W & H Properties, LLC

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint.  
[Provide details of why you are not satisfied with this resolution.]
Regards,
 I not only saved the message left but it was left on a voice mail for  patient and doctors to call in... there is an office employee that picked up the message ... this is business but it also was personal for me so such a message should not have been left... US mail system would of been correct. I will be forwarding the message left to Intuit , and putting another complaint in on a government site.

To whom it may concernThis is a debt collection matter. Nobody from Greenberg, Grant and Richards told the complainant they were an attorney. I can pull recordings on all calls here and Commercial Asset Investigations can pull theirs as well to prove such. Complainant has the right to turn away any...

investigator that might show up at her business. There would only be a HIPPA violation if she allowed it. She contracted our client Intuit to process her payroll. Intuit  paid her employees AND her and was not reimbursed for it. Attached records show the biggest disbursement of funds was to her directly. It seems to me after her behavior towards our client she would attempt to find out what we were calling about instead of crying foul. Attached is proof of debt. GGR did not violate any laws and if she does not resolve the matter GGR will recommend to Intuit that they litigate the matter.John [redacted]Greenberg, Grant & Richards800-497-5332 [redacted]

Dear Dispute Resolution Team,Thank you for allowing us to respond to this complaint. We have had no contact with the complainant. Attached is a wave file from Commercial Asset Investigations. If you review the tape no where is it stated "called saying they are attorneys" or "planning on freezing all...

of our assets". This is purely a fabrication by the complainant trying to paint us in an improper light. If you will further review the wave file you will hear that our representative ([redacted]) name was given as a contact person for more information. To date the complainant has not contacted us We intend to move forward with the actions we stated in the recording. When the investigator shows up the complainant can either cooperate or not. The entire matter is regarding a debt of $[redacted]. attached is a PDF with the statement of account and a promissory note. The debt is owed to [redacted]. in conclusion we will continue to attempt to contact him. If he fails to respond or deal with the matter we will make the appropriate recommendations to our client on how to retrieve the monies owed to them. In conclusion we feel the only entity being harassed here is our client [redacted] Greenberg, Grant & Richards800-497-5332 x 1106

RE complaint [redacted] Complainant owns a company [redacted] Inc. Our client [redacted] provided payroll services for this company. On 5/2/16 [redacted] paid the [redacted] a total of $7644.09 for unemployment taxes. The complainant failed to reimburse them for those monies. in his...

agreement with [redacted] he is also responsible for their collection expenses which brings the total to $9555.11. Mark [redacted] was confirmed to be working with Commercial Asset Investigations who we employ to do asset searches in the even a client wants to litigate. As far a his cease and desist letter that only applies to consumer matters and this is commercial. he should look up section 803.5 of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act for proof. I have attached the court case he forwarded alleging that was against us. You will find it is a suit regarding an inmate in a Wisconsin prison. So his assertions are pure fabrication. this is a debt collection matter. John [redacted]Vice President of CollectionsGreenberg,Grant & Richards800-497-5332 x 1106

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution would be satisfactory to me.  These people have thug like behavior. and I thank Revdex.com for the communication but I think Revdex.com should listen to the message that was left. I will deal with my credit issue ...as today I received a letter.

[redacted] Dear DR Response Team Here are our response to the second round of complaints. 1.       The phone number we contacted the complainant on is not “public” it was provided by Complainant as the business number and also identifies as [redacted] voicemail2.       Commercial Asset Investigations was hired by us to do a financial investigation of [redacted]3.       There is absolutely no evidence of these claims in the transcript4.       We have called the number he provided to our client which answers as another company which is why we had [redacted] investigate all5.       Mark [redacted] works for Commercial Asset Investigations-the other entity complainant states is a fictitious entity created due to [redacted] shortcomings in voice translation. Neither are “sister” companies of GGR6.       [redacted] has informed us that they subcontract work through [redacted] [redacted] in states they are not licensed and if they do go to a state they are not licensed in they are accompanied by a local licensed PI provided by the broker7.       At this point we cannot say whether there is or is not personal liability on his part that was the point of the investigation. As far as the accusations of harassment the [redacted] codes 2709 and 2709.1 deal with stalking. Legitimate attempts at collecting debt is not harassment or is it stalking.In conclusion I have attached the information complainant provided [redacted] when they set up the payroll account for [redacted]. There is also an email stream from complainant back and for with our client regarding the debt. The complaint failed to fund the account set up for [redacted] to debit AFTER they paid the company’s payroll tax to the [redacted]. [redacted] charged the complainant an NSF fee which he did not want to pay for HIS error and demanded our client not only waive the fee but give him a free month of payroll service. They denied his request, in turn he hired another payroll company and refused reimburse [redacted] for the first quarter payroll taxes. Complainant also mailed us a letter denying that [redacted] had any liability what so ever. That is attached as well. We have verified with the [redacted] the employer account he provided [redacted] was registered to [redacted]. We have no intention of contacting the complainant any further on this matter as he has proven that no matter what proof is provided he will not pay the debt he owes. [redacted] has a solid reputation in the business community as does GGR. Complainant also falsely provided the Revdex.com with a copy of a lawsuit that we were not a part of. As such we request the complaint be removed from our records as this an attempt to blemish the reputation of two reputable businesses GGR and [redacted] to cover up not paying a bill.

Dear Response Team,I am in receipt of the the complaint from [redacted]. The complainant knew she owed a debt to [redacted] of $1,399.33. She had been invoiced from May of 2014 until it was placed in collections by them in November of 2014. Our first collection letter went out on...

11/19/2014. Attached are wave files of her authorizing our rep to debit the first payment-note he tells her on the recording it is for [redacted]. The second attachment is the call she made to him threatening him accusing him of wrong doing and telling the Revdex.com and the state of [redacted] will take action. The third wave file is of our rep leaving a message for her and that employee transferred the call to "[redacted]" who in turn asked what the problem was AND authorized our rep to the payment through again. This check went NSF as well. This entire complaint is a blatant fabrication of what happened when my staff contacted her. Fortunately we record all conversations and the truth is presented here for the listening. As far as her assertions we did not have the right to discuss with her employee, her employee volunteered and that falls under the legal theory of "apparent authority". This is a commercial transaction and as such falls under the [redacted] not the [redacted] which is for consumers. Furthermore I have cc'd this complaint to the Vice President of Sales at GGR and will request he contact [redacted] to obtain permission to engage local counsel and file suit in small claims court. I suggest the complainant govern herself accordingly. I also request that due to the obvious fabrication involved in the complaint the Revdex.com stricken it from our file.John F[redacted]Vice President of CollectionsGreenberg, Grant & Richards[redacted]