Carfax Inc

As it states on the order page the customer used to make their purchase, the Unlimited CARFAX Reports plan is "Unlimited Reports by U.S. License Plate."  The customer is not purchasing any VIN searches with this plan, and the order does not state anywhere that it includes searches by VIN....

 CARFAX does not offer or advertise an unlimited-by-VIN plan.  
These details are also listed in the Customer Agreement on the order page, to which the customer must read and accept before asking us to place their order.  This is also listed in the purchase confirmation page as well as the receipt email.  
The account does come with five free VINs, and states in the account "Run by License Plate (Unlimited Reports)" and "Run by VIN (5 Free Reports)".  I am sorry if the customer was not aware that the plan did not include unlimited VINs, but CARFAX did make it clear in several areas that the plan is unlimited by only license plates.

Vehicle prices listed on the CARFAX Used Car Listings website are submitted by the selling dealership.  For this reason, the CARFAX website asks those using the site to "Please contact the dealer to confirm price and vehicle availability."  The site also states, "Vehicle descriptions and...

details on this page may have been provided, in part or entirely, by the seller or its agent. CARFAX does not verify these descriptions and details, and is not responsible for the accuracy of the information."

CARFAX does...

not offer phone based customer service but does offer
live chat and e-mail customer support, and data disputes are worked on in the order they are received.
 
CARFAX receives electronically-submitted data records from over
80,000 data sources, and loads these records directly into its Vehicle History
Report database as they are received. Because CARFAX does not receive any paper
documents or perform any data entry, an error made by a data source may
occasionally display on a CARFAX Vehicle History Report.  Since millions
of records are loaded every day, every CARFAX Vehicle History Report states
that it can only rely on its data sources of the accuracy of its
information.  Therefore, CARFAX does not and cannot guarantee the accuracy
of information reported to CARFAX by its sources.
 
A California police department reported the accident to CARFAX
for the customer’s vehicle.  It was only after contacting the police
department that CARFAX was able to verify that the accident was reported for to
it for the wrong vehicle.  The customer’s case was resolved and the
accident record was removed on September 12, 2014.

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]
 Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:
the answer from them is not as simple as their response.the paper work I sent is enough for them to to fix it.you try to work with them and you will see what I mean.google carfax problems
Regards,
[redacted]

The information cannot be removed.  The customer will need to unsubscribe if they no longer wish to receive emails.

You can remove the damages part.
 
Via Revdex.com, I still want full explanation, how the damaging erroneous report came to exist, how did they manage to get [redacted]'s accident to [redacted]'s file, especially given that the latter is [redacted] and no [redacted] was involved in the accident and why...

it took Carfax few days to verify that they had made huge error, while it took me just 2 minutes to place a call and find out all the details.
 
On top of that, poor customer support and complete irresponsibility has been demonstrated :( If you are providing a sensitive service, you should take more sense of responsibility on!

On 3/6/2015 2:31 PM, CARFAX sent the customer the following email, to which we received no response.
Good Afternoon [redacted], 
Thank you for contacting CARFAX. 
I do not see an account with the email address...

provided but I will gladly try to locate it if you could please provide me with the full name on the account, purchase date, last 4 digits of the card used, expiration date of the card, zip code, receipt number, and other possible email addresses that the account could be under. 
Thank you, 
Lynsey 
Consumer Affairs 
CARFAX, INC.

The CARFAX Report would have stated that no accidents were reported to CARFAX at that time, that not all information is reported to CARFAX, and that new information from new sources will result in the change the CARFAX Report.  Therefore, CARFAX does not offer compensation when prior accidents...

are reported to CARFAX.

As stated in the previous response, CARFAX is completely honoring the Money Back Guarantee to which we both agreed.  The customer checked the box stating that they read and accepted the Customer Agreement.  The Customer Agreement outlines that the account qualifies for a refund as long as two or less CARFAX Reports were run.  The customer ran more than two CARFAX Reports, and therefore, honoring the agreement, the account is no longer qualified for a refund.  This response is similar to the previous response because the facts have not changed.  I'm sorry if the customer wants the refund policy to be something else, but that is just not the case.

Every CARFAX Vehicle History Report and our website are very clear about what information CARFAX can provide.  Details are outlined below:
This CARFAX Vehicle History Report is based only on information supplied to CARFAX and available as of [the date and time you run the...

Report].  Other information about this vehicle, including problems, may not have been reported to CARFAX. Use this report as one important tool, along with a vehicle inspection and test drive, to make a better decision about your next used car.
Not all accidents / issues are reported to CARFAX
Use this tool, along with a vehicle inspection and test drive, to make a better decision about your next used car.
CARFAX DEPENDS ON ITS SOURCES FOR THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF ITS INFORMATION. THEREFORE, NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED BY CARFAX OR ITS AGENTS FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN THIS REPORT. CARFAX FURTHER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
CARFAX Vehicle History Reports are based on information supplied to CARFAX. CARFAX does not have the complete history of every vehicle. Use the CARFAX search as one important tool, along with a vehicle inspection and test drive, to make a better decision about your next used car.
CARFAX may not have the complete history of every vehicle.

As the customer has pointed out, the CARFAX order page states the package is unlimited CARFAX Reports by U.S. license plate for 30 days.  The package is not a VIN package and the customer is not paying for any CARFAX Reports by VIN, as this is a license plate package.  However, the package...

does come with five CARFAX Reports by VIN for free as a courtesy.

The CARFAX Vehicle History Report states, accurately, that an accident report was written for this...

vehicle and that the damage severity chosen by the police officer was “totaled.”  CARFAX is accurately reporting the information from the police report.  This damage severity is not the same as an insurance company designation of Total Loss.  Note that the CARFAX Report states “No total loss reported to CARFAX.” 
CARFAX did not write the police report and did not fabricate the damage severity listed on it.  CARFAX is in no position to determine if an official document is in error; only the issuing agency, the police department, has the authority to do so, and if the damage severity is in error, only the police department can correct it.

Deceptive advertising. They sell an "unlimited" history report package which actually only has unlimited searches by license plate (almost completely useless) but includes only five reports by VIN. It does say this in the "fine print" but I don't think it is ever worthwhile to do business with companies that will rip you off unless you scrutinize the "fine print". Who knows how else they will try to trick you? There are superior alternatives to Carfax anyway.

Review: I'm experienced a significant loss in my vehicle's value because of a false reported "total vehicle loss" from a CARFAX generated report. I've contacted customer service a number of times; they have been difficult to get in touch with, provide little to no details on the issue, and are unwilling to assist with resolving their error. This is regarding Case # [redacted] in CARFAX's database. My vehicle's VIN is [redacted].

There is no record or findings that my vehicle was ever in an accident. I had to have a dealer inspect the vehicle to verify as such; all VIN stickers are original and matching. I've also found numerous other issues where CARFAX falsely reported such information and had similar consumer issues. I attempted to work with customer service, however they were unwilling to assist.

This morning, I paid $29.99 to perform a Vehicle History Report from a competitor (Autocheck.com) to help ensure that this report was an error on CARFAX's behalf. The report verified no vehicle history issues or concerns, especially a Total Vehicle Loss.

Currently, I'm unable to trade in my vehicle to a dealer to purchase a newer vehicle for it's actual value. I've made significant efforts to work with customer service and would great appreciate the assistance of the Revdex.com in having this error resolved.Desired Settlement: CARFAX, at a minimum, needs to address my customer service issues and have this error resolved as soon as possible (removing the false Total Vehicle Loss report from my vehicle's VIN). I also had to drive over 60 miles to two dealerships regarding this issue, as well as pay an additional 29.99 for the AutoCheck report -- I also would expect some from of reimbursement for these expenditures.

Business

Response:

An insurance company

reported to CARFAX that the vehicle was declared a total loss. On November 26, 2013, CARFAX received

confirmation from the insurance company that it was reported to CARFAX in error

and the total loss was removed.

Consumer

Response:

[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards,

Review: My car was wrongfully posted on carfax as for sale, along with the wrong mileage. I called them all day yesterday, and they told me they have "no live operators" that can help because they are an Internet based company. Instead I got stuck with three automated case numbers for the same problem I kept calling, with no one returning my phone calls, emails, messages, none. I made a point to leave my case numbers with my email address with every message but they will not get back to me. Their answering service is all electronic, and there's no way to reach an actual live human. All they have is an operator. I don't understand how a company as big as carfax does not have any live help; this is mind boggling. I need my issue corrected because if they don't take the false sale claim and false mileage off their site, I could get sued for mileage fraud if I ever sell the car. Please, please help me. The three case numbers I have are: #[redacted], #[redacted], #[redacted]Desired Settlement: Follow through with what they promised and actually have a live agent speak to me and help me. It is something very simple that can be taken care of, there is no reason for me to keep calling, and there is no reason why a company this big does not have any live agents!

Business

Response:

CARFAX received the customer's data research request form on June 26, 2014. CARFAX completed its research and contacted the customer the following day, June 27, 2014.

Consumer

Response:

[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards,

Review: We purchased a VW Jetta 2 years ago from a dealer. It was used and they presented us with a Carfax report. The report stated NO accidents. The car was clean. Now 2 years later, we go to trade in the car and the dealer pulls a Carfax report. To our shock and surprise they come back telling us that the car had been in a significant accident over 6 months before we purchased the car. So I pay for a report from a company advertising that there service can warn me about ay issue with the car I want to buy and obviously they are not the "all knowing" company they claim to be. So when we look at the report that the dealer has pulled (and again the dealer has paid for this service in one way) it states that the accident took over 9 months to show up on the Carfax report. So 3 months after we had already purchased the car, this company decided to throw on the report an accident. We pay for a service that isn't providing all the information....hmmmm sounds like false advertising to me. So now I have a car that is worth about $6,000 and we owe about $5,500 on but because this company failed to fulfill their promise of informing me of the "issues" I will only be able to get $2,000. So I pay for a service, they fail to fulfill their side of the deal and now I will be screwed out of $4,000.Desired Settlement: I don't even know what I want because I know they are not going to give me the $4,000 that I am now going to have to pay out of my pocket to get rid of this car. I'm sure they have some excuse as to why there is a lag in their information but if this is the premiere service that almost every person and dealer buying a used car goes to for reference then I will never waste my time again with them and will spread the word that this company is misleading the public.

Business

Response:

Review: Selling a car for my Mother and the buyer went to Carfax. Carfax report showed that Insurance Company totaled the car. My Mother,myself and the prospective buyer called her Insurance Company of over 15 years and asked why car was totaled. They stated to all three parties that car was never reported totaled by them, they further gave the buyer a letter stating this. How did this company get this information and publish this information, that could have cost my mother hundreds of dollars. Meanwhile I have to spend $40 to find out if this report from Carfax is true, what a scam!! Obviously not everything on the internet is true.Desired Settlement: I expect a refund and the company review their reporting practices.

Business

Response:

Dear [redacted]:

We appreciate the

opportunity to offer the following response to the subject complaint.

I could not locate any

information in our system by that email address. If [redacted] would like a refund or for CARFAX

to verify the total loss referenced, he can contact us through our Help Center.

www.carfax.com/help

Respectfully,

Manager, Product Support and Data Escalations

CARFAX, Inc.

Review: According to Carfax provided by [redacted] of [redacted] etc.. when I purchased a 2003 Mustang gt ; Vin # [redacted], the last reported odometer reading was 58,097 mileage,thus giving this vehicle a carfax history impact of +340 (above retail value)), stating" this vehicle is worth more than average, based on information in this report". At the time of this report, two owners were reported to have owned this ar. On 05/26/2008, [redacted] Chevrolet of Nevada [redacted] Nv. ###-###-####,,purshased this car, and no mileage was reported, in same Year of 05/26/2008 . II consulted with [redacted] and the informed me that they show, on their hard copy, all entries were reported for that time in questioned as was the first by desert mini.The most recent reported mileage reported was on 05/04/2007 of 2,429 by the then previous owner#1.On or around , Feb. 2013, another Carfax report was provided by [redacted] Ford [redacted]. [redacted] NV.89107 . Unlike what carfax reported the previous report, mentioned here, and received by me in Jan. 2012, this report reflects no last reported odometer reading as the first one reported by [redacted] which had cited 58,097 mileage .Additionally, this report reports "$20.00 below retail book value. unlike the previous 1 year earlier Carfax report of #340.00 Above retail book value. Going further, ,in the detailed history, dated 05/26/2008, this reports an entry of "none" at all for reported entry mileage,yet the 2008 entry has reported 60,705 for its' reported entry.with the comment "mileage inconsistency" was entered by Carfax report I received in Jan. 2012. With the history report provided by [redacted] Ford as of Feb. 2013. the 05/2602008 mileage has a direct affect on this cars Carfax price adj. of negative $20.00 below retail book value when just 1 year ago,the first Carfax history impact reported +340 above retail value. The Carfax reports are in conflict thus I was not afforded a non-bias informational report at the time I purchased this car.Desired Settlement: As is stated by Carfax themselves on page 2 of their reports, "title problems not reported by carfax will guarantee them to buy back the car". I request that since then have incorrevtly "Ommited" the ststed information here in this complaint, that they also refund entire amount of the car purchase by me too due to my not having correct information on the report.

Business

Response:

Dear **. [redacted]:

We appreciate the

opportunity to offer the following response to the subject complaint.

I do not see anything wrong with the CARFAX Report, nor do I

understand the complaint. Odometer

readings are not considered as part of the CARFAX Price Adjustment because the

odometer reading is part of the vehicle’s retail book value. The mileage inconsistency was removed in

April of 2013 because the source of the record contacted CARFAX and stated that

it was reported in error.

Respectfully,

Manager, Product Support and Data Escalations

CARFAX, Inc.

Consumer

Response:

[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed Administratively Resolved]

Review: [redacted]

I am rejecting this response because:

Hello, First, thanks for the assistance. This will be considered a disagreement to the response from carfax. They themselves have stated not until April 2013, did the information take proper citation. That is correct, and around same time , I spoke with [redacted] Chevrolet about the missing mileage , and was told they did in fact report it to carfax. This finding was on their hard card. They can attest to the accuracy of this information to any party in this complaint. Therefor, I was not afforded the opportunity to make an informed decision due to the lack of information by carfax.

According to the [redacted] ford carfax,of which was made in 2013,th entry dated 05/26/2008, comments column reflects the following:"Vehicle sold, mileage inconsistency. On the other carfax report, [redacted] of [redacted] of which I was relying on at the time of my purchase, the same entry reflects no mileage inconsistency. The only entry made is "Vehicle sold". Also, carfax price calculator for the value of this car is based on the information in its' carfax reports(,quoted ). The [redacted] of [redacted] report reflects +$340.00 abovetail value book value.Yet, the [redacted] Ford report reflects _$20.00 below retail book value (Quoted).Now, by simple logic,, the +$340.00above retail book value takes hold ,true,because of no reports of any mileage inconsistency had been enteredin the comments column. Yet, the carfax report of 2013,[redacted] Ford,with the -$20.00 below book value (Quote) does have the mileage inconsistenvy enteredof which gave the 2003 Mustang GT a negative value only due to that comment. A cars value for retail sales are based on the odometer reading , thus estimating this cars retail value of $5000.00 according to the [redacted] Ford appraisal team at 2013 carfax date.In contrast, the +$340.00 on first carfax, [redacted] Mini, was entered because same information, mileage inconsistency, wasn"t entered . Had it been entered, and now its' known it should have been by carfax, as findley Chevrolet has stated and will state same to any party in this complaint, the value would have been lower for the retail value at that time. But, that did't occur thus [redacted] and I, were misinformed of a mileage inconsistency, and led to believe the value it was sold at $12,000. Thus, respondant didn't reveal correct information at time of my purchase and should have since they were given a mileage on that date of 60, which again would have reflected the true retail value, and not $12,000.00.

Thank You, [redacted]

Business

Response:

**. [redacted], In response to complaint [redacted], I am still not certain what exactly **. [redacted] is asking for. However, it is true that an incorrect odometer reading was reported to CARFAX, which was corrected when the source notified CARFAX of the error. It is also true that a mileage inconsistency can affect the value of a vehicle, but so can hundreds of other factors, including accidents and multiple vehicle owners. Today, which no mileage inconsistency reported to CARFAX, the CARFAX Price Adjustment is still a negative value. Respectfully, [redacted]Manager, Product Support and Data EscalationsCARFAX, Inc.

Review: The Carfax website offers three different approaches to using their service. You can purchase the ability to review one Carfax report, five Carfax reports or 'Unlimited' reports. I feel the 'Unlimited' plan is uses Unfair and Deceptive practices in presenting itself. You have to open a second web-page and read through the fine print to find out that the 'Unlimited' plan isn't unlimited at all. In fact it is significantly limited - by time. The plan expires 30 days after purchase.

Since CarFax takes such care to express the quantity of the other two plans (1 report and 5 reports) it should present equally carefully and equally notably the limits of the 'Unlimited' plan.

If I cannot receive resolution through the Revdex.com I plan to take this to my State Attorney General.Desired Settlement: I seek what I believe is a reasonable resolution. One year of 'Unlimited' CarFax reports through the web-site. Clearly CarFax feels that people must believe they are purchasing a greater quantity than 30 days worth of service or they would have been willing to adequately disclose the full material terms in the promotional web-site versus the terms and conditions.

Business

Response:

Dear **. [redacted]:

We appreciate the

opportunity to offer the following response to the subject complaint.

CARFAX does not offer a plan that allows unlimited access

for one year. The CARFAX Unlimited plan

allows consumers to run an unlimited number of CARFAX Reports by U.S. license

plate for 30 days. It also includes five

CARFAX Reports by VIN for free. The 30

day timeframe is specified in the Customer Agreement on the order page, to

which the customer agreed when placing the order; it was also included in the

receipt email, and the expiration date is displayed in the CARFAX account each

time it is accessed.

As a courtesy, the customer can contact our customer support

team through our Help Center to request a one-time 30 day extension to his

Unlimited account to continue running an unlimited number of CARFAX Reports by

U.S. license plate for 30 more days, or any remaining CARFAX Reports by VIN he

may have. www.carfax.com/help

I apologize for any misunderstanding about the plans CARFAX

offers.

Respectfully,

Manager, Product Support and Data Escalations

CARFAX, Inc.

Review: CARFAX sells a service based on a vehicles history attributed to its VIN or PLATE Number. I ordered this service from CARFAX on 10/1/2013, I order the service called UNLIMITED CARFAX REPORTS FOR 54.99. Today, I went to search and was prompted with a notice that I reached my limit (of only 5 searches). I have attempted to contact this company and they do not respond.

I asked for a refund, and I have no response.Desired Settlement: I would like to be reimbursed for the charges that I paid

CARFAX should be advised to stop advertising to promote unlimited access, when in fact, they only give access to 5 searches.

Business

Response:

Dear **. [redacted]:

We appreciate the

opportunity to offer the following response to the subject complaint.

CARFAX sent the consumer the following email on October 24,

2013:

The unlimited account allows you to run an unlimited number

of private party license plates and 5 free VINs within a 30 day time period. I

see you have run all available VINs. Since you were unaware of the limitations,

I am adding 5 more VIN searches as a onetime courtesy. Good luck in your

search!

Respectfully,

Manager, Product Support and Data Escalations

CARFAX, Inc.