Sign in

LegalWing

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about LegalWing? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews LegalWing

LegalWing Reviews (27)

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
I thought it best to send you a copy of the letter.  I am a retired paralegal with 40 years of experience and have served and answered complaints on behalf of the United States.  I think I know the rules of Civ. Procedure.  I want them to stop any further communication.  They are nothing more than ambulance chasers.
Regards,
[redacted]

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
How did you obtain my personal information? You did no identity confirmation before promoting your company to my personal doorstep.
Wouldn't it be best to do research before you send a letter? Since it appears you did not, how many other people have you solicited mistakenly in the same manner?
Regards,
[redacted]

Review: LegalWing (hereinafter LW), based on a search of public records, assumed that I was Robert Eugene Black. In so assuming, posted a negative mark on my credit reports. I explained to LW that I was not the alleged person noted in their civil complaint and notification letter. In October 2014, approximate day of the week unknown, I telephoned LW and spoke with a female representative who identified herself as [redacted]. At this time [redacted] informed me that I would receive a release letter in 10 days and that the hastily placed negative on my credit reports would be removed. To this date, this has not been effected. In addition, per LW's notification letter dated 09/16/2014 regarding the matter at issue, I requested a copy of the civil complaint by calling ([redacted]. Again, to this date, I have yet to receive a copy of the aforementioned civil complaint as all requests have fallen on deft ears.Desired Settlement: That LegalWing in addition to restoring my credit history to its good standing prior to their negligent act, provide me with the promised request release letter and a copy of the civil complaint (case #[redacted]).

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

What respondent (LegalWing) clearly fails to address is the

fact that their company has inflicted undo stress on someone other than the defendant

named in their alleged civil complaint i.e., ([redacted] vs. [redacted]). In addition, LegalWing’s

letter to me states, in pertinent part, as follows: “Based on a search of public records, we, [I

will assume “we” being LegalWing], believe that “[redacted]” etc., is inconsistent

with the named plaintiff in their alleged complaint. With regards to my paying for a document that clearly

has nothing to do with me, that’s illogical.

Resolution of this matter is quite simple. It is my position that LegalWing is to have

no further contact with me in regards to the issue before this mediating body i.e.,

Revdex.com.

Regards,

Business

Response:

That is fine. If it weren't for this complaint, we would have had no further contact with him anyways.

Review: I have received a letter stating that a suit has been filed against me [redacted] LLC vs [redacted] in the Los Angeles Superior Court on June 10, 2015 and that I have as little as 30 days from the date of filing to respond or a default can be entered against me even if I do not believe I have been properly served and that the plaintiff can garnish my wages, levy my bank account, or attach a lien on my home. This information is incorrect because a permanent Order/Judgment can not e issued by a judge without the following of civil procedures and service of process which If I recall is 120 days from the date of service of the filing. This is nothing more than a scare tactic to draw up business. They also claim a relationship with legal aid? At any rate I think their business practices should be looked into and they should be reported to the District Attorney's office as well.Desired Settlement: I would like them to stop this practice. They should either State they are effecting POS for the plaintiff and attach the complaint as required by civil procdure or stop the harassing and threatening sounds of their letters..

Business

Response:

She really misunderstood the letter. We are not suing her and as such, we would have no reason to serve her. She is also misinformed as to the time limits regarding service and her deadline to respond. Once she is personally served, she only has 30 days to respond and the Plaintiff is normally required to serve the defendants within 60 days unless they can show some hardship or difficulty in effecting service despite making attempts. That is up to judicial discretion but as I mentioned initially, she misunderstood the letter just as she misunderstands her legal obligations in the case.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

I thought it best to send you a copy of the letter. I am a retired paralegal with 40 years of experience and have served and answered complaints on behalf of the United States. I think I know the rules of Civ. Procedure. I want them to stop any further communication. They are nothing more than ambulance chasers.

Regards,

Review: I received this letter from LegalWing on October 06, 2015. The letter states that a lawsuit was filed against me on 09/21/2015. If I wanted to know more information about this matter I should contact Legal Wing and I have as little as 30 days from the date of this letter to respond to the lawsuit. The letter gives a name of [redacted] which I am unfamiliar with, have never met a woman with that name anywhere. I have never been in any type of accident.Desired Settlement: Desire outcome for me would be for Revdex.com to contact this business and resolve this matter accordingly, thank you.

Business

Response:

The letter was intended for [redacted], not [redacted]. Why would they even open someone else's mail and of course he's not involved in a lawsuit as the letter was not addressed to him.

Consumer

Response:

Here is the attached document of the letter that you requested from me. Hopefully this will resolve any issues and if there is further documents sent to me I will forward them as soon as possible.Like I mentioned previously on my complaint, I have never met a woman by the name of [redacted]. I searched the case number through lacourt.org and it does appear once I fill in the case number,

Review: I received a "legal" letter stating that a woman by the name of [redacted] (never met a "[redacted]") is attempting to pursue a Family Law claim in Contra Costa County's Superior Court, California against myself, and Legal Wing is offering "help" to resolve the situation, by contacting them on their "Toll-Free" 800' number.Upon further investigation, the Attorney they are referencing in regards to this ([redacted]), is based out of Twin Falls, ID. I contacted this attorney and they claim that this is NOT an attempt on their behalf, and that they have received MANY claims recently in regards to this, and are attempting to find any information they can in regards to a physical address (which doesn't exist).The Case number referenced does NOT exist in Contra Costa County's system, appearing to be a fraudulent claim from Legal Wing. The company does not have a physical address, referencing a P.O. Box that changes frequently according to The Law Offices of [redacted].The letter to notify is claiming that no action on my behalf will result in legal decisions being made without consent of myself or any legal party I am involved with. Leading up to property seizures and child support/alimony payments.They are offering legal services (research on the "case", and referring a lawyer that could potentially help) under the guise of a "Not-For-Profit" organization. Upon further investigation of these services, they require a $15.00/month payment to begin a service to help the "defendant" find an "Aggressive Lawyer" with whom they have a relationship.It appears this company is attempting to prey upon unsuspecting and naive people who do not understand how legal process works, so they can get their monthly payment for "protection" . This seems like a extortion racket that is using phishing practices by calling their Toll-Free number, or contacting them via their Fax or Email.Toll Free: ###-###-####Fax: ###-###-####Email: [email protected] Settlement: I would like information regarding how they obtained my name and address, and would appreciate a Revdex.com associate to call me regarding this issue. An investigation of this company is required, and to NOT inform other members of the public would be unethical. I am not sure that what they are doing is entirely legal (case number which doesn't exist insinuates mail fraud).

Business

Response:

I, [redacted], am not an attorney nor have I ever purported to be one. The fact that there is an attorney by the same name is purely coincidence. The case number referenced is real and a simple search of the Contra Costa County Website shows that it is real. Here is a link to the case information showing that [redacted] is a defendant in a Domestic Violence case.

He received the letter because a search of public records shows that he is the only [redacted] residing in Contra Costa County. This is not 100% accurate but a call to our office would have resolved the confusion. We have paralegals who can assist with document preparation and if he requests the assistance of an attorney, we can refer him to one. We never asked him for any money. The monthly service he refers to is optional to join, can cancel at any time, and is really just a membership due to pay our costs in assisting the public.

I'm not thrilled about the idea of participating in dispute resolution with an organization that has already been found corrupt (Revdex.com), but only respond here to alleviate the concerns of the complaint as he apparently prefers contacting your organization rather than ours directly.

Consumer

Response:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.

How did you obtain my personal information? You did no identity confirmation before promoting your company to my personal doorstep.

Wouldn't it be best to do research before you send a letter? Since it appears you did not, how many other people have you solicited mistakenly in the same manner?

Regards,

Review: This company has now sent me two notices of an impending law suit against myself by a plaintiff [redacted] I have never heard of, never contacted. The "case" is supposedly filed in Kern County. I have never been to Kern County. The case number is [redacted] for a [redacted]r. I am [redacted]. My wife and I believe this is a scam operation trying to scare us into using their "attorney" services. My wife and I have never done anything to provoke a lawsuit against us with anyone. We have never been involved in any lawsuit of any kind. These notices have come to us completely out of the blue, with no previous solicitation on our part of any kind. Can you contact this company and make them stop harassing us? And can you prevent them from continuing this farcical "business"?!Desired Settlement: We just want to be left alone without these disturbing, threatening mailings that make no sense and are completely without reference or context or evidence.

Business

Response:

There is a case number [redacted] filed against [redacted]r in Kern County. He acknowledges his name is [redacted]r but that he has a middle name. Most lawsuits are filed without reference to middle names as the general public rarely knows someones middle name. If he is claiming not to have been sued, then he can throw away the letter and disregard it. We've only sent him a letter and have never asked for any money from him. We're a not for profit, we don't charge people. If he called us rather than file this complaint, he would know that.

Consumer

Response:

Calls to the company were unanswered. To the best of my knowledge, I have not been sued in Kern county. I fact I have never even been in Kern county. I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me. I will ignore the letter. I will wait for the business to perform this action and, if it does, will consider this complaint resolved.

Regards,

Check fields!

Write a review of LegalWing

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

LegalWing Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: Attorneys Referral Service, Legal Services Plans

Address: PO Box 80340, Rancho Santa Margarita, California, United States, 92688

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

www.legalwing.org

This site can’t be reached

Shady, yet now dead: once upon a time this website was reported to be associated with LegalWing, but after several inspections we’ve come to the conclusion that this domain is no longer active.



Add contact information for LegalWing

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated