LegalWing

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below I thought it best to send you a copy of the letter I am a retired paralegal with years of experience and have served and answered complaints on behalf of the United States I think I know the rules of CivProcedure I want them to stop any further communication They are nothing more than ambulance chasers Regards, [redacted]

That is fine If it weren't for this complaint, we would have had no further contact with him anyways

In that case, and according to the court website, a lawsuit was filed against him Pertinent portions of the court website are pasted herein:Case Number: [redacted] VS [redacted] ET ALFiling Date: 09/21/2015Case Type: Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)Status: PendingFuture Hearings [redacted] [redacted] in [redacted] , Los Angeles, CA 90012Final Status Conference [redacted] [redacted] in [redacted] , Los Angeles, CA 90012Jury Trial [redacted] [redacted] at North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012OSC RE DismissalDocuments Filed | Proceeding InformationPartiesDOES 1-- Defendant/Respondent [redacted] - Plaintiff/Petitioner [redacted] - Defendant/Respondent - Defendant/RespondentCase Information | Party Information | Proceeding InformationDocuments Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)09/21/ComplaintCase Information | Party Information | Documents FiledProceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)None

In that case, and according to the court website, a lawsuit was filed against him Pertinent portions of the court website are pasted herein: Case Number: [redacted] VS [redacted] ET AL Filing Date: 09/21/2015Case Type: Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)Status: Pending Future Hearings [redacted] [redacted] in [redacted] , Los Angeles, CA 90012Final Status Conference [redacted] [redacted] in [redacted] , Los Angeles, CA 90012Jury Trial [redacted] [redacted] at North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012OSC RE Dismissal Documents Filed | Proceeding Information Parties DOES 1-- Defendant/Respondent [redacted] - Plaintiff/Petitioner [redacted] - Defendant/Respondent - Defendant/Respondent Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)09/21/Complaint Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)None

Revdex.com: Calls to the company were unanswered To the best of my knowledge, I have not been sued in Kern county I fact I have never even been in Kern county I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me I will ignore the letter I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved Regards, [redacted]

Here is the attached document of the letter that you requested from meHopefully this will resolve any issues and if there is further documents sent to me I will forward them as soon as possible.Like I mentioned previously on my complaint, I have never met a woman by the name of [redacted] I searched the case number through lacourt.org and it does appear once I fill in the case number, On the email that was sent to me by Revdex.com it states that the letter was not intended for me but yet it has my name on itThe document that I am forwarding to you proofs what I am statingTherefore I would ask Revdex.com to please have Legal Wing remove me from their records Thank You, [redacted] ***

The letter was intended for [redacted] , not [redacted] *** Why would they even open someone else's mail and of course he's not involved in a lawsuit as the letter was not addressed to him

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below What respondent (LegalWing) clearly fails to address is the fact that their company has inflicted undo stress on someone other than the defendant named in their alleged civil complaint i.e., ( [redacted] vs [redacted] ***) In addition, LegalWing’s letter to me states, in pertinent part, as follows: “Based on a search of public records, we, [I will assume “we” being LegalWing], believe that “ [redacted] ***” etc., is inconsistent with the named plaintiff in their alleged complaint With regards to my paying for a document that clearly has nothing to do with me, that’s illogical Resolution of this matter is quite simple It is my position that LegalWing is to have no further contact with me in regards to the issue before this mediating body i.e., Revdex.com Regards, [redacted] ***

There is a case number [redacted] filed against [redacted] ***r in Kern County He acknowledges his name is [redacted] ***r but that he has a middle name Most lawsuits are filed without reference to middle names as the general public rarely knows someones middle name If he is claiming not to have been sued, then he can throw away the letter and disregard it We've only sent him a letter and have never asked for any money from him We're a not for profit, we don't charge people If he called us rather than file this complaint, he would know that

Here is the attached document of the letter that you requested from meHopefully this will
resolve any issues and if there is further documents sent to me I will forward them as soon as possible.Like I mentioned previously on my complaint, I have never met a woman by the name of *** ***I searched the case number through lacourt.org and it does appear once I fill in the case number,On the email that was sent to me by Revdex.com it states that the letter was not intended for me but yet it has my name on itThe document that I am forwarding to you proofs what I am statingTherefore I would askRevdex.com to please have Legal Wing remove me from their records. Thank You,*** ***

She really misunderstood the letter We are not suing her and as such, we would have no reason to serve her She is also misinformed as to the time limits regarding service and her deadline to respond Once she is personally served, she only has days to respond and the Plaintiff
is normally required to serve the defendants within days unless they can show some hardship or difficulty in effecting service despite making attempts That is up to judicial discretion but as I mentioned initially, she misunderstood the letter just as she misunderstands her legal obligations in the case

I, *** ***, am not an attorney nor have I ever purported to be one The fact that there is an attorney by the same name is purely coincidence The case number referenced is real and a simple search of the Contra Costa County Website shows that it is real Here is a link to the
case information showing that *** *** is a defendant in a Domestic Violence case
***
He received the letter because a search of public records shows that he is the only *** *** residing in Contra Costa County This is not 100% accurate but a call to our office would have resolved the confusion We have paralegals who can assist with document preparation and if he requests the assistance of an attorney, we can refer him to one We never asked him for any money The monthly service he refers to is optional to join, can cancel at any time, and is really just a membership due to pay our costs in assisting the public
I'm not thrilled about the idea of participating in dispute resolution with an organization that has already been found corrupt (Revdex.com), but only respond here to alleviate the concerns of the complaint as he apparently prefers contacting your organization rather than ours directly
***

In that case, and according to the court website, a lawsuit was filed against him.  Pertinent portions of the court website are pasted herein:Case Number:  [redacted] VS [redacted] ET ALFiling Date:  09/21/2015Case Type:  Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)Status:  PendingFuture Hearings [redacted] in [redacted], Los Angeles, CA 90012Final Status Conference[redacted] in [redacted], Los Angeles, CA 90012Jury Trial[redacted] at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012OSC RE DismissalDocuments Filed | Proceeding InformationPartiesDOES 1-50 - Defendant/Respondent[redacted] - Plaintiff/Petitioner[redacted] - Defendant/Respondent  - Defendant/RespondentCase Information | Party Information | Proceeding InformationDocuments Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)09/21/2015 ComplaintCase Information | Party Information | Documents FiledProceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)None

Revdex.com:
Calls to the company were unanswered.  To the best of my knowledge, I have not been sued in Kern county.  I fact I have never even been in Kern county.  I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me.  I will ignore the letter.   I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved.
Regards,
[redacted]

In that case, and according to the court website, a lawsuit was filed against him.  Pertinent portions of the court website are pasted herein:
Case Number:  [redacted] VS [redacted] ET AL
Filing Date:  09/21/2015Case Type:  Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)Status:  Pending
Future Hearings [redacted] in [redacted], Los Angeles, CA 90012Final Status Conference[redacted] in [redacted], Los Angeles, CA 90012Jury Trial[redacted] at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012OSC RE Dismissal
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties
DOES 1-50 - Defendant/Respondent
[redacted] - Plaintiff/Petitioner
[redacted] - Defendant/Respondent 
 - Defendant/Respondent
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)09/21/2015 Complaint
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)None

That is fine.  If it weren't for this complaint, we would have had no further contact with him anyways.

Here is the attached document of the letter that you requested from me. Hopefully this will...

resolve any issues and if there is further documents sent to me I will forward them as soon as possible.Like I mentioned previously on my complaint, I have never met a woman by the name of [redacted]. I searched the case number through lacourt.org and it does appear once I fill in the case number,
On the email that was sent to me by Revdex.com it states that the letter was not intended for me but yet it has my name on it. The document that I am forwarding to you proofs what I am stating. Therefore I would ask
Revdex.com to please have Legal Wing remove me from their records. 
Thank You,
[redacted]

The letter was intended for [redacted], not [redacted].  Why would they even open someone else's mail and of course he's not involved in a lawsuit as the letter was not addressed to him.

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear...

below.
What respondent (LegalWing) clearly fails to address is the
fact that their company has inflicted undo stress on someone other than the defendant
named in their alleged civil complaint i.e., ([redacted] vs. [redacted]).  In addition, LegalWing’s
letter to me states, in pertinent part, as follows:  “Based on a search of public records, we, [I
will assume “we” being LegalWing], believe that “[redacted]” etc., is inconsistent
with the named plaintiff in their alleged complaint.  With regards to my paying for a document that clearly
has nothing to do with me, that’s illogical.
Resolution of this matter is quite simple.  It is my position that LegalWing is to have
no further contact with me in regards to the issue before this mediating body i.e.,
Revdex.com.    
Regards,[redacted]

There is a case number [redacted] filed against [redacted]r in Kern County.  He acknowledges his name is [redacted]r but that he has a middle name.  Most lawsuits are filed without reference to middle names...

as the general public rarely knows someones middle name.  If he is claiming not to have been sued, then he can throw away the letter and disregard it.  We've only sent him a letter and have never asked for any money from him.  We're a not for profit, we don't charge people.  If he called us rather than file this complaint, he would know that.