Sign in

Kentucky Fried Chicken

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Kentucky Fried Chicken? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Restaurants, Carry Out Food Kentucky Fried Chicken

Kentucky Fried Chicken Reviews (52)

Yuk
Ordered extra crispy Had to go thru drive thru. Got home was original recipe c[censored]

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: When call Texan Towing that is who we hireNot the employee of Texan towing ?

Dear Ms***: Alamo Title Insurance (the “Company”) received notice of [redacted] ’s (the “Complainant”) Revdex.com Complaint (the “Complaint”) filed against Austin Title Company (“Austin Title”) on July 20, The Company has reviewed the Complaint and relevant documents and hereby responds as followsOn or about July 1, 2016, the Complainant filed the Complaint contesting certain funds held in escrow as a result of a Bastrop West Water Company bill (“BWW Bill”)The Complainant asserts that the funds were never disbursed to her pursuant to an escrow agreement (“Escrow Agreement”)Consequently, the Complainant is requesting that the Company disburse the Escrow FundsThe facts, as understood by the Company, are as follows: On August 13, 2015, the Company closed a sales transaction between the Complainant and Anastacio and Laura Reyna (Buyers”) involving property located at Edmonson Lane, Cedar Creek, Texas (“Property”)Based on the Company’s investigation, the Buyers’ Realtor, [redacted] , contacted Bastrop West Water Company (“BWW”) before closing to inquire about water services for the PropertyAt this time, she learned about the BWW Bill in the amount of $The BWW Bill arose from certain services performed for the Complainant while she owned the PropertySpecifically, the BWW Bill is comprised of two charges: (1) a $charge for repairs to the water main after damage caused by one of the Complainant’s contractors on January 29, 2015, and (2) a $charge for installing a new water meter pursuant to an agreement on February 2, Based on the Company’s investigation, it appears that although there is a charge for the installation of a meter, the meter was removed after the Complainant denied having requested installation of the meter, and refused to pay the $for installationConsequently, before closing, there was no water meter or water service for the PropertyUpon discovery of the BWW Bill, MsHarris and the Buyers required that the Complainant pay the BWW Bill so that the Buyers could receive water service at the PropertyThe Complainant, refused to pay the BWW Bill because she believed it was an attempt by BWW to “extort money prior to the sale” and therefore “not valid.” Subsequently, the Complainant initiated a Public Utilities Commission complaint (Complaint Number ***) contesting the validity of the BWW Bill (“PUC Complaint”)Pursuant to the Complainant’s decision to initiate the PUC Complaint, the Buyers, the Complainant, and the escrow agent entered into the Escrow Agreement on August 12, 2015, in order to close the saleThe Escrow Agreement provides that $be held in escrow (“Escrow Funds”) pending satisfaction of the following: Restoring the water meterAll parties must agree on the final amount to be paid to Bastrop West Water Company or if funds are not used to the Water installation/restoration, all parties must agree to release the funds to the sellerSeller agrees to sign disbursement release within business days of receipt of the invoiceAll parties must sign the disbursement of funds(Emphasis Added)Based on the Company’s written records, MsHarris received a copy of an invoice for the BWW Bill on August 11, (“Invoice”)The Invoice was subsequently give to the Complainant since she agreed to “sign disbursement release within days of receipt of the Invoice.” The Company’s investigation demonstrates that the Complainant received the Invoice on more than one occasionWhen the Complainant received the Invoice, she refused to release the Escrow Funds because she believed that she “had not received a legitimate invoice” and her “attorney had advised her not to pay until the PUC made its final ruling.” Suspecting the Escrow Funds would not be disbursed to BWW in time, MsHarris paid the BWW Bill out of her personal funds on September 8, In accordance with the Escrow Agreement, because the Escrow Funds were “not used for the water installation/restoration,” the escrow agent sought the agreement of the Complainant and the Buyers before releasing the Escrow FundsUnder Texas law, an escrow agent owes a fiduciary duty to both parties, seller and buyer, to carry out the terms of the agreement creating the escrow agencyDunmore vChicago Title InsCo., S.W.3d 635, (TexApp2013), citing Watkins vWilliamson, S.W.2d 383, (Tex.App.-Dallas 1993, no writ)When the Complainant requested that Escrow Funds be disbursed back to her on October 22, 2015, the escrow agent specifically informed her that it “would not release the funds to the Complainant without the Buyers’ signatures.” When the Complainant requested the Escrow Funds be disbursed a second time, on November 12, 2015, the escrow agent contacted the Buyers’ Realtor inquiring whether “the Buyers are willing to release the funds.” The Escrow Agent again contacted both the Complainant and Buyers in December 2015, stating that if the Complainant and Buyers had “come into agreement on who will receive these funds, it needs a signed authorization signed by all parties showing agreement on how the funds are to be disbursed.” Based on the Company’s investigation, the parties have not yet come to an agreement; therefore, the Escrow Funds have not been released to datePursuant to paragraph of the Escrow Agreement, “The funds are to be released ONLY upon written notification given by ALL Parties.” Additionally, paragraph provides in pertinent part, “The undersigned agree to save and hold harmless Escrow Agent and its underwriter from any liability arising under and as a result of this Escrow Agreement.” Based on the foregoing, it is the Company’s position that the Escrow Agent’s actions did not violate the Escrow AgreementThe Company’s review of the documents associated with this transaction confirm that no Escrow Funds have been released without the Complainant’s consentFurthermore, the Escrow Agent’s retention of the Escrow Funds is pursuant to the Escrow Agreement entered into by the Complainant which requires that the Escrow Agent receive authorization of all parties before the Escrow Funds are released; however, the Escrow Agent has been unable to obtain the consent of both partiesPromptly upon receipt of the Complaint, the Company again reached out to the parties to determine whether they would authorize the release of the Escrow FundsIn addition, the Escrow Agent has sent releases to the parties in an attempt to obtain authorization from both parties showing how the Escrow Funds are to be disbursedPursuant to the Escrow Agreement, if the Escrow Agent receives the signed releases from the parties showing how the Escrow Funds should be disbursed, the Escrow Agent will release the funds accordinglyFor the foregoing reasons, the Company has been unable to release the Escrow Funds to the ComplainantThe Company will continue to attempt to obtain the requisite authorization from the partiesAccordingly, the Company respectfully requests that the Revdex.com find the Complaint to be without merit and close its filePlease contact me [redacted] or at [redacted] should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter or if you need additional information or documentationPlease reference the above claim number in all communications with my office

The statement "The first windshield that we installed is exactly what we quoted the customer but after the installation he had changed his mind." is untruedifferent employees of reliable glass have confirmed that I ordered the right part number but that they sent out the wrong oneI have had to call another glass company in to replace my windshieldI have been in contact with someone from reliable about fixing my issuesOnce they are fixed I will accept the response

Initial Business Response / [redacted] (1000, 10, 2016/01/08) */ I am unable to give a refund or replacement unless they bring the food back Initial Consumer Rebuttal / [redacted] (3000, 12, 2016/01/12) */ (The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.) after all these weeks if the store serious thought someone could keep and maintain bad food is total outrageous and disrespect the entire basic common sense

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because: while copious, Austin Title did not respond to the issues in my complaint Nor do I understand why I had to file a Revdex.com complaint in order to get a response to my calls, emails and letters The sole purpose of the Escrow agreement was to ensure that the buyers were not charged for initiating the service of the water meterThey were not; that would have been illegalThat purpose was Terminated when service began in September It is fraudulent for the Austin Title company to be the authors of the Escrow Agreement which enriches them & not me, the Payee, in case of ambiguityThey are also cherry picking which terms they choose to comply with [redacted] #Fund are to be held until September 14, [redacted] #(WHICH supercedes #5) In the event that no funds are received by Escrow Agent on or before the date in #4, Escrow agent ...shall pay all remaining funds to [redacted] without recourse or liability In Austin Title's October 5, email, they refute their sole defense here, item # If we do not receive your signed Release of Escrow Funds by October 14, 2015, we will release the funds to Bastrop Water for payment on the invoice as requestedThey were quite willing to release the funds, WITHOUT signature to BWW, but not me, the payee In addition, Austin Title continues to confuse the alleged & fraudulent BWW invoice to the SELLER with a possible invoice to the BUYER I cannot understand how BWW can claim that it charged the buyers nothing while Austin Title is claiming that BWW charged the realtor [redacted] $Yet both BWW & [redacted] told Texas Public Utility Commission that BWW did NOT charge for the meterNor have I received any copy of [redacted] ' payment, despite my frequent requests Regards, [redacted]

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below [This consumer rebuttal was received by Revdex.com via email and is a copy/paste by **.]Hello [redacted] I am not in agreement with the response received from Mike D [redacted] He was given an opportunity to try and "fix" the problem as it was occurring half way through the project as things were unfolding We asked him to monitor his employees (during his second chance) and he couldn't even do that By the end of the project, every employee (which was different almost daily) had quit his company His employees were explaining to me that the damage to the cabinets is done and there is nothing they could do to fix it They encouraged me to have Mike replace ALL OF the cabinetry!We have had multiple professional companies look at our project and agree the doors need to be replaced The damage is done I also do not trust Mike and his employees ( of whom is even left) to EVEN come back to our home Mike did not give us an opportunity to file a claim with his insurance company He simply said it would not be accepted We want to formally submit a claim to his company to see if they will formally reject it after we send them our proof.Thank you for your help [redacted] I copied my original complaint below- [redacted] This company came to our home and attempted to paint our kitchen cabinets whiteIn doing so, he damaged almost every cabinet door in our kitchen, not to mention how horrible the quality of the paint job looks on everything elseIt all has an orange peel look to itWe have had other cabinet painting contractors come out to take a look and told us that the job was not prepped or completed properlyHis company was not capable of handling a project like oursMike D [redacted] s employees were all high on drugs while at our home, admitted to me by one of his own employeesThey made a complete mess of our garage, and everything in it during the painting processCountless issuesWe gave Mike an opportunity to fix what was going wrong in our home during the process and it couldn’t be doneThey attempted to strip what they originally painted by using an electric sanderThe sander caused permanent damage to all of our doorsOur doors are so damaged by them that the only solution is to replace them allThe sander has nicked of all of our beveling on ALL of the doorsMike is saying his insurance company will not come out to take a look at our project but I don’t think he is being truthful about what he is telling us or how he is describing the claim to his insurance companyHonestly, I am not certain this business has liability insurance although his paperwork states that he doesWe have provided him a complete estimate on the cost to replace the doors and he is refusing to pay itWe will follow through with legal courses of actions as promised if this can’t be resolved with him paying us what he owes to replace our doors[redacted] e.mail: [redacted] Regards, [redacted]

Revdex.com:At this time, I have not been contacted by Kentucky Fried Chicken regarding complaint ID [redacted] the tacky unprofessional conduct I wont be surprise if the company AVOID the compliantSincerely, [redacted]

The customer entered the car wash with a trailer hitch on his vehicle (Our signage clearly notifies the customers that hitches are not allowed and are to be removed by the driver before entering the wash)As our security cameras show, our attendants retracted the large vertical spinning cloth wraps so that the wraps would not be damaged by the hitchThis is standard procedure at ours, and most other, car washesIncidentally, this is the reason that the back of the car was not cleaned quite as well as the customer would have likedThe in-tunnel cameras also show that the piece of the vehicle in question (on the rear of the vehicle) came off when the dryers/blowers came on at the exit of the tunnelThe cloth did not cause a problem as it did not touch the rear of the vehicleThe airspeed of the dryers is equivalent to driving down the road at approximately mph'sAlso, we run approximately cars per month with no issuesWhy would our wash decide to pick on his vehicle? If a restaurant serves chicken dinners and only one person gets sick, then it's probably not the restaurant's faultLogic and the evidence supported by our cameras would suggest that the issue was with the ten year old vehicle, not our equipmentThe customer even stated that they had been through our wash many times, as if this would prove that the wash was at faultThis actually suggests that there must of been something wrong with the part on the vehicle because the many other times it came through there were no issuesWE would have been glad to pay for any damage that was the fault of our equipment, but this was not the case.Also, we attempted to call the customer within hours and the call was sent to voicemail where we were notified that the mailbox was full

RE: Complaint ID: [redacted] - [redacted] has made several complaints against our gym, and each time we have tried our best toassist him.When [redacted] came by the office to inquire about a late fee, he was not happy with ourresponseHe purchased his membership on November 27, 2015; therefore, his paymentprocesses on the 271h of each monthIf another day would have been better for him, we wouldhave been happy to accommodate him, but he never made that requestWhen we suggestedhe contact his bank to find out why there were no funds when his payment was processed, hebecame antagonisticNo one followed him to his car, no one threatened or harassed him.We scan cameras daily, and we noticed [redacted] using our facility as a rest room/shower roomfacilityHe came in several times a day to use the rest room/shower roomWe also noticed himsitting on a treadmill in the early morning facing the TV, and asleep in a lobby chair just outsidethe officeHe had stated in one of his complaints that he is homelessAfter making theseobservations, we contacted our franchise Manager and asked for direction on how to handle thesituationWe were directed to cancel his membership due to him not being happy with the wayAnytime Fitness operates, along with his misuse of the facilityWhen we tried to provide himwith information about an agency (Love, IN.C.) who might be able to help him, he declinedtaking the number.We spoke with [redacted] and explained we were cancelling his membership before his nextpayment processed because we didn't feel our facility was a good fit for himSince then wehave had multiple complaints on our feedback forum, multiple phone calls to the home office,multiple messages left on our office voice mail demanding his membership back [redacted] hasmade multiple complaints since his membership started, dating back when we were PeninsulaAthletic Club in where he complained about late fees and the manager at that timeWe donot feel [redacted] is a good fit for our facility Sincerely, Mistie D [redacted] Assistant H2i

Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this does not resolve my complaint I have reviewed the three picturesSo, it looks like there was tape on the back windshield wiper when we entered the car washHowever, upon exiting the car wash there was no tape on the back windshield wiperThis confirms that something did malfunction in the car washI had requested the complete video of the cayenne going to the car washThese three pictures did not help with more than the tape being on the back windshield wiper as we entered the car wash Upon exiting the car wash there was no tape on the back windshield wiperThis confirms that something did malfunction in the car washI had requested the complete video of the cayenne going to the car washThese three pictures did not help with more than the tape being on the back windshield wiper as we entered the car wash I would like to request again a copy of the video completeAlsoI am requesting a mediation to resolve this issue Regards, [redacted]

***,By copy of this email I will ask *** to forward to you snapshots taken from the video of the incident.You will see in the photos, the vehicle entering the wash, followed by a few shots of the vehicle AFTER it has left the cloth wash area (trim pieces still attached), in the rinse area (again trim still attached) and finally in the blow dry area (where the trim detaches)The trim on this approximately year old vehicle has most likely become aged and worn and would ultimately have fallen off at some point on the roadUnfortunately, for us it just happened to be in the tunnel of the carwashOur blowers are the most popular in the industry and are factory set and are in perfect working order. I understand why the customer would feel we are at fault but we washed nearly cars that day with no other incidentsThis is a case of a worn part on an aged vehicleThe problem lies with the vehicle, not the wash.Thanks for your efforts in this matter.*** ***Owner

The driver called the owner as soon as it happenedHe then strapped the cover down and proceeded to the shopHe informed the owner of the vehicle that he would take care of it. All of our drivers are responsible for any damage they do in the process of towing a vehicleThey sign a contract
concerning this. I found out about the incident a month after it originally happened. The driver left a week after thatI have spoken to the owner of the vehicle as well as the shopI have given both the drivers phone number as well as where he is employed. *** *** GMTexan Towing***-***-*** mobile***-***-*** office***-***-*** fax

This business response was take over the phone by Revdex.com staff member ***Mike stated the consumer owes his business $in ITEX dollars.Mike stated he is willing to do the work the consumer needs to have done; he said he will replace her doors and do the refinishing work needed on the doors and cabinets, but the consumer would need to fulfill the payment owed him.Mike said he will otherwise pay the consumer $in cash and reduce his balance owed from $in ITEX dollars to $3000.00.Mike said he is confident the re-work that's being requested by the consumer will not exceed $700.00Mike said his insurance company recommended he handle this matter himself because the work the consumer needs is less than the amount of his insurance deductible

Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
The
purpose for the escrow agreement was terminated on September 9,
when the water service was started for the buyersThe sellers have
no legitimate claim on these funds; neither does Bastrop West Water
The Escrow agreement is invalid
Item
#(which supercedes #2)
In the event
that no funds are received by Escrow Agent on or before the date in
#
(September 14, 2015], Escrow
Agent, at
its sole discretion,
shall pay all remaining Ands to [Complainant]
Austin
Title claims it has not utilized the Escrow Funds to its own benefit
That is not trueAustin title retains control of the funds, and has
accrued interest on it for the last year, and will continue to do so
In
addition, Austin Title knew for months
& months
prior to the closing that there was not going to be an agreement on
the water bill as long as it was going to be applied towards the
fraudulent & illegal 'invoice' of the seller, instead of the
actual invoice charged the buyers
Austin
Title claims to act
pursuant to Paragraph 2, and obtain the agreement of all parties
before releasing the Escrow FundsThis is completely invalidated by
their October email to release funds to BWW without obtaining any
signatures whatsoever
I have not received any verification of *** ***' payment to
BWW at the closingIt was not included in the HUD Settlement
statementPUC is also very interested in verifying this payment
Please send me a copyIn any event, I find it highly unethical for
Austin Title to continue to demand payment for an invoice they claim
was paid a year ago
Austin
Title 10/5/email sent separately
Regards,
* ***

The driver called the owner as soon as it happenedHe then strapped the cover down and proceeded to the shopHe informed the owner of the vehicle that he would take care of it. All of our drivers are responsible for any damage they do in the process of towing a vehicleThey sign a contract
concerning this. I found out about the incident a month after it originally happened. The driver left a week after thatI have spoken to the owner of the vehicle as well as the shopI have given both the drivers phone number as well as where he is employed. *** *** GMTexan Towing***-***-*** mobile***-***-*** office***-***-*** fax

Alamo Title Insurance (the "Company") received notice of ** ***'s (the "Complainant") Revdex.com Complaint (the "Complaint") filed against Austin Title Company ("Austin Title" or "Escrow Agent") on July 20, The Company responded to the Complaint on July 28, On August 8, 2016, the Company received notification that the Complainant purportedly rejected the Company's response (the "2nd Complaint")The Company has reviewed the 2nd Complaint and relevant documents and hereby responds as followsThe facts surrounding the claim were set forth in the Company's previous response sent on July 28, (the "Response"), and are incorporated by reference herein; capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed in the ResponseIn the 2nd Complaint the Complainant asserts that Austin Title is enriched by holding the Escrow FundsAustin Title has not utilized the Escrow Funds to its own benefitPursuant to the Escrow Agreement, the Escrow Funds are being held pending execution of the releases by the partiesAs the Company also indicated in its Response, the Escrow Agent has sent releases to the parties in an attempt to obtain authorization from both parties showing how the Escrow Funds are to be disbursedPursuant to the Escrow Agreement, if the Escrow Agent receives the signed releases from the parties showing how the Escrow Funds should be disbursed, the Escrow Agent will release the funds accordinglyThe Complainant also cites to provisions and of the Escrow Agreement contending the terms obligate the Escrow Agent to release the Escrow Funds to the ComplainantPlease refer to the attached Escrow Agreement, which states in relevant part: Restoring the water meterAll parties must agree on the final amount to be paid to Bastrop West Water Company or if funds are not used for the Water installation/restoration, all parties must agree to release the funds to the sellerSeller agrees to sign disbursement release within business days of receipt of the invoiceAll parties must sign the disbursement of funds.•••In the event no written notification is received by Escrow Agent on or before (September 14, 2015], Escrow Agent, at its sole discretion, shall pay all remaining Ands to [Complainant] without recourse or liability to Escrow Agent and its underwriter and without notice to the undersignedIn the event a controversy arises over said funds, Escrow Agent, at its sole discretion, may tender the funds into court for settlement, after deducing its attorney's fees, court costs, and escrow fees, if any, which have accrued.(Emphasis Added).Although paragraphs and of the Escrow Agreement grant the Escrow Agent the ability, depending on the circumstances, to either pay the Escrow Funds to the Complainant or tender the Escrow Funds into court for settlement, the Escrow Agent may do so at its sole discretionHere, the Escrow Agent decided to act pursuant to Paragraph 2, and obtain the agreement of all parties before releasing the Escrow FundsThis is also consistent with paragraph of the Escrow Agreement which states:The Funds are to be released ONLY upon written notification given by ALL PARTIES.Consequently, although the Escrow Agent did not take those steps available to it under paragraphs and 7, this does not constitute a violation of the Escrow Agreement as the Escrow Agent's actions comport with paragraphs and of the Escrow AgreementFurthermore, Complainant's statement that paragraph of the Escrow Agreement supersedes paragraph is not expressly cited nor is it a consistent reading of the Escrow Agreement.The Complainant also asserts that she has not received a copy of MsHarris' paymentAs previously provided in the Company's Response, please see the attached receipt showing payment by MsHarris.In accordance with the Escrow Agreement, because the Escrow Funds were "not used for the water installation/restoration," the Escrow Agent sought the agreement of the Complainant and the Buyers before releasing the Escrow FundsUnder Texas law, an escrow agent owes a fiduciary duty to both parties, seller and buyer, to carry out the terms of the agreement creating the escrow agencyDunmore vChicago Title InsCo., S.W.3d 635, (TexApp2013), citing Watkins vWilliamson, S.W.2d 383, (Tex.App.-Dallas 1993, no writ)When the Complainant requested that Escrow Funds be disbursed back to her on October 22, 2015, the Escrow Agent specifically informed her that it "would not release the funds to the Complainant without the Buyers' signatures." When the Complainant requested the Escrow Funds be disbursed a second time, on November 12, 2015, the Escrow Agent contacted the Buyers' Realtor inquiring whether "the Buyers are willing to release the funds." The Escrow Agent again contacted both the Complainant and Buyers in December 2015, stating that if the Complainant and Buyers had "come into agreement on who will receive these funds, it needs a signed authorization signed by all parties showing agreement on how the funds are to be disbursed." The Escrow Agent promptly contacted the Buyers' Realtor and has continued to follow up with her since receiving notification of the ComplaintBased on the Company's investigation, the parties have not yet come to an agreement; therefore, the Escrow Funds have not been released to datePursuant to the Escrow Agreement, should the parties not reach an agreement, the Escrow Agent may tender the Escrow Funds into court for settlement, subtracting the necessary fees and costs.For the foregoing reasons, the Company has been unable to release the Escrow Funds to the ComplainantThe Company will continue to attempt to obtain the requisite authorization from the partiesAccordingly, the Company respectfully requests that the Revdex.com find the Complaint to be without merit and close its file.Please contact me *** or at *** should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter or if you need additional information or documentationPlease reference the above claim number in all communications with my office.Respectfully,*** ***Claims Counsel, AVPEnclosures: Complaint, Company's Response, 2nd Complaint, Escrow Agreement, Release of Escrow Form, Payment of BWW Bill by Realtor

I went to kfc to purchase a meal at 9:33pm and they let me order a meal and pay When I got to the window to get my food the first thing that I noticed was that the kitchen was really quiet I asked the person she handed me my food how old was the chicken He proceeded to tell me that he did not know He left the window and a second person came to the window and said the chicken had been there since 8:by now its hour and minutes that this chicken had been sitting on the heat lamps I requested fresh chicken The man said it would be minutes to get fresh chicken I said fine Then a second man came back and said that it would be minutes because they had turned the fryers off at I believe that I have been mistreated twice first because they would have sold me old food and secondly because a simple trip to get fast food has turned onto a hour long expedition and they did not attempt to even empathize on the situation
Product_Or_Service: Old dry food from an hour

Business response taken over the phone by Revdex.com staff 11/17/Business says that one of his guys will be following up with the consumer to address the issue over the next hours and they will contact the consumer tomorrow to let them know directly

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 5, 2015/05/07) */
Contact Name and Title: *** - Area Coach
Contact Phone: XXXXXXXXXX
Contact Email: ***@gmail.com
This customer was given a refund on 4/28/We were waiting for a proof of purchase to process the refundOnce a receipt was provided
we refunded the transaction
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (2000, 7, 2015/05/08) */
(The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.)
I received the refund and I'm satisfied of the outcomeI wish to close the complaint

Check fields!

Write a review of Kentucky Fried Chicken

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by
adding a photo
Submit your review

Kentucky Fried Chicken Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Description: FOODS-CARRY OUT

Address: 7024 Villa Ridge Court, Granbury, Texas, United States, 76049-2020

Phone:

Show more...

Web:

This website was reported to be associated with Kentucky Fried Chicken.



Add contact information for Kentucky Fried Chicken

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated