I would like to apologize to Mr [redacted] , I have checked and see that he is registered on the national Do Not call listWe have been in contact the last several days with our source provider in an effort to get to the bottom of this issueWe have noticed in the last two months the increase in this occuranceWe do not wish to bother anyone on the do not call list, our source provider is currently double and triple checking to make sure we are in complete compliance with the rules and guidelines set forth by the FCCI did listen to the recordings and we did call Mr [redacted] and had technical difficulties on the first attempt wich I'm sure only compounded the problemI would like to offer my most sincerest apologies on behalf of United Express Construction and have made certain he will not be bothered by our company againWe understand where he is coming fromthis issue is not taken lightly and we will address thisIf there is anything else we can do please let us knowWe want to be an asset to the community of San Diego County and will try and get better with everydayWe appreciate you bringing this to our attention Regards [redacted] United Express Construction
I understand Mr [redacted] 's frustration, however he asked for a third party to join, I can do nothing else but to apologize and assure Mr [redacted] that we will not be calling him again Regards [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.How can this company possibly be a member in good standing in the Revdex.com? Not only do they violate FEDERAL laws regarding Do-Not-Call lists, they also admit that they violate CALIFORNIA laws regarding recording of telephone conversations Here is the law: California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversationSee CalPenal Code § The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation See Flanagan vFlanagan, P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-(Cal2002) A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as wellSee California v Gibbons, CalApp3d (Cal CtApp1989) If they knowingly and routinely violate FEDERAL and CALIFORNIA laws, how do you think they will treat customers? The least that Revdex.com can do is to remove them from the list of approved businesses I am willing to consider mediation of this matter in lieu of filing a court complaint and/or with the District Attorney Will Revdex.com participate in this regard? Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to meThe number they have been calling is [redacted] ***, if they have that removed from their database I would be consider the complaint resolvedI will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Regards, [redacted]
Hello, I would like to apologize to Mr [redacted] for any trouble or irritationI looked up the call history for [redacted] and show that we have called Mr [redacted] times since 10/13/ but actually only speaking with him once on 5/19/for secondsWith that said, Mr [redacted] 's D.N.Cstatus should have kept him out of our system with the cross checking program we have in placeTo be honest we have had some issues with the software we are using to do this, and are currently seeking out other avenues to use insteadWe appreciate Mr [redacted] 's privacy and on behalf of the entire company would like to extend Mr [redacted] our sincerest apology Regards [redacted] United Express Consruction
I would like to apologize to Mr [redacted] , I have checked and see that he is registered on the national Do Not call listWe have been in contact the last several days with our source provider in an effort to get to the bottom of this issueWe have noticed in the last two months the increase in this occuranceWe do not wish to bother anyone on the do not call list, our source provider is currently double and triple checking to make sure we are in complete compliance with the rules and guidelines set forth by the FCCI did listen to the recordings and we did call Mr [redacted] and had technical difficulties on the first attempt wich I'm sure only compounded the problemI would like to offer my most sincerest apologies on behalf of United Express Construction and have made certain he will not be bothered by our company againWe understand where he is coming fromthis issue is not taken lightly and we will address thisIf there is anything else we can do please let us knowWe want to be an asset to the community of San Diego County and will try and get better with everydayWe appreciate you bringing this to our attention Regards [redacted] United Express Construction
I understand Mr [redacted] 's frustration, however he asked for a third party to join, I can do nothing else but to apologize and assure Mr [redacted] that we will not be calling him again Regards [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.How can this company possibly be a member in good standing in the Revdex.com? Not only do they violate FEDERAL laws regarding Do-Not-Call lists, they also admit that they violate CALIFORNIA laws regarding recording of telephone conversations Here is the law: California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversationSee CalPenal Code § The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation See Flanagan vFlanagan, P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-(Cal2002) A California appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video cameras to record conversations as wellSee California v Gibbons, CalApp3d (Cal CtApp1989) If they knowingly and routinely violate FEDERAL and CALIFORNIA laws, how do you think they will treat customers? The least that Revdex.com can do is to remove them from the list of approved businesses I am willing to consider mediation of this matter in lieu of filing a court complaint and/or with the District Attorney Will Revdex.com participate in this regard? Regards, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to meThe number they have been calling is [redacted] ***, if they have that removed from their database I would be consider the complaint resolvedI will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Regards, [redacted]
Hello, I would like to apologize to Mr [redacted] for any trouble or irritationI looked up the call history for [redacted] and show that we have called Mr [redacted] times since 10/13/ but actually only speaking with him once on 5/19/for secondsWith that said, Mr [redacted] 's D.N.Cstatus should have kept him out of our system with the cross checking program we have in placeTo be honest we have had some issues with the software we are using to do this, and are currently seeking out other avenues to use insteadWe appreciate Mr [redacted] 's privacy and on behalf of the entire company would like to extend Mr [redacted] our sincerest apology Regards [redacted] United Express Consruction