New Jersey Medical Institute Kaplan Medical

A response was sent 4/2/2015 to Mr. [redacted] as follows:"This is in response to your request to the RevDex.com regarding the delay of your final audit for the policy period of
12/05/13 to 12/05/14.  While the audit
information was received 12/29/14, unfortunately we did not...

determine that
additional information was needed until 2/24/15.
At that time, the Audit Analyst made contact regarding a
discrepancy in the amount of wages reported compared to the amount of wages
reported on the verification documents. Our file indicates the information was
provided by you on 3/20/15 and the audit was promptly completed that same day.
A refund for the unearned premium in the amount of $456 was
released and mailed to you on 3/25/15.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any
additional questions."

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

A response was sent to [redacted] 2/4/2016, outlining the timeline of payments and all activity on the policy.....resulting in a refund of $3.37.

A response was sent 1/19/2017...delay in appraisal process, due to significant weather conditions and the holidays, that caused an increase in the length of time to complete the appraisal.   Your claim has been settled and a payment was issued to your lienholder on January 16,2017, as...

the vehicle was deemed a total loss.

A response was sent to [redacted] Roofing, Attn: [redacted] on February 28, 2017 from [redacted], Claim Manager, [redacted] Claim Office.  Ms. Bibko explained that the Xactimate pricing system used has been deemed appropriate by contractors and the insurance industry for the type of work...

in question.  The unit costs that are used in our estmiates for roof replacement are reasonable and customary; Travelers therefore cannot amend our estimate.

A response was sent to Mr. [redacted] on 7/2/2015 as follows:
"You
filed a claim due to damages sustained as a result of a fire/smoke loss on
March 22, 2015, as a result of a chimney fire. We received the claim on March
22, 2015, at 2:41 pm and contact was made on March 22, 2015, at 3:15 pm...

to
discuss the facts surrounding the loss. Due to the home being uninhabitable,
due to the amount of smoke, we coordinated with you all to set you up in a
hotel until the inspection could take place. The adjuster set an inspection
time with you for March 23, 2015 at 1:30 pm. At the time of the inspection, Mr.
[redacted] chose to stay in the home while the rest of the family stayed at the
hotel. The adjuster reviewed the property and discussed the scope with you and
your contractor to get an agreed scope as to what needed to be done to clean
the home and remove the fire damaged material to rid the home of the odor. The
adjuster also approved an additional 2 weeks of Additional Living Expense for your
family to remain at the hotel until this work could be completed. The
contractor’s then advised Mr. [redacted] that no one could stay in the home during
the cleaning process; therefore, he then joined the family at the hotel.
The
adjuster completed his initial estimate on April 2, 2015.  This estimate was provided to you along with
the initial payment to be used to cover the costs of the cleaning repairs to
make the home habitable. On April 6, 2015, you provided the claims adjuster
with photos of soot still located within the cupboards after your contractor
completed the cleaning and voiced concerns of damage to some of your flooring.
There was also some concern as to the extent of the damage to the fireplace.  In light of this additional information, an
engineering firm was contacted to inspect the fireplace. The adjuster also
agreed to again meet with you and your contractor on April 14, 2015, to assess
the additional damage and certain contents that had been cleaned but still
smelled of smoke. The adjuster addressed the flooring damages and adjusted the
estimate to include the additional repairs that were needed.
On
April 17, 2015, the engineering firm inspected your home and the fireplace. The
firm concluded that the fireplace and chimney were structurally unaffected as a
result of the fire. The engineer found that the actual fire was a result of the
chimney being installed directly against the exterior framed wall, which caused
the framed wall to combust when the chimney heated up. The chimney was improperly
constructed against current residential code as it did not provide the minimum
2” clearance from any combustible materials. The adjuster received the official
engineer report on April 29, 2015, and provided a copy to you for your records.
The estimate was then updated to reflect the cleaning of the chimney and
fireplace as the engineer confirmed no structural damage to the fireplace or
chimney.
Your
next concern was the chimney and the framing, which are currently against code.
The adjuster advised Mr. [redacted] on May 8, 2015, that the policy did not provide
coverage to correct improper workmanship; however, if the local municipality
were to enforce an ordinance or law requiring additional work to be completed
to meet that ordinance or law, the policy had additional coverage to account
for those costs. The adjuster advised Mr. [redacted] and your contractor that they
would need to get something in writing from the local municipality outlining
what exactly they were enforcing, if anything at all, before Travelers could
proceed with any further adjustment to correct this issue.
The
adjuster followed up with your contractor on May 27, 2015, to request status on
any ordinance or law enforcements being made by the local municipality and
received a response from the contractor on May 31, 2015, advising they have
left multiple messages and had not heard back. The adjuster followed up again with
the contractor on June 15, 2015, to determine whether any ordinance or law
enforcements were being made.  The
contractor responded that they only received a verbal response that the issue
with chimney needed to be corrected and that the municipality was working on preparing
an official write up. When it became apparent your contractor was not placing a
priority on gathering this information, the adjuster went straight to the
municipality to expedite the process and obtained the necessary information to
confirm the enforcement. The adjuster updated the claim and the estimate to
include these additional costs and submitted this information to you on June
24, 2015. At this time Travelers is not aware of any additional issues regarding
the repairs to your home.
In
conclusion, the adjuster has responded timely with any requests made by you and
has continued to coordinate with you to address your concerns. The only time
anything was communicated to you about providing a name for a different
contractor was when you voiced concerns regarding the lack of quality cleaning
and/or the missing of areas on your contractor’s part. In response to these
specific complaints by you, the adjuster advised that he could provide the
names of additional contractors for you to consider if you were unhappy with your
current contractor. Furthermore, every time the estimate was updated to account
for additional repair or cleaning costs, the adjuster issued an additional
payment to you so you would have the funds available to complete that work. If
any work was not conducted timely, it was not a result of the adjuster holding up
a payment but, rather, an apparent lack of coordination between you and your
contractor. Finally, throughout the time the home was uninhabitable, you have
had access to utilize your Additional Living Expense coverage to stay elsewhere
until the cleaning was completed.
Moving
forward, Travelers will continue to diligently work with you and your
contractor to fully resolve any additional issues, which will include
continuing to follow up with you and your contractor to verify that the repair work
is commencing. If there are further belongings that may have sustained damage
as a result of the loss, we will continue work with you to evaluate them to
determine the reparability and/or replacement. "

A response has been sent to Mr. [redacted] today, 10/26/2015.It outlined the amounts due, paid, and explained there was a system processing error when adding the 2015 Scion.
We regret that you do not agree with the premium charged to
you for your coverage.  However, our review
shows that...

the premium charged to be appropriate based on the coverage
provided.

A response was sent 9/21/2016 outlining what has already been paid out, and that additional documentation would be needed to further evaluate the cost to repair the building.
"We are currently still working with [redacted] on their subrogation/Recovery claim. I note we have fully resolved your Contents...

claim and have a Release for $12,262.93. Your issue is with the Cost to Repair the Building. "
You claim that the cost to repair your building is $65,000. Please forward documentation you have that shows this amount.

Review: I enrolled into kaplan medical paid them the whole tution fee but I am facing harressment from their coustomer service and they are not issuing my i-20 the oficials who are responsible for service arre never present where they should be and their way of talking is inappropriate this is the letter I foraded to theri head still got no reply.

Respected sir,

I enrolled into Kaplan medical classes for my USMLE preparations I was happy about the way how I was entertained by the customer service before I actually paid my fee for the course but after I actually enrolled nobody takes any interest into things,I want you to send a copy of the email to the director of Kaplan as in the director who owns this company I am aware that you are a for profit organisation but this is just to ensure that I get the quality I expect to get after I have paid my fee,I am having the following issues:

1.the center I enrolled into the Newark one,the staff is energetic here I would love to mention about Dr.[redacted], [redacted]y [redacted] who were very helpful I can but say [redacted]y [redacted] is an asset to Kaplan,but I am never able to reach the DSO of the center I emailed things to the manager of the center but still got no reply, I am always told we are busy I completely understand that but I too have plans about attending the lectures why does it have to be stressful?

2.The people at 1800KAPTEST when asked for help they simply say go through Chopras sorry but I am skeptical about them because of the political system in India,indeed outsourcing is frustrating for both Americans and at least me as an Indian,please don't expect me to pay a bribe to Chopras to get a visa,or to get into the classes by ta middle man(The Chopras).

3.The Kaplan faculty is amazing but why do we have to enroll so many students when they cant be managed,my dad is doctor and I have been through a family of doctors I know what it means to be a doctor.

th email cannot be included but if wanted it can be forwaded. thanksDesired Settlement: I want my i-20 asap within a day I don't care if they send it via super fast mail,once if I join the coaching I should not be harassed for reporting them if I am I would file a suit against them about the same I am already in touch with my uncle who is an attorney in chicago.