COMPLETION BY THE NEW CONTRACTOR, MY ATTORNEY WILL BE GOING AFTER *** AND THE *** FOR ALL DAMAGES. ADDITIONALLY, *** THERE WILL BE NO MEDIATION, AS TYLER'S RENOVATIONS PULLED NO PERMITS, MISREPRESENTED THEIR AFFILIATIONS, AND WRITES THEIR OWN REVIEWS ON *** UNDER VARIOUS EMAIL ACCOUNTS. *** THEY HAVE RECORDS ON THEIR BUSINESS PRACTICES IN ***. TYLER'S RENOVATIONS ARE *** IN ALL ASPECTS OF THEIR WORK. I HAVE TURNED OVER ALL ASPECTS OF THEIR NON-PERFORMANCE TO MY ATTORNEY AT THIS POINT, THE NEW CONTRACTOR AGREES TO IDENTIFY AND REPAIR THE DAMAGES BEFORE PROCEEDING AGAINST ***. I WILL ALSO BE GOING AFTER THEIR ***. DO NOT USE THIS *** CONTRACTOR WHO PREYS ON EL PASOANS. *** ADVISED ME THEY HAVE NO RECORDS OF TYLER'S EVERY PULLING A PERMIT IN EL PASO COUNTY AND THE *** DOES NOT HAVE ANY RECORD OF THIS COMPANY. I WILL SEE THEM IN COURT, AS THEY ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DO BUSINESS IN EL PASO COUNTY.
As for the homeowners other claims; these are pure falsehoods of a man who knows he is the cause of His own stop work age and is not willing to apologize. Tyler's Renovations is a fully Licensed El Paso company with all of licenses in order and up to date. Tyler's Renovations has never operated in *** The homeowner is pulling up old records of our peoples places of residence to try and make it seem as if the company moves around. ***
The only place Tyler's Renovations has operated is El Paso where it has strong ties to the community and a supporter of local tradesmen.
The claim of stolen property of 2500 value is just a flat out lie. If the homeowner is claiming such as above He is trying to defraud His insurance company. No one that works directly for Tyler's Renovations ever worked inside the house. Again the homeowner is making statements that are complete falsehoods in attempt to sway people away from ***. Making claims that cannot be proven in the hopes of causing Tyler's Renovations harm is what this person is attempting to do to explain away His actions.***
The fact that Tyler's Renovations has no business dealing with *** is not relevant. This association is by there own statement interested in new construction *** His actions are unacceptable.
to Tyler's Renovations, for which no work was completed. El Paso City Code requires contractors to pull permits. *** visited the work site and stated clearly to me that balcony's needs to have a 1/4" slope per foot to drain water properly. The deck has no slope. Tyler S argued over this as there was no slope on the work they partially completed. Frank S stated it was not his problem, and as you can see,*** I said, " what have I paid you $40,000 for and told him he had to make it right. I disagree with Tyler's recollection and the courts will too. Nothing he said in his response has any relevance. *** I also never signed any change orders for whatever he says he did and the*** is only finishing his incomplete and damages he has caused. My front balcony is now having leaks downstairs where I never had them before.*** There will be no mediation or arbitration, as he never pulled a permit, thereby making any work illegal in El Paso, Tx. Yes, I did *** His work crew is of course going to lie for his company. That is where they get paid. Tyler's Renovations had done the same thing and it was documented in *** Additionally, they can no longer do business in the*** There was no place to provide *** done and work done that must be replaced according to my current contractor. *** has agreed to document all non compliance with City Code.
We had Tyler's Renovations do an addition on our rental home in El Paso, Tx. The work was completed on time. During construction There was some problems with the existing house that required additional work. The extra's were very reasonable considering the extent of the work done. The house looks great and we got new tenants right away at a much higher monthly rental rate. We will recover our investment in a few months. Great Job. We would use Tylers Renovations on our next project.
Tylers Renovations was hired as handyman for property XXXXX *** turned out to need more than just handyman services. Tylers Renovations didn't advised they were not registered, bonded, or licensed in Horizon for remodeling a guest bathroom. Tyler flooded my townhouse in which I had to file a claim with my homeowners insurance because of his negligence, the bathroom was incomplete, and now he doesn't want to refund me my 3,000 on kitchen cabinets that he was going to start on, the product was not delivered, some of the items for the guest bathroom were never picked up from property. He purchased a medicine cabinet which he charged me for but was never picked up, returned & refunded. No permits were ever retrieved from the city for this type of job.
Product_Or_Service: KITCHEN CABINETS
Order_Number: SEE ATTACHED
Account_Number: NOT SURE
Refund I'm requesting for Tyler's renovation to complete the guest bathroom, pick up debris, refund of 3,000 dollars for kitchen cabinets that i don't want because of his non sense, poor job, and poor knowledge and problem solver. I was not impressed with his job whatsoever. Thanks *** P.S. According to *** at *** Construction they performed major construction work with out permits and that is illegal.
The Guest bathroom was completed as per contract. Work customer wants is extra work that she feels she does not have to pay for. Photos available, before and after. As per contract, Homeowner did pay the outstanding and full amount which constitutes acceptance of all work completed as per contract outline. Contract was completed 4-26-18
All construction material created by the company was picked up, swept up and deposited in local landfill as per contract. Photos available before and after. Any materials at site were not created by the Company and as such does not fall within the contract for removal. 4-24-18
Cabinets belong to the homeowner and were a custom order, boxes built by third party ( Contract signed (4-02-18). Homeowner waited 30 days past estimated install date (est installation date as per contract 4-16-18) to decide that she wanted to cancel the kitchen which is in direct violation of the contract. She was given to opportunity to return the boxes with the third party charge of 20% restocking. She chose not too. Within those 30 days the homeowner did state on 4 occasions that the boxes were to be delivered to another party for finishing and that Homeowner would inform company about where to deliver the boxes. She has of yet followed up for delivery. All work at the above address was done to industry standards as set forth by National and International guidelines and done with the complete knowledge and acceptance of the client. This is back up with change orders for work done at the property and signed by the homeowner at the time the change order was created to fulfill the Homeowners desires. In response to a text the company sent the Homeowner a letter stating that as per contract all changes must be agreed upon by both parties however to expedite matters the Third party box manufacturer would take back the boxes minus a restocking fee, all that was required was a change order as per contract. She declined to do so. The homeowner was also sent a Breach of Contract letter outlining the 15 different breach's that She perpetrated. The homeowner still has 13 days in which to agree to the third party box makers restock fee which is fair and reasonable and the box maker will issue a refund. The homeowner knows this but feels she is above having to pay for work already completed.
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Will upload additional photos of unfinished guest bathroom. All I want is my 3k refund for unwanted cabinets.
As stated before, if the client signs the change order and submits it the monies will be returned. However We refuse to pay the 20% charge the cabnit maker will charge us.
She must agree to pay the 20%.
The cabnit maker is being more then reasonable however His patience is not without end. If he decides not to take the cabnits back they will be delivered to the job address in the condition that they are in.
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I'll settle to pay 10%