Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Reviews (%countItem)
View Photos
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Rating
Address: 2700 Via Fortuna Ste 500, Austin, Texas, United States, 78746-7998
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Fax: |
+1 (512) 634-3789 +1 (956) 725-4594 +1 (903) 874-5007 +1 (361) 578-6144 +1 (210) 225-6410 +1 (361) 664-5050 +1 (254) 756-6606 +1 (361) 888-4405 +1 (432) 333-7012 +1 (936) 639-5059 +1 (936) 327-6882 |
Web: |
|
E-mails: |
Sign in to see
|
Add contact information for Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson
Add new contacts
My parents received a toll violation collection notice of unpaid tolls and penalties at an address on ***. I have never lived at this address. The notice references a toll violation from a vehicle with license plate # ***, AZ violation ID dated 03-28-19 in riverside county with an outstanding toll of $2.20 and a penalty of $100. I have never owned a vehicle with the above referenced license plate and I have never traveled on a toll road on or around 03-28-19
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards amounts owed to our
client, the 91 Express Lanes, owned by the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC),
located in Southern California.On March 28, 2019, a vehicle with Arizona license plate
***, rented by ***, incurred two tolls on the 91 Express Lanes.
Two notices were mailed to Mr., for each toll usage to the address our
client received from the rental company – ***.When no response was received to the notices, the violations
were referred to the firm for collection on September 9, 2019. On September 11
and October 19, 2019, the firm mailed notices to Mr. for the OCTA
violation. The second notice was received back as mail return. The firm mailed
a notice to Mr. for the RCTC violation on September 11, 2019. Mail return
was received. The Firm continuously attempted to locate a new address for Mr.
*** to provide him with notice of the amount owed. A new address was located
and the firm mailed a notice for the RCTC violation to *** on February 1, 2020. Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed Mr.’s
accounts with our client. The images of the violations were confirmed. Our
client has a rental affidavit on file from Enterprise stating that Mr.
was in possession of the vehicle at the time the violations occurred. As
such, the current balance due for the OCTA violation is $102.45 and the current
balance due for the RCTC violation is $102.20.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
I received a rather cheap looking "Notice of Debt" from this law firm stating I owe a debt of $80.95 to Northwest Parkway. To my knowledge I have not been on Northwest Parkway in years and have never received any notice that any amount was owing. Is this a scam?
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. ***. Ms.’s complaint regards an account for unpaid
tolls and fees owed to our client, the Northwest Parkway (NWP).Between March 9 and June 10, 2018, NWP recorded two tolls
incurred by a vehicle with Tennessee license plate 5J74R3 registered to ***
L. ***. NWP mailed Ms. two notices on May 16 and June 16, 2019. A Past
Due Notice was mailed on July 16, 2019 for $60.95; which included a $25.00 Past
Due Fee on each toll. The notices were mailed to the address NWP received from
the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***. When no response was received to these notices, the account
was referred to the firm for collection on August 16, 2019. The Firm
mailed notices on August 20 and September 26, 2019 for $80.95, which included a
$20.00 Collection Fee. The second notice was received back as mail return.
The Firm continuously attempted to locate a new address for Ms. to
provide her with notice of the amount owed. A new address was located and on
February 5, 2020, the Firm mailed a notice to ***.Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with
our client. NWP reviewed the mail tracking and determined it was likely Ms.
*** did not receive the bills they mailed. As such, the account has been
recalled from our office. Ms. may contact NWP directly at .
The current balance due is $9.65.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
I received a letter of Intent from this company when I called them I asked them what the $300 were for? They gave me a run around and didn't want to tell me how the $300 added up. They are saying I owe from 2011 so 9 years ago? And they dont want to explain why. I paid all my items in 2011 when I appeared in court. I researched the case number with the superior Court of Alameda, and no match was found. I ran my dmv records and this has never comed up. I will contact the Superior Court of Alameda since I have all my documents from that day. I lived in the same address several years and NEVER recevied any letters or anything.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account with
our client, the Alameda Superior Court.Our office contacted the Court to review the file after
receiving Mr.’s dispute and the Court then recalled the file from our
office. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
I've received notices from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP to collect a parking debt. The violation # is ***. We did park in the lot in Omaha (Orpheum Lot #60 at 1427 Harney, Omaha, NE 68102 on 9/24/19) and my friend paid to park with her credit card but we forgot to put the pay stub in our window, resulting in a ticket. The next day my friend mailed the payment stub along with the ticket to the address on the ticket. Now LGBS is trying to collect for a parking violation even though we paid. I've tried to contact SP Plus Corporation but they are of no help. I could send a copy of my friend's bank statement that shows the $15 parking fee was withdrawn that day from her account but I never get a good answer as to where I would send that. I think because my friend paid, perhaps the paystub and ticket did not get matched with my vehicle and that's why this got sent to this debit collector? I can prove we paid to park there that day. But who do I send this proof to? There is no clear customer service email/contact on their website and when I called, they provided an undeliverable email address. I should not have to pay this $70 fine.
To: ComplainantOn 11/11/2019, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
(the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from SP Plus Corporation,
Inc. (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was
issued on 9/24/2019 at 7:16 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at 1427
Harney, Omaha, NE. The violation was issued to a vehicle with Iowa license
plate FLB160 for “non-payment” in the amount of $70.00.On 11/19/2019, the firm skip-trace provider skipped the
license plate information to the vehicle registrant, at the time of the
violation, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant
address on 11/25/2019. On 1/6/2020, after no response from the vehicle
registrant, a secondary collection notice was mailed to the registrant address.On 1/10/2020, you telephoned the firm’s Call Center and
received instructions on how to dispute the violation through mail and/or
email. During that call, the correct email address, ***@LGBS.COM, was provided to you.
The firm’s mailing address appears on both notices you received. If you no
longer have the physical receipt issued, the firm can accept a “redacted” bank
statement showing parking payment, if the date and location match that of
violation ***.On 2/13/2020, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***. The
firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation and proceeded,
as required, to suspend all collection activity and validate the debt by
sending you a “debt validation notice” listing the violation particulars and
original/current debt holder, the client. Also included, are photos of your
vehicle with no parking receipt, your vehicle license plate, both taken at the
time and location of the violation, and a photo of lot rules and payment
location.At this time, the client still considers violation ***
outstanding and past due. This violation has not been reported to any credit
bureau or agency, and even though the violation has been validated, we can
still accept and consider any proof of payment you choose to provide.Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any
additional information.Thank you,***Capital PartnerLinebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP***.***@lgbs.com
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me as they have supplied the email address where I can send my proof of payment (email address had previously been undeliverable as I had a typo in it). As long as I receive confirmation of my email and the evidence of payment (attached credit card statement), all should be satisfactory. Thank you Revdex.com.
Regards
This office sent to MY house, notice of Delinquent Tax liability regarding my parents. They noted that to review the bill, we had to go to the Butte County website and enter the APN. well, when we do, NOTHING comes up. Mind you, my parents DO NOT live at this address. They are elderly, in their 80's and also forgetful. So when I called on their behalf, I was told I cannot get any answers since I am not them. She did not provide me with any information on how we can get this resolved. is this real? is this a scam trying to get elderly people to pay them over $3k? my parents have always paid their bills timely, so unknown what this is about, but I am getting no where when trying to call.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Ms.’s complaint regards an account owed by
her parents, Joe and Olivia *** to our client, Butte County. Our office requires written authorization by an account
holder to provide third parties with account information in an effort to the
protect the account holder’s privacy. However, we contacted the County to
review the account after receiving the dispute and our client indicated that
they had spoken to Ms. *** to inform her of the basis of the
account. If Ms. *** needs additional information from our office,
we request that she provide a written authorization from one of the account
holders to discuss the account with her. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
My son was using a car that was registered to me and had some toll violations on the 91 toll roads. I did not have any knowledge of these violations. The collection agency was sending the notices to an address that I have not lived at for 5 years. The tolls amount to $32.40, the violation fees are now $920.00 due the time involved. When I finally became aware of this 3 years later, I called Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson and offered to pay the outstanding tolls. They refused my offer. I do not feel that $920.00 is a reasonable penalty. I would like to pay the tolls and settle this matter.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Ms.’s complaint regards amounts owed to
our client, the 91 Express Lanes, owned by the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), located
in Southern California.Between March 16, 2017 and Feb 3, 2019, a vehicle with
California license plate 7RUS949, registered to ***, incurred ten
tolls on the 91 Express Lanes. Two notices were mailed to Ms., for each
toll usage to the address our client received from the Department of Motor
Vehicles – ***01.When no response was received to the notices, the violations
were referred to the firm for collection. Between July 11, 2017 and February 5,
2020, the firm mailed fourteen notices to Ms. for the OCTA
violations. The firm mailed eight notices to *** for the RCTC
violations between December 20, 2017 and October 10, 2019. On July 3, 2019, July 8, 2019, October 21, 2019 and February
10, 2020, ***, who identified himself as Ms.’s spouse, called
the firm and spoke with Customer Service Representatives (CSR). Mr.
stated his son was driving the vehicle and they did not receive notices. On the
October 21, 2019 call, the CSR offered to send the accounts to a supervisor and
call him back with a settlement offer. Mr. stated he would contact 91
Express directly instead.Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed Ms.’s
accounts with our client. The images on the violations were confirmed. The
registered owner is responsible for the violations regardless of who was
driving the vehicle. It is also the registered owner’s responsibility to keep
the DMV updated with their current address. Our client has advised that
Ms. was notified of the Administrative Hearing Process, but they have not
received anything from her. The 91 Express Lanes recommends that Ms.
***, if she wishes, begin the Administrative Hearing Process. Currently, the
balance due for Ms.’s OCTA account is $952.40 and the balance due for Ms.
***’s RCTC account is $645.10.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:I did not receive any of the fourteen notices they claimed to have sent. What address where they sent to? I have lived at *** for 4 years and we only got any letters to this address in the past year.I will bet that all the letters they claimed to sent were sent to *** in ***, I lived at this address for a short time and when I moved I filed a change of address with the Post Office. All mail would have been forwarded for a year. I did not receive any notices at all from these people.
Regards
I received a Notice of Intent to Intercept Filing dated 1/16/20 from this company notifying me of an alleged debt with the Alameda County Superior Court. The notice informed me that the company would request the Franchise Tax Board intercept my tax refund if I did not pay or dispute the debt within 30 days. Yesterday, the FTB intercepted my tax refund on behalf of this company. This was only 24 days after the company's notice of 1/16/20. The company failed to comply with state law requiring it to give me a period of 30 days to pay or dispute the amount after it sent its notice and it proceeded to take my tax refund prematurely without giving me the required opportunity to dispute the alleged debt. On 2/11/20, I called the company and spoke with *** about the company's actions and that it did not give me the opportunity to dispute the debt within 30 days of sending its notice to intercept. *** told me it was not her or her company that took my tax return and blamed the FTB for taking the money. I told her that it was only because her company requested the FTB take the money and then she shifted blame to the Alameda County Superior Court since the alleged debt was owed to it. I told her that her company was acting as the agent for the court and was the one that sent me the notice to intercept and the court had nothing to do with it. She then told me that collection attempts for the alleged debt have been ongoing since July 2019 and I told her that was news to me as I have never before received anything from anyone about this alleged debt. She then blamed me for not updating my address with the DMV but she, again, was completely wrong as the DMV has had a correct address for me since at least 2016 (in fact, my driver license that was issued in August 2017 has my current and correct address on it). *** refused to reverse the intercept and refused to let me speak with a supervisor or one of the attorneys at this supposed law firm. She told me she did not even have a file for my account and did not have a copy of the notice of intercept that her company sent to me. She refused to do anything to correct her company's violation of the law and ensure that the money it unlawfully took from me was returned to me immediately (or, at any time for that matter). She told me to file a lawsuit if I wanted my money back and eventually hung up on me. This company violated the terms of the notice that it created and sent to me along with state law by denying me any due process before it told the FTB to take my tax refund. It gave me absolutely no opportunity to dispute the alleged debt or the amount of it prior to unilaterally stealing my money by having the FTB unlawfully intercept my tax refund. This company clearly does not review the entirety of an alleged debt to determine its validity prior to taking action to collect it and fails to provide any due process to individuals (or any process at all) before unlawfully stealing money from a debtor to pay a debt that it hasn't even verified as being correct or accurate. When challenged about its unlawful practices, it simply ignores the consumer and hangs up on the consumer.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards amounts owed to our client,
Alameda Superior Court. The debt stems from a ticket from November 2015 and has been
in collections since June 29, 2019. My office mailed its first notice of tax
intercept on August 15, 2019 to ***. A
second letter was mailed on October 30, 2019. This second letter came back as
returned. A new address was found and another letter was mailed to Mr. at
the new address on January 16, 2020. Mr. may still dispute the debt directly with the
Alameda Superior Court. A manager has also reviewed Mr.’s phone call with
the agent who took the call and she has received coaching to appropriately
handle a request to escalate the call. When a request is made, it is our firm’s
policy to allow account holders to speak with a supervisor or attorney or to
have one call back if one is not immediately available. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because: The response entirely fails to address the issue. The company failed to provide me with the required due process prior to intercepting my tax refund. The law and the very notice sent by the company is clear -- it is to provide me with 30 days after notifying me of its intent to intercept my tax refund in order to dispute the alleged debt prior to intercepting any tax refund. It notified me in a notice dated 1/16/20 yet proceeded to intercept my tax refund on 2/10/20, which was 24 days after sending me notice and six days before it was permitted to intercept the refund. It never gave me the required opportunity to dispute the alleged debt before it stole my tax refund. It was also required to provide me with information regarding the alleged debt prior to sending me notice of any intent to intercept my tax return but, as its response makes clear, it sent all information to an invalid address that I have not resided at since 2015 (even the address that it used was incomplete as it lacked a unit number). The DMV has had my current and correct address since 2015 so there is no reason for it not to have sent the required information to me prior to intercepting my tax refund. The law does not permit interception of a tax refund without first providing adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard and this company failed to comply with that requirement. It is unlawful to take a tax refund from a citizen without proper due process and then require the citizen to try to get it back. That's theft and exactly what happened here.
Regards
I am further responding to the consumer complaint filed with
your office by ***. My office mailed its first notice of tax intercept on August
15, 2019, more than 30 days before Mr.’s taxes were intercepted. This
letter was not returned as undeliverable and the tax intercept was submitted
based on this notice. If Mr. has a dispute, he may still dispute the debt
directly with the Alameda Superior Court. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because: The response is untruthful. I never received an asserted notice from August 2019 or any other time prior to the one of January 16, 2020. By its own admission, prior to the January 16 notice, the firm only had an old address at which I resided to send any information to me. Thus, assuming that a notice was sent in August 2019, it was sent to my old address and would not have been forwarded to me since the forwarding order with the USPS expired back in 2016, a year after I moved. Additionally, any asserted notice would only have been sent back to the firm as undeliverable if the current resident now living at my old address had taken the time and effort to return the notice to the USPS for return to the firm. Otherwise, the current resident would just disregard it or throw it away. The USPS would not itself return the asserted notice as undeliverable because it clearly was deliverable since the address remains a valid residential address -- it was deliverable, however, to the wrong person. The firm knew it did not provide valid prior notice with its asserted August 2019 notice since it then sent a notice in January 2020. There would be no need to send a notice in January 2020 if the first asserted notice in August 2019 was sent and it was valid and sufficient. Further, the notice received in January 2020 was not titled a second notice, did not state that it was a follow-up to an asserted prior notice, and made no mention at all about an asserted prior notice.
The firm's remedy of disputing the amount with the court is wrong, baseless, and improper on many different levels. The law requires the firm to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard PRIOR to taking an individual's tax refund and affords an individual the ability to dispute a proposed withholding of a tax refund BEFORE it is done. You cannot deprive an individual of this notice and opportunity and then ask the individual to try to get the money back after it has already been taken. That is a blatant disregard and violation of the law and impermissibly shifts the burden from the firm to the individual.
There was no proper required notice provided to me prior to the interception of my tax refund and this firm simply refuses to acknowledge that it is wrong and will continue to fabricate asserted justifications for its wrongful actions without regard to the truth.
Regards
I received a notice of debt on 02/08/2020 stating the following:
"This firm is a debt collector. We are attempting to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose. According to Elizabeth River Tunnels, you have an outstanding debt, in the amount shown above, owed to ElizabethRiver Tunnels for unpaid tolls and fees."
The amount is for $80.17.
I live and Florida and did not drive the vehicle referenced in this notice anywhere near the Elizabeth River Tunnels area.
I did not drive through a toll without paying. I also did not receive an initial notification stating I had an outstanding unpaid toll. I believe this to be an error and would like all fees to be removed.
Can you provide more information regarding when this toll was used and which specific city it was?
I am an Active Duty military member and do not want collections.
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
I filed a complaint against Linebarger collection firm regarding an Elizabeth River Tunnel toll that was allegedly unpaid after I received a notice of debt. I also followed up with ERT and learned that the bill and late notifications were sent to the wrong address. After clearing this up with ERT, they deleted the late fees and only charged me the toll.
This unpaid toll was legitimate and the company resolved this issue. Thank you.
Regards
I received a letter stating that I owed over $100 for tolls. The letter did not include dates or locations. I have an EZ Pass in my car, and my plates are registered to my card.. When I log into the website, it shows I owe $0 and that there are no violations. I did not receive anything prior to this letter, and the information is incorrect. I called and spoke with them on the phone, and they are making this difficult while also not providing any details to actually show that this is mine.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account
for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the New York State Thruway
Authority (NYSTA).On March 23, 2019, NYSTA recorded two tolls incurred by a
vehicle with New York license plate *** registered to ***
***. On April 28, 2019, an invoice was mailed for $2.00, the amount
of the tolls to the address on file with the DMV, ***. On May 30, 2019, an invoice was mailed for $7.00,
which included a $5.00 Late Fee. On July 1, 2019, NYSTA mailed a Notice
of Violation Enforcement Impending Collection/ Legal Action Notice for $102.00,
which included a $50.00 fee on each toll. The account was sent to the firm for collections on August
6, 2019. The Firm mailed a notice on August 12, 2019 to the 148 Wallace Ave.,
address and it was returned as unable to be delivered. The Firm continuously
attempted to locate a new address for Mr. to provide him with notice
of the amount owed. A new address was located and the firm mailed a notice to
32 Devonshire Road, Buffalo, NY 14223 on January 30, 2020. On February 8, 2020, Mr. called our office and
stated he has an E-ZPass account. The Customer Service Representative gave Mr.
*** information on the account and stated an E-ZPass account was not
detected at the time of the violations. Mr. stated he did not receive
notices and wanted to know how he could dispute. Mr. was advised to
send a copy of his registration covering the date of the tolls to our office
for further review. It should be noted that it is the duty of the vehicle owner
to keep their address updated with the DMV.Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with
our client. NYSTA has advised Mr.’s E-ZPass account was opened on
September 9, 2019, which is after the date of the violations. As such, the
balance of $102.00 remains due and owing. Mr. may contact our office
at to discuss a possible settlement.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for
resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is
desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
I have called back and this dispute was rejected before the requested documents were received. As of today I have confirmed that the documents that were received have not yet even been reviewed. Included in these documents are a copy of my registration showing my car was registered to the correct address *** in March 2019. This means that the toll that occurred on March 23rd should have been sent to the correct address which as per your last message it was not. This applies to both the first and particularly the second notice that was sent to the incorrect address as it is unlikely the second letter was even sent in March due to the date of occurrence.
Again I would like the fees removed from this toll as the toll was mailed to the wrong address twice despite my registration reflecting the correct address. Based on my record with all other tolls and history I am not trying to avoid $2 in tolls but was rather never made aware of them.
Regards
Upon receipt of the rejection, we reviewed Mr.’s
documentation with our client. NYSTA’s records indicate that at the time of the
violation Mr.’s address was ***. Our
client has reached out to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to confirm
exactly when the address was changed by Mr. in order to determine how
to proceed. NYSTA will contact our office once they receive an answer from the
DMV. The firm will reach out to Mr. with the conclusion.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for
resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is
desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
I appreciate you and your client continuing to research the address change and the violation date. However, as per your message please ensure you confirm that you are checking the date of my address change not against the date of the violation but against the date that each attempt to reach me by mail was made. In March I was in the process of moving which is why my address was changed and I do not know how long it takes the DMV system to update the NY state thruways system. I understand if at the time of the violation my address had not been updated however there is a big time frame between the date the violation occurred and when the “last attempt” to reach me by mail was made. My concern is that the subsequent attempts to reach me by mail after the violation should have been sent to the updated address not the address at the the time of the violation.
Regards
NYSTA’s records indicate that at the time of the violation, March
23, 2019, Mr.’s address was ***. Based
on the response received from the Department of Motor Vehicles, they have also
indicated that as of March 23, 2019, Mr.’s address was the same as
above. Notices were mailed by NYSTA April 28, May 30, and July 1, 2019. Our
client did not receive an address update from the United States Postal Service
for any of the notices. As such, the balance of $102.00 remains due and owing.
Mr. may contact our office at 877-251-1675 to discuss a possible
resolution.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for
resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is
desired or necessary, please let us know.
Received a parking violation notice by mail from law firm Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson,LLP in San Antonio Texas on behalf of SP Plus corporation. P.O Box 645083 Cincinnati OH 45264. Violation location in Milwaukee Wisconsin 408 Florida St. On 05-29-2019.For $65 never been at this location. Or had a plate number ***. None of the numbers match my current or past plate numbers. No mention of year ,Make Or Model on notice.Or State that issued plate.I called law firm at and found out violation is for Toyota 4 Runner.Never owned such vehicle. I was told to send my dispute to ***-***@LGBS.com.
To: ComplainantOn 7/15/2019, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
(the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from SP Plus Corporation,
Inc. (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was
issued on 5/29/2019 at 7:10 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at 408
Florida Street in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The violation was issued to a Toyota
4runner with Illinois license plate *** for “expired ticket” in the amount of
$65.00.After numerous attempts to acquire the vehicle registrant information,
on 11/11/2019, one of the firm’s skip-trace providers skipped the license plate
information to the supposed vehicle registrant at the time of the violation,
and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant address on 11/18/2019.
After no response, a secondary collection notice was mailed to the registrant
address on 1/6/2020.On 2/5/2020 at 11:50 AM CST, the firm received a call from
the Complainant claiming not to own the vehicle or the license plate referenced
in the collection notices. Collection staff instructed the Complainant on how
to dispute the violation in writing.On 2/6/2020, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***. The
firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation, and, as
required, ceased collection activity and began to validate violation ***.
Upon review of the evidence photos provided by the client, it was determined
that the lot attendant had entered the license plate number incorrectly. Due to
this inaccuracy, the Complainant was incorrectly identified as the vehicle
registrant.As a result, the firm is no longer attempting to collect
violation *** from the Complainant. This violation has not been
reported to any credit reporting bureau or agency.Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any
additional information.Thank you,
***Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP***.***@lgbs.com
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards
They have sent several (at least 4) threatening collection notices that I owe property tax for a property I sold a year and a half ago. They are a large law firm! But they don't research the requests. ? The gentleman says, "we don't follow up, we just collect what they tell us." What?! I had to do the research FOR THEM, they asked me for names and numbers, and I had to make phone calls to clear my name and "prove" innocence. And I still don't know that they have cleared it... The one star is for the phone call I did receive back within 20 minutes, but uh...they are a collection agency too.
the company has sent false tickets and a complaint stating that I owe fora tickets from 13 years ago. Citation #
Dear Mr.:On behalf of Linebarger
Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP. (“Firm”), I am writing in response to your
complaint received from the Revdex.com (Revdex.com). The complaint alleges that collection action
is being pursued for ticket *** that you don’t believe you owe. Our law firm has been retained to represent
the City of Chicago (“City”) for the collection of outstanding citations.According to the Illinois
Secretary of State, you were the sole registered owner of a 2004 Dodge
Intrepid, VIN ***, Illinois License Plate 8653958, registered at ***. The City sent notice as required by law to the address as registered
with the Illinois Secretary of State. No successful challenge was ever
received resulting in the above listed citation reaching final determination
status and a penalty being assessed. The
citation was referred to our law firm for collection and as a result,
collection fees were incurred. You
currently owe $122.00 for this citation.This citation does not appear
through an online search by driver’s license because no driver’s license number
was associated with the vehicle at the time of registration.Enclosed are a copy of the
notice of violation and screen print from the City’s system showing the ticket
detail and ticket summary. It should be noted that you
have other citations outstanding. You
currently owe a total of $427.00.I hope that I have addressed
your concerns. You should contact our
office to remit payment or discuss payment arrangements at . Sincerely
I received a letter from the law firm saying some citation debt for $789.00 . I never had any traffic violations or citation. I checked the online database for ca.gov there is nothing against my license number. Not sure why I got it and what is it for.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. The complaint regards an account with our client, the
Alameda Superior Court.The debt stems from a traffic violation September 28, 2018.
A copy of the redacted traffic citation is attached. The complainant can
contact our office to receive a non-redacted copy. Our client has verified that
the current unpaid balance is $789.00.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
I never received any citation notice or payment details from the County or state. I agree that the citation look good and it happened. But I never received the notice to pay. Also I tried looking up for this in Superior court of California website and looked for my license atleast 5 times in last 6 months, there are no active citations.
Regards
I received a Notice of Collection from Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson, LLP related to an alleged Citation from the City of Woodsboro, TX Municipal Court. This notice of collection is in error and the law firm is clearly mistaken. There is a citation number ***, but no further supporting documentation. Furthermore, I no longer live in the State of Texas and have not been to that part of Texas in over 25 years. There is no way that I have an open citation as: a) I have always paid any traffic tickets; and b) I have renewed my license numerous times since being in that area and it would have flagged during these renewals if there was an open item.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s
complaint regards an unpaid traffic citation owed to our client, the City of
Woodsboro Municipal Court (“Client”).On February
6, 2018, our Client assigned to Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
(“Firm”) a delinquent traffic citation, number ***, for collection. The outstanding citation was issued for
speeding 11-15 mph over the limit.On June 18, 2019, the Firm mailed Mr. a letter that
produced no response. On August 15, 2019
the Firm mailed another letter that came back mail returned. We continued to skip trace in order to find a
current address so the we could notify Mr. of the outstanding
citation. In August of 2020 we were able
to locate a new address, ***, and
mailed another letter on January 9, 2020. We have had no direct contact with Mr..Upon receipt of this complaint, we verified with our Client
that the citation is still outstanding and due in the amount of $134.98. We have attached the record from our Client
that indicates that *** with an address at the time of the
citation of *** is the responsible
party. If Mr. believes that we have
the incorrect person he can call our office at to discuss. Please accept the
above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that
this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the
complaint. In the event additional information is desired or
necessary, please let us know.
I have received a letter in regards to a traffic violation and the amount due of $300.
I am disputing this because I was not in the vicinity of the citation in 2007, as stated by the representative when I called in to inquire and obtain details.
#
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account with our client,
the Alameda Superior Court.Our office contacted the Court to review the file after
receiving Mr.’s dispute and the Court then recalled the file from our
office. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
I received a Notice of Intent to Intercept dated January 16,2020 on January 25,2020. This is my first initial contact with this debt collector regarding the alleged debt with Superior Court of California the specified court was not listed. Upon checking my records with the courts the case number listed on the Notice of Intent is invalid it does not link to any FTA/FTP violations on the alameda.courts.ca.gov website. When I looked up my name, drivers license number, and DOB all past violations did not link to the alleged case number in question. All past citations with the Superior Court of CA Alameda has been closed and completely paid and satisfied directly with the court. I would like the location of the court where the said violation is being reported, along with the docket number, date of violation, and maybe even a valid case number that I will be able to present to the court in person. This notice of intent is invalid I have no business in Alameda county, and all previous debts have been closed and satisfied as stated with the Superior Court of CA Alameda.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Ms.’s complaint regards an account with our
client, the Alameda Superior Court.Our office contacted the Court to review the file after
receiving Ms.’s dispute and the Court then recalled the file from our
office. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards
I received a collections letter totaling 175$ claimed on behalf of the Superior Court of California, Alameda County. As I know for a fact I have zero outstanding debt with said court and county, I feel no need to pay this. Upon calling the provided number (), I was met with an automated system that led eventually to a real person who continuously dodged the question of what this collection was actually for, and continuously told me to just pay. Upon doing research of this supposed 'law firm', I have discovered that many people claim (including here on your site) this to be a company that sends out bogus claims. A scam if you will. If anything I have read is to be believed, this is just the beginning, and I wish to nip this problem in the bud. A check of my credit reports shows I have no outstanding collections or fines that I was not aware of, so I know I am in the right here. Thank you.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account with our
client, the Alameda Superior Court.Our office contacted the Court to review the file after
receiving Mr.’s dispute and the Court then recalled the file from our
office. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.
Continue to recieve Notices of Collections for vehicles tickets that were not included in the payment process set up through Linebarger Blair and Sampson in past. Due to human error on their part they continue hold information on past tickets for future financial gain. Tickets seem to excess two to three hundred dollars and are five to six years old.
Dear Ms.:On behalf of Linebarger
Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP. (“Firm”), I am writing in response to your
complaint received from the Revdex.com (Revdex.com). The complaint alleges that collection action
is being pursued for ticket *** that was not included in a prior payment
plan. Our law firm has been retained to
represent the City of Chicago (“City”) for the collection of outstanding citations.According to the Illinois
Secretary of State, you were the sole registered owner of a 1997 Ford Explorer,
VIN ***, Illinois License Plate ***, registered at ***. The
City sent notice as required by law to the address as registered with the Illinois
Secretary of State. On March 4, 2015, you agreed to make a down payment of $865.20 and
entered into a payment plan to have the boot released from your vehicle bearing
Plate ***. At that time, this
citation (***) was not included in the plan because it had not yet
reached final determination status.No successful challenge was ever
received resulting in the above listed citation reaching final determination
status and a penalty being assessed. The
citation was referred to our law firm for collection and as a result,
collection fees were incurred. On May 21, 2015, you agreed to make a down payment of $189.10 and entered
into a second payment plan for the additional citations which had then reached
final determination status, including ***. No payments were made towards this citation
through the payment plan and it was defaulted on February 6, 2016 for
non-payment.On July 12, 2017 a partial payment of $98.54 was applied to this
citation, received from a state tax offset. The remaining balance due for this citation is $47.86.Enclosed are copies of the
payment plan agreements and screen prints from the City’s system showing the
ticket detail for this citation, as well as a ticket summary. It should be noted that you have other citations outstanding. You currently owe a total of $1,231.26.I hope that I have addressed
your concerns. You should contact our
office to remit payment or discuss payment arrangements at . Sincerely,*** Encl.
I received a notice from this company in the middle of December 2019 regarding a Parking violation that occurred in Denver Colorado. I ignored it thinking it was spam since I wasn`t in Colorado during that time. I checked my mail this morning and I have received yet another letter from them stating that I owe $62. The issue I have with this is that I was *** in the *** in California over the time they claim I received the violation in Colorado, and the license plate mentioned has never belonged to me. I don't know where they got this information about this parking violation, but it is completely incorrect and would like to have it resolved..
To: ComplainantOn 5/16/2017, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
(the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from SP Plus Corporation,
Inc. (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was
issued on 3/31/2017 at 4:07 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at ***, Denver, CO 80202. The violation was issued to a Hyundai with New
Mexico license plate *** for “not valid parking receipt” for $62.00.After numerous attempts to acquire the vehicle registrant
information, on 11/11/2019, one of the firm’s skip-trace providers skipped the
license plate information to the vehicle registrant at the time of the
violation, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant
address on 11/18/2019. After no response, a secondary collection notice was mailed
to the registrant address on 1/6/2020.On 1/27/2020, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***. The
firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation, and, as
required, ceased collection activity and began to validate violation
***. Upon review, it was determined that the Complainant could not
be verified as the vehicle registrant at the time of the violation.As a result, the firm is no longer attempting to collect
violation *** from the Complainant. This violation has not been
reported to any credit reporting bureau or agency.Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any
additional information.Thank you,***Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP***.***@lgbs.com
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Regards
Received several letters regarding of unpaid tools and fees assessed against me by the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT). The law firm of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP. $37.50 ERT and fees as they previously invoiced + $25.00 ERT assessed delinquency fees and included with total amount due of $62.50. First, I am *** from the ***. Second, I wrote to the above referenced company and told them to provide me with the date, time of this alleged violation, The photograph of the violation and the reason this plate is in my name as the owner, according their records. Failure to do so would result in informing the law enforcement to file a report as an attempted scam. The vehicle with those plates were assigned to a Honda Civic and sold. The plates were not transfer accordingly. If this so called attorneys would look into the matter they will find if researched that I never owned a Nissan Tiguan. This discrepancy need to be resolved immediately.
I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account for unpaid
tolls and fees owed to our client, the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT).Between June 28 and June 29, 2016, a vehicle with
Virginia license plate ***, registered to *** incurred two tolls
on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. On July 14, 2016, ERT mailed Mr. a
Toll Invoice for $7.50; the amount of the tolls incurred. When no payment was
received, additional statements were mailed with penalties. The statements were
mailed to the address ERT received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.When no response was received, the above referenced account
was referred to the firm for collection on November 16, 2016. Three
notices were mailed to Mr. between February 1, 2017 and September 25,
2019. A forwarding address was received and notices were mailed October 9, 2019
and January 13, 2020 to ***. On October 7, 2019, *** contacted our office to
request more information. The Customer Service Representative advised Ms.
*** we were unable to discuss the account without authorization from ***
***. On October 17 and 24, 2019, the firm received a letter from Mr.
requesting a photograph of the violation. A Debt Validation Notice was mailed
to Mr. on October 31, 2019.Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with
ERT. Per the ERT review, the balance of $62.50 remains due and owing. Mr.
*** may provide a Bill of Sale or a Transcript of Driver History Record form
from the Department of Motor Vehicles to further dispute.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.