Sign in

Washington Medical Group

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Washington Medical Group? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Washington Medical Group

Washington Medical Group Reviews (9)

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered] Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because:Claims with the insurance company failed solely due professional negligence and incompetence by Washington Medical GroupMe signing the registration and patient responsibility forms does not relieve the business from responsibility to process the paperwork correctly and does not justify being negligent in filling out the claims and failing to properly follow up with the insurance company Regards, [redacted]

Dear [redacted] ,Thank you for your inquiry in regards to complaint ID # [redacted] .The patient affiliated with this complaint was a new patient with Washington Medical Group as of September All new patients are presented with registration forms, which in detail; provides the financial responsibilities of the patient for medical expenses in regards to the medical services received at Washington Medical Group.Before the start of a new patient visit, each patient is required to thoroughly read the Registration Package that is signed, initialed and dated to ensure clarityThe complete registration form signed by the patient has been provided for your review omitting private health information.Page of the Registration Package, is the continuation of the Financial Responsibility Agreement beginning on page Bullet two (2) of page informed the customer that he/she is responsible for medical expenses incurred for services provided by Washington Medical Group "For not providing a valid referral or obtaining any required pre-authorization at the time of service." This page has been acknowledges as read by the patient on 09/13/2017.The terms precertification and pre-authorization (or prior authorization) are often used interchangeably within the realm of healthcareUnfortunately, this can lead to confusion as the two are mutually exclusive of one another.To date the patient has never been billed for any denied claimsOn 10/31/a pre-certification / authorization request was submitted to the patient's carriervisits were approved by the carrier the same day covering all dates of services rendered to the patientAt this time all dates of services have reprocessed for payment.If you have any questions or need any additional information please feel free to contact me, Christi A [redacted] , Medical Billing Specialist with Washington Medical Group.Thank you,Christi A [redacted] Billing Specialist

Clearly, I have not been treated properly by The Washington Medical Group.Starting with the initial visit, I paid $upfront for therapy using EMO*** technology, I was rescheduled multiple times due to them not havingthe proper equipmentFinally, my doctor recommended physical therapy in placeof *** since the equipment that I was promised (and the reason why Ischeduled the appointment) was not availableI would like to note that I find itfrustrating that they charge patients a $fee for cancellations that are not withinhours, when in January of they canceled on me several times within 48hours of my appointmentWashington Medical Group was unable to provide mewith *** after I paid for this service and canceled my follow upappointments twiceWashington Medical Group was not clear and direct with me at any time duringthis entire year, I found their approach regarding my follvisits veryconfusingThe information they provide to patients is inconsistent as well as fullof omissionsAccording to phone records and emails, I contacted MsB***, alsoknown as Alexandra A***, over times from February to June regarding thisrefundHer assistant in June 16th, stated she would provide this refundIcontacted my insurance regarding duplicate charges (not related to this $150) forfollow up visits (that I did not pursue since we changed the plan to physicaltherapy)This is completely independent of the original dispute, so I am sure youcan imagine how frustrated I was when she linked them together in her replyIattempted to contact her several times from July to Novemeber without successIrecall being on hold during my last attempt for over minutesI have attachedthe email I sent to her in November regarding the aboveIn that email you willnotice a response from her billing department stating that it was noted on myaccount that I made a “threat”In her letter to you, you will also notice thefollowing terms: “made threats, accusations, and unreasonable ultimatums”Exercising my right to report this to the appropriate agencies is not a threatI findthis offensive and insultingAdditionally, I consider this an attempt to defame mycharacterMy refund should not be ransom for waiving a patient's rights to claims associatedwith other doctor visitsI was requested to sign such waiver, and I consider thisattempt of coercing a patient away from their rights unlawfulAlso of note,Washington Medical Group did not respect my privacy as in her attempts toresolve these matters she exposed confidential information to othercorrespondents, Washington Medical Group did not provide me with the pertinentinformation I needed to make a sound judgment on therapy as I was not informedof their inadequate technology at the time of payment.Rather than resolving this professionally, MsB*** was overzealous in herapproachIf she was often away from her office in 2014, she should havecommunicated/delegated my concerns to other staff at WMGWhy are they areunwilling to Stick to the original resolution we agreed upon (via phone in June)?Thank you for your time and assistance regarding this matterSincerely,

Dear [redacted],Thank you for your inquiry in regards to complaint ID # [redacted].The patient affiliated with this complaint was a new patient with Washington Medical Group as of September 2017. All new patients are presented with registration forms, which in detail; provides the financial...

responsibilities of the patient for medical expenses in regards to the medical services received at Washington Medical Group.Before the start of a new patient visit, each patient is required to thoroughly read the Registration Package that is signed, initialed and dated to ensure clarity. The complete registration form signed by the patient has been provided for your review omitting private health information.Page 3 of the Registration Package, is the continuation of the Financial Responsibility Agreement beginning on page 2. Bullet two (2) of page 3 informed the customer that he/she is responsible for medical expenses incurred for services provided by Washington Medical Group "For not providing a valid referral or obtaining any required pre-authorization at the time of service." This page has been acknowledges as read by the patient on 09/13/2017.The terms precertification and pre-authorization (or prior authorization) are often used interchangeably within the realm of healthcare. Unfortunately, this can lead to confusion as the two are mutually exclusive of one another.To date the patient has never been billed for any denied claims. On 10/31/2017 a pre-certification / authorization request was submitted to the patient's carrier. 15 visits were approved by the carrier the same day covering all dates of services rendered to the patient. At this time all dates of services have reprocessed for payment.If you have any questions or need any additional information please feel free to contact me, Christi A[redacted], Medical Billing Specialist with Washington Medical Group.Thank you,Christi A[redacted] Billing Specialist

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:Claims with the insurance company failed solely due  professional negligence and incompetence by Washington Medical Group. Me signing the registration and patient responsibility forms does not relieve the business from responsibility to process the paperwork correctly and does not justify being negligent in filling out the claims and failing to properly follow up with the insurance company.
Regards,
[redacted]

Washington Medical Group, P.C. is in receipt of your correspondence dated January 2, 2015 regarding Mr. [redacted]’s billing complaint.The service in question was the [redacted] Intake visit. Mr. [redacted] was informed by the Office Manager then that [redacted] services are not payable by his...

insurance; hence, it will be a cost to him as a self-pay charge. He provided a hardship discount letter; thereby, the [redacted] Intake visit was reduced to $150.00 and the therapy visits to $45.00 per session.The [redacted] Intake visit was provided on December 20, 2013. During the visit, the technician spent subsequent time teaching and having Mr. [redacted] implement progressive muscle relaxation and deep relaxation breathing, in which he noted a reduction in pain from start of the session until the end. After the visit, he was given a handout showing different techniques that he must practice as required for his [redacted] therapy. A missing component of the [redacted] machine caused a delay in starting his [redacted] therapy and the technician informed him of this situation. However, it was not necessary for the intake session which was mainly subjective information. In between this time, he did not indicate any dissatisfaction with his [redacted] visit or the lack thereof. Then on January 20, 2014, when the technician informed him that we received the part and that we can schedule him for [redacted] therapy, he stated he did not want to be scheduled as he could not afford to pay for the sessions even with a hardship discount. Due to this, Mr. [redacted] was referred to have Physical Therapy instead since it is a covered service by his insurance carrier. He was seen by the physician three times for Physical Therapy and at no time did he object to the services being billed to his insurance or to him. In fact, Mr. [redacted] paid for previous balances that his insurance applied to his deductible.The first time Mr. [redacted] contacted our office was on June 23, 2014, in which it was explained to him that the service in question was rendered and billed correctly; thus, there was no refund to be issued. The second time he called was on July 24, 2014, in which the Operations Manager’s assistant explained to him again that a full [redacted] intake was indeed performed and was billed accurately. During the conversation, she reminded him of his $121.85 balance from his visits with Dr. Macedo and Dr. Pilgrim. It was then that he started questioning the validity of Dr. Pilgrim’s charges as well. The assistant informed him that the outstanding charges were due to his deductible, which our office cannot waive as they were allocated by his insurance carrier. As1327 18" Street, N.W. Ko Washington, D.C. 2oo36 Ø (2o2) 785-24ooRevdex.com WASHINGTON DC Jan 20 2015 12:199m P903/213C) 1 - 2 C) - 1 5 : 1 TI : 23 AM : : 3/ 13WASHINGTON MEDICAL GROUIP, P.C.noted, at the end of the conversation, the office agreed to apply the $150.00 payment he made for the [redacted] Intake to his outstanding balance of $121.85, leaving a credit of $28.15 that will be refunded to him. At no point in time did Washington Medical Group, P.C. state that it will refund Mr. [redacted] the full amount of $150.00. Though this effort was unnecessary, our office was willing to do this as we value Mr. [redacted] as a patient and was willing to make accommodations.After this conversation, the Operations Manager did try to contact Mr. [redacted], per his request, in several occasions but to no avail. The last conversation occurred on November 17, 2014, whereby he was notified again of the same stance. However, he disagreed to this resolution and made threats, false accusations, and unreasonable ultimatums. At that junction, all offers were removed from the table.As it currently stands, Washington Medical Group, P.C. will not issue a refund check to Mr. [redacted] as the service provided to him on December 20, 2013 was performed and was accurately billed. Consequently, the balance of $121.85 remains as patient’s responsibility. As indicated in our correspondence dated November 26, 2014, which was mailed to Mr. [redacted] on December 1, 2014 and on January 5, 2015, his account will be forwarded to an outside collection agency with the associated fees such as re-billing and collection fees, etc. if the balance remains unpaid by March 2, 2015.I have attached a copy of our correspondence to Mr. [redacted] dated November 26, 2014, a copy of the Patient Registration and Financial Responsibility forms, and of the encounter forms dated April 29, 2014 and June 11, 2014.If you have any other questions, feel free to contact our office at (202) 785–2400.Sincerely,Jennifer Villalon Billing Manager1327 18* Street, N.W. so Washington, D.C. zoo.36 & (292) 385-2400C) 1 - 2 () - 1 E : 1 || : 2 AM :Revdex.com WASHINGTON DC Jan 20 2015 12:19.pm P004/013: #4 , 1 3WASHINGTON MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.November 26, 2014Adel [redacted] o 1632 Crystal Sq Arc, Apt. #15120 Arlington, VA 22202Mr. [redacted],According to our records, on December 6, 2013, you spoke with Keisha in regards to obtaining a hardship discount for evaluation and treatment of [redacted] since [redacted] is a noncovered charge with your insurance carrier. As such, you were informed that the hardship discount for this service would be as follows: [redacted] intake visit will be $150.00 and treatment visits will be $45.00. When you came in on December 20, 2013 for the [redacted] Intake visit, you provided us your hardship letter and paid $150.00, under check #108.You presented to Washington Medical Group, P.C for subsequent visits and called in and spoke with office staff subsequent times for various reasons and never once mentioned needing to Schedule [redacted] or being upset with services rendered on December 20, 2013. In fact, during your intake session the [redacted] technician spent subsequent time teaching and having you implement progressive muscle relaxation and deep relaxation breathing. While in the office that day you noted a reduction in pain from start of session to end. In addition, you were provided homework of practicing the new learned techniques required for your [redacted] sessions. You saw Dr. Macedo on December 30, 2013 and did not have any discrepancies regarding your [redacted] intake session. In fact, instead you informed Dr. Pedro Steven Macedo that you were finding the techniques trained on December 20, 2013 very helpful. At no time, for a period of seven months, did you dispute services rendered.Although your intake did not require the use of the EMG wiring for the [redacted] machine your therapy sessions did. Washington Medical Group, P.C., informed you that the EMG component for the [redacted] machine was broken and that new component was being replaced. Your [redacted] treatment appointment was scheduled for January 6, 2014 in expectation that the EMG part would be functional for EMG [redacted] at that time. This original appointment was rescheduled to January 9, 2014. However, on January 9, 2014, the [redacted] technician informed you that the EMG component had not come in. Once the component was received on January 20, 2014 you were called and informed, but did not want to schedule for treatment at that time. At this junction, you informed the office that you could not afford to pay out of pocket even with the hardship discount. Then on January 31, 2014 you were called by Ellen and asked to schedule a follow up appointment for form completion, in which you at first refused to schedule and then called back to schedule with Dr. Macedo. However, at no time did you ask to schedule a [redacted] therapy session. You were seen by Dr. Macedo and by his assistant on February 3, 2014, in which he filled out your disability form. In addition, he also noted that he was referring you to Dr. Barrie Pilgrim for “myofascial release therapy.”1327 18" Street, N.W. Ko washington, D.C. 2oozó (o (zo2) 785-24oo327 § 3. q?????-24Revdex.com WASHINGTON DC Jan 20 2015 12:19.pm P005/013: #C) 1 - 2 () - 1 E : 1 || : 2 AM : E* | 3WASHINGTON MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.The first time you informed our practice of any discontent of your [redacted] intake was June 23, 2014, whereby you contacted the Billing Department and spoke with Jennifer, at this time, you questioned the [redacted] Intake visit performed on December 20, 2013. In your conversation, you disputed the validity of the intake since [redacted] treatments could not be provided due to a missing part of the machine. However, it was explained that the part was available by January 20, 2014; yet, you decided to not partake in the [redacted] treatments. In fact you mentioned that you had decided to see Dr. Pilgrim for therapeutic treatment instead of having [redacted] therapy since that is covered by your insurance carrier. Then on July 24, 2014, you called the Billing Department and spoke with Jennifer again in which you requested the refund of $150.00 which was the amount you paid for your December 20, 2013 visit. She informed you that the visit was not for [redacted] treatment but was for the clinical intake which was performed at the time of service; therefore, no refund will be issued.Later that day, you spoke with Claire and in your conversation you re-iterated that you had informed the providers of your dissatisfaction and that you were disputing the [redacted] Intake visit. She stated that a full intake was performed and was billed accordingly. She also informed you of your outstanding balance of $121.85 for your visits on April 29, 2014 with Dr. Macedo and on June 11, 2014 with Dr. Pilgrim. Claire contacted me at the end of the conversation, it was noted that the Operations Manager, Alexandra Bocian, agreed upon that although the intake was performed, WMG will apply the payment of $150.00 towards your outstanding balance of $121.85, which leaves you a credit of $28.15 that will be refunded to you. Washington Medical Group, P.C. has heard and listened to all your concerns and assumed that this gesture was unnecessary but illustrated that we valued you as a patient and was willing to make accommodations. However, our willingness to concede and provide you a creditled you to request more concessions, which were unreasonable and unwarranted.At this junction, you got upset and further questioned your previous visits with Dr. Pilgrim stating that you should not have a balance on your account and that you should have not paid for your previous balance at all as the services billed were incorrect and fraudulent. In addition, you stated that you are writing a correspondence to the Department of Health in regard to these matters. Claire informed you that these charges were performed and were billed appropriately and that your insurance adjudicated them based on your benefits. Claims that are submitted, processed, and allocated to patient responsibility by your insurance company cannot be removed, reduced, or waived by our office based on our contractual agreement with them. Doing so will be a breached of contract and fraud. Therefore, all accommodations were removed from thetable.Your initial evaluation and management with Dr. Pilgrim was on February 21, 2014, whereby he established a treatment plan that “will be carried out over 6-8 sessions, 1-2 times weekly, followed by re-evaluation no later than 30 days.” However, you did not schedule a follow up until April 9, 2014 and then two months after that visit, which was on June 11, 2014. As you can see Mr. [redacted], you never carried out the plan of care that was established on your initial visit or on your follow up visits; thus, a re-evaluation must be performed to see where you are at.1327 18° Street, N.W. $9 Washington, D.C. 2c0g6 ) (202) 85.2400Revdex.com WASHINGTON DC Jan 20 2015 12:19.pm P006/013 C) 1 - 2 () - 1 E : 1 || : 2 AM : : # 3 , ) ??WASHINGTON MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.On November 4, 2014, you sent an email to alexandra(a)washingtonmedgroup.com. In the email, you made two claims. The first statement was that after we spoke about a month ago, no one has contacted you. The second was that you have tried to reach me “the past 3 weeks over 4 times” but could not. In response to your first claim, the office did try to call you at 3:00 pm and 4:30 pm on September 26, 2014 but to no avail, we again tried the morning after but also to no avail. As for the second claim, since I was out of the office for several days, I asked Jennifer to confirm with our staff if we received any phone calls or messages from you and to reply to your email. Jennifer emailed you back stating that we had no form of communication noted in our records from you to our office.In our conversation on Monday, November 17, 2014, you re-iterated to me about your dissatisfaction with the [redacted] Intake. I informed you once again that we are willing to apply the payment of $150.00 you had made on this day to your outstanding balance of $121.85 and we will refund you the difference of $28.15. I had told you if you wanted to agree to this proposal then I would need something in writing stipulating you were satisfied with the offer at hand, You stated you could not provide me with something in writing because you disagreed with Dr. Pilgrim’s charges and did not want to waive any rights if any you had to dispute them. Since our communication did not resolve in an amicable resolution, I informed you to contact your insurance carrier and we will send you this correspondence.To summarize, Mr. [redacted], Washington Medical Group, P.C has maintained its stance and has tried to resolve your issues amicably. However, with your continuous innuendos, false allegations and threats, we will not participate in such behaviors. We stand by our service and will not engage in any type of extortion. You are now stipulating that you have recordings of our conversations, which you never informed us at the time of our conversations that you were recording and in the District of Columbia, you are required to notify prior to recording any party that you are conducting such an act. Regardless, any record you do have should reiterate the same sentiments. Since you have the recordings, please listen to them as we have not changed our standpoint. We never agreed to provide you arefund of $150.00. We did previously agree to provide you a credit towards your outstanding balance prior to being informed that you wanted additional demands. In your demand, you asked us to not collect deductibles on previously adjudicated claims and to refund you the self-pay charge of $150.00. Doing this is a breach of our contract with your insurance carrier and a fraudulent act on our part, which we do not want to be a part of. When we informed you of this, you stated that you did not receive the services which we had documented by the physician using Electronic Health Records in your account. You stated it would be cheaper to pay you out than to have attorneys involved. This is considered a “shakedown”, in which we will not take part in such acts. I hope your recordings captured these statements as well.At that junction, I informed you we were sending you a written correspondence and will no longer engage in verbal conversations since you continue to take it out of context. We have informed you to exhaust all your judiciary avenues. We standby our service and have followed all appropriate procedures. We will not be forced or pressured to do anything unethical orinappropriate.1327 18" Street, N.W. Ko Washington, D.C. 2oo36 sto (2o2) 785-24coRevdex.com WASHINGTON DC Jan 20 2015 12:19.pm P007/013 C) 1 - 2 () - 1 E : 1 || : 2 AM : : # ?? , ‘ ??WASHINGTON MEDICAL GROUIP, P.C.As it currently stands, your balance with WMG is $121.85. Your financial agreement with our office stipulates that a $10.00 re-billing fee will be assessed to your account if payments are not received within 30 days of the original billing, a late fee of $15.00 will be assessed every 90 days after the initial billing date and will be assessed an 18% APR fee every 90 days after the initial billing date. We have frozen your account; thus, none of these charges were billed to your account since we believe an amicable resolution can transpire. However, since this is not the case, if we cannot resolve your account by March 2, 2015, your account will be forwarded to Berks Credit & Collections, Inc. and further correspondence must be directly to them.I have attached a copy of the Financial Responsibility Agreement form you have signed for your records and of the encounter forms for the outstanding dates of service. Also attached is a copyof your patient statement.

February 23, 2015
Dear [redacted],
Washington Medical Group, P.C. is in receipt of your correspondence dated February 18, 2015 regarding [redacted]’s billing complaint.
[redacted] was seen in our office multiple times by Dr. Ana P[redacted]. In his initial visit,...

December 4, 2014, his insurance processed the claim with a co-payment. His second visit on January 15, 2015 was just recently processed with a $47,98 deductible. And his last visit on February 13, 2015 is currently pending for adjudication.Our office files claims to insurance companies for patients who have insurance. It is the insurance companies, not our practice, that determine payments and patient liability for each claim. If [redacted] is questioning the validity of his co-payments or deductibles, he needs to contact his insurance carrier directly. However, claims that were submitted, processed, and has been allocated to patient responsibility by insurance companies cannot be removed, reduced, or waived by our office based on our contractual agreement with them. Doing so is a breach of our contract.
In addition, it was stated in our Patient Registration form, in which [redacted] signed and initialed, that “obtaining test results require a face-to-face consult with a licensed medical professional. Test results cannot be given over the phone, email and/or via facsimile. These regulations are in compliance with appropriate medical care guidelines and other government agencies within the District of Columbia.” Consequently, [redacted] must see his provider to obtain his results. Whether he needs to pay a copayment or deductible for his visit is based on the processing of the claim by his insurance carrier. I have attached a copy of the patient registration form for your records.
As stated above, the claim for February 13, 2015 is still pending from [redacted]’s insurance carrier. Once we received the
Explanation of Benefit from them, we will post it to his account. If his insurance allocated a co-payment or deductible for this visit, [redacted] will be hilted for the balance.
If you have further question, feel free to contact our office. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jennifer V
Billing Manager

Washington Medical Group, P.C. is in receipt of your correspondence dated February 3, 2015 regarding Mr. [redacted]’s billing complaint.Our office will not continue to participate in this endeavor. We have exhausted all appropriate efforts to resolve and aide Mr. [redacted]. However, he continues to “throw spaghetti in an effort that it will stick” and continues to derail and overlook the essential points. First, he was provided a hardship discount for a service he did receive on December 20, 2013. Second, he did not question the service or engage in any request of a refund until the summer of 2014 (6 months after the fact). This in our opinion was only ignited when he obtained a bill for not meeting his deductible, which was for two different visits. Third, when we offered to come to an amicable resolution, he made threats and accused our practice of fraudulent activities. This was propagated in our opinion because he wanted more concessions, in which we refused.
In his correspondence, Mr. [redacted] made some statements that we would like to address. First he stated that he “find[s] it frustrating that they charge patients a $40 fee for cancellations that are not within 48 hours, when in January of 2014 they canceled on [him] several times within 48 hours of [his] appointment.” Our cancelation policy of 48 hours in advance is within our terms, which Mr. [redacted] had agreed and signed to. In fact, according to our records, Mr. [redacted] had canceled several appointments either a day before or on the day of his appointment, which is clearly not within the 48 hour timeframe; however, these missed appointment fees were waived.
The second statement that we would like to address is when Mr. [redacted] indicated that “According to phone records and emails, [he] contacted Ms. [redacted] . . . over 40 times from February to June regarding this refund.” According to our records, Mr. [redacted]’s conversation with another staff and myself was in regard to his balance for an unrelated visit and his bounced check, not about the refund of the [redacted] Intake. In addition, of note Mr. [redacted] did not contact our office “over 40 times from February to June” and every concern he had made was addressed both verbally and in writing.
The last point that we would like to discuss is his statement, “Washington Medical Group did not respect my privacy as in her attempts to resolve these matters she exposed confidential information to other correspondents.” In the Notice of Privacy Practices form Mr. [redacted] signed, it stated that “We will use and disclose your health information for payment disputes, health oversight, and legal proceeding purposes.” Thus, when Mr. [redacted] reached out to your company, we provided an explanation of the visits in question solely for billing purposes and solely to Revdex.com Serving Metro DC.
As it currently stands, our office will not issue a refund to Mr. [redacted] as the [redacted] Intake was provided to him. In addition, his outstanding balance of $121.85 remains as patient responsibility, which is due by March 2, 2015. If payment is not received by this date, we do not have any other alternative but to forward his account, with applicable fees, to an outside collections agency. Any further communications must be directly to them.If you have any other questions, feel free to contact our office at ###-###-####.
Sincerely,
Jennifer V[redacted]
Billing Manager

Review: Yesterday, I received a call from a collections agency regarding a medical bill from this organization for a service received over a year ago. There are so many problems with this: 1. I had and have had every single day of my life including the date of service, ACTIVE INSURANCE, that this organization accepts. 2. My insurance company has no record of the claim cited by the collections agency. 3. The call, 1.5 years later, that I received from the collections agency was the first I had heard of this billing issue. In other words, this office never called, nothing, failing to inform me of my overdue bill, failing to bill my insurance company (who they have successfully billed at other dates), and turned all of my personal information over to creditors compromising my privacy, my credit, and my time.Desired Settlement: The medical group needs to bill my insurance company, stating WHY the bill is "untimely" in order to receive approval from the insurance company. They need to call the creditors and correct the problem. And they need to fix their billing practices to include better communication, protection of privacy, and less laziness with people's lives in the future. This is not this organizations first billing mistake. I no longer visit the practice. I hope they don't mess this up for other clients.

Business

Response:

Washington Medical Group, P.C.<[email protected]>

Check fields!

Write a review of Washington Medical Group

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Washington Medical Group Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: Clinics

Address: 1327 18th Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20036


Add contact information for Washington Medical Group

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated