Sign in

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson

2700 Via Fortuna Ste 500, Austin, Texas, United States, 78746-7998

Sharing is caring! Have something to share about Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson? Use RevDex to write a review
Reviews Lawyers, Collections Agencies, Bankruptcy Attorney Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Reviews (%countItem)

I received a collection letter via the U.S. Postal mail from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson LLP, P.O. Box 659443 San Antinio TX, 78265. The collection letter stated I owed $70 for a unpaid parking citation from the City and County of Denver. The letter did not include the Fair Debt Collection Practices required info for disputing this debt. I recognized the many red flags that this is invalid and a scam. I have not parked in downtown Denver, I have not received a parking ticket in any state in the USA, the notice listed an original meter violation offense date of as 12-05-2018 which is over a year ago, the notice listed a license plate and make of vehicle that I do not own. The notice demanding payment as a scare tactic and the threat if I did not pay immediately to avoid further collection action is offensive to me. There is inconsistent contact info on where collection letter came from in Texas, but it states two different payment mailing addresses in Denver, P.O. Box 711 Denver 80201 or Denver Parking Violation Bureau, Department 1242 Denver 80256. This letter is a scam. I do not want to be contacted by this business ever again.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 29, 2020

We are in receipt of the
complaint in the referenced matter. Because complainant did not
attempt to communicate with our office prior to submission of this complaint,
we had no ability to review the account or provide customer service to resolve
the inquiry prior to the complaint submission. We
appreciate receiving information from complainant in order to resolve the
matter.Based upon the information in
the complaint, we have been able to review the account with our
client. The City and County of Denver has directed our law
firm to close the account and take no further action. We have
closed this account as directed by our client. As a point of
clarification and direct response to allegations in the complaint, our law firm
is properly contracted with the City and County of Denver, Colorado to assist
in collecting and resolving outstanding parking citations. The
communications we send on behalf of our clients are in no way a “scam”.
Complainant may communicate directly with our office in the event additional
information is desired.We trust that this response and
the action we have taken will provide sufficient and satisfactory resolution of
the complaint. In the event additional information is required to
resolve the matter, please contact our office.

Customer Response • Jan 29, 2020

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards

This business is a scam! They have 3 completely different listed addresses for their office in SA (only have 1 office). They are well known for scamming people. They will LIE and send a fake bill, demanding for payment and THREATENING jail time if not paid. The customer service dept. is rude and unprofessional as well. I had my attorney look into this business and it is a scam!

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 29, 2020

To: Complainant On December 9, 2019, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the Firm) received a delinquent traffic violation from Nueces County, TX Precinct 1 Place 1. The case # was ***. The case was related to a speeding ticket issued July 27, 2019. On December 21, 2019, the complainant called the Firm’s office, after receiving a collection notice. She advised a representative that the above mentioned ticket was a warning only. She also advised the representative that she was trying to contact the court and the trooper who issued the warning. On December 30, the complainant called the Firm again, stating that the court had dismissed the ticket earlier that morning. Upon receipt of the complaint, January 21, 2020, the Firm placed the case in an unworkable status, awaiting verification of the court dismissal. On January 27, the Firm did receive notice of dismissal. As a result, the Firm is no longer attempting to collect Case ***. Respectfully

It seems that the collection agency Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson is the business that needs to be included in this dispute or specifically directed to. On this day 01/17/20, I recieved a second notice from this collection agency dated 01/09/20, informing that they have yet to receive a response from myself about disputing so they are assuming that the debt is valid. This is incorrect, due to the fact that I've called this agency 12/13/19 to gather more information about the debt and on how to dispute. Prior to their first notice that was received 12/13/19 and dated 12/3/19, I have never received any mailings or phone calls in regards to this debt. I had to call both Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson as well as Elizabeth River Tunnel to learn that for over two years, notices were being sent to an address that no longer had any ties to my personal information. Not my home or mailing address nor was the address registered to my car. My current address has been properly updated into my personal information for over two years, and just recently have I been informed about anything. Not by the actual Tunnel themselves, but a collection agency who just so happen to have my current address. Once again no receipt of any prior notice or proper phone call so I am disputing this debt with both Elizabeth River Tunnel and Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson, and I will not pay a penny of this debt because I was never notified properly.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 27, 2020

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your
office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account for unpaid
tolls and fees owed to our client, the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT).Between July 20 and August 6, 2017, a vehicle
with North Carolina license plate ***, registered to *** incurred
two tolls on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. On August 23, 2017, ERT mailed
Mr. a statement for $10.20; the amount of the tolls incurred. On November
2, 2017, ERT mailed a statement for $40.15, which included a $25.00 Late
Payment Fee and a new toll that occurred on September 24, 2017. On December 4,
2017, ERT mailed a statement for $65.15, which included an additional $25.00
Late Payment Fee. On January 15, 2018, ERT mailed a statement for $156.85,
which included a $50.00 Collection Fee and eight additional tolls that occurred
between December 13 and December 29, 2017. On February 20, 2018, ERT mailed a statement for $181.85,
which included an additional $25.00 Late Payment Fee. On March 27 and April 30,
2018, ERT mailed two additional statement for $181.85. On July 3, 2018, ERT
mailed a statement for $198.08, which included three new tolls that occurred
between May 28 and June 20, 2018. On August 7, 2018, ERT mailed a statement for
$223.08, which included an additional $25.00 Late Payment Fee. An additional
statement for $223.08 was mailed on September 10, 2018. On October 18, 2018,
ERT mailed a statement for $228.61, which included a new toll from October 12,
2018.On November 26, 2018, ERT mailed a statement for $253.61,
which included a new Late Payment Fee. On February 18, 2019, a statement was
mailed for $270.30, which included three new tolls that occurred between
December 28, 2018 and January 23, 2019. ERT mailed a statement on March 25,
2019 for $295.30, which included a Late Payment Fee. On April 30, 2019, ERT
mailed a statement for $306.41, which included two new tolls that occurred on
April 12 and April 20, 2019. ERT mailed a statement on June 3, 2019 for
$331.41, which included a Late Payment Fee. The statements were mailed to the address
ERT received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – 352 Seasons Cir Apt 201,
Fletcher, NC 28732.When no response was received, the above referenced account
was referred to the firm for collection on January 31, 2018. Notices were
mailed to Mr. on February 16, March 6, and April 27, 2018. The Firm
continuously attempted to locate a new address for Mr. to provide him
with notice of the amount owed. A new address was located and the firm mailed
notices to 4108 Doubles Ct Apt 202, Virginia Beach, VA 23462 on December 3,
2019 and January 9, 2020. On December 13, 2019, Mr. contacted our office to
request more information and state he did not receive statements. The Customer
Service Representative went over the dates of the tolls and the balance
information. Mr. was advised he could request copies of the notices by
sending in a dispute in writing. No correspondence was received prior to this
complaint.Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with
ERT. Per the ERT review, the balance of $331.41 remains due and owing. Mr.
*** may provide a Transcript of Driver History Record form to further
dispute.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Jan 27, 2020

Complaint: ***

I am rejecting this response because: The information on the tolls is correct but once again, I was NOT PROPERLY NOTIFIED. The address of *** was not registered to my vehicle from what I recall. Even so, the address has been properly changed and updated for two years. No information was even forwarded to my new address. I should have received information to my current address. There is no way that it should take two years to provide me information about these tolls. Also if that old address was the one that was registered to my vehicle, so they say, how did they get ahold of my current address. Why couldn't the actual tunnel get ahold of my address but all of a sudden their collection agency could. I truly believe that information had been purposely withheld or sent to the incorrect address so that a decent amount of interest or late fees stacked up. I am not paying for a toll that I NEVER recieved any information regarding.

Regards

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Feb 04, 2020

Upon receipt of Mr.’s rejection, we reviewed the
account again with ERT. Per the ERT review, Mr. must provide a Transcript
of Driver History Record form from the Department of Motor Vehicles to further
dispute.Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to
allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Feb 04, 2020

Revdex.com:
I can provide that information but I don't see why I have to provide such information when in the business's last response that clearly say that the account shows that it has owned in 2017 and the registered address was ***. that is my current address that I've been living for a bit over 2 years. They specified that the address was registered with the DMV. If you look back at the business's previous responses, they specify that my registered address which was provided by the DMV was ***. This was my previous address in which once again, I have not had any correlation or connection with that address in 2 years. They also specify that for 2 years, that was the registered address that they've been sending notices to. Their story does not add up.

Regards

These people are thieves, Yes I made a mistake by taking a toll road but $100 up charge for service fee when the toll was 1.75. This is insane and the people, Officials or government should be ashamed for using the power of the enforcing bodies that let citizens get ripped off like this.

We received a bill for a parking violation in Denver Colorado that happened on 1/6/2016. The license plate on the bill has never been registered to anyone in our family and none of us were in Colorado at the time.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 17, 2020

To: Complainant

On 3/7/2016 and 4/11/2016, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the firm) received two delinquent parking violations from SP Plus Corporation, Inc. (the client) for collection. The parking violations, *** and ***, were issued on 1/19/2016 at 2:37 PM and 2/24/2016 at 12:38 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at 1632 Welton St, Denver, CO 80202. Both violations were issued to a Chevrolet truck with Kansas license plate *** for “expired parking receipt” in the amount of $50.00 each.

After numerous attempts to locate the vehicle registrant and/or titleholder with no results, on 11/11/2019, the firm skip-trace provider skipped the license plate information to the vehicle registrant at the time of the violation, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant address on 11/18/2019. On 1/6/2020, a secondary collection notice was mailed to the registrant at the same registrant address referencing both violations.

On 1/15/2020, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***. The firm considered this complaint a dispute of the violations, and, as required, began the process of validating both violations. Upon review of the evidence provided by the client, it was determined that the license plate photos for both violations were illegible. As a result, the firm requested that the client void both violations.

Currently the firm is no longer attempting to collect violations *** and *** from the Complainant. These violations have not been reported to any credit bureau or agency.

Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you,

***. ***
Capital Partner
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
***.***@lgbs.com
(713) 844-3450

They harass you they don't hold up to their end of the deal they get mislead you give you falsifying information. And when you make your payments to them they take forever to give you your clearance letters and they have no concerned about you they are very very rude and unprofessional

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 17, 2020

Ms.:

On behalf of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (“Firm”), I am responding to the complaint filed with the Revdex.com (“Revdex.com”) in regard to the Firm’s collection efforts on behalf of the Clerk of Court for Polk County, FL (“Clerk”) for Case No. ***; Case No. ***; and Case No. *** (hereafter collectively referred to as the “Traffic Cases”). Upon receipt of this complaint, we placed the Traffic Cases in a stop work status for review. We also reviewed the Traffic Cases with the Clerk.

The Firm represents the Clerk in the collection of delinquent court fees and fines. The Clerk forwarded the Traffic Cases to our Firm as court records indicated that payment obligations had become delinquent.

The complaint alleges you feel you have been treated unprofessionally. The complaint further alleges you were given incorrect information, charged extra fees, and the Firm took a prolonged period of time in issuing a D6 Clearance Form thereby preventing you from reinstating your driver’s license. To start, we would like to apologize if you feel you were treated unprofessionally. The Firm takes pride in treating all of our client’s customers with respect and in a professional manner. We also apologize if the process and/or the fees associated with your account were not clearly explained. The balance due is based on fees imposed as a result of the Traffic Cases. Any additional fees are either required or permitted by Florida law due to the status of the case being in collections, fees related to the payment plan, or fees related to tendering a check with insufficient funds. Further, the Clerk issues a D6 Clearance Form after all funds have been properly processed. As a result, the Firm does not issue the D6 Clearance Form. While we understand the delay in the issuance of the D6 Clearance Form may be inconvenient, it is due to payment processing periods outside of the Firm’s control.

Unfortunately, the Firm does not have the authority to modify the outstanding obligations related to the Traffic Cases. It appears you are currently on a payment plan with the Firm, and a D6 Clearance Form was issued so that you should be able to get your license reinstated if you have not already done so. Please note it is crucial that all payment plan payments are timely made. If there is a default on your payment plan, there may be additional fees charged to your account and your license may be suspended again.

I hope this is enough to satisfy your inquiry. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at .

Best Regards,

***.

cc:
file
Revdex.com

I've now received two letters from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP. The most recent was sent on 12/28/19 for a toll debt collection.
I ignored the first notice noting this is spam or a mistake:
1. I don't own a car.
2. Have never owned a car associated with thee License plate Number provided on the letter.

This is clearly a mistake and I'd like this to be resolved and removed from my name immediately.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 07, 2020

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. ***’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA).

Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed this account and determined that an address update had incorrectly associated ***’s address in New York, New York with our account. Please accept this letter as confirmation that we have removed ***’s address from the account and notated that her address was added in error.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Jan 10, 2020

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards

this law firm has sent me multiple letters saying I used a toll road in orange county 6/16/19 for $100.00 (which was my nephews bday, and we were no where near OC) with a car that was under my name & someone else, but was repossessed last year. they said I passed the 91 express toll road lane in OC, this year when the car was out of my possession last year of DEC 2018. I had faxed them correspondence between the finance company as well as my lawyer. I called to see and confirm if they got it and a lady said to call back in a couple days to see if they got the fax!?? faxes are instant, and I got a confirmation. meaning they have it, they just dont want to say they have it, just like the letters I have written, ive sent it certified mail and they supposedly dont have it. this is horrible! I dont even have this car and they're trying to bill me!

also, ive asked for proof of a picture and they told me I have to send a mailed letter to someone in Colorado, for my picture?
they said the DMV wont even have it. Horrible fake people!

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 08, 2020

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. Ms.’s complaint regards amounts owed to our client, the 91 Express Lanes, owned by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), located in Southern California.

On June 16, 2019, a vehicle with California license plate ***, registered to *** and ***, incurred one toll on the 91 Express Lanes. Two notices were mailed for the violation to the address our client received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.

When no response was received to the notices, the account was referred to the firm for collection on September 30, 2019. The firm mailed three notices to Ms. and Mr. between October 2 and December 23, 2019. Ms. contacted the firm four times between November 19 and December 31, 2019 stating she was no longer in possession of the vehicle. The Customer Service Representatives advised Ms. to send documentation proving this. On December 31, 2019, the firm received a fax that contained an email chain between Ms. and her attorney.

Upon receipt of this complaint and Ms.’s fax, we reviewed the account with OCTA. Our client has advised that Ms. will need to provide a Release of Liability showing she was removed from the registration prior to the date of the violation. If Ms. was still on the registration at the time of the violation, both Ms. and Mr. are liable regardless of who was driving.

Due to Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Compliance, OCTA is unable to provide copies of notices, photos, or any other type of personal information via mail. If Ms. wishes to view the image of the violation, she may visit a 91 Express Lanes Customer Service Center with a valid ID.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Feb 13, 2020

Complaint: ***

I am rejecting this response because:
I dont have possession of the car when they were trying to give me a toll way ticket in aug of 2019. it was out if my hands and sold around 4-4-19,

the date of the letter was sent out march of 2019.

Regards

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Feb 18, 2020

Upon receipt of this Ms.’s response, we reviewed the
documents she provided with OCTA. Our client was able to confirm through the
Department of Motor Vehicles that the vehicle was sold prior to the date of the
violation. As such, OCTA has dismissed the violation. There is no further
amount due by Ms.. Please accept the above information as our response to the
complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow
for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional
information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Feb 18, 2020

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards

SP Plus Corporation alleged that I had failed to pay for parking at *** Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 3225 on 3 Aug 2019. I contacted LGB&S, LLP to advise the Collections Department agent (***) that I had a receipt for proof of payment. She instructed me to email it. She gave me an incorrect email address and has blocked me do that I can not access anyone to speak to another agent you obtain the correct email address.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 06, 2020

To: Complainant

On 9/18/2019, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from SP Plus Corporation, Inc. (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was issued on 8/3/2019 at 4:34 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at ***, Jacksonville Beach, FL. The violation was issued to a motorcycle with Ohio license plate *** for “no money paid” in the amount of $42.00.

On 9/23/2019, the firm skip-trace provider skipped the license plate information to the vehicle registrant and titleholder, at the time of the violation, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant address on 9/30/2019. On 11/11/2019 a secondary collection notice was mailed to the registrant and on 12/16/2019, a third collection notice was mailed to the same registrant address.

On 12/30/2019, you telephoned the firm’s Call Center and received instructions on how to dispute the violation through email. Despite claiming you received an “incorrect email address”, an internal review of the phone call revealed the correct email address, ***-***@LGBS.COM, was provided to you. We received 2 calls from you at 7:54 AM and 7:57 AM on the same day, but it appears that both calls were terminated by you. The firm’s representative attempted to call you back at 7:57 AM on the same day, but the call went unanswered.

On 12/30/2019, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***. The firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation and proceeded, as required, to validate the debt by sending you a “debt validation notice” listing the violation particulars and original/current debt holder, the client. Also included, are photos of your vehicle with no parking receipt, your vehicle license plate, both taken at the time and location of the violation, and a photo of lot rules.

At this time, the client still considers violation *** outstanding and past due. This violation has not been reported to any credit bureau or agency, and even though the violation has been validated, we can still accept your receipt copy as proof of payment, if the date, time and lot locations match that of the violation.

Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you,

***. ***
***
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
***.***@lgbs.com

Customer Response • Jan 07, 2020

SUBJECT: Response to Business for Complaint: *** re parking ticket for ***, Jacksonville Beach, Florida on 3 AUG 2019 I am rejecting this response because the business reported an incomplete and inaccurate statements within the Revdex.com Statement of Facts form.
A. On 30 DEC 2019, I contacted the offices of LGB&S, LLP to advise the agent that I had indeed paid for parking space on Saturday, 3 AUG 2019 through the Passport Parking app. To complete the transaction through this app, I was required to identify the city, state, zone number (1510), lot number (Lot 10), license number (OH ***), and pay $7.00 plus a $.25 convenience fee paid by my credit card ending in 1382. The transaction number for this purchase is: 185930876. NOTE: Such parking apps are common in high activity areas such as around universities, business districts, and beaches. I have used this parking app with no negative consequences in the past. Prior to paying, I confirmed the zone number and lot number. While at the parking lot, upon having received the parking ticket, I also showed the parking attendants proof of payment; however, both of them advised me that they did not have the authority to revoke the ticket.
B. When contacting LGB&S, LLP, it was my goal to provide evidence of my having paid for the opportunity to park at the particular parking lot at ***, Jacksonville Beach, Florida on 3 AUG 2019 starting at 1327 HRS. Please be advised that my friends and I visited this beach only one time during our trip and upon departing from this parking lot, we rode our motorcycles to St. Augustine, Florida, never ever returning to Jacksonville Beach.
C. On 30 DEC 2019, the representative of LGB&S, LLP with whom I spoke provided me an email address – I confirmed the email address prior to attempting to send my documents. Upon two (2) efforts to email my documents (Letter of Dispute and Receipt of Payment), I received the following notification – “Undeliverable: FW: Your Passport Parking Mobile Pay Receipt” on 30 DEC 2019 at 0851 HRS and another notification of the same on the same date at 0852 HRS. These notifications were send as result of failed efforts to send my document to the following email address: ***@lgbs.com.
D. Upon receiving these two (2) notifications, I called the office of LGB&S, LLP two (2) times; however, no one ever answered the phone and no option to leave a message was presented. Upon one additional effort someone answered the phone, then hung up on me once I requested the opportunity to speak with a representative of the company. I never terminated any calls; on the contrary, my purpose was to speak to a person at least to ascertain why my emails were not being received.
E. After googling LGB&S, LLP on the internet, I finally identified another telephone number where I reached a woman (***) who worked in administration and who was willing to hear my concerns. She gave me a different email address. I forwarded my email to her attention at ***.***@lgbs.com. To date, I still have never received a response from her or any other representative of LGB&S, LLP nor SP Corporation.
F. In the meantime, on the same day of my efforts (30 DEC 2019), because I was so frustrated with my efforts, I submitted a complaint to the Revdex.com attempting to explain my frustrations.

2. It was my hope that SP Corporation and LGB&S, LLP would review my proof of payment and upon reasonable consideration determine that I had indeed paid to park at the subject lot. Unfortunately, it seems that LGB&S, LLP has refused any due diligence on my part and any consideration of my letter of dispute and proof of payment. NOTE: I am happy to show that the funds were actually deducted from my account. Neither my letter of dispute, nor additional documentation was unreasonable. My complaint to the Revdex.com was generated because I had had so much difficulty attempting to communicate with LGB&S, LLP in an effort to resolve this matter.
3. My request is that SP Corporation and/or LGB&S, LLP advise me why they refuse to accept my receipts as evidence of payment.:

Regards

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 17, 2020

To: Complainant

We received your rejection of the firm (Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP) response to Revdex.com Complaint ***. Upon review of your issues, we contacted the firm employee you contacted in our Austin, Texas Office and retrieved your correspondence.

The firm is forwarding your email error report to I.T. Staff to investigate your difficulty in transmitting receipt information to the firm’s Call Center.

Also, firm staff was able to review your receipt information, and validate the payment of parking charges prior to the violation issuance.

The firm has requested that the client (SP Plus Corporation) void violation ***. This violation has not been reported to any credit bureau or agency.

Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you,

***. ***
***
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
***.***@lgbs.com

I got a letter from these Folks. for a parking violation at findley market in cincinnati. I was at the market on dec 15th I paid for parking adn have my receit. I got this and its for a different lic plate number not mine. it says I owe them 25.00 its a notice of Debt and it says "this is not a threat to file a lawsuit at this time, no attorney with this firm has a personally reviewed the particular circumstances of your account.' but you can pay them by credit card. Scam. like to report this to who ever cares. thank you. id like to leave negative stars but have to pick a star. Scam artists.

I received a letter from Linebarger Goggan Blair and Sampson that I have unpaid tolls, December 22 of this year and I have never been near a toll on that date, and every toll I have come across I have paid. I don’t believe that I need to pay around $85 for that.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 02, 2020

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. ***’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT).

On April 14, 2019, a vehicle with Texas license plate *** registered to *** incurred two tolls on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. On May 20, 2019, ERT mailed *** a statement for $10.70; the amount of the tolls incurred. On June 25, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $35.70, which included a $25.00 Late Payment Fee. On July 30, 2019, ERT mailed a statement, again for $35.70. On September 3, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $85.70, which included a $50.00 Collection Fee. The statements were mailed to the address ERT received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.

When no response was received, the above referenced tolls were referred to the firm for collection on September 4, 2019. Notice were mailed to *** on September 9 and October 16, 2019. No response was received. The Firm continuously attempted to locate a new address for *** to provide him with notice of the amount owed. A new address was located and on December 22, 2019, the Firm mailed a notice to ***.

Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with ERT. The images were confirmed. Per the ERT review, the balance of $85.70 remains due and owing.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Received a notification of a bill in collections, although I have never had any correspondence of a bill of any kind. The letter gives instructions on how to pay but no information of when, where, etc of the suspected violation. My vehicle is equipped with an EZ pass and wonder how I could get a toll charge. Please advise because I'm not paying a bill without proof of said offense. Too many scams these days.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 02, 2020

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. ***. Captain ***’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT).

On July 22, 2019, a vehicle with Texas license plate ***, registered to *** incurred one toll on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. On August 26, 2019, ERT mailed Captain *** a statement for $12.36; the amount of the toll incurred. On October 1, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $37.36, which included a $25.00 Late Payment Fee. On November 5, 2019, ERT mailed a statement, again for $37.36. On December 10, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $87.36, which included a $50.00 Collection Fee. The statements were mailed to 10720 Linkwood Court Apt 1310, Baton Rouge, LA 70810.

When no response was received, the above referenced account was referred to the firm for collection on December 11, 2019. Prior to sending a notice, the firm received an update from the National Change of Address (NCOA). A notice was mailed to Captain *** on December 14, 2019 to ***.

Payment for $87.36 was received on December 26, 2019. There is no further amount due on this account.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Jan 02, 2020

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. The address on file by the DMV was inaccurate. This is a huge downside of being in the military and moving all across the country.

Regards

The company received a notice of debt from the law offices of Linebarger Goggan. The notice stated my company owed $80.76 due to an unpaid toll for Elizabeth river tunnels. The bill is erroneous because 1) the vehicle has not been in that area. 2) EZ-pass is established for the offending license plate number. This was the first and only notification of debt owed before tacking on an exorbitant amount of fees. I would like this matter corrected in a timely fashion.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 18, 2019

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. ***’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the Elizabeth River Tunnels (ERT).

On June 19, 2019, a vehicle with Virginia license plate ***, registered to Keating Group LLC incurred one toll on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. On July 23, 2019, ERT mailed Keating Group LLC a statement for $5.76; the amount of the tolls incurred. On August 27, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $30.76, which included a $25.00 Late Payment Fee. On October 1, 2019, ERT mailed a statement, again for $30.76. On November 5, 2019, ERT mailed a statement for $80.76, which included a $50.00 Collection Fee. The statements were mailed to the address ERT received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.

When no response was received, the above referenced tolls were referred to the firm for collection on November 6, 2019. The firm received a National Change of Address hit and a notice was mailed to Keating Group LLC on December 3, 2019 to ***. A forwarding address was received and a new notice was mailed December 11, 2019 to ***.

Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with ERT. Per the ERT review, Virginia license plate *** was not registered to an E-ZPass account until October 22, 2019, which is after the date of the toll. As such, the balance of $80.76 remains due and owing.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Dec 19, 2019

Complaint: ***

I am rejecting this response because: the described vehicle had an EZ pass mounted when the toll was accessed in June. The pass was installed before June not on October 22 when the plate was registered. The EZ pass was in good standing at the time. No fees should be assessed and the original toll should come off of the Ezpass resulting in a &0 balance owed. Please retroactively charge the Ezpass.

Regards

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Jan 02, 2020

Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account again with ERT. ERT has confirmed that Virginia license plate *** was not registered to an E-ZPass account until October 22, 2019, which is after the date of the toll. The Virginia E-ZPass Customer Agreement states the user agrees “to promptly update license plate information for all vehicles that may use the E-ZPass Account and remove license plates for vehicles no longer associated with the account”. As such, the balance of $80.76 remains due and owing.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

About a month ago, I received a letter from this rogue law firm regarding a bogus debt. I immediately sent them a cease and desist letter demanding no more correspondence from them. Now, on 12/10/19, I received additional correspondnce from them after I specifically asked them in writing not to contact me. They're in violation of my civil rights.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 19, 2019

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA).

Between July 4 and August 1, 2019, NYSTA recorded four tolls incurred by a vehicle with New York license plate *** registered to ***. Notices were mailed by NYSTA to the address received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***

The account was sent to the firm for collections on November 18, 2019. The firm mailed a notice on November 20, 2019. On December 5, 2019, the firm received correspondence from Mr. disputing the debt and requesting that no further correspondence be sent to him. The account was reviewed with NYSTA who informed us the balance was valid. In response to Mr.’s dispute, a Debt Validation Notice was mailed to Mr. on December 10, 2019, to provide clarifying information and debt validation. Mr.’s account, toll Violation ***, has been placed in a disputed status and no further communication will be made.

Upon receipt of this complaint, we again reviewed the account with our client. NYSTA advised that a $2.00 payment was received from Mr. on October 11, 2019 for the tolls associated with violation number *** (tolls that were incurred on June 5, 2019). No payments have been received for violation ***. As such, the balance of $204.00 remains due and owing.

It is recommended that Mr. contact E-ZPass NY Customer Service Center to discuss resolution of the delinquent toll violation as well as two additional outstanding violations that have not yet been referred to us for collection.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Dec 20, 2019

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards

On Dec 12th, a Travis Count Constable served me papers for suit no. ***. The constable visited my home and then met me at a business.

Upon reviewing the detail, I come to find that the delinquent taxes on the two properties mentioned are not mine. I believe Linebarger obtained my personal information via very liberal skip tracing practices; resulting in my name being added to the “AKA” line as well as my personal home address, ***.

I called their listed number, *** with no answer nor ability to contact them to reach a resolution. The interaction with the deputy took place in front of my employees which made it EXTREMELY embarrassing. I’m afraid that I have to go ahead and pay this bill for the simple fact that I don’t want to be embarrassed or harassed. At no time did this company attempt to reach me other than to directly file a lawsuit.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 19, 2019

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. ***’s complaint is in regards to delinquent taxes.

The suit involving *** has been non-suited. All taxes were paid and the case was able to be dismissed along with all parties to the suit.

The complaining party, ***, had previously sent an email to our Fort Worth office (who then forwarded to our attention in Brownsville) indicating that the property that was the subject of our tax suit was owned by his father and not him.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Dec 19, 2019

Complaint: ***

I am rejecting this response because:

my father paid his taxes, that still does not explain why I was seeked by the Travis County Constable. I would like to know how exactly this company obtained my address and information and proceeded to have a constable visit me without any confirmation if I was or was not the owner. Again, the act was rather embarrassing since it was done in front of colleagues.

further, they have not reached out to me to follow up or even apologize.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 26, 2019

The *** suit, involving *** was non-suited as all taxes were paid. From our client’s information, Cameron County, taxes were paid by ***.

We had contact via telephone with ***, the complaining party, on Friday, December 20, 2019. During the call, we explained to *** what had occurred, which was a misperception of our gatherings from our research in which we used him instead of his father due to them having the same name and similar history of addresses. We also told *** we could send him the signed non-suit order via email address and/or mail, along with a receipt of the account showing a zero balance. Aside from explaining to *** what had happened, we did apologize for the misunderstanding.

We have sent *** the signed Motion and Order of non-suit for the lawsuit, as well as the paid receipts of the account to the email address he provided us with. As of this afternoon, we have not heard back from ***.

I was sent a bill for a toll that I did not take. I disputed the bill with *** and sent this to Revdex.com. It took *** over a month and half to respond. When they finally responded I was directed to the website to pay the bill for $5.35. Then they proceeded to send an additional bill for $80. This is egregious and I'll fight this in court. The car is not mine and I don't live near the tolls nor did I drive through them. I will testify to this in court. I will also be forwarding this to the FTC.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 13, 2019

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. Mr.’s complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the ***).

On June 22, 2019, a vehicle with Virginia license plate ***, registered to *** incurred one toll on the Elizabeth River Tunnels. Statements were mailed to the address ERT received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.

The above referenced toll was referred to the firm for collection on November 13, 2019. A notice was mailed to Mr. on November 17, 2019. On December 4, 2019, the penalties were waived and the balance of $5.35 was marked as paid in full in our office. There is no further amount due by Mr..

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Dec 16, 2019

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

Regards

Received letter regarding
Violation number ***
License plate *** Amount due to SP PLUS

I was nowhere near michigan during this time

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 13, 2019

To: Complainant

On 10/30/2017, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from *** (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was issued on 9/14/2017 at 8:09 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at ***. The violation was issued to a vehicle, Ford Fusion, with Michigan license plate *** for “Warning Nonpayment Recorded” in the amount of $10.00.

After several attempts to locate the vehicle registrant, on 11/11/2019, the firm skip-traced the provided license plate information to the vehicle registrant at the time of the violation, per the firm’s skip-trace vendor, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant address on 11/18/2019.

The firm received no contact, either written or by phone, from the Complainant, until the firm received Revdex.com Complaint *** on 12/10/2019.

The firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation and proceeded to validate the debt, as required. Upon review of the violation, “warning” was detected in the violation description, so the firm checked with the client to establish the validity of the violation. The client had partially closed the violation, but the firm was not notified, and the date of closure could not be confirmed, so the client completely voided the violation without cause on 12/11/2019.

As of 12/11/2019, the firm is no longer attempting to collect violation *** from the Complainant. The firm has not reported this parking violation to any credit reporting agencies.

Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you

This business is attempting to collect a debt on behalf of the New York State Thruway Authority that does not exist. Neither I nor my vehicle has been to New York on the dates in question nor is the license plate that is listed owned by me. This debt is fraudulent and illegal. Please list this among your numerous other complaints.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 10, 2019

I am responding to the consumer complaint filed with your office by ***. Ms.’ complaint regards an account for unpaid tolls and fees owed to our client, the New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA).

On July 5, 2019, NYSTA recorded one toll incurred by a motorhome with North Carolina license plate *** registered to ***. On August 18, 2019, NYSTA mailed an invoice for $2.00, the amount of the toll. On September 18, 2019, NYSTA mailed a second notice for $7.00, which included a $5.00 fee. A Notice of Violation Enforcement Impending Collection / Legal Action was mailed on October 21, 2019 for $52.00, which replaced the $5.00 fee with a $50.00 fee. The notices were mailed to the address received from the Department of Motor Vehicles – ***.

When no response was received to the notices, the account was referred to the Firm for collection on November 25, 2019. The Firm mailed a notice on November 27, 2019 in the amount of $52.00. Upon receipt of this complaint, we reviewed the account with NYSTA. Our client has verified the image from the toll and advised the balance of $52.00 is valid and remains due and owing.

Please accept the above information as our response to the complaint. We trust that this information will be sufficient to allow for resolution of the complaint. In the event additional information is desired or necessary, please let us know.

Customer Response • Jan 06, 2020

Complaint: ***

I am rejecting this response because: Sorry we did not reply. We still contend that we have not been to this state during the dates specified. We cannot guarantee that someone else may have removed our tag and traveled with it. Regardless, this is not our bill and neither I nor my husband owe this bill the vehicle it is registered to is owned jointly.
Regards

I received a letter from Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson advising me that they were attempting to collect a debt for a parking violation for a vehicle plate: ***. Violation: Parking Date: 06-15-16 Location: ***. I called them on 12/05/19 to dispute the debt. I spoke with *** and advised her I was disputing the debt. I asked for the vehicle type that the plate was on and they advised me it was a Jeep. I advised her that I have never owned a Jeep. She advised that she would remove the debt from this address. It did not mention it would be removed from my name or the Vehicle License Plate. I requested a letter or documentation from them advising that I do not owe this debt. *** advised that they do not do this. I again requested the documentation and was refused.
I had included the violation number, but your system was reading it as a Social Security number and would not process my entry.

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Response • Dec 10, 2019

To: Complainant

On 8/1/2016, Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP (the firm) received a delinquent parking violation from ***. (the client) for collection. The parking violation, ***, was issued on 6/15/2016 at 12:47 PM at a parking lot managed by the client at ***. The violation was issued to a vehicle with Illinois license plate *** for “No payment in box” in the amount of $26.50.

After several attempts to locate the vehicle registrant, on 11/06/2019, the firm skip-traced the provided license plate information to the vehicle registrant at the time of the violation, per the firm’s skip-trace vendor, and an initial collection notice was mailed to the registrant address on 11/11/2019. On 12/6/2019, the Complainant telephoned the firm’s Call Center. The Complainant said it was not their vehicle and the collection staff promised to remove the Complainant’s address from the violation and noted the account had a possible incorrect vehicle registrant. On 12/9/2019, the firm received Revdex.com Complaint ***.

The firm considered Revdex.com Complaint *** a dispute of the violation and proceeded to validate the debt, as required. Upon review of the skip-trace, it was discovered that the client’s lot operator incorrectly entered the vehicle license plate. The firm is currently correcting the license plate number and removing the Complainant’s information from the violation.

As of 12/9/2019, the firm is no longer attempting to collect violation *** from the Complainant. The firm has not reported this parking violation to any credit reporting agencies.

Please let me know, if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you

Customer Response • Jan 06, 2020

Revdex.com:

I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.

My apologies for the delayed response to your original email advising me of the outcome of your investigation. I was having some difficulty with the email opening. I am satisfied with the outcome and the additional information provided by the company. This is what I asked them to send me and they refused. Thank you for your assistance in closing this issue.
Regards

I also received a notice for a parking violation. The license plate is not mine. I've never been to this location. And when you look it up on *** (which is where my payment is suppose to go) it names the make and model of the car. I have never owned a car of this make or model. It is a total scam!!!! I have emailed a complaint and of course have not heard anything back.

Check fields!

Write a review of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson

Satisfaction rating
 
 
 
 
 
Upload here Increase visibility and credibility of your review by adding a photo

Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson Rating

Overall satisfaction rating

Address: 2700 Via Fortuna Ste 500, Austin, Texas, United States, 78746-7998

Phone:

Show more...

Fax:

+1 (512) 634-3789
+1 (956) 725-4594
+1 (903) 874-5007
+1 (361) 578-6144
+1 (210) 225-6410
+1 (361) 664-5050
+1 (254) 756-6606
+1 (361) 888-4405
+1 (432) 333-7012
+1 (936) 639-5059
+1 (936) 327-6882

Web:

This website was reported to be associated with Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson.



E-mails:

Sign in to see

Add contact information for Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson

Add new contacts
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | New | Updated