Wades Auto Ranch

Tell us why here...To whom it may concern,IN REFERENCE TO THE COMPLAINT AGAINST WADE’S AUTO RANCH, I WOULD LIKE TO FIRST STATE THAT THE CADDILAC CTS WAS PURCHASED “AS IS NO WARRANTY”THIS MEANS THAT ONCE THE VEHICLE LEAVES THE LOT, THERE IS NO WARRANTY…NEITHER EXPRESSED NOR IMPLIEDNEXT I
WOULD LIKE TO EXPLAIN THE ENTIRE STORYTHE DAY MRS*** WAS COMING TO PURCHASE HER CADDILAC CTS, THE STARTER WENT OUT. WE HAD OUR MECHANIC FIX THE STARTER AND MRS*** HAD HER CAR THE VERY NEXT DAYTHREE WEEKS LATER, MRS*** HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM WITH THE CAR NOT STARTING. I WAS IN CONTACT WITH MRS*** AT ALL TIMES AND EXPRESSED THAT AS SOON AS OUR MECHANIC CAME BACK TO WORKWE WOULD HAVE THE CAR FIXED; REMIND YOU IT WAS STILL “AS IS NO WARRANTY”THE MECHANIC SHOWED UP AFTER WEEKS OF NOT WORKING, DROVE TO MRS***S APARTMENT, AND REPLACED THE STARTER AGAIN (FREE OF CHARGE)COME TO FIND OUT IT WAS A FAULTY STARTER, WHICH IS OUT OF EVERYONE’S CONTROL MRS*** WAS UPSET WITH THE TIME IT TOOK FOR OUR MECHANIC TO COME BACK TO WORKTHAT IS WHEN MRS *** DECIDED TO BE VERY RUDE AND THREATENING IN HER TEXT WITH TALK OF LAWYERS AND SUING USWE WERE WARNED (BY MRS***) OF FAMILY MEMBERS THAT WERE LAWYERS AND HAD KNOWLEDGE OF THE LEMON LAWAFTER WE HAD MRS ***’S CAR FIXED, SHE WAS HAPPY AGAIN AND APOLOGIZED FOR THE THREATS SAYING “I WAS JUST UPSET”. A COUPLE OF MONTHS GO ON, AND OTHER THAN TRYING TO CONTACT HER ABOUT LATE PAYMENTS EACH MONTH, WE DIDN’T HEAR FROM HER MUCHI THEN RECEIVED A TEXTTHE TEXT STATED “THE CAR WON’T START AGAIN”. REMEMBER, THIS IS THE SAME CAR THAT WAS SOLD “AS IS NO WARRANTY” AFTER THE LAST EPISODE, I WASN’T INTERESTED IN DEALING WITH THE THREATENING TEXT MESSAGES AND HAVING THE SAME RESULTS AS BEFORE, SO I SIMPLY TOLD HER TO TAKE THE CAR TO A MECHANICTHE MECHANIC DIAGNOSED THE PROBLEM AS A FAULTY ALTERNATOR AND QUOTED HER $TO FIX IT SHE WAS ASTOUNDED AT THE PRICE AND TOLD ME TO JUST PICK IT UP, AND SHE DID NOT WANT THE CAR ANYMORE. SHE THEN CHANGED HER MIND AND TOLD ME THAT HER PARENTS WOULD PAY TO HAVE IT FIXED, BUT SHE WANTED US TO SPLIT ITWE DECLINED TO PAY FOR HALF OF IT DUE TO HER HAVING THE CAR FOR OVER THREE MONTHS ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE CAR PURCHASED HAD 130,MILES ON IT, AND THE ALTERNATOR IS A COMPONTENT THAT WILL GIVE OUT OVER TIME AFTER MULTIPLE CONVERSATIONS, WE CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT MRS*** HAD DECIDED TO SUE US DUE TO THE LEMON LAW AS SHE HAD THREATENED BEFORE I BELIEVE MRS*** IS UNAWARE OF WHAT THE LEMON LAW STATES THE LEMON LAW STATES “The Lemon Law applies to new vehicles (including cars, trucks, vans, motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, motor homes, towable recreational vehicles (TRVs) and neighborhood electric vehicles) purchased or leased from a Texas licensed dealer or lessor that develop problems covered by a written factory warranty.” IT ALSO STATES THAT THE DEALER HAS TO HAVE “REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO FIX THE PROBLEM”WE NEVER TRIED TO FIX THE ALTERNATOROBVISOULY BEING THAT MRS ***’S CAR WAS ONCE AGAIN SOLD, “AS IS NO WARRANTY”, AND AS A USED CAR, THE LEMON LAW DOES NOT APPLYIN CONCLUSION, WE FEEL THAT WADE’S AUTO RANCH WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND TO FIX MRS ***’S CAR THE FIRST TIME, AND DO NOT FEEL WE ARE OBLIGATED TO RETURN ANY OF THE MONEY