Check Plus Contractors, LLC

Dear Consumer,
We are the rebate
processor and have to process rebates according to the manufacturer’s
guidelines. Unfortunately the rebate form for this offer (***)
clearly states that we can only issue payment up to per household at the
top,
and again at the bottomIt also states “The use of multiple addresses to
obtain additional rebates constitutes as fraud.” I have attached this for your reference and highlighted the verbiage for your convenience
The manufacturer has declined to make payment on your
inquiry because you have already met the offer limitWe apologize that we
cannot assist your further. Jennifer BConsumer Relation Analyst

Mr***We forwarded your complaint to the manufacturer directly and have been notified the manufacturer will be contacting you directly for resolution and payment.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

Dear Consumer, I was able to locate the three submissions for Luxco that you submitted belowAfter researching this further I was able to guarantee that your inquiry has been resolvedI have put details of your three submissions below for your referenceLUXCOOffer:
*** $Valid Submissions: As you stated of your submissions: *** and ***- Were qualified for the $This is because the receipts that you submitted did not clearly state that the bottles you purchased were the 1.75L I do show that you contacted our rebate team about this on 4/8/and you were issued an additional payment of $for each oneYour submission numbers for these were *** and ***. It appears both the $and the $checks cleared the bank. Showing that you did receive the full $you expected for these two rebatesYour third submission: ***; our processing plant captured the purchase date from your receipt as 4/29/16. This date was not considered a Valid date since this offer ended in MarchHowever; I went ahead and issued a $courtesy payment for you. Your new submission number is:***Please allow days to receive this paymentJennifer B Consumer Relations Analyst Inmar Promotion Network https://inmarrebates.com/

Dear Consumer,Our system shows this rebate was processed correctly because the receipt submitted did not contain a purchase date. I have attached a copy of the receiptI did receive approval to issue a courtesy payment under submission number 118044122304556. Please allow about days
to receive this payment.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

Dear Consumer,Our system shows check was mailed 9/28/17. Please allow some additional time to receive this check. Thank you,Jennifer Consumer Relations Program Manager

Mr***We forwarded your complaint to the manufacturer directly and have been notified the manufacturer will be contacting you directly for resolution and payment.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

Dear Consumer,I have reviewed your receipt and verified the purchases. I have requested the additional payment under and you should receive this payment in about days.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID ***, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards,
*** ***

Dear Consumer,Our records do not show any Windsor rebates under you name and address that have been disqualifiedTo research those further we would need the Submission numbers you state you were disqualified on We were able to locate the other two of your submissions
in our system and it appears you were paid on bothI have put the information for you belowSubmission# *** for Luxco offer ***: Our records show you called in on 12/29/and we issued a courtesy payment- New Submission # ***. Check for $was issued on 1/19/16.Submission# *** for Diageo offer ***: Our records show you called in on 12/17/and we issued a courtesy payment- New Submission # ***. Check for $was issued on 1/14/16.Unfortunately per manufacturer's guidelines if your receipt does not state what you purchased our processing plant will not be able to qualify your submissionsWe suggest asking your store to supply a detailed receipt if you know you will be sending in a rebate; if they cannot you will have to call us to get your submissions paidWe apologize for any inconvenience this causes you!Thank you,Jennifer BConsumer Relations Analyst

Dear
Consumer,
","sans-serif"> I have reviewed your submission and have issued the rebate for youYour new submission number for this payment is: ***Please
allow days for rebate delivery
For any
updates prior to or after the to weeks, please call our office at 1-877-552-
from 8:AM to 4:PM EST, Monday through Friday

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the responseIf no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
Complaint:
I am rejecting this response because:
This is the same story they have been giving me for over months now. How can a company not have funding for rebates? I would like direct contact information for Skyy Vodka if you can't give me an answer. This is not acceptable.
Regards,
Donna ***

Dear Consumer,Our system shows you submitted twice for offer This limit on this offer is one per household (name and address) Our records reflect you purchased two bottles of Lindeman's wine and wrote the UPC codes for both bottles on both rebate forms This should have been
submitted using one rebate form with both receipts to qualify for the $rebate The is rebate is not about the product, but about the offer id submitted under We have received approval to issue an additional $payment under submission number Please allow days to receive this payment.Thank you,Jennifer Consumer Relations Program Manager

They are asking for more information from me Here is that information:Submission number 217003011001657Offer ID DIAGEO4682Offer name: save up to $off spirits - tear off
Complaint:
I am rejecting this response because:
Regards,
Theresa Collins

[A default letter is provided here which indicates your
acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID 12580195, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards,
Steven ***

Dear Consumer,I have received approval to issue a courtesy payment on your purchase date of 12/15/17. Please allow days to receive this payment.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

Dear Consumer,Our system shows check is mailing 3/6/2018.Thank you,JenniferConsumer Relations Program Manager

I am rejecting this response because it took me phone calls, facebook posts, negative reviews and a Revdex.com complaint to have them send my checkRevdex.com, please look into this companyIt is a scam
Regards,
*** ***

I am going to reject this resolution until the check is receivedAs there has been poor communication by this company throughout this issue and in the past, I will not close the complaing until I have the check in handAs previously stated I initially contacted you 7/15/and received no response. Regards,
*** ***

Dear Consumer,Our system and the rebate for shows this rebate was for $not the $as indicated I have attached a copy of your rebate for your records I have requested the $payment under new submission number *** Please allow days to receive this
payment. Thank you,JenniferConsumer Consumer Relations Program Manager

I offer apology on the submission of Windsor Rebate as they have responded through another channelI am totally dissatisfied with the INMAR REBATE operation as they reject over 50% of the submission based on identificationMORELLIS of STPaul MN sells large volume liquorTheir Cash Register receipts are broken down to beer, wine, liquor and meatsThe price is there but no product identificationIt is under these conditions it behooves the rebate center to contact the merchant or wholesaler of the productAnother item is the check comes through the USPS system based on total honesty open. It would be the same as a$bill with note attachmentmailedEven with INMAR claim that they have forwarded the checks I make an unequivocal statement that large percentage of the rebates are not filled